Lung CancerPhase 2TACTICNCT00554775
WBRT & Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC and Brain Metastases
A Phase 2 study testing erlotinib hydrochloride in people with Lung Cancer and Metastatic Cancer, run by University College, London at 7 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Erlotinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Erlotinib may also make tumor cells more sensitive to radiation therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer, Metastatic Cancer
- What is being tested?
- erlotinib hydrochloride
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Jan 2008to Nov 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) meeting 1 of the following criteria:
- Newly diagnosed multiple brain metastases not suitable for first-line chemotherapy
- Relapsed NSCLC with newly diagnosed multiple brain metastases
- Relapsed after second-line chemotherapy with newly diagnosed multiple brain metastases NOTE: *Biopsy of brain metastases is not required
- Diagnosis of brain metastases must be confirmed by contrast CT scan or MRI within the past 4 weeks
- Symptoms attributable to brain metastases
- Patients who have undergone craniotomy with incomplete resection are eligible
- Clinician certain that whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) will be beneficial
- No evidence of solitary brain metastasis on MRI that can be treated with surgical resection, radiosurgery, or stereotactic radiotherapy
- No more than 3 sites (organ systems) of extracranial metastases
- No liver metastases
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- Karnofsky performance status 70-100%
- RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class I or II
- Serum bilirubin < 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- AST and ALT < 2 times ULN (< 5 times ULN if liver metastases are present)
- Creatinine < 5 times ULN
- Able to take oral medication
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- Caretaker able and willing to participate in the study
- Patient and caretaker have access to a telephone and willing to respond to telephone interview
- No other prior or concurrent malignant disease likely to interfere with study treatment or comparisons
- No evidence of other significant laboratory finding or concurrent uncontrolled medical illness, that in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with study treatment or results comparison or render the patient at high risk for treatment complications including, but not limited to, any of the following:
- Severe uncontrolled infection
- Unstable angina
- Myocardial infarction within the past month
- Uncontrolled inflammatory bowel disease (e.g., Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis)
- Acute renal failure
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- See Disease Characteristics
- At least 28 days since prior chemotherapy (for relapsed patients originally treated with chemotherapy)
- No prior cranial radiotherapy
- No prior anti-cancer EGFR therapy (e.g., erlotinib, gefitinib, or cetuximab)
- No prior treatment for brain metastases (e.g., radiosurgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy)
- Prior radiotherapy to the primary tumor and/or systemic treatment to metastatic sites of disease allowed
- No concurrent cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom7 sites
Charing Cross Hospital
London, England, W6 8RF
University College of London Hospitals
London, England, WIT 3AA
Christie Hospital
Manchester, England, M20 4BX
Glan Clwyd Hospital
Rhyl, Denbighshire, Wales, LL18 5UJ
Salisbury District Hospital
Salisbury, England, SP2 8BJ
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton, England, SO16 6YD
South West Wales Cancer Institute
Swansea, Wales, SA2 8QA
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Phase II Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) and Tarceva (OSI-774, Erlotinib) in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With Multiple Brain Metastases [TACTIC]
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Erlotinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Erlotinib may also make tumor cells more sensitive to radiation therapy. It is not yet known whether giving whole-brain radiation therapy together with erlotinib is more effective than whole-brain radiation therapy alone in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying whole-brain radiation therapy and erlotinib to see how well they work compared with whole-brain radiation therapy alone in treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the effect of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and erlotinib hydrochloride vs WBRT alone on neurological progression-free survival at 2 months in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and multiple brain metastases.
Secondary
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens.
- Compare the response rate in these patients.
- Compare quality of life of these patients.
- Compare change in performance status in these patients.
- Compare steroid dosing in these patients.
- Compare sites of progression (cranial or extracranial) in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified by presence of extracranial metastases (yes vs no), RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) score (I vs II) and treatment center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients undergo whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) once daily for 5 days. Patients also receive oral erlotinib hydrochloride once daily for up to 24 months.
- Arm II: Patients undergo WBRT as in arm I. Patients also receive oral placebo once daily for up to 24 months.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, monthly for 12 months, and then at 18 and 24 months.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 1-2 months.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, Metastatic Cancer
- Being tested
- erlotinib hydrochloride, placebo
- Keywords
- tumors metastatic to brain, stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, recurrent non-small cell lung cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis, Brain Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
erlotinib hydrochlorideDrug
Also called tarceva, OSI-774
PO 100 mg daily during WBRT, increasing to 150mg daily after WBRT for up to 24 months
placeboDrug
WBRT plus matched placebo for the same schedule and duration as erlotinib hydrochloride
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| erlotinib hydrochloride | Experimental | WBRT plus Tarceva (OSI-774, erlotinib) PO 100 mg daily during WBRT, increasing to 150mg daily after WBRT for up to 24 months Receives: Drug: erlotinib hydrochloride |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | WBRT plus matched placebo for the same schedule and duration as erlotinib hydrochloride arm Receives: Drug: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Neurological progression-free survival at 2 months
Measured: at 2 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Toxicity
Measured: during and for 28 days following Tarceva/placebo treatment.
Response rate
Measured: from date of randomisation to radiological progression
Quality of life
Measured: completed monthly for the first 12 months and at 18 and 24 months from randomisation
Change in performance status
Measured: from baseline
Steroid dosing
Measured: from baseline
Sites of progression (cranial or extracranial)
Measured: from baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2008
- Primary completionNov 2010
- Study completionNov 2010
Why it stopped: IDMC made a recommendation to stop the trial as the target for continuing to the 2nd phase was not met.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University College, LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University College, London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cancer Research UK, Roche Pharma AG
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Siow M. Lee, MD, PhD, FRCP, Study chair, University College London Hospitals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00554775
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000573254
- Other IDs
- CRUK-UCL-BRD-05-177, BRD/05/177, EUDRACT-2006-000113-38, CRUK-TACTIC, EU-20792, ISRCTN31916843
- Acronym
- TACTIC
- Status last verified
- Dec 2011
- First submitted
- 6 Nov 2007
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Phase II Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) and Tarceva (OSI-774, Erlotinib) in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With Multiple Brain Metastases [TACTIC]
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00554775
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TACTIC / CDR0000573254
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, Metastatic Cancer
- Keywords
- tumors metastatic to brain, stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, recurrent non-small cell lung cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: IDMC made a recommendation to stop the trial as the target for continuing to the 2nd phase was not met.
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University College, LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cancer Research UK, Roche Pharma AG
- Study start
- Jan 2008
- Primary completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Erlotinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Erlotinib may also make tumor cells more sensitive to radiation therapy. It is not yet known whether giving whole-brain radiation therapy together with erlotinib is more effective than whole-brain radiation therapy alone in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying whole-brain radiation therapy and erlotinib to see how well they work compared with whole-brain radiation therapy alone in treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the effect of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and erlotinib hydrochloride vs WBRT alone on neurological progression-free survival at 2 months in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and multiple brain metastases.
Secondary
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens.
- Compare the response rate in these patients.
- Compare quality of life of these patients.
- Compare change in performance status in these patients.
- Compare steroid dosing in these patients.
- Compare sites of progression (cranial or extracranial) in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified by presence of extracranial metastases (yes vs no), RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) score (I vs II) and treatment center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients undergo whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) once daily for 5 days. Patients also receive oral erlotinib hydrochloride once daily for up to 24 months.
- Arm II: Patients undergo WBRT as in arm I. Patients also receive oral placebo once daily for up to 24 months.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, monthly for 12 months, and then at 18 and 24 months.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 1-2 months.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| erlotinib hydrochloride | Experimental | Drug: erlotinib hydrochlorideWBRT plus Tarceva (OSI-774, erlotinib) PO 100 mg daily during WBRT, increasing to 150mg daily after WBRT for up to 24 months |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: placeboWBRT plus matched placebo for the same schedule and duration as erlotinib hydrochloride arm |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| erlotinib hydrochlorideAlso: tarceva, OSI-774PO 100 mg daily during WBRT, increasing to 150mg daily after WBRT for up to 24 months | Drug | erlotinib hydrochloride |
| placeboWBRT plus matched placebo for the same schedule and duration as erlotinib hydrochloride | Drug | placebo |
Primary outcome
Neurological progression-free survival at 2 months
Time frame: at 2 months
6 secondary outcomes
Toxicity
Time frame: during and for 28 days following Tarceva/placebo treatment.
Response rate
Time frame: from date of randomisation to radiological progression
Quality of life
Time frame: completed monthly for the first 12 months and at 18 and 24 months from randomisation
Change in performance status
Time frame: from baseline
Steroid dosing
Time frame: from baseline
Sites of progression (cranial or extracranial)
Time frame: from baseline
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: IDMC made a recommendation to stop the trial as the target for continuing to the 2nd phase was not met.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2011.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Siow M. Lee, MD, PhD, FRCP study chair
University College London Hospitals
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing erlotinib hydrochloride in people with Lung Cancer and Metastatic Cancer, run by University College, London at 7 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: IDMC made a recommendation to stop the trial as the target for continuing to the 2nd phase was not met.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Neurological progression-free survival at 2 months (time frame: at 2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2011.