Coronary Heart DiseasePhase 2NCT00558779
Surgical Manipulation of the Aorta and Cerebral Infarction
A Phase 2 study testing OBCAB (Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) and CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting) in people with Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke, run by University of Wuerzburg at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to compare two surgical strategies for coronary artery bypass grafting with respect to the occurrence of cerebral infarctions made visible by magnetic resonance imaging Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, Cerebral Infarction
- What is being tested?
- OBCAB (Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) and CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Nov 2007to May 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age > 72
- history of stroke
- cerebrovascular artery disease with stenosis > 50%
- peripheral arterial disease.
Who cannot join
- urgent or emergency operation
- unstable angina
- reoperation
- concomitant valvular disease requiring surgery
- implanted pacemaker or other incorporated ferromagnetic material
- claustrophobia.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg
Würzburg, 97080
Wilko Reents, MD, 0049-931-201-33001, reents_w@klinik.uni-wuerzburg.de
Wilko Reents, MD
About this study
Official title: Surgical Manipulation of the Ascending Aorta and Cerebral Infarction Following CABG
The purpose of the study is to compare two surgical strategies for coronary artery bypass grafting with respect to the occurrence of cerebral infarctions made visible by magnetic resonance imaging
Read the detailed description
Stroke is one of the most devastating complications following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with an overall incidence ranging from 2.0 % to 3.2 %. The presumed etiology for the majority of strokes after CABG is atheroembolism from the diseased aorta ascendens caused by surgical manipulation. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) allows the construction of bypass grafts without surgical manipulation of the aorta. Yet a trial comparing different surgical strategies with stroke as the primary end point would require several thousand patients to achieve an adequate statistical power. The number of patients can be substantially reduced, if cerebral damage is assessed by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). Using DW-MRI we have recently demonstrated that 25% of a patient population undergoing CABG without an increased risk of stroke showed new cerebral infarctions. These new cerebral lesions all showed an embolic pattern, became visible at T2-weighted images and were clinically silent, e .g. did not cause a new focal neurologic deficit. Given the much higher frequency of cerebral lesions assessed by DW-MRI than clinically apparent stroke, DW-MRI is an ideal surrogate parameter for the assessment of cerebral damage in patients undergoing CABG.
The aim of the study is therefore, to investigate the influence of the surgical technique on the occurence of new ischemic cerebral lesions as assessed by DW-MRI in patients undergoing CABG in a prospective randomized setting. We hypothesize that OPCAB, which enables sparing of aortic manipulation, will reduce cerebral infarctions in patients with an increased risk for perioperative stroke.
- Conditions
- Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, Cerebral Infarction
- Being tested
- OBCAB (Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting), CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting)
- Keywords
- Coronary artery bypass, off pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB)
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Disease, Stroke, Cerebral Infarction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OBCAB (Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting)Procedure or surgery
OPCAB with sparing of aortic manipulation (eg, no aortic cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass, no aortic cross-clamp, no side-clamping of the aorta). Graft anastomosis to the central circulation with y-grafts on the arteria thoracica interna or on the aorta with help of the Heart-string-system (Guidant)
CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting)Procedure or surgery
conventional CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: OBCAB (Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) |
| 2 | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
occurrence and number of cerebral infarctions assessed by magnetic resonance imaging
Measured: 2-7 days after surgery
Secondary outcomes (7)
mortality
Measured: within hospital stay following surgery
stroke
Measured: within hospital stay following surgery
delirium
Measured: within hospital stay following surgery
neurocognitive performance
Measured: within hospital stay following surgery
multi-organ failure
Measured: within hospital stay following surgery
myocardial infarction
Measured: within hospital stay following surgery
completeness of revascularisation
Measured: within hospital stay following surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2007
- Study completionMay 2010 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Heart DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wuerzburg
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Deutsche Stiftung für Herzforschung
- Investigators
- Wilko Reents, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00558779
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 49/07
- Other IDs
- F/13/03
- Status last verified
- Nov 2007
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2007
- Last updated
- 22 Nov 2007
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Stamou SC, Hill PC, Dangas G, Pfister AJ, Boyce SW, Dullum MK, Bafi AS, Corso PJ. Stroke after coronary artery bypass: incidence, predictors, and clinical outcome. Stroke. 2001 Jul;32(7):1508-13. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.7.1508.
PubMed 11441193Roach GW, Kanchuger M, Mangano CM, Newman M, Nussmeier N, Wolman R, Aggarwal A, Marschall K, Graham SH, Ley C. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 19;335(25):1857-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199612193352501.
PubMed 8948560Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Teodori G, Di Giammarco G, Cirmeni S, Contini M, Iaco AL, Pano M. Impact of aortic manipulation on incidence of cerebrovascular accidents after surgical myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 May;73(5):1387-93. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03470-7.
PubMed 12022522Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, Ferguson TB, Gardner TJ, Hiratzka LF, Isselbacher EM, Lytle BW, Mack MJ, Murkin JM, Robbins RC; American Heart Association. Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia in collaboration with the interdisciplinary working group on quality of care and outcomes research. Circulation. 2005 May 31;111(21):2858-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.165030.
PubMed 15927994Bendszus M, Reents W, Franke D, Mullges W, Babin-Ebell J, Koltzenburg M, Warmuth-Metz M, Solymosi L. Brain damage after coronary artery bypass grafting. Arch Neurol. 2002 Jul;59(7):1090-5. doi: 10.1001/archneur.59.7.1090.
PubMed 12117356
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Nov 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Surgical Manipulation of the Ascending Aorta and Cerebral Infarction Following CABG
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00558779
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 49/07
- Conditions
- Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, Cerebral Infarction
- Keywords
- Coronary artery bypass, off pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB)
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of WuerzburgUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Deutsche Stiftung für Herzforschung
- Study start
- Nov 2007
- Study completion
- May 2010 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to compare two surgical strategies for coronary artery bypass grafting with respect to the occurrence of cerebral infarctions made visible by magnetic resonance imaging
Detailed description
Stroke is one of the most devastating complications following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with an overall incidence ranging from 2.0 % to 3.2 %. The presumed etiology for the majority of strokes after CABG is atheroembolism from the diseased aorta ascendens caused by surgical manipulation. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) allows the construction of bypass grafts without surgical manipulation of the aorta. Yet a trial comparing different surgical strategies with stroke as the primary end point would require several thousand patients to achieve an adequate statistical power. The number of patients can be substantially reduced, if cerebral damage is assessed by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). Using DW-MRI we have recently demonstrated that 25% of a patient population undergoing CABG without an increased risk of stroke showed new cerebral infarctions. These new cerebral lesions all showed an embolic pattern, became visible at T2-weighted images and were clinically silent, e .g. did not cause a new focal neurologic deficit. Given the much higher frequency of cerebral lesions assessed by DW-MRI than clinically apparent stroke, DW-MRI is an ideal surrogate parameter for the assessment of cerebral damage in patients undergoing CABG.
The aim of the study is therefore, to investigate the influence of the surgical technique on the occurence of new ischemic cerebral lesions as assessed by DW-MRI in patients undergoing CABG in a prospective randomized setting. We hypothesize that OPCAB, which enables sparing of aortic manipulation, will reduce cerebral infarctions in patients with an increased risk for perioperative stroke.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Procedure: OBCAB (Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) |
| 2 | Active comparator | Procedure: CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting) |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- age > 72
- history of stroke
- cerebrovascular artery disease with stenosis > 50%
- peripheral arterial disease.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- urgent or emergency operation
- unstable angina
- reoperation
- concomitant valvular disease requiring surgery
- implanted pacemaker or other incorporated ferromagnetic material
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OBCAB (Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting)OPCAB with sparing of aortic manipulation (eg, no aortic cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass, no aortic cross-clamp, no side-clamping of the aorta). Graft anastomosis to the central circulation with y-grafts on the arteria thoracica interna or on the aorta with help of the Heart-string-system (Guidant) | Procedure or surgery | 1 |
| CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting)conventional CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass | Procedure or surgery | 2 |
Primary outcome
occurrence and number of cerebral infarctions assessed by magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: 2-7 days after surgery
7 secondary outcomes
mortality
Time frame: within hospital stay following surgery
stroke
Time frame: within hospital stay following surgery
delirium
Time frame: within hospital stay following surgery
neurocognitive performance
Time frame: within hospital stay following surgery
multi-organ failure
Time frame: within hospital stay following surgery
myocardial infarction
Time frame: within hospital stay following surgery
completeness of revascularisation
Time frame: within hospital stay following surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Nov 2007.
- Background: PubMed 11441193Stamou SC, Hill PC, Dangas G, Pfister AJ, Boyce SW, Dullum MK, Bafi AS, Corso PJ. Stroke after coronary artery bypass: incidence, predictors, and clinical outcome. Stroke. 2001 Jul;32(7):1508-13. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.7.1508.
- Background: PubMed 8948560Roach GW, Kanchuger M, Mangano CM, Newman M, Nussmeier N, Wolman R, Aggarwal A, Marschall K, Graham SH, Ley C. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 19;335(25):1857-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199612193352501.
- Background: PubMed 12022522Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Teodori G, Di Giammarco G, Cirmeni S, Contini M, Iaco AL, Pano M. Impact of aortic manipulation on incidence of cerebrovascular accidents after surgical myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 May;73(5):1387-93. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03470-7.
- Background: PubMed 15927994Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, Ferguson TB, Gardner TJ, Hiratzka LF, Isselbacher EM, Lytle BW, Mack MJ, Murkin JM, Robbins RC; American Heart Association. Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia in collaboration with the interdisciplinary working group on quality of care and outcomes research. Circulation. 2005 May 31;111(21):2858-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.165030.
- Background: PubMed 12117356Bendszus M, Reents W, Franke D, Mullges W, Babin-Ebell J, Koltzenburg M, Warmuth-Metz M, Solymosi L. Brain damage after coronary artery bypass grafting. Arch Neurol. 2002 Jul;59(7):1090-5. doi: 10.1001/archneur.59.7.1090.
Related trials for Coronary Heart Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wilko Reents, MD principal investigator
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing OBCAB (Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) and CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting) in people with Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke, run by University of Wuerzburg at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Nov 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Wilko Reents, MD (0049 - 931 - 201 - 33001, reents_w@klinik.uni-wuerzburg.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
occurrence and number of cerebral infarctions assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (time frame: 2-7 days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00558779, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Nov 2007.