Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Phase 3NCT00559585
Methotrexate-Inadequate Response Study
A Phase 3 study testing Subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept and Intravenous (IV) Abatacept in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 203 sites in 24 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a weekly subcutaneous dose of abatacept yields clinical efficacy comparable to that of monthly intravenous doses of abatacept in participants with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to current methotrexate therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
- What is being tested?
- Subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept and Intravenous (IV) Abatacept
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,492 participants
- Where
- 203 sitesin 24 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2008to Sep 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects who are considered methotrexate inadequate responders
- 10 or more swollen joints (66 joint count) and 12 or more tender joints (68 joint count)
Who cannot join
- Subjects who failed one or multiple anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapies
- Subjects who meet diagnostic criteria for any other rheumatic disease (e.g., lupus erythematous)
- Subjects with active vasculitis of a major organ system (except for subcutaneous rheumatoid nodules)
- Subjects with severe chronic or recurrent bacterial infections
- Subjects who have received treatment with rituximab
- An Anti-TNF Failure Sub-study was initiated (recruited separately from Main study) using the same treatment as the Main study in order to assess the immunogenicity and safety in the Anti-TNF Failure population. The Sub-study terminated due to low recruitment and participants were permitted to roll into the LT Open Label Period.
Trial locations and contacts
203 sites in 24 countries.
203 sites in 24 countries
United States70 sites
The Center For Rheumatology, Llp
Albany, New York, 12206
Albuquerque Clinical Trials, Inc.
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Albuquerque Rehabilitation & Rheumatology Pc
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Arthritis Clinic Of Northern Virginia, P.C.
Arlington, Virginia, 22205
Asheville Rheumatology & Osteoporosis Research Asso P. A.
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
Arthritis & Rheumatology Of Georgia,Pc
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Walter F. Chase
Austin, Texas, 78705
Arthritis And Rheumatic Disease Specialties
Aventura, Florida, 33180
East Penn Rheumatology Associates
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015
Rheumatology Associates, Pc
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205
Boise Rheumatology/ Intermountain Research Center, Inc
Boise, Idaho, 83702
Boulder Medical Center
Boulder, Colorado, 80304
Guadagnoli, Germano
Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06606
Joao Nascimento
Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06606
Low Country Rheumatology, Pa
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
The Arthritis Clinic & Carolina Bone & Joint
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Center For Arthritis & Rheumatic Diseases, Pc
Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320
Cincinnati Rheumatic Disease Study Group
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Coeur D'Alene Arthrit Clin
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, 83814
Arthritis Assoc And Osteo Ctr Of Col Sprgs
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80910
Columbia Arthritis Center
Columbia, South Carolina, 29204
Klein And Associates, M.D., Pa
Cumberland, Maryland, 21502
Clinical Research Center Of Ct/Ny
Danbury, Connecticut, 06810
Denver Arthritis Clinic
Denver, Colorado, 80230
Allergy And Arthritis Associates
Dover, New Jersey, 07801
Rheumatology
Durham, North Carolina, 27704
Pro Research
Eugene, Oregon, 97401
Physicians East, Pa
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834
St. Joseph'S Mercy Clinic
Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913
Rheumatic Disease Clinical Research Center, Llc
Houston, Texas, 77004
Accurate Clinical Research
Houston, Texas, 77034
Talbert Medical Group
Huntington Beach, California, 92646
Arthritis Assoicates Of Mississippi
Jackson, Mississippi, 39202
Arthritis Clinic
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Rheumatology Consultants Pllc
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909
Allergy & Rheumatology Medical Clinic, Inc.
La Jolla, California, 92037
Portland Rheumatology Clinic, Llc
Lake Oswego, Oregon, 97035
Kansas City Internal Medicine
Lee's Summit, Missouri, 64086
Physician Research Collaboration, Llc
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516
Valerius Medical Group &Research Ctr. Of Greater Long Beach
Long Beach, California, 90806
Arthritis Center Of The Rockies, Pc
Loveland, Colorado, 80538
The Arthritis Group, Pc
Memphis, Tennessee, 38104
Coastal Clinical Research, Inc
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Carolina Health Specialists
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572
St. Thomas Hospital Tower East
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205
Health Research Of Oklahoma
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Southern Tier Arthritis & Rheumatism
Olean, New York, 14760
South Puget Sound Clinincal Research Center
Olympia, Washington, 98502
Arthritis & Osteoporosis Treatment Center, Pa
Orange Park, Florida, 32073
Acme Research, Llc
Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118
Rheumatology Associates Of Central Florida
Orlando, Florida, 32806
The Arthritis Center
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684
Stanford University School Of Medicine
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Rheumatology Associates
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906
Quincy Medical Group
Quincy, Illinois, 62301
Rockford Orthopedic Associates, Ltd.
Rockford, Illinois, 61107
Shores Rheumatology, P. C.
Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, 48081
San Diego Arthritis Medical Clinic
San Diego, California, 92108
Sarasota Arthritis Research Center
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
Advanced Arthritis Care & Research
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258
The Arthritis Center
Springfield, Illinois, 62704
Carolina Pharmaceutical Research
Statesville, North Carolina, 28625
Texas Research Center
Sugarland, Texas, 77479
Arthritis Health Associates
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Tacoma Center For Arthritis Research Ps
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Catalina Pointe Clinical Research, Inc.
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Oklahoma Center For Arthritis Therapy And Research
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104
Healthcare Research Consultants
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74135
Carolina Arthritis Associates
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
Clinical Pharmacology Study Group
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610
Mexico13 sites
Local Institution
Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, 20230
Local Institution
Chihuahua City, Chihuahua, 31000
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 0
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44100
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44620
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44690
Local Institution
Mérida, Yucatán, 97000
Local Institution
Mexico City, Mexico City, 06726
Local Institution
Morelia, Michioacan, 58270
Local Institution
Nuevo León, Nuevo León, 64020
Local Institution
Querétaro City, Querétaro, 76178
Local Institution
San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí, 78240
Local Institution
Tijuana, Estado de Baja California, 22320
Brazil12 sites
Local Institution
Campinas, São Paulo, 13059
Local Institution
Campinas, São Paulo, 13083
Local Institution
Curitiba, Paraná, 80060240
Local Institution
Curitiba, Paraná, 80440
Local Institution
Goiânia, Goiás, 74110
Local Institution
Goiânia, Goiás, 74605
Local Institution
Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, 36010
Local Institution
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035003
Local Institution
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 91610
Local Institution
Recife, Pernambuco, 50670
Local Institution
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20551
Local Institution
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04027
France11 sites
Local Institution
Bordeaux, 33076
Local Institution
Brest, 29609
Local Institution
Chambray-lès-Tours, 37170
Local Institution
Le Mans, 72037
Local Institution
Lille, 59037
Local Institution
Marseille, 13008
Local Institution
Nice, 06202
Local Institution
Paris, 75651
Local Institution
Paris, 75679
Local Institution
Poitiers, 86021
Local Institution
Strasbourg, 67098
Canada10 sites
Local Institution
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1Y2
Local Institution
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 2B6
Local Institution
Mississauga, Ontario, L5M 2V8
Local Institution
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 1A2
Local Institution
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8
Local Institution
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1A 5E8
Local Institution
Ste-Foy, Quebec, G1V 3M7
Local Institution
Ste-Foy, Quebec, G1W 4R4
Local Institution
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8Z 1Y2
Local Institution
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1M3
Argentina9 sites
Local Institution
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1015
Local Institution
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1426
Local Institution
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1428DQG
Local Institution
Ciudad Autonoma, Buenos Aires, CP1425A WC
Local Institution
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, 5000
Local Institution
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, 5016
Local Institution
Rosario, Santa Fe, Santa Fe Province, 2000
Local Institution
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, 4000
Local Institution
Santa Fe, Santa Fe Province, 3000
Poland9 sites
Local Institution
Bialystok, 15-337
Local Institution
Bialystok, 15-461
Local Institution
Bydgoszcz, 85-168
Local Institution
Gmina Końskie, 26-200
Local Institution
Krakow, 30-510
Local Institution
Poznan, 60-218
Local Institution
Poznan, 60773
Local Institution
Torun, 87-100
Local Institution
Warsaw, 02-777
India7 sites
Local Institution
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 034
Local Institution
Bangalore, 560003
Local Institution
Hyderabad, 500004
Local Institution
Lucknow, 226014
Local Institution
Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380009
Local Institution
New Delhi, 110029
Local Institution
Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500003
Australia6 sites
Local Institution
Cairns, Queensland, QLD 4870
Local Institution
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3081
Local Institution
Maroochydore, Queensland, 4558
Local Institution
Shenton Park, Western Australia, 6008
Local Institution
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065
Local Institution
Woodville, South Australia, 5011
Belgium6 sites
Local Institution
Brussels, 1020
Local Institution
Brussels, 1200
Local Institution
Hasselt, 3500
Local Institution
Leuven, 3000
Local Institution
Wilrijk, 2610
Local Institution
Yvoir, 5530
South Africa6 sites
Local Institution
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4001
Local Institution
Kempton Park, Gauteng, 1619
Local Institution
Muckleneuk, Gauteng, 0002
Local Institution
Muckleneuk, Gauteng, 0132
Local Institution
Panorama, Western Cape, 7500
Local Institution
Pretoria, Gauteng, 0083
Italy5 sites
Local Institution
Naples, 80131
Local Institution
Padova, 35128
Local Institution
Pavia, 27100
Local Institution
Roma, 00168
Local Institution
Siena, 53100
Peru5 sites
Local Institution
Callao, Provincia Constitucional del Callao, CALLAO 2
Local Institution
Lima, Lima Province, 11
Local Institution
Lima, Lima Province, LIMA 13
Local Institution
Lima, Lima Province, LIMA 27
Local Institution
Lima, Lima Province, LIMA 33
Russia5 sites
Local Institution
Moscow, 115522
Local Institution
Moscow, 119049
Local Institution
Moscow, 129327
Local Institution
Yaroslavl, 150003
Local Institution
Yekaterinburg, 620102
South Korea5 sites
Local Institution
Daegu, 705-718
Local Institution
Daejeon, 302-799
Local Institution
Seoul, Sungdong-Gu, 133-792
Local Institution
Seoul, 135-710
Local Institution
Seoul, 137-040
United Kingdom5 sites
Local Institution
Bridgend, Glamorgan, CF31 1RQ
Local Institution
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 2QQ
Local Institution
London, Greater London, E11 1NR
Local Institution
Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE7 7DN
Local Institution
Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD
Germany4 sites
Local Institution
Berlin, 14059
Local Institution
Leipzig, 04103
Local Institution
München, 80639
Local Institution
München, 81541
Taiwan4 sites
Local Institution
Kaohsiung City, 833
Local Institution
Taichung, 402
Local Institution
Taichung, 404
Local Institution
Taichung, 407
Chile3 sites
Local Institution
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 0
Local Institution
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7500995
Local Institution
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan
Turkey (Türkiye)3 sites
Local Institution
Denizli, 20070
Local Institution
Edirne, 22030
Local Institution
Gaziantep, 27310
Hungary2 sites
Local Institution
Budapest, 1023
Local Institution
Debrecen, 4012
About this study
Official title: A Phase IIIB Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept Administered Subcutaneously and Intravenously in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis, Receiving Background Methotrexate, and Experiencing an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a weekly subcutaneous dose of abatacept yields clinical efficacy comparable to that of monthly intravenous doses of abatacept in participants with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to current methotrexate therapy.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
- Being tested
- Subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept, Intravenous (IV) Abatacept
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Subcutaneous (SC) AbataceptDrug
Also called Orencia, BMS-188667
Participants received 125 mg weekly SC abatacept injections (with an intravenous [IV] abatacept loading dose on Day 1, based on weight). A double-dummy design was used to protect the blind, thus, participants also received IV injections of placebo (IV Placebo) with the exception that on Day 1 a loading dose of IV abatacept replaced the IV Placebo treatment.
Intravenous (IV) AbataceptDrug
Also called Orencia, BMS-188667
Participants received IV abatacept infusions on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days, thereafter. A double-dummy design was used to protect the blind, thus, participants also received SC injections of placebo (SC Placebo).
500mg (for body weight up to 60 kg)
750 mg (body weight between 61 and 100 kg)
1g (body weight above 100 kg)infusions
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept | Active comparator | Participants received 125 mg weekly SC abatacept injections (with an intravenous [IV] abatacept loading dose on Day 1, based on weight). A double-dummy design was used to protect the blind, thus, participants also received IV injections of placebo (IV Placebo) with the exception that on Day 1 a loading dose of IV abatacept replaced the IV Placebo treatment. Receives: Drug: Subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept |
| Intravenous (IV) Abatacept | Active comparator | Participants received IV abatacept infusions on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days, thereafter. A double-dummy design was used to protect the blind, thus, participants also received SC injections of placebo (SC Placebo). Receives: Drug: Intravenous (IV) Abatacept |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Day 169
The ACR 20 definition of improvement is a 20% improvement from baseline in the number of tender and swollen joints, and a 20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures: participant global assessment of pain, participant global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of physical function and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein).
Measured: Day 169
Anti-TNF Failure Sub-Study Double Blind Period : Number of Participants With Positive Anti-abatacept or Anti-Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Antigen 4-T Cell (CTLA4-T) Response in Anti-TNF Failure Population
Serum samples from all treated adult participants with active rheumatoid arthritis who were from the Anti-TNF failure population were screened for the presence of drug-specific antibodies using Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbant Assay (ELISA). The number of participants who had the presence of anti-abatacept antibodies or anti-CTLA-4 antibodies present in their serum are summarized.
Measured: Days 85, and 169 and postvisits on Days 28, 56, and 85
Secondary outcomes (31)
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants Achieving ACR 50 and ACR 70 Responses at Day 169
The ACR 50 definition of improvement is a 50% improvement from baseline in the number of tender and swollen joint counts, and a 50% improvement from baseline in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures: participant global assessment of pain, participant global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of physical function and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). ACR 70 is defined similarly with 70% improvements from baseline for tender and swollen joint counts and 3 out of 5 core measures.
Measured: Day 169
Double-blind Period: Mean Baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) for Participants With Assessments at Day 169
The disability section of the full HAQ-DI includes 20 questions to assess physical functions in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common activities. The questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. Higher scores=greater dysfunction. A disability index was calculated by summing the worst scores in each domain and dividing by the number of domains answered.
Measured: Day 169
Double-blind Period: Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline to Day 169 in HAQ-DI
The HAQ-DI includes 20 questions to assess physical function in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. The domain questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do. HAQ-DI=sum of worst scores in each domain divided by the number of domains answered. HAQ-DI ranges from 0 to a maximum overall score of 3.0.
Measured: Baseline to Day 169
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants Achieving Clinically Meaningful HAQ-DI Response at Day 169
The disability section of the full HAQ-DI includes 20 questions to assess physical functions in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common activities. The questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0=without any difficulty, 1= with some difficulty, 2= with much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. Higher scores=greater dysfunction. A disability index was calculated by summing the worst scores in each domain and dividing by the number of domains answered. Clinically meaningful HAQ-DI response=an improvement of at least 0.3 units from baseline in HAQ-DI.
Measured: Day 169
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death As Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, or AEs Leading to Discontinuation
AE=any new untoward medical event or worsening of a preexisting medical condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event. Treatment-related SAE=possibly, probably, or certainly related to study drug
Measured: Day 1 to 56 days after last dose in short-term or first dose in the long-term, whichever occurs first.
Anti-TNF Failure Sub-study Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With SAEs, AEs Leading to Discontinuation or Who Died
AE=any new untoward medical event or worsening of a preexisting medical condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
Measured: Day 1 to 56 days after last dose in short-term or first dose in the long-term, whichever occurs first.
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs: all infections,serious infections,and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; malignancies; acute infusional AEs (prespecified AEs occurring within 1 hr of start of infusion), peri-infusional AEs (prespecified AEs occurring within 24 hrs of the start of infusion), system injection reactions, and local injection site reactions
Measured: Day 1 up to 56 days post last dose in short- term period or first dose in the long -term period, whichever occurs first.
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Sign Measurements
Vital sign measurements were performed for participants before and after infusion/subcutaneous injection of study medication at each visit and included seated systolic blood pressure, seated diastolic blood pressure, temperature, and heart rate. Abnormalities were determined to be clinically significant by the investigator.
Measured: Day 1 through end of short-term period (Day 169)
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Test Results Meeting the Criteria for Marked Abnormality
ULN=upper limit of normal; LLN=lower limit of normal; BL= baseline. Marked abnormality criteria: Hemoglobin: >3 g/dL decrease from BL; hematocrit: <0.75*BL; erythrocytes: <0.75*BL; platelets: <0.67*LLN/>1.5*ULN, or if BL<LLN, use <0.5*BL and <100,000 mm^3; leukocytes: <0.75*LLN/>1.25*ULN, or if BL<LLN use <0.8*BL or >ULN, or if BL>ULN, use >1.2*BL or <LLN; neutrophils+bands: <1.0*10^3 c/uL; eosinophils: >0.750*10^3 c/uL; basophils: >400 mm^3; monocytes: >2000 mm^3; lymphocytes: <0.750*10^3 c/uL/>7.50*10^3 c/uL.
Measured: Day 1 through end of short-term period (Day 169)
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Liver Function Laboratory Test Results Meeting the Criteria for Marked Abnormality
Marked abnormality criteria: Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): >2*ULN, or if BL>ULN, use >3*BL; aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >3*ULN, or if BL>ULN, use >4*BL; alanine aminotransferase (ALT): >3*ULN, or if BL>ULN, use >4*BL; G-glutamyl transferase (GGT): >2* ULN, or if BL>ULN, use >3*BL; bilirubin: >2* ULN, or if BL>ULN, use >4*BL; blood urea nitrogen: >2* BL; creatinine: >1.5*BL
Measured: Day 1 through end of short-term period (Day 169)
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Electrolyte Laboratory Test Results Meeting the Criteria for Marked Abnormality
Marked abnormality criteria: Sodium: <0.95*LLN/>1.05*ULN, or if BL<LLN, use <0.95* BL or >ULN, or if BL>ULN, use>1.05* BL or <LLN; potassium: <0.9* LLN/>1.1*ULN, or if BL<LLN then use <0.9* BL or >ULN, or if BL>ULN, use>1.1* BL or <LLN; chlorine: <0.9*LLN/>1.1* ULN, or if BL<LLN, use <0.9*BL or >ULN, or if BL>ULN, use>1.1*BL or <LLN; calcium: <0.8* LLN/>1.2* ULN, or if BL<LLN, use <0.75*BL or >ULN, or if BL>ULN, use>1.25* BL or <LLN; phosphorous: <0.75* LLN/>1.25*ULN, or if BL<LLN, use 0.67*BL or >ULN, or if BL>ULN, use>1.33* BL or <LLN
Measured: Day 1 through end of short-term period (Day 169)
Double-blind Period: Minimum Observed Serum Concentration of Abatacept
Measured: Days 57, 85, 113, 120, 127, 134, 141, and 169
Anti-TNF Failure Sub-study Double-blind Period: Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Abatacept
Serum concentrations of abatacept were analyzed using a validated ELISA. Steady-state trough observed concentration in serum (Cminss) was measured in μg/mL. Samples were obtained on Days 57, 85, 113, 120, 127, 134, 141, and 169.
Measured: Days 57, 85, 113, 120, 127, 134, 141, and 169 (ST Period)
Double-blind Period: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration of Abatacept
Measured: End of infusion on Days 1 and 113 for IV infusion and in the dosing interval of Days 113 to 120 for subcutaneous
Anti-TNF Failure Substudy Double Blind Period: Geometric Mean Maximum Observed Serum Concentration of Abatacept
Serum concentrations of abatacept were analyzed using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Samples were obtained on Days 57, 85, 113, 120, 127, 134, 141, and 169. Cmax was measured in micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL).
Measured: End of infusion on Days 1 and 113 for IV infusion and in the dosing interval of Days 113 to 120 for subcutaneous
Double-blind Period: Area Under The Curve In A Dose Interval (AUC TAU) of Abatacept
Measured: Dosing interval between Days 113 and 141 (TAU=28 days)
Anti-TNF Failure Sub-study Double Blind Period: Area Under The Curve In A Dose Interval (AUC TAU) of Abatacept
Serum concentrations of abatacept were analyzed using a validated ELISA. AUC(TAU) was measured as μg*h/mL. Samples for AUC (TAU) were obtained on Days 113, 120, 127, 134, and 141.
Measured: Dosing Interval between Days 113 and 141 (TAU=28 days)
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-abatacept or Anti-Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Antigen 4-T Cell (CTLA4-T) Responses Over Time by Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbant Assay (ELISA)
Serum samples from all treated adult participants with active rheumatoid arthritis were screened for the presence of drug-specific antibodies using ELISA. Immunogenicity was defined as the presence of a positive anti-abatacept (anti-ABA) or anti-CTLA4 antibody (anti-CTLA4).
Measured: Days 85, and 169 and postvisits on Days 28, 56, and 85
Double-blind Period: Time-matched Median Percent Change From Baseline in Levels of Serum C-reactive Protein Over the Short-term Period
C-reactive protein is an acute phase reactant protein that is a clinical marker for rheumatoid arthritis. Time-matched median percent change from baseline= (time-matched baseline value - Post-baseline value)/time-matched baseline value*100, where the time-matched baseline value represents the median baseline value for only that cohort of participants with measurements available at that visit.
Measured: Baseline to Days 15, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-abatacept Responses Over Time by Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay Among the First 10% of Participants Randomized
An electrochemiluminescence immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction (JNCT) category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a postbaseline titer higher than Baseline, or any postbaseline positivity if Baseline value was missing. Trt=treatment.
Measured: Days 85, and 169 and postvisits on Days 28, 56, and 85
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants Seroconverting by Day 169 According to Status (Negative or Positive) at Baseline
Rheumatoid factor (RF) is an autoantibody (antibody directed against an organism's own tissues) most relevant in rheumatoid arthritis. It is an antibody against the Fc portion of Immunoglobulin (Ig)G, which is itself an antibody. RF and IgG join to form immune complexes which contribute to the disease process.
Measured: Baseline to Day 169
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants Achieving ACR 20 Response at Days 169, 729, 1261, and 1821
The ACR 20 definition of improvement is a 20% improvement from baseline in the number of tender and swollen joints, and a 20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures: participant global assessment of pain, participant global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of physical function and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein).
Measured: Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants Achieving ACR 50 and ACR 70 Responses at Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
The ACR 50 definition of improvement is a 50% improvement from baseline in the number of tender and swollen joint counts, and a 50% improvement from baseline in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures: participant global assessment of pain, participant global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of physical function and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). ACR 70 is defined similarly with 70% improvements from baseline for tender and swollen joint counts and 3 out of 5 core measures.
Measured: Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Open-Label LT Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) Using C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
The DAS28 index measures disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis and is a composite derived from the number of swollen/tender joints, laboratory tests of inflammation (C-reactive protein measured in mg/L), and participant assessment of global health (by marking a visual analog scale 100 mm line from "very good" to "very bad"). A higher DAS28 score indicates worse control of disease. High disease activity is > 5.1, low disease activity is < 3.2 and remission is < 2.6. A clinically significant response= decrease in DAS28 score of >1.2 from baseline.
Measured: Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants Achieving DAS 28 Remission at Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
The DAS28 index measures disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis and is a composite derived from the number of swollen/tender joints, laboratory tests of inflammation (C-reactive protein measured in mg/L), and participant assessment of global health (by marking a visual analog scale 100 mm line from "very good" to "very bad"). A higher DAS28 score indicates worse control of disease. High disease activity is > 5.1, low disease activity is < 3.2 and remission is < 2.6.
Measured: Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants Achieving DAS 28 Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
The DAS28 index measures disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis and is a composite derived from the number of swollen/tender joints, laboratory tests of inflammation (C-reactive protein measured in mg/L), and participant assessment of global health (by marking a visual analog scale 100 mm line from "very good" to "very bad"). A higher DAS28 score indicates worse control of disease. High disease activity is > 5.1, low disease activity is < 3.2 and remission is < 2.6.
Measured: Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants With HAQ-DI Response at Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
The disability section of the full HAQ includes 20 questions to assess physical function in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. The domain questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do. HAQ-DI=sum of worst scores in each domain divided by the number of domains answered. HAQ-DI overall score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 3.0. HAQ response was defined as an improvement (reduction) from baseline (Day 1) of at least 0.3 units in the HAQ score.
Measured: Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants With Death As Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, or AEs Leading to Discontinuation
AE=any new untoward medical event or worsening of a preexisting medical condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event. Treatment-related SAE=possibly, probably, or certainly related to study drug
Measured: End of ST Period (Day 169) to last dose plus 85 days, up to 5 years (September 2014)
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs: all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; malignancies; system injection reactions, and local injection site reactions.
Measured: End of ST Period (Day 169) to last dose plus 85 days, up to 5 years (September 2014)
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Sign Measurements
Vital sign assessments were performed in the LT period at 12-week intervals and at a yearly visit (at 16-week intervals) and, for participants who withdrew from the study prematurely, 7 days after the last dose of SC abatacept. Vital signs included seated systolic blood pressure, seated diastolic blood pressure, temperature, and heart rate. Abnormalities were determined to be clinically significant by the investigator.
Measured: End of ST Period (Day 169) to last dose plus 7 days, up to 5 years (September 2014)
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities
Laboratory assessments were performed in the LT period at 12-week intervals and at a yearly visit and, for participants who withdrew from the study prematurely, 7 days after the last dose of SC abatacept. Abnormalities were determined to be clinically significant by the investigator.
Measured: End of ST Period (Day 169) to last dose plus 7 days, up to 5 years (September 2014)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2008
- Primary completionNov 2009
- Study completionSep 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 2,492 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00559585
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IM101-174
- Other IDs
- EUDRACT # 2007-005434-37
- Status last verified
- Nov 2015
- First submitted
- 15 Nov 2007
- Last updated
- 9 Nov 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Alten R, Bingham CO 3rd, Cohen SB, Curtis JR, Kelly S, Wong D, Genovese MC. Antibody response to pneumococcal and influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving abatacept. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 May 26;17:231. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1082-z.
PubMed 27229685Genovese MC, Tena CP, Covarrubias A, Leon G, Mysler E, Keiserman M, Valente R, Nash P, Simon-Campos JA, Box J, Legerton CW 3rd, Nasonov E, Durez P, Delaet I, Teng J, Alten R. Subcutaneous abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: longterm data from the ACQUIRE trial. J Rheumatol. 2014 Apr;41(4):629-39. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130112. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
PubMed 24584926Genovese MC, Covarrubias A, Leon G, Mysler E, Keiserman M, Valente R, Nash P, Simon-Campos JA, Porawska W, Box J, Legerton C 3rd, Nasonov E, Durez P, Aranda R, Pappu R, Delaet I, Teng J, Alten R. Subcutaneous abatacept versus intravenous abatacept: a phase IIIb noninferiority study in patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Oct;63(10):2854-64. doi: 10.1002/art.30463.
PubMed 21618201
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Nov 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase IIIB Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept Administered Subcutaneously and Intravenously in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis, Receiving Background Methotrexate, and Experiencing an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00559585
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IM101-174
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,492 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2008
- Primary completion
- Nov 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Jul 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a weekly subcutaneous dose of abatacept yields clinical efficacy comparable to that of monthly intravenous doses of abatacept in participants with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to current methotrexate therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept | Active comparator | Drug: Subcutaneous (SC) AbataceptParticipants received 125 mg weekly SC abatacept injections (with an intravenous [IV] abatacept loading dose on Day 1, based on weight). A double-dummy design was used to protect the blind, thus, participants also received IV injections of placebo (IV Placebo) with the exception that on Day 1 a loading dose of IV abatacept replaced the IV Placebo treatment. |
| Intravenous (IV) Abatacept | Active comparator | Drug: Intravenous (IV) AbataceptParticipants received IV abatacept infusions on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days, thereafter. A double-dummy design was used to protect the blind, thus, participants also received SC injections of placebo (SC Placebo). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Subjects who are considered methotrexate inadequate responders
- 10 or more swollen joints (66 joint count) and 12 or more tender joints (68 joint count)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subjects who failed one or multiple anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapies
- Subjects who meet diagnostic criteria for any other rheumatic disease (e.g., lupus erythematous)
- Subjects with active vasculitis of a major organ system (except for subcutaneous rheumatoid nodules)
- Subjects with severe chronic or recurrent bacterial infections
- Subjects who have received treatment with rituximab
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Subcutaneous (SC) AbataceptAlso: Orencia, BMS-188667Participants received 125 mg weekly SC abatacept injections (with an intravenous [IV] abatacept loading dose on Day 1, based on weight). A double-dummy design was used to protect the blind, thus, participants also received IV injections of placebo (IV Placebo) with the exception that on Day 1 a loading dose of IV abatacept replaced the IV Placebo treatment. | Drug | Subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept |
| Intravenous (IV) AbataceptAlso: Orencia, BMS-188667Participants received IV abatacept infusions on Days 1, 15, 29, and every 28 days, thereafter. A double-dummy design was used to protect the blind, thus, participants also received SC injections of placebo (SC Placebo). 500mg (for body weight up to 60 kg) 750 mg (body weight between 61 and 100 kg) 1g (body weight above 100 kg)infusions | Drug | Intravenous (IV) Abatacept |
Primary outcome
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
The ACR 20 definition of improvement is a 20% improvement from baseline in the number of tender and swollen joints, and a 20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures: participant global assessment of pain, participant global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of physical function and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein).
Anti-TNF Failure Sub-Study Double Blind Period : Number of Participants With Positive Anti-abatacept or Anti-Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Antigen 4-T Cell (CTLA4-T) Response in Anti-TNF Failure Population
Time frame: Days 85, and 169 and postvisits on Days 28, 56, and 85
Serum samples from all treated adult participants with active rheumatoid arthritis who were from the Anti-TNF failure population were screened for the presence of drug-specific antibodies using Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbant Assay (ELISA). The number of participants who had the presence of anti-abatacept antibodies or anti-CTLA-4 antibodies present in their serum are summarized.
31 secondary outcomes
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants Achieving ACR 50 and ACR 70 Responses at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Double-blind Period: Mean Baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) for Participants With Assessments at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Double-blind Period: Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline to Day 169 in HAQ-DI
Time frame: Baseline to Day 169
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants Achieving Clinically Meaningful HAQ-DI Response at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death As Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, or AEs Leading to Discontinuation
Time frame: Day 1 to 56 days after last dose in short-term or first dose in the long-term, whichever occurs first.
Anti-TNF Failure Sub-study Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With SAEs, AEs Leading to Discontinuation or Who Died
Time frame: Day 1 to 56 days after last dose in short-term or first dose in the long-term, whichever occurs first.
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Time frame: Day 1 up to 56 days post last dose in short- term period or first dose in the long -term period, whichever occurs first.
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Sign Measurements
Time frame: Day 1 through end of short-term period (Day 169)
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Test Results Meeting the Criteria for Marked Abnormality
Time frame: Day 1 through end of short-term period (Day 169)
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Liver Function Laboratory Test Results Meeting the Criteria for Marked Abnormality
Time frame: Day 1 through end of short-term period (Day 169)
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Electrolyte Laboratory Test Results Meeting the Criteria for Marked Abnormality
Time frame: Day 1 through end of short-term period (Day 169)
Double-blind Period: Minimum Observed Serum Concentration of Abatacept
Time frame: Days 57, 85, 113, 120, 127, 134, 141, and 169
Anti-TNF Failure Sub-study Double-blind Period: Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Abatacept
Time frame: Days 57, 85, 113, 120, 127, 134, 141, and 169 (ST Period)
Double-blind Period: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration of Abatacept
Time frame: End of infusion on Days 1 and 113 for IV infusion and in the dosing interval of Days 113 to 120 for subcutaneous
Anti-TNF Failure Substudy Double Blind Period: Geometric Mean Maximum Observed Serum Concentration of Abatacept
Time frame: End of infusion on Days 1 and 113 for IV infusion and in the dosing interval of Days 113 to 120 for subcutaneous
Double-blind Period: Area Under The Curve In A Dose Interval (AUC TAU) of Abatacept
Time frame: Dosing interval between Days 113 and 141 (TAU=28 days)
Anti-TNF Failure Sub-study Double Blind Period: Area Under The Curve In A Dose Interval (AUC TAU) of Abatacept
Time frame: Dosing Interval between Days 113 and 141 (TAU=28 days)
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-abatacept or Anti-Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Antigen 4-T Cell (CTLA4-T) Responses Over Time by Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbant Assay (ELISA)
Time frame: Days 85, and 169 and postvisits on Days 28, 56, and 85
Double-blind Period: Time-matched Median Percent Change From Baseline in Levels of Serum C-reactive Protein Over the Short-term Period
Time frame: Baseline to Days 15, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Positive Anti-abatacept Responses Over Time by Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay Among the First 10% of Participants Randomized
Time frame: Days 85, and 169 and postvisits on Days 28, 56, and 85
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants Seroconverting by Day 169 According to Status (Negative or Positive) at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Day 169
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants Achieving ACR 20 Response at Days 169, 729, 1261, and 1821
Time frame: Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants Achieving ACR 50 and ACR 70 Responses at Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Time frame: Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Open-Label LT Period: Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) Using C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Time frame: Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants Achieving DAS 28 Remission at Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Time frame: Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants Achieving DAS 28 Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Time frame: Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants With HAQ-DI Response at Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Time frame: Days 169, 729, 1261, 1821
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants With Death As Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, or AEs Leading to Discontinuation
Time frame: End of ST Period (Day 169) to last dose plus 85 days, up to 5 years (September 2014)
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Time frame: End of ST Period (Day 169) to last dose plus 85 days, up to 5 years (September 2014)
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Sign Measurements
Time frame: End of ST Period (Day 169) to last dose plus 7 days, up to 5 years (September 2014)
Open-Label LT Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: End of ST Period (Day 169) to last dose plus 7 days, up to 5 years (September 2014)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Nov 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27229685Alten R, Bingham CO 3rd, Cohen SB, Curtis JR, Kelly S, Wong D, Genovese MC. Antibody response to pneumococcal and influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving abatacept. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 May 26;17:231. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1082-z.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24584926Genovese MC, Tena CP, Covarrubias A, Leon G, Mysler E, Keiserman M, Valente R, Nash P, Simon-Campos JA, Box J, Legerton CW 3rd, Nasonov E, Durez P, Delaet I, Teng J, Alten R. Subcutaneous abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: longterm data from the ACQUIRE trial. J Rheumatol. 2014 Apr;41(4):629-39. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130112. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21618201Genovese MC, Covarrubias A, Leon G, Mysler E, Keiserman M, Valente R, Nash P, Simon-Campos JA, Porawska W, Box J, Legerton C 3rd, Nasonov E, Durez P, Aranda R, Pappu R, Delaet I, Teng J, Alten R. Subcutaneous abatacept versus intravenous abatacept: a phase IIIb noninferiority study in patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Oct;63(10):2854-64. doi: 10.1002/art.30463.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
RecruitingPhase 2
COVID-19 Booster and IIV Schedule in Immunocompromised Hosts
COVID 19, Influenza
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of Airway, Blood and/or Urine Specimens From Subjects for Research Studies
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Smoking
Enrolling by invitation
Nutrition in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Not yet recruiting
Acceptability of a Nurse-led Telehealth Remote Self-monitoring Model of Care in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Clinical Study of YTS109 Cell in R/R Autoimmune Diseases
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
203 sites in 24 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept and Intravenous (IV) Abatacept in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 203 sites in 24 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 203 sites in United States, Mexico, Brazil, France, Canada and 19 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jul 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Day 169 (time frame: Day 169). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00559585, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Nov 2015.