AzTrials
AzTrials

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisPhase 4NCT00560287

Non-Invasive Ventilation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

A Phase 4 study testing Non invasive ventilation delivered with one of the ventilator specifically designed for NIV and given to the patient by the home care providers and Non invasive ventilation in people with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Chronic Respiratory Failure, run by Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri at 2 sites in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) has been increasingly used as a treatment of chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure. Its use in patients affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disorders is still controversial, while most of the studies performed in restrictive thoracic disorders (RTD), and in particular… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Non invasive ventilation delivered with one of the ventilator specifically designed for NIV and given to the patient by the home care providers and Non invasive ventilation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
2 sitesItaly
Study dates
Jan 2008to Aug 2010
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with the diagnosis of ALS and one of the following signs:
  • Vital Capacity < 50% predicted
  • A Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) < 60% predicted
  • Polygraphic signs of nocturnal hypoventilation with daytime symptoms.

Who cannot join

  • Life expectancy>12 months
  • Any comorbidity
  • Acute Respiratory Failure

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Stefano Nava, MD contact

0382 592 ext. 806

snava@fsm.it

Franco Fanfulla, MD contact

0382 592 ext. 815

ffanfulla@fsm.it

Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Fondazione S.Maugeri

    Pavia, 27100

    Stefano Nava, md, o3825921, snava@fsm.it

    Stefano Nava, md, 03825921, snava@fsm.it

    Recruiting
  • Respiratory Unit FSM

    Pavia, 27100

    Stefano Nava, md, 0382 592 ext. 806, snava@fsm.it

    Francesco Fanfulla, MD, 0382 592 ext. 815, ffanfulla@fsm.it

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Role of Non-invasive Ventilation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Volume Versus Pressure Mode

Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) has been increasingly used as a treatment of chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure. Its use in patients affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disorders is still controversial, while most of the studies performed in restrictive thoracic disorders (RTD), and in particular in neuromuscular patients, suggested alleviation of the symptoms of chronic hypoventilation in the short term, and in two small studies survival was prolonged.

In the terminal phase of the disease, when the respiratory muscles became weaker it is very likely that the operators need to frequently adjust the level of inspiratory pressure in an attempt to guarantee an adequate tidal volume, so that alveolar hypoventilation may be avoided.

Read more

Theoretically the use of a volume assisted ventilation may overpass this problem of frequent variations of the settings, since the provision of a fixed tidal volume may always guarantee and adequate alveolar ventilation.

The primary aims of this multicenter randomized study are to evaluate the clinical efficacy, the patients' tolerance and quality of life and the frequency of changing settings in a group of patients with SLS and initial chronic respiratory failure undergoing long-term NIV with Pressure Support Ventilation or Volume Assisted Ventilation.

Read the detailed description

Background

Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) has been increasingly used as a treatment of chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure. Its use in patients affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disorders is still controversial, while most of the studies performed in restrictive thoracic disorders (RTD), and in particular in neuromuscular patients, suggested alleviation of the symptoms of chronic hypoventilation in the short term, and in two small studies survival was prolonged. As a matter of fact a recent Cochrane review stated that "long-term mechanical ventilation should be offered as a therapeutic option to patients with chronic respiratory failure due to neuromuscular diseases". Recurrent episodes of nocturnal desaturation especially during REM sleep may deeply influence the prognosis of patients affect by these disorders (i.e. ALS), and they are often associated with hypercapnia, so that the correction of nocturnal hypoventilation seems to be the major goal to achieve with the ventilatory treatment.

A very recent randomized controlled trial show that in ALS without severe bulbar dysfunction, NIV improves survival with maintenance of, and improvement in, quality of life, including sleep quality. The survival benefit from NIV in this group is much greater than that from currently available neuroprotective therapy, like riluzole.

Most of the studies performed in RTD disorders were performed using a pressure assisted mode (i.e Pressure Support Ventilation), because of the supposed better tolerance of the patients and easy of settings for the operators, even though this has never been scientifically proven.

In the terminal phase of the disease, when the respiratory muscles became weaker it is very likely that the operators need to frequently adjust the level of inspiratory pressure in an attempt to guarantee an adequate tidal volume, so that alveolar hypoventilation may be avoided.

Theoretically the use of a volume assisted ventilation may overpass this problem of frequent variations of the settings, since the provision of a fixed tidal volume may always guarantee and adequate alveolar ventilation.

The primary aims of this multicenter randomized study are to evaluate the clinical efficacy, the patients' tolerance and quality of life and the frequency of changing settings in a group of patients with SLS and initial chronic respiratory failure undergoing long-term NIV with Pressure Support Ventilation or Volume Assisted Ventilation.

Aim of the Project

The primary aims of the project are to evaluate the clinical efficacy, the patients' tolerance and quality of life and the frequency of changing settings in a group of patients with SLS and initial chronic respiratory failure undergoing long-term NIV with Pressure Support Ventilation or Volume Assisted Ventilation.

  • Enrollment criteria: Patients with the diagnosis of ALS and one of the following signs: 1) Vital Capacity < 50% predicted 2) a Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) < 60% predicted 3) polygraphic signs of nocturnal hypoventilation with daytime symptoms.
  • The patients will be randomized to receive NIV with one of the following modes: 1) Pressure Support Ventilation with the inspiratory pressure set according to the patient's tolerance in order to achieve an expired tidal volume > 6 ml/Kg and <8ml/Kg. The back-up rate will be set at 10 breaths/min. 2) Volume assist ventilation with a back-up rate of 10 breaths/min and a tidal volume set to achieve an expired tidal volume > 6 ml/Kg and <8ml/Kg
Being tested
Non invasive ventilation delivered with one of the ventilator specifically designed for NIV and given to the patient by the home care providers, Non invasive ventilation
Keywords
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Non-invasive ventilation, Chronic Respiratory Failure
Medical subject headings
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Non invasive ventilation delivered with one of the ventilator specifically designed for NIV and given to the patient by the home care providersDevice

    Also called Legendaire (Airox), Vivo (Breas), Elisee (Saime), Synchrony (Respironics)

    A very recent randomized controlled trial show that in ALS without severe bulbar dysfunction, NIV improves survival with maintenance of, and improvement in, quality of life, including sleep quality. The survival benefit from NIV in this group is much greater than that from currently available neuroprotective therapy, like riluzole.

  • Non invasive ventilationDevice

    Also called Legendaire (Airox), Vivo (Breas), Elisee (Saime), Synchrony (Respironics)

    A very recent randomized controlled trial show that in ALS without severe bulbar dysfunction, NIV improves survival with maintenance of, and improvement in, quality of life, including sleep quality. The survival benefit from NIV in this group is much greater than that from currently available neuroprotective therapy, like riluzole.

Study groups in NCT00560287
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorVolume assist non-invasive ventilation
Receives: Device: Non invasive ventilation delivered with one of the ventilator specifically designed for NIV and given to the patient by the home care providers; Device: Non invasive ventilation
2Active comparatorPressure Assist mode
Receives: Device: Non invasive ventilation delivered with one of the ventilator specifically designed for NIV and given to the patient by the home care providers; Device: Non invasive ventilation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. quality of life

    Measured: 1 year

  2. tolerance to NIV

    Measured: 1 year

  3. number of hours of NIV per day

    Measured: 1 year

  4. frequency of hospital admission

    Measured: 1 year

  5. frequency of changing the ventilator settings by the operator.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. survival

    Measured: 1 year

  2. diurnal and nocturnal gas exchange

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Pulmonary Function Tests (PFTs).

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Nov 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2008
  3. Primary completionAug 2009
  4. Study completionAug 2010 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00560287
Sponsor's protocol ID
190H09
Other IDs
190H09
Status last verified
Mar 2010
First submitted
16 Nov 2007
Last updated
29 Mar 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Non invasive ventilation delivered with one of the ventilator specifically designed for NIV and given to the patient by the home care providers and Non invasive ventilation in people with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Chronic Respiratory Failure, run by Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri at 2 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Stefano Nava, MD (0382 592 ext. 806, snava@fsm.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

quality of life (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2010.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in