Dry EyePhase 2NCT00560638
Loteprednol Etabonate Opthalmic Suspension for the Treatment of Dry Eye
A Phase 2 study testing loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5% in people with Dry Eye, run by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This was a single-center, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 4-visit, CAE (Controlled Adverse Environment) study lasting approximately 4 weeks. Subjects were randomized to receive loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5% or placebo (vehicle of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Dry Eye
- What is being tested?
- loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 119 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2005to Feb 2006
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- at least 18 years of age or older
- able and willing to follow instructions, including participation in study assessments and able be present for the required study visits for the duration of the study
- If female and of childbearing potential, were not pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy. Women of childbearing potential were required to have a negative urine pregnancy test at the pre-screen visit and had to agree to use an acceptable method of mechanical or hormonal contraceptive for the duration of the study
- a diagnosis of dry eye
- a history of intermittent or regular artificial tear use within the past 3 months
- best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of +0.7 or better assessed by Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale in one or both eyes
- a fluorescein staining score of ≥ 1+ in at least one region in at least one eye at Visit 1 and before CAE exposure at Visits 2 and 3 OR a fluorescein staining score of ≥ 1+ in at least one region in at least one eye at Visit 1 and before CAE exposure at Visits 2 and 3 with a conjunctival redness score of ≥ 1.5+ at Visit 1 and before CAE exposure at Visits 2 and 3 in at least one eye
- Demonstrated a response when exposed to the CAE at Visits 2 and 3
Who cannot join
- clinically significant blepharitis or Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) or lid margin inflammation, particularly if systemic or topical medications were currently being used to treat any of these diagnoses
- diagnosed with an on-going ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal), or active ocular inflammation (e.g. follicular conjunctivitis), or preauricular lymphadenopathy, particularly if systemic or topical medications were currently being used to treat any of these diagnoses
- Reported an ocular discomfort score of 4+ in both eyes at time 0 of CAE exposure at Visits 2 or 3
- Wore contact lenses and refused to remove them for the duration of the study
- previous laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery
- currently taking any topical ophthalmic prescription (including medications for glaucoma) or over-the-counter (OTC) solutions, artificial tears, gels or scrubs and could not discontinue these medications for the duration of the study
Show all 10Show fewer
- presently taking any medication known to cause ocular drying that had not been a stable dose for at least 30 days
- currently taking oral antihistamines that could not be discontinued during the study
- a systemic disease, uncontrolled medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with study measurements or subject compliance
- received another experimental drug or device within 30 days prior to screening
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Ophthalmic Research Associates
Andover, Massachusetts, 01810
About this study
Official title: A Double-Masked, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Suspension, 0.5% for the Treatment of Dry Eye Used Either TID or QID for a 2 Week Period
This was a single-center, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 4-visit, CAE (Controlled Adverse Environment) study lasting approximately 4 weeks. Subjects were randomized to receive loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5% or placebo (vehicle of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%) and instructed to dose bilaterally either TID or QID according to randomization.
- Conditions
- Dry Eye
- Being tested
- loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%, vehicle of loteprednol etabonate
- Medical subject headings
- Dry Eye Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%Drug
Also called Lotemax
TID
loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%Drug
Also called Lotemax
QID
vehicle of loteprednol etabonateDrug
TID or BID according to the randomization
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Loteprednol Etabonate TID | Experimental | loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%, TID Receives: Drug: loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5% |
| Loteprednol Etabonate QID | Experimental | loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%, QID Receives: Drug: loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5% |
| Vehicle | Placebo comparator | vehicle of loteprednol etabonate Receives: Drug: vehicle of loteprednol etabonate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ocular discomfort during CAE exposure
Measured: during CAE exposure
Corneal and conjunctival staining and conjunctival redness
Measured: After CAE exposure
Secondary outcomes (3)
Corneal and conjunctival staining and conjunctival redness
Measured: before CAE exposure
Blink rate, Tear film break-up time (TFBUT), and Ocular Protection Index (OPI)
Measured: before after CAE exposure
Ocular discomfort
Measured: collected in patient diaries
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2005
- Primary completionFeb 2006
- Study completionFeb 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Dry EyeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 119 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Gail Torkildsen, MD, Principal investigator, Ophthalmic Research Associates, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00560638
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 439
- Status last verified
- Jul 2011
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2007
- Last updated
- 18 Jul 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jul 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-Masked, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Suspension, 0.5% for the Treatment of Dry Eye Used Either TID or QID for a 2 Week Period
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00560638
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 439
- Conditions
- Dry Eye
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 119 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2005
- Primary completion
- Feb 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This was a single-center, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 4-visit, CAE (Controlled Adverse Environment) study lasting approximately 4 weeks. Subjects were randomized to receive loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5% or placebo (vehicle of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%) and instructed to dose bilaterally either TID or QID according to randomization.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Loteprednol Etabonate TID | Experimental | Drug: loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%, TID |
| Loteprednol Etabonate QID | Experimental | Drug: loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%, QID |
| Vehicle | Placebo comparator | Drug: vehicle of loteprednol etabonatevehicle of loteprednol etabonate |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- at least 18 years of age or older
- able and willing to follow instructions, including participation in study assessments and able be present for the required study visits for the duration of the study
- If female and of childbearing potential, were not pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy. Women of childbearing potential were required to have a negative urine pregnancy test at the pre-screen visit and had to agree to use an acceptable method of mechanical or hormonal contraceptive for the duration of the study
- a diagnosis of dry eye
- a history of intermittent or regular artificial tear use within the past 3 months
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- clinically significant blepharitis or Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) or lid margin inflammation, particularly if systemic or topical medications were currently being used to treat any of these diagnoses
- diagnosed with an on-going ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal), or active ocular inflammation (e.g. follicular conjunctivitis), or preauricular lymphadenopathy, particularly if systemic or topical medications were currently being used to treat any of these diagnoses
- Reported an ocular discomfort score of 4+ in both eyes at time 0 of CAE exposure at Visits 2 or 3
- Wore contact lenses and refused to remove them for the duration of the study
- previous laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%Also: LotemaxTID | Drug | Loteprednol Etabonate TID |
| loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%Also: LotemaxQID | Drug | Loteprednol Etabonate QID |
| vehicle of loteprednol etabonateTID or BID according to the randomization | Drug | Vehicle |
Primary outcome
Ocular discomfort during CAE exposure
Time frame: during CAE exposure
Corneal and conjunctival staining and conjunctival redness
Time frame: After CAE exposure
3 secondary outcomes
Corneal and conjunctival staining and conjunctival redness
Time frame: before CAE exposure
Blink rate, Tear film break-up time (TFBUT), and Ocular Protection Index (OPI)
Time frame: before after CAE exposure
Ocular discomfort
Time frame: collected in patient diaries
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jul 2011.
Related trials for Dry Eye
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Autologous Transplantation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelium for Geographic Atrophy Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
RecruitingObservational study
The Pathogenesis and Natural History of Sjogren's Disease
Sjogren's Syndrome, Salivary Gland
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gail Torkildsen, MD principal investigator
Ophthalmic Research Associates, Inc.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5% in people with Dry Eye, run by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ocular discomfort during CAE exposure (time frame: during CAE exposure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2011.