MalariaPhase 2/3NCT00561899
Comparison of Three Drug Combinations for Intermittent Treatment of Malaria in Children
A Phase 2/3 study testing SP, amodiaquine, piperaquine, dihdroartemisinin, intermittent preventive treatment and Du-Cotecxin in people with Malaria, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in The Gambia.
Trial summary
Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) offers a way of preventing malaria infection without compromising the development of malaria immunity or encouraging drug resistance. The effect of IPT in children in the prevention of malaria has been evaluated in a number of trials in areas of seasonal malaria transmission. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 5 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Malaria
- What is being tested?
- SP, amodiaquine, piperaquine, dihdroartemisinin, intermittent preventive treatment and Du-Cotecxin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,295 participants
- Where
- 1 siteThe Gambia
- Study dates
- Aug 2007to Jun 2008
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 5 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Age between 1 to 5 years at enrolment.
- Informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians.
- No current participation in another malaria intervention trial.
- Free of obvious health problems as established by medical history and clinical examination before entering into the study.
- Available for the duration of the study.
Who cannot join
- Known allergy to any of the antimalarial drugs used in the trial and if this is unknown, then a history of allergic reaction to any drug.
- Acute or chronic, clinically significant pulmonary, cardiovascular, hepatic or renal functional abnormality, as determined by physical examination or laboratory tests.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Three Drug Combinations for Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Children Aged 1-5 Years in an Area of Seasonal Malaria Transmission in Upper River Division, The Gambia
Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) offers a way of preventing malaria infection without compromising the development of malaria immunity or encouraging drug resistance. The effect of IPT in children in the prevention of malaria has been evaluated in a number of trials in areas of seasonal malaria transmission. Results from these trials have shown that IPTc provided between 40% - 86% protection against clinical malaria. In 2006, a trial that compared two methods of IPTc delivery was carried out in Upper River Division, The Gambia. Preliminary results of the trial have shown that the treatment was very effective as only 4% (45/1133) of the children seen at the end of year cross-sectional survey were parasitaemic. Tolerability was assessed in a subset of 1100 children and the results showed that about 13.5% of children developed mild to moderate vomiting. Malaise was present in about 10% of the study subjects. Severe adverse events were rare. Thus it is important to investigate if other drug regimens might be equally effective in preventing malaria but less likely to cause adverse events. During the 2007 malaria transmission season, 1009 children aged 1-5 years will be individually randomized to receive amodiaquine plus SP, piperaquine plus SP or Artekin TM (dihdroartemisinin plus piperaquine) at monthly intervals on three occasions during the months of September, October, and November. To determine the prevalence of side effects following drug administration participants in each treatment group will be visited at home three and seven days after each round of drug administration and a side effects questionnaire completed. To help establish whether these adverse events are drug related, the same questionnaire will be administered after each treatment round, to 286 age-matched children who are not part of the trial. The primary ends points will be the incidence of adverse events.
Read the detailed description
Objectives
Primary Objective To determine the safety and tolerability of amodiaquine(AQ) (three days) plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine(SP) (one day), piperaquine(PQP) (three days) plus SP (one day), and Artekin TM (PQP plus dihydroartemisinin, DHA) (3 days) when used for seasonal IPT in children.
Secondary Objective To determine the efficacy of AQ (three days) plus SP (one day), PQP (three days) plus SP (one day) and Artekin TM (3 days) when used for seasonal IPT in children.
3.4 Randomisation Open-label, individual randomisation was carried out three weeks before the first dose of IPTc administration in September 2007. Study subjects were individually randomised into either the AQ plus SP, PQP plus SP or ArtekinTM treatment groups in a 1:1:1 fashion. An independent statistician generated the randomizing subject study number (SSN) that assigned each SSN to one of the treatment groups. A photo ID card was given to all participants to facilitate identification at every contact, at home or in the health centres.
3.5 Drug distribution at the health centres Study subjects and their parents were informed about the date of treatment approximately one week before any intervention. Treatment is scheduled to be given during the months of September, October and November. Drugs are to be given at the nearest health centre by a designated member of staff. Tablets are crushed, mixed with honey or suspended in water and given on a spoon. Staff who administer drugs at the health centre play no further part in the trial. All participants are kept under observation for 30 minutes after drugs are taken. In case of vomiting, the drug is re-administrated. At the time of each monthly drug administration, a brief clinical assessment is carried out. Children who are febrile are screened for malaria using a rapid antigen test. Children found to have malaria are treated with Lumefantrine-artemether (CoartemTM, Norvatis Pharma., Basel Switzerland).
3.7 Morbidity surveillance during the rainy season Passive surveillance for malaria will be maintained throughout the transmission season. Parents/guardians are being encouraged to take their children to the health centre identified as being closest to their home at any time that their child becomes unwell. Project staff are based at each of these health facilities to identify children in the trial and to ensure that they are seen, properly investigated and treated promptly. At each clinic visit, axillary temperature is recorded using a digital thermometer and haemoglobin concentration measured using a Hemocue machine. A dipstick for diagnosis of malaria is to be used if fever (axillary temperature of ³ 37.5°C) or a history of fever within the previous 48 hours is present. In such cases, a thick blood smear is also be collected for subsequent confirmation of the diagnosis. Study subjects with documented fever (axillary temperature of ³ 37.5°C) or history of recent fever and malaria parasitaemia are treated with Coartem. The treatment of study subjects seen at the health centres for other conditions is being carried out in accordance with national guidelines.
3.8 End of malaria transmission season cross-sectional survey Children enrolled in the study will be seen at the OPD clinic at the end of malaria transmission season for examination by a study physician and a finger-prick blood sample will be obtained for preparation of a thick blood smear and determination of haemoglobin concentration. A standardized questionnaire will be administered to the parents/guardians of the study subject, to collect information regarding illness that had occurred since the last visit, symptoms experienced, use of healthcare facilities and use of medicines. Information on the use of bed nets will be collected again at this visit.
3.10. Assessment of adverse events To determine the prevalence of minor side effects following drug administration such as headache, fever, weakness, abdominal pain, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, rash, itching or sleep disorder participants in each treatment group are to be visited at home three and seven days after each round of drug administration and a side effects questionnaire completed. Field workers who complete these questionnaires will be unaware of the treatment group to which the child belongs. To help establish whether these adverse events are drug related, the same questionnaire will be administered once after each treatment round, to 286 children who are not part of the trial, recruited from nearby villages and matched for age to children in the trial.
Any serious adverse event that occurs during the study period will be reported to the Local Safety Monitor and Chairman of DSMB.
Primary end-point:
- Incidence of any adverse events during the observation period.
Secondary endpoints:
- Mean Hb (g/dl) at the end of malaria transmission.
- Prevalence of malaria parasitaemia at the end of the malaria transmission season.
- Number of OPD attendances with malaria that meet the case definitions as indicated below during the surveillance period.
Data management and analysis All baseline, surveillance and laboratory data will be collected on forms designed for the trial. Field and laboratory staff will be trained to follow the procedures set out in a series of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Key data will be double entered and inconsistencies checked; range checks will be used for standard variables. Primary analyses will be performed on an intention to treat (ITT) basis. Any child who receives a first dose of drug will be included in the ITT analysis. Children who are randomised but who do not receive any mediation will not be included in this analysis.
Sample size calculations Drugs for IPT need to be acceptable and have low frequency of adverse events. If the frequency of adverse events is 20% in the SP/AQ group, a trial with 286 children per arm has 90% power to detect a halving in the frequency of adverse events, using a significance level of 0.05, or a reduction to 9% or less if a significance of 0.025 is used (to preserve an overall type 1 error rate of 5% for the primary endpoint when there are 2 comparisons, each alternative drug group with SP/AQ). If the frequency of adverse events is 15%, a reduction to 5% or less can be detected with the same power, and if the frequency is 10% a reduction to 2% or less can be detected. Based on experience from several studies the drop-out rate is not expected to exceed 15% and is likely to be less. Allowing for 15% drop out, a sample size of 286*3/(1-0.15)=1009 is needed.
Withdrawal during the study:
Study subjects may be withdrawn from the study for any one of the following reasons.
- Withdrawal of parental / legal guardian's consent.
- Serious adverse event attributable to the study drug.
- Loss to follow-up.
Children who develop adverse events attributable to study drugs should not receive further doses but should be followed-up to monitor safety until the resolution of the adverse reaction.
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Being tested
- SP, amodiaquine, piperaquine, dihdroartemisinin, intermittent preventive treatment, Du-Cotecxin
- Keywords
- safety, tolerability, efficacy, intermittent prevetive treatment, children
- Medical subject headings
- Malaria
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SP, amodiaquine, piperaquine, dihdroartemisininDrug
Also called Fansidar, Du-Cotecxin
once every month during september, October and November
intermittent preventive treatmentDrug
Also called SP, Du-Cotecxin
SP(500mg sulfadoxine/25mg pyrimethamine)1.25mg SP per kg stat Amodiaquine (200mg base) 25mg/kg over 3 days Piperaquine (320 mg per tablet) 16.8 g/kg daily for 3 days Du-Cotecxin ( 40mg dihydroartemisinin(DHA)/320mg piperaquine(PQP))PQP/DHA 1.6/12.8mg/kg once daily for 3 days
Du-CotecxinDrug
Also called SP
Du-Cotecxin (40mg dihydroartemisinin (DHA/320mg Piperaquine (PQP) PQP/DHA 1.6/12.8mg/kg once daily for 3 days
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | SP+AQ Receives: Drug: SP, amodiaquine, piperaquine, dihdroartemisinin |
| 2 | Experimental | Piperaquine plus SP arm Receives: Drug: intermittent preventive treatment |
| 3 | Experimental | Du-Cotecxin Receives: Drug: Du-Cotecxin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The safety and tolerability of AQ plus SP, PQP plus SP, and PQP plus DHA when used for seasonal IPT in children
Measured: Onset of IPT to end of malaria season
Secondary outcomes (1)
The efficacy of the three drug regimens when used for seasonal IPT in children
Measured: Onset of IPT to end of malaria season
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2007
- Primary completionFeb 2008
- Study completionJun 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MalariaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,295 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Department of State for Health and Social Welfare, The Gambia
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brian Greenwood, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Investigators
- Kalifa Bojang, MD, Principal investigator, Medical Research Council Unit, The GambiaKalifa Bojang, MD, Principal investigator, Medical Research Council
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00561899
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SCC1089
- Other IDs
- GMP_PII_6
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 20 Nov 2007
- Last updated
- 26 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Bojang K, Akor F, Bittaye O, Conway D, Bottomley C, Milligan P, Greenwood B. A randomised trial to compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of three drug combinations for intermittent preventive treatment in children. PLoS One. 2010 Jun 21;5(6):e11225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011225.
PubMed 20574538
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Three Drug Combinations for Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Children Aged 1-5 Years in an Area of Seasonal Malaria Transmission in Upper River Division, The Gambia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00561899
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCC1089
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Keywords
- safety, tolerability, efficacy, intermittent prevetive treatment, children
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,295 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Department of State for Health and Social Welfare, The Gambia
- Study start
- Aug 2007
- Primary completion
- Feb 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) offers a way of preventing malaria infection without compromising the development of malaria immunity or encouraging drug resistance. The effect of IPT in children in the prevention of malaria has been evaluated in a number of trials in areas of seasonal malaria transmission. Results from these trials have shown that IPTc provided between 40% - 86% protection against clinical malaria. In 2006, a trial that compared two methods of IPTc delivery was carried out in Upper River Division, The Gambia. Preliminary results of the trial have shown that the treatment was very effective as only 4% (45/1133) of the children seen at the end of year cross-sectional survey were parasitaemic. Tolerability was assessed in a subset of 1100 children and the results showed that about 13.5% of children developed mild to moderate vomiting. Malaise was present in about 10% of the study subjects. Severe adverse events were rare. Thus it is important to investigate if other drug regimens might be equally effective in preventing malaria but less likely to cause adverse events. During the 2007 malaria transmission season, 1009 children aged 1-5 years will be individually randomized to receive amodiaquine plus SP, piperaquine plus SP or Artekin TM (dihdroartemisinin plus piperaquine) at monthly intervals on three occasions during the months of September, October, and November. To determine the prevalence of side effects following drug administration participants in each treatment group will be visited at home three and seven days after each round of drug administration and a side effects questionnaire completed. To help establish whether these adverse events are drug related, the same questionnaire will be administered after each treatment round, to 286 age-matched children who are not part of the trial. The primary ends points will be the incidence of adverse events.
Detailed description
Objectives
Primary Objective To determine the safety and tolerability of amodiaquine(AQ) (three days) plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine(SP) (one day), piperaquine(PQP) (three days) plus SP (one day), and Artekin TM (PQP plus dihydroartemisinin, DHA) (3 days) when used for seasonal IPT in children.
Secondary Objective To determine the efficacy of AQ (three days) plus SP (one day), PQP (three days) plus SP (one day) and Artekin TM (3 days) when used for seasonal IPT in children.
3.4 Randomisation Open-label, individual randomisation was carried out three weeks before the first dose of IPTc administration in September 2007. Study subjects were individually randomised into either the AQ plus SP, PQP plus SP or ArtekinTM treatment groups in a 1:1:1 fashion. An independent statistician generated the randomizing subject study number (SSN) that assigned each SSN to one of the treatment groups. A photo ID card was given to all participants to facilitate identification at every contact, at home or in the health centres.
3.5 Drug distribution at the health centres Study subjects and their parents were informed about the date of treatment approximately one week before any intervention. Treatment is scheduled to be given during the months of September, October and November. Drugs are to be given at the nearest health centre by a designated member of staff. Tablets are crushed, mixed with honey or suspended in water and given on a spoon. Staff who administer drugs at the health centre play no further part in the trial. All participants are kept under observation for 30 minutes after drugs are taken. In case of vomiting, the drug is re-administrated. At the time of each monthly drug administration, a brief clinical assessment is carried out. Children who are febrile are screened for malaria using a rapid antigen test. Children found to have malaria are treated with Lumefantrine-artemether (CoartemTM, Norvatis Pharma., Basel Switzerland).
3.7 Morbidity surveillance during the rainy season Passive surveillance for malaria will be maintained throughout the transmission season. Parents/guardians are being encouraged to take their children to the health centre identified as being closest to their home at any time that their child becomes unwell. Project staff are based at each of these health facilities to identify children in the trial and to ensure that they are seen, properly investigated and treated promptly. At each clinic visit, axillary temperature is recorded using a digital thermometer and haemoglobin concentration measured using a Hemocue machine. A dipstick for diagnosis of malaria is to be used if fever (axillary temperature of ³ 37.5°C) or a history of fever within the previous 48 hours is present. In such cases, a thick blood smear is also be collected for subsequent confirmation of the diagnosis. Study subjects with documented fever (axillary temperature of ³ 37.5°C) or history of recent fever and malaria parasitaemia are treated with Coartem. The treatment of study subjects seen at the health centres for other conditions is being carried out in accordance with national guidelines.
3.8 End of malaria transmission season cross-sectional survey Children enrolled in the study will be seen at the OPD clinic at the end of malaria transmission season for examination by a study physician and a finger-prick blood sample will be obtained for preparation of a thick blood smear and determination of haemoglobin concentration. A standardized questionnaire will be administered to the parents/guardians of the study subject, to collect information regarding illness that had occurred since the last visit, symptoms experienced, use of healthcare facilities and use of medicines. Information on the use of bed nets will be collected again at this visit.
3.10. Assessment of adverse events To determine the prevalence of minor side effects following drug administration such as headache, fever, weakness, abdominal pain, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, rash, itching or sleep disorder participants in each treatment group are to be visited at home three and seven days after each round of drug administration and a side effects questionnaire completed. Field workers who complete these questionnaires will be unaware of the treatment group to which the child belongs. To help establish whether these adverse events are drug related, the same questionnaire will be administered once after each treatment round, to 286 children who are not part of the trial, recruited from nearby villages and matched for age to children in the trial.
Any serious adverse event that occurs during the study period will be reported to the Local Safety Monitor and Chairman of DSMB.
Primary end-point:
- Incidence of any adverse events during the observation period.
Secondary endpoints:
- Mean Hb (g/dl) at the end of malaria transmission.
- Prevalence of malaria parasitaemia at the end of the malaria transmission season.
- Number of OPD attendances with malaria that meet the case definitions as indicated below during the surveillance period.
Data management and analysis All baseline, surveillance and laboratory data will be collected on forms designed for the trial. Field and laboratory staff will be trained to follow the procedures set out in a series of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Key data will be double entered and inconsistencies checked; range checks will be used for standard variables. Primary analyses will be performed on an intention to treat (ITT) basis. Any child who receives a first dose of drug will be included in the ITT analysis. Children who are randomised but who do not receive any mediation will not be included in this analysis.
Sample size calculations Drugs for IPT need to be acceptable and have low frequency of adverse events. If the frequency of adverse events is 20% in the SP/AQ group, a trial with 286 children per arm has 90% power to detect a halving in the frequency of adverse events, using a significance level of 0.05, or a reduction to 9% or less if a significance of 0.025 is used (to preserve an overall type 1 error rate of 5% for the primary endpoint when there are 2 comparisons, each alternative drug group with SP/AQ). If the frequency of adverse events is 15%, a reduction to 5% or less can be detected with the same power, and if the frequency is 10% a reduction to 2% or less can be detected. Based on experience from several studies the drop-out rate is not expected to exceed 15% and is likely to be less. Allowing for 15% drop out, a sample size of 286*3/(1-0.15)=1009 is needed.
Withdrawal during the study:
Study subjects may be withdrawn from the study for any one of the following reasons.
- Withdrawal of parental / legal guardian's consent.
- Serious adverse event attributable to the study drug.
- Loss to follow-up.
Children who develop adverse events attributable to study drugs should not receive further doses but should be followed-up to monitor safety until the resolution of the adverse reaction.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: SP, amodiaquine, piperaquine, dihdroartemisininSP+AQ |
| 2 | Experimental | Drug: intermittent preventive treatmentPiperaquine plus SP arm |
| 3 | Experimental | Drug: Du-CotecxinDu-Cotecxin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 5 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age between 1 to 5 years at enrolment.
- Informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians.
- No current participation in another malaria intervention trial.
- Free of obvious health problems as established by medical history and clinical examination before entering into the study.
- Available for the duration of the study.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Known allergy to any of the antimalarial drugs used in the trial and if this is unknown, then a history of allergic reaction to any drug.
- Acute or chronic, clinically significant pulmonary, cardiovascular, hepatic or renal functional abnormality, as determined by physical examination or laboratory tests.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SP, amodiaquine, piperaquine, dihdroartemisininAlso: Fansidar, Du-Cotecxinonce every month during september, October and November | Drug | 1 |
| intermittent preventive treatmentAlso: SP, Du-CotecxinSP(500mg sulfadoxine/25mg pyrimethamine)1.25mg SP per kg stat Amodiaquine (200mg base) 25mg/kg over 3 days Piperaquine (320 mg per tablet) 16.8 g/kg daily for 3 days Du-Cotecxin ( 40mg dihydroartemisinin(DHA)/320mg piperaquine(PQP))PQP/DHA 1.6/12.8mg/kg once daily for 3 days | Drug | 2 |
| Du-CotecxinAlso: SPDu-Cotecxin (40mg dihydroartemisinin (DHA/320mg Piperaquine (PQP) PQP/DHA 1.6/12.8mg/kg once daily for 3 days | Drug | 3 |
Primary outcome
The safety and tolerability of AQ plus SP, PQP plus SP, and PQP plus DHA when used for seasonal IPT in children
Time frame: Onset of IPT to end of malaria season
1 secondary outcome
The efficacy of the three drug regimens when used for seasonal IPT in children
Time frame: Onset of IPT to end of malaria season
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jan 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20574538Bojang K, Akor F, Bittaye O, Conway D, Bottomley C, Milligan P, Greenwood B. A randomised trial to compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of three drug combinations for intermittent preventive treatment in children. PLoS One. 2010 Jun 21;5(6):e11225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011225.
Related trials for Malaria
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Trajectories and Mechanisms of Recovery From Malaria: An Observational Study
Malaria
Not yet recruiting
Positron Emission Tomography and Organ-Specific Changes in Participants Co-Enrolled in NIH Studies of Plasmodium Vivax Controlled Human Malaria Infection
Healthy Volunteer, Malaria
Recruiting
The Effects of Iron Treatment on Vaccine Immunogenicity in Kenyan Infants With Iron Deficiency
Iron Deficiencies
RecruitingObservational study
Host and Parasite Factors That Influence Susceptibility to Malaria Infection and Disease During Pregnancy and Early Childhood in Ouelessebougou and Bamako, Mali
Malaria
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of PfSPZ-LARC2 Vaccine Against CHMI in Malaria-Naïve Adults
Malaria Falciparum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kalifa Bojang, MD principal investigator
Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia
Kalifa Bojang, MD principal investigator
Medical Research Council
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing SP, amodiaquine, piperaquine, dihdroartemisinin, intermittent preventive treatment and Du-Cotecxin in people with Malaria, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in The Gambia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in The Gambia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The safety and tolerability of AQ plus SP, PQP plus SP, and PQP plus DHA when used for seasonal IPT in children (time frame: Onset of IPT to end of malaria season). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00561899, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2017.