AzTrials
AzTrials

Cerebrovascular AccidentsNCT00564005

Mechanism and Efficacy of Rehabilitation Approaches

A study testing Constraint-induced therapy (CIT), Bilateral arm training (BAT) and Combined therapy (CT) in people with Cerebrovascular Accidents, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Identify the possible mechanisms and the relative effectiveness of existing rehabilitation approaches that target upper extremity deficits of stroke patients on the ground that these approaches are based on neuroplasticity principles and sound motor control theories. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Cerebrovascular Accidents
What is being tested?
Constraint-induced therapy (CIT), Bilateral arm training (BAT) and Combined therapy (CT)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
Jan 2008to Dec 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • a first-ever clinical cerebrovascular accident patients
  • at least 6 months post-stroke onset
  • premorbid right-hand dominance
  • demonstration of Brunnstrom stage III of the affected upper extremity
  • no excessive spasticity in the joints of the affected upper extremity

Who cannot join

  • a score of less than 24 on the Mini Mental State Exam
  • poor physical conditions that would interfere with participation
  • excessive pain in any joint that might limit participation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Kwei-shan, Toayuan County, 333

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Mechanisms and Long-term Effects of Separate vs. Coupled Rehabilitation Approaches After Stroke

Identify the possible mechanisms and the relative effectiveness of existing rehabilitation approaches that target upper extremity deficits of stroke patients on the ground that these approaches are based on neuroplasticity principles and sound motor control theories.

Read the detailed description

Comparisons of constraint-induced therapy (CIT) vs. bilateral arm training (BIT)vs. combined therapy were made. Stroke patients will receive one of these three approaches and be evaluated pre- and post-treatment. the treatment will last 3 weeks and 5 days per week. The evaluation will include clinical measures of motor function, ADL, and quality of life, kinematic performance, and activation patterns of cortex.

Being tested
Constraint-induced therapy (CIT), Bilateral arm training (BAT), Combined therapy (CT), Control intervention
Keywords
stroke rehabilitation, cortical reorganization, kinematic analysis
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Constraint-induced therapy (CIT)Other

    restraint of the unaffected arm and practice of the affected arm

  • Bilateral arm training (BAT)Other

    bilateral symmetric, repetitive arm training

  • Combined therapy (CT)Other

    combined different treatment approaches

  • Control interventionBehavioural

    Conventional treatment program

Study groups in NCT00564005
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Experimentalconstraint-induced therapy
Receives: Other: Constraint-induced therapy (CIT)
2Experimentalbilateral arm training
Receives: Other: Bilateral arm training (BAT)
3Experimentalcombined therapy
Receives: Other: Combined therapy (CT)
Control interventionActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Control intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cortical reorganization and kinematic analysis

    Measured: 2008-2010

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. clinical measures at the impairment, activity, participation levels

    Measured: 2008-2010

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Nov 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2008
  3. Primary completionDec 2010
  4. Study completionDec 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00564005
Sponsor's protocol ID
NHRI-EX97-9742PI
Other IDs
96-0252B
Status last verified
Sep 2014
First submitted
25 Nov 2007
Last updated
11 Feb 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Wu CY, Chen YA, Lin KC, Chao CP, Chen YT. Constraint-induced therapy with trunk restraint for improving functional outcomes and trunk-arm control after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2012 Apr;92(4):483-92. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110213. Epub 2012 Jan 6.

    PubMed 22228607

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Constraint-induced therapy (CIT), Bilateral arm training (BAT) and Combined therapy (CT) in people with Cerebrovascular Accidents, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cortical reorganization and kinematic analysis (time frame: 2008-2010). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00564005, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in