LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00564512
Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab or Alemtuzumab in Treating CLL2007 CLL 2007 FMP
A Phase 3 study testing Campath, rituximab and cyclophosphamide in people with Leukemia, run by French Innovative Leukemia Organisation at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, work in different ways to kill cancer cells or stop them from growing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab and alemtuzumab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- Campath, rituximab and cyclophosphamide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 178 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Nov 2007to Jul 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), meeting the following criteria:
- Binet classification stages B or C
- Del 17 p (FISH) negative (< 10 % positives cores)
- Matutes score 4 or 5
- Exclusion Transformation to aggressive B-cell malignancy (e.g. diffuse large cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, or prolymphocytic leukemia)
- PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- No prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy for CLL
- Corticosteroids within the past month allowed
Who cannot join
- Life expectancy < 6 months
- Creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min
- Total bilirubin > 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Gamma glutamyltransferase or transaminase levels > 2 x ULN
- Cumulative illness rating scale > 6
- HIV seropositivity
Show all 27Show fewer
- Hepatitis B or C seropositivity (unless clearly due to vaccination)
- Clinically significant autoimmune anemia
- Active bacterial, viral, or fungal infection
- Active second malignancy currently requiring treatment (except basal cell carcinoma or in situ endometrial carcinoma) and/or less than 5 years complete remission after breast cancer
- Any severe comorbid conditions including, but not limited to, any of the following:
- Class III or IV heart failure
- Recent myocardial infarction
- Unstable angina
- Ventricular tachyarrhythmias requiring ongoing treatment
- Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with hypoxemia
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Concomitant disease requiring prolonged use of corticosteroids (> 1 month)
- Known hypersensitivity with anaphylactic reaction to humanized monoclonal antibodies or any of the study drugs
- Contraindication to the use of rituximab or alemtuzumab according to Summary of Product Characteristics
- Any coexisting medical or psychological condition that would preclude participation in the required study procedures
- Any mental deficiency preventing proper understanding of the requirements of treatment
- Person under law control
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Fertile patients who cannot or do not wish to use an effective method of contraception, during and for 12 months after the final treatment used for the purposes of the study
- PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Randomized Phase-III Trial Comparing Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide Plus Rituximab (FCR) to FC and MabCampath (FCCam) for Previously Untreated Fit Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, work in different ways to kill cancer cells or stop them from growing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab and alemtuzumab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Others interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. It is not yet known whether giving fludarabine and cyclophosphamide together with rituximab is more effective than giving fludarabine and cyclophosphamide together with alemtuzumab in treating B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying giving fludarabine together with cyclophosphamide and rituximab to see how well it works as first-line therapy compared with giving fludarabine together with cyclophosphamide and alemtuzumab in treating patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To compare 36-month progression-free survival in patients with Binet stage B or C B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with first-line therapy comprising fludarabine phosphate and cyclophosphamide and either rituximab or alemtuzumab.
Secondary
- To compare the disease-free survival, event-free survival, and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare time to next treatment in patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare the overall response rate (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]) in patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare the rate of phenotypic and molecular response in patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare the duration of phenotypic, molecular, complete and partial responses in patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare the response rates and survival times in biological subgroups.
- To compare the rates of treatment-related adverse effects in patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Minimal residual disease study.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to Ig mutational status and cytogenetic abnormalities. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive rituximab IV on day 1 and fludarabine phosphate and cyclophosphamide IV or orally on days 2-4 of course 1. Beginning in course 2 and for all subsequent courses, patients receive rituximab IV on day 1 and fludarabine phosphate and cyclophosphamide IV or orally on days 1-3.
- Arm II: Patients receive alemtuzumab subcutaneously, oral fludarabine phosphate, and oral cyclophosphamide on days 1-3.
In both arms, treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 6 months.
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Being tested
- Campath, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, fludarabine
- Keywords
- B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage I chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage II chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage III chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage IV chronic lymphocytic leukemia
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CampathBiological
Also called Alemtuzumab
Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Campath (FCCam)
rituximabBiological
Also called Mabthera®
Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Rituximab (FCR)
cyclophosphamideDrug
Also called Endoxan®
Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Campath (FCCAM) Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Rituximab (FCR)
fludarabineDrug
Also called Fludara®
Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Campath (FCCAM) Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Rituximab (FCR)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| FCCAM | Experimental | Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Campath (FCCam) Oral Fludarabine: 40 mg/m2 per os, D1 to D3 Oral Cyclophosphamide: 250 mg/m2/day as one dose at noon, D1 to D3 Campath®: 30 mg sc, D1 to D3 without dose escalation Receives: Biological: rituximab; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: fludarabine |
| FCR | Active comparator | Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Rituximab (FCR)
First course:
Rituximab 375 mg/m2 on D1.
D2 to D4:
oral Fludarabine: 40 mg/m2/day as a single morning dose oral Cyclophosphamide: 250 mg/m2/day as a single dose at noon
Subsequent courses (2 to 6)
Rituximab 500 mg/m2 on D1
D1 to D3:
oral Fludarabine: 40 mg/m2/day as a single morning dose oral Cyclophosphamide: 250 mg/m2/day as a single dose at noon Receives: Biological: Campath; Drug: cyclophosphamide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free survival at 36 months
Measured: 36 months follow up
Secondary outcomes (8)
Disease-free survival
Measured: 36 months follow up
Event-free survival
Measured: 36 months follow up
Overall survival
Measured: 36 months follow up
Time to next treatment
Measured: 36 months follow up
Overall response rate (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR])
Measured: 36 months follow up
Duration of phenotypic, molecular, NCI complete and partial responses
Measured: 36 months follow up
Response rates and survival times in biological subgroups
Measured: 36 months follow up
Treatment-related adverse effects
Measured: 36 months follow up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2007
- Primary completionJan 2009
- Study completionJul 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 178 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- French Innovative Leukemia Organisation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stephane Lepretre, MD, Study chair, Centre Henri BecquerelPierre Feugier, Principal investigator, CHU de Nancy - Hopitaux de BraboisRoselyne DELEPINE, mrs, Study director, Groupe Est Ouest Etudes leucemies et Autres Maladies du Sang
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00564512
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000577580
- Other IDs
- CLL-2007-FMP
- Status last verified
- Apr 2009
- First submitted
- 27 Nov 2007
- Last updated
- 25 Jul 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Grgurevic S, Montilla-Perez P, Bradbury A, Gilhodes J, Queille S, Pelofy S, Bancaud A, Filleron T, Ysebaert L, Recher C, Laurent G, Fournie JJ, Cazaux C, Quillet-Mary A, Hoffmann JS. DNA polymerase nu gene expression influences fludarabine resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia independently of p53 status. Haematologica. 2018 Jun;103(6):1038-1046. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.174243. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
PubMed 29567785Lepretre S, Aurran T, Mahe B, Cazin B, Tournilhac O, Maisonneuve H, Casasnovas O, Delmer A, Leblond V, Royer B, Corront B, Chevret S, Delepine R, Vaudaux S, Van Den Neste E, Bene MC, Letestu R, Cymbalista F, Feugier P. Excess mortality after treatment with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in combination with alemtuzumab in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in a randomized phase 3 trial. Blood. 2012 May 31;119(22):5104-10. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-365437. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
PubMed 22337714
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jul 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Phase-III Trial Comparing Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide Plus Rituximab (FCR) to FC and MabCampath (FCCam) for Previously Untreated Fit Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00564512
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000577580
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Keywords
- B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage I chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage II chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage III chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage IV chronic lymphocytic leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 178 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- French Innovative Leukemia OrganisationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2007
- Primary completion
- Jan 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, work in different ways to kill cancer cells or stop them from growing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab and alemtuzumab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Others interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. It is not yet known whether giving fludarabine and cyclophosphamide together with rituximab is more effective than giving fludarabine and cyclophosphamide together with alemtuzumab in treating B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying giving fludarabine together with cyclophosphamide and rituximab to see how well it works as first-line therapy compared with giving fludarabine together with cyclophosphamide and alemtuzumab in treating patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To compare 36-month progression-free survival in patients with Binet stage B or C B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with first-line therapy comprising fludarabine phosphate and cyclophosphamide and either rituximab or alemtuzumab.
Secondary
- To compare the disease-free survival, event-free survival, and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare time to next treatment in patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare the overall response rate (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]) in patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare the rate of phenotypic and molecular response in patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare the duration of phenotypic, molecular, complete and partial responses in patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare the response rates and survival times in biological subgroups.
- To compare the rates of treatment-related adverse effects in patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Minimal residual disease study.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to Ig mutational status and cytogenetic abnormalities. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive rituximab IV on day 1 and fludarabine phosphate and cyclophosphamide IV or orally on days 2-4 of course 1. Beginning in course 2 and for all subsequent courses, patients receive rituximab IV on day 1 and fludarabine phosphate and cyclophosphamide IV or orally on days 1-3.
- Arm II: Patients receive alemtuzumab subcutaneously, oral fludarabine phosphate, and oral cyclophosphamide on days 1-3.
In both arms, treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 6 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| FCCAM | Experimental | Biological: rituximab, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: fludarabineFludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Campath (FCCam) Oral Fludarabine: 40 mg/m2 per os, D1 to D3 Oral Cyclophosphamide: 250 mg/m2/day as one dose at noon, D1 to D3 Campath®: 30 mg sc, D1 to D3 without dose escalation |
| FCR | Active comparator | Biological: Campath, Drug: cyclophosphamideFludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Rituximab (FCR) First course: Rituximab 375 mg/m2 on D1. D2 to D4: oral Fludarabine: 40 mg/m2/day as a single morning dose oral Cyclophosphamide: 250 mg/m2/day as a single dose at noon Subsequent courses (2 to 6) Rituximab 500 mg/m2 on D1 D1 to D3: oral Fludarabine: 40 mg/m2/day as a single morning dose oral Cyclophosphamide: 250 mg/m2/day as a single dose at noon |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Binet classification stages B or C
- Del 17 p (FISH) negative (< 10 % positives cores)
- Matutes score 4 or 5
- Exclusion Transformation to aggressive B-cell malignancy (e.g. diffuse large cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, or prolymphocytic leukemia)
- No prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy for CLL
Key exclusion criteria (27 listed)
- Life expectancy < 6 months
- Creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min
- Total bilirubin > 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Gamma glutamyltransferase or transaminase levels > 2 x ULN
- Cumulative illness rating scale > 6
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CampathAlso: AlemtuzumabFludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Campath (FCCam) | Biological | FCR |
| rituximabAlso: Mabthera®Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Rituximab (FCR) | Biological | FCCAM |
| cyclophosphamideAlso: Endoxan®Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Campath (FCCAM) Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Rituximab (FCR) | Drug | FCCAM, FCR |
| fludarabineAlso: Fludara®Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Campath (FCCAM) Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide-Rituximab (FCR) | Drug | FCCAM |
Primary outcome
Progression-free survival at 36 months
Time frame: 36 months follow up
8 secondary outcomes
Disease-free survival
Time frame: 36 months follow up
Event-free survival
Time frame: 36 months follow up
Overall survival
Time frame: 36 months follow up
Time to next treatment
Time frame: 36 months follow up
Overall response rate (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR])
Time frame: 36 months follow up
Duration of phenotypic, molecular, NCI complete and partial responses
Time frame: 36 months follow up
Response rates and survival times in biological subgroups
Time frame: 36 months follow up
Treatment-related adverse effects
Time frame: 36 months follow up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jul 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29567785Grgurevic S, Montilla-Perez P, Bradbury A, Gilhodes J, Queille S, Pelofy S, Bancaud A, Filleron T, Ysebaert L, Recher C, Laurent G, Fournie JJ, Cazaux C, Quillet-Mary A, Hoffmann JS. DNA polymerase nu gene expression influences fludarabine resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia independently of p53 status. Haematologica. 2018 Jun;103(6):1038-1046. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.174243. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22337714Lepretre S, Aurran T, Mahe B, Cazin B, Tournilhac O, Maisonneuve H, Casasnovas O, Delmer A, Leblond V, Royer B, Corront B, Chevret S, Delepine R, Vaudaux S, Van Den Neste E, Bene MC, Letestu R, Cymbalista F, Feugier P. Excess mortality after treatment with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in combination with alemtuzumab in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in a randomized phase 3 trial. Blood. 2012 May 31;119(22):5104-10. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-365437. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
Related trials for Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephane Lepretre, MD study chair
Centre Henri Becquerel
Pierre Feugier principal investigator
CHU de Nancy - Hopitaux de Brabois
Roselyne DELEPINE, mrs study director
Groupe Est Ouest Etudes leucemies et Autres Maladies du Sang
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Campath, rituximab and cyclophosphamide in people with Leukemia, run by French Innovative Leukemia Organisation at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 27 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free survival at 36 months (time frame: 36 months follow up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00564512, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2013.