Fecal IncontinencePhase 1/2TOPASNCT00565136
Evaluation of Outcomes of Restoring Pelvic Floor Support With TOPAS in Women With Moderate Fecal Incontinence Symptoms
A Phase 1/2 study testing TOPAS in people with Fecal Incontinence, run by ASTORA Women's Health at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The study purpose is to gain experience with the TOPAS system, a minimally- invasively delivered self-fixating mesh for the treatment of pelvic floor weakness in women with symptoms of moderate fecal incontinence Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Fecal Incontinence
- What is being tested?
- TOPAS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2007to Dec 2012
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Females at least 21 years of age who have evidence of pelvic floor weakness
- Females who attempted but not been satisfied with conservative therapies such as dietary changes, dietary bulking agents, biofeedback, etc.
- Subjects, who have an external anal injury, must have some voluntary sphincter control
Who cannot join
- Subjects who are unwilling or unable to sign an Informed Consent form
- Subjects who are currently pregnant or considering future child-bearing
- Subjects who are contraindicated for surgery
- Subjects who are allergic to polypropylene mesh
- Subjects who are enrolled in a concurrent clinical trial
- Subjects with previous implantation of mesh or trauma to the pelvic area
Show all 18Show fewer
- Subjects who engage in anal receptive intercourse
- Subjects with a significant evacuation disorder such as chronic constipation
- Subjects with Crohn's Disease, ulcerative colitis or chronic diarrhea as the primary cause for fecal incontinence
- Subjects who had a hysterectomy within 6 months prior to enrollment
- Subjects with vaginal prolapse that passes the hymen
- Subjects with complete rectal prolapse
- Subjects with a history of pelvic radiation that compromises the anal canal
- Subjects who have psychiatric disturbance or debilitation as a possible cause for fecal incontinence
- Subjects with a neurological disorder such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, or brain tumor as a possible cause for fecal incontinence symptoms
- Subjects with an active pelvic infection or a recto-vaginal fistula
- Subjects who have not had a negative screening exam for colon cancer within 10 years of enrollment
- Subjects who have other inappropriate conditions as determined by the physician
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
St. Lukes Hospital
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 97205
Mount Auburn Hospital
Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138
The Christ Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55454
Sacred Heart Hospital
Spokane, Washington, 99204
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Outcomes of Restoring Pelvic Floor Support Using TOPAS, AMS Pelvic Floor Support System, in Women With Moderate Fecal Incontinence Symptoms
The study purpose is to gain experience with the TOPAS system, a minimally- invasively delivered self-fixating mesh for the treatment of pelvic floor weakness in women with symptoms of moderate fecal incontinence
Read the detailed description
This is a multi-center study under a common protocol. Approximately 20-30 patients will be enrolled across 5 sites in the U.S. The study population is females at least 21 years of age who have attempted but have not been satisfied with conservative therapy for their fecal incontinence symptoms. The study follow-up is two years.
- Conditions
- Fecal Incontinence
- Being tested
- TOPAS
- Keywords
- Device study, Pelvic floor weakness, Fecal incontinence
- Medical subject headings
- Fecal Incontinence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TOPASDevice
A mesh sling permanently implanted to increase pelvic floor support
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TOPAS | Experimental | TOPAS AMS Pelvic Floor Repair System Receives: Device: TOPAS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Fecal Incontinence Incidence From Baseline (Pre-treatment) Through 24 Months Post-treatment
Includes solid and liquid stools, as measured by the mean rate obtained using a subject-reported bowel diary. The 3 month post-treatment visit was the primary endpoint time period.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment), 6 Week, 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 Month and 24 Month post-treatment
Secondary outcomes (8)
Incidence Rate of Complications During the 24 Month Post-Treatment Follow-up Period
Complications are defined as all adverse events reported during the 24 month follow-up period including serious/non-serious events and events related/not related to the device and/or procedure. Incidence rate is calculated as: (total number of adverse events reported in the 24 month follow-up period) / (total number of subjects implanted = 29)
Measured: Through 24 month post-treatment
Fecal Incontinence Symptoms as Measured by the Wexner Score
The Wexner Score (also known as the Cleveland Clinic Florida Incontinence Score) is a subject-completed questionnaire that asks about the frequency of incontinence to gas, liquid, solid, of the need to wear pads, and of lifestyle changes (scored on a frequency scale from 0 (=absent) to 4 (daily). An overall Wexner Score is computed from these five components and a score of 0 means perfect control and 20 means complete incontinence.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment), 6 Week, 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 Month and 24 Month post-treatment
Fecal Incontinence Symptoms as Measured by Symptom Severity Scale in Fecal Incontinence
The Symptom Severity Scale in Fecal Incontinence is a subject-completed questionnaire that asks about the symptoms of fecal incontinence in the following areas: frequency, stool composition, stool amount, and degree of urgency. The total score is measured on a 0 (best) to 13 (worst) scale. Scores of 1-6, 7-10, and 11-13 were categorized as mild, moderate, and severe fecal incontinence, respectively.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment), 6 Week, 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 Month and 24 Month post-treatment
Quality of Life Assessment as Measured by Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life
The Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Assessment is a subject-completed questionnaire. It is measured in each of four areas of depression (7 items), lifestyle (10 items), coping (9 items), and embarrassment (3 items). Area scores are measured on a 1 (worse) to 4 (best) scale and are each the average of their component individual item scores measured on the same scale.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment), 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 Month and 24 Month post-treatment
Pain Intensity as Measured by the Pain Intensity Scale
The Pain Intensity Scale is a subject completed questionnaire. Scores are measured on 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) scale.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment), 6 Week post-treatment
Intra- and Peri-Surgical Parameters: Length of Procedure
Measured: Duration of the device implant procedure
Intra- and Peri-Surgical Parameters: Length of Hospital Stay
Measured: Length of the hospital stay for the device implant procedure
Intra- and Peri-Surgical Parameters: Estimated Blood Loss During Implant Procedure
Measured: Duration of the device implant procedure (an average of 23 minutes)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2007
- Primary completionDec 2010
- Study completionDec 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Fecal IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ASTORA Women's Health
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anders Mellgren, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Abbott Northwestern Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00565136
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WC0610
- Acronym
- TOPAS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2016
- First submitted
- 27 Nov 2007
- Last updated
- 23 May 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rosenblatt P, Schumacher J, Lucente V, McNevin S, Rafferty J, Mellgren A. A preliminary evaluation of the TOPAS system for the treatment of fecal incontinence in women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):155-62. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000080.
PubMed 24763157
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Outcomes of Restoring Pelvic Floor Support Using TOPAS, AMS Pelvic Floor Support System, in Women With Moderate Fecal Incontinence Symptoms
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00565136
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TOPAS / WC0610
- Conditions
- Fecal Incontinence
- Keywords
- Device study, Pelvic floor weakness, Fecal incontinence
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ASTORA Women's HealthIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2007
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Aug 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study purpose is to gain experience with the TOPAS system, a minimally- invasively delivered self-fixating mesh for the treatment of pelvic floor weakness in women with symptoms of moderate fecal incontinence
Detailed description
This is a multi-center study under a common protocol. Approximately 20-30 patients will be enrolled across 5 sites in the U.S. The study population is females at least 21 years of age who have attempted but have not been satisfied with conservative therapy for their fecal incontinence symptoms. The study follow-up is two years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TOPAS | Experimental | Device: TOPASTOPAS AMS Pelvic Floor Repair System |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Females at least 21 years of age who have evidence of pelvic floor weakness
- Females who attempted but not been satisfied with conservative therapies such as dietary changes, dietary bulking agents, biofeedback, etc.
- Subjects, who have an external anal injury, must have some voluntary sphincter control
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Subjects who are unwilling or unable to sign an Informed Consent form
- Subjects who are currently pregnant or considering future child-bearing
- Subjects who are contraindicated for surgery
- Subjects who are allergic to polypropylene mesh
- Subjects who are enrolled in a concurrent clinical trial
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TOPASA mesh sling permanently implanted to increase pelvic floor support | Device | TOPAS |
Primary outcome
Fecal Incontinence Incidence From Baseline (Pre-treatment) Through 24 Months Post-treatment
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), 6 Week, 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 Month and 24 Month post-treatment
Includes solid and liquid stools, as measured by the mean rate obtained using a subject-reported bowel diary. The 3 month post-treatment visit was the primary endpoint time period.
8 secondary outcomes
Incidence Rate of Complications During the 24 Month Post-Treatment Follow-up Period
Time frame: Through 24 month post-treatment
Fecal Incontinence Symptoms as Measured by the Wexner Score
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), 6 Week, 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 Month and 24 Month post-treatment
Fecal Incontinence Symptoms as Measured by Symptom Severity Scale in Fecal Incontinence
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), 6 Week, 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 Month and 24 Month post-treatment
Quality of Life Assessment as Measured by Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 Month and 24 Month post-treatment
Pain Intensity as Measured by the Pain Intensity Scale
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), 6 Week post-treatment
Intra- and Peri-Surgical Parameters: Length of Procedure
Time frame: Duration of the device implant procedure
Intra- and Peri-Surgical Parameters: Length of Hospital Stay
Time frame: Length of the hospital stay for the device implant procedure
Intra- and Peri-Surgical Parameters: Estimated Blood Loss During Implant Procedure
Time frame: Duration of the device implant procedure (an average of 23 minutes)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 May 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 24763157Rosenblatt P, Schumacher J, Lucente V, McNevin S, Rafferty J, Mellgren A. A preliminary evaluation of the TOPAS system for the treatment of fecal incontinence in women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):155-62. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000080.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Fecal Incontinence
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Recruiting
Acute Genital Nerve Stimulation for Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Individuals Living With Spinal Cord Injury
Fecal Incontinence
Recruiting
At-Home Genital Nerve Stimulation for SCI Bowel
Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
Postpartum Health Trajectories the First Year After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury and the Impact of a Group-Based Intervention
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury
Recruiting
Outcome Research in Bowel Irrigation Techniques for the Treatment of Chronic Constipation and/or Faecal Incontinence
Faecal Incontinence, Chronic Constipation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anders Mellgren, MD, PhD principal investigator
Abbott Northwestern Medical Center
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing TOPAS in people with Fecal Incontinence, run by ASTORA Women's Health at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Aug 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Fecal Incontinence Incidence From Baseline (Pre-treatment) Through 24 Months Post-treatment (time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), 6 Week, 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 Month and 24 Month post-treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00565136, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2016.