Coronary Artery DiseaseCARDUCCINCT00566059
Computed Tomographic Angiography or Conventional Coronary Angiography in Clinical Decision Making
An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Artery Stenosis, run by University Medical Center Groningen at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Patients planned for elective conventional coronary angiography will undergo CT coronary angiography (Dual Source CT) in order to assess the correlation of stenosis detection and therapeutic advice between conventional and CT coronary angiography. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Stenosis
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- May 2006to May 2007
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients over 50 years of age, scheduled for elective coronary angiography
Who may be able to join
- Over 50 years of age
- Scheduled for elective coronary angiography
Who cannot join
- Patients with known iodine allergy
- Severe renal insufficiency (creatinine levels > 120 micromol/L)
- Hyperthyroidism
- Cardiac arrhythmias
- Unstable clinical condition
- Inability to follow breath-hold commands
- Previous PCI or CABG were excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison Between Invasive Coronary Angiography and Dual-Source Computed Tomography
Patients planned for elective conventional coronary angiography will undergo CT coronary angiography (Dual Source CT) in order to assess the correlation of stenosis detection and therapeutic advice between conventional and CT coronary angiography. We hypothesize that their is a good correlation between conventional and CT coronary angiography for stenosis detection and therapeutic advice.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Stenosis
- Keywords
- therapeutic advice
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Stenosis
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2006
- Study completionMay 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Medical Center GroningenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Center Groningen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Felix Zijlstra, MD PhD, Study director, University Medical Center Groningen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00566059
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CARDUCCI
- Acronym
- CARDUCCI
- Status last verified
- Nov 2007
- First submitted
- 30 Nov 2007
- Last updated
- 3 Dec 2007
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Dec 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Between Invasive Coronary Angiography and Dual-Source Computed Tomography
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00566059
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CARDUCCI / CARDUCCI
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Stenosis
- Keywords
- therapeutic advice
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Center GroningenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2006
- Study completion
- May 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients planned for elective conventional coronary angiography will undergo CT coronary angiography (Dual Source CT) in order to assess the correlation of stenosis detection and therapeutic advice between conventional and CT coronary angiography. We hypothesize that their is a good correlation between conventional and CT coronary angiography for stenosis detection and therapeutic advice.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients over 50 years of age, scheduled for elective coronary angiography
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Over 50 years of age
- Scheduled for elective coronary angiography
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with known iodine allergy
- Severe renal insufficiency (creatinine levels > 120 micromol/L)
- Hyperthyroidism
- Cardiac arrhythmias
- Unstable clinical condition
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Dec 2007.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Felix Zijlstra, MD PhD study director
University Medical Center Groningen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Artery Stenosis, run by University Medical Center Groningen at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2007.