AzTrials
AzTrials

Waldenström MacroglobulinemiaPhase 3NCT00566332

Trial Comparing Chlorambucil to Fludarabine in Patients With Advanced Waldenström Macroglobulinemia

A Phase 3 study testing Chlorambucil and Fludarabine in people with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia and Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma, run by French Study Group on Chronic Lymphoid Leukemia at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia (WM) is a lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by a monoclonal IgM paraprotein and morphological evidence of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma: the cells are IgM+, IgD+, CD19+ and CD20+ but usually CD5-, CD10- and CD23-. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Chlorambucil and Fludarabine
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
414 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jun 2001to Dec 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Established diagnosis of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (the 2nd Workshop on Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia) or Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma or Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma, needing a treatment
  • Life expectancy > 6 months
  • Creatinine < 200 µmol/l
  • SGPT and SGOT < 2x ULN
  • A negative direct Coombs test
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Past chemotherapy/radiotherapy/immunotherapy prior to the study for Waldenström macroglobulinemia
  • Previous malignancy less than 5 years ago except carcinoma in situ of the cervix and non-melanoma skin cancer
  • Positive HIV serology
  • Active Hepatitis B or C
  • Lactation/pregnancy
  • Impossible good compliance with the study protocol
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Active infection not controlled
  • Psychological condition hampering understanding of the study
  • Transformation into large B cell lymphoma
  • Peripheral neuropathy > grade II

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière. 47-83 Bd de l'hôpital

    Paris, 75013

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Randomized Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Chlorambucil to Fludarabine in Patients With Advanced Waldenström Macroglobulinemia,Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma or Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia (WM) is a lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by a monoclonal IgM paraprotein and morphological evidence of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma: the cells are IgM+, IgD+, CD19+ and CD20+ but usually CD5-, CD10- and CD23-. The treatment efficacy is difficult to assess because of the lack of clear diagnostic criteria , good response criteria, and of randomized trials.

The actual treatment is Chlorambucil, an alkylating agent. A purine analogue such as Fludarabine has proven its efficacy on 30 % to 80 % as first line therapy

Read more

This study is a phase II b open, prospective, international multicenter trial (England, Dr Johnson, Dr Catovsky, Australia: Dr Seymour) promoted by the French Cooperative Group on Chronic Lymphoid Leukemia in untreated WM, or closely related disorders ( Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma or splenic marginal zone lymphoma). 366 patients must be included, among them 180 patients in France. Patients will be stratified according to the lymphoproliferative disorder.

The patients will receive Chlorambucil by oral route for 10 days every 28 days (12 cycles) (8 MG/M², 6 MG/M² if patient is more than 75 years old) or Fludarabine by oral route for 5 days every 28 days (6 cycles) (40MG/M², 30 MG/M² if patient is more than 75 years old).

The primary objective is to compare the efficacy (response rate) of Chlorambucil to Fludarabine in previously untreated patients. The secondary objectives are the duration of response, the improvement of hematological parameters, the toxicity, the quality of life, the event free survival and the overall survival.

Being tested
Chlorambucil, Fludarabine
Keywords
Waldenström Macroglobulinemia, Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma, Fludarabine, Chlorambucil
Medical subject headings
Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia, Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ChlorambucilDrug

    Chlorambucil 8 mg/m² (6 mg/m² if patient aged more than 75 years old) 10 days every 28 days during 12 months By oral route

  • FludarabineDrug

    Fludarabine 40 mg/m² (30 mg/m² if patient aged more than 75 years old) 5 days every 28 days during 6 cycles By oral route

Study groups in NCT00566332
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorChlorambucil 8mg/m² (6 mg/m² if patient aged more than 75 years old) 10 days every 28 days during 12 months
Receives: Drug: Chlorambucil
2Active comparatorFludarabine
Receives: Drug: Fludarabine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient overall response

    Measured: At the end of treatment whether 6 or 12 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Biological study

    Measured: Whether 6 or 12 months

  2. Quality of life

    Measured: Whether 6 or 12 months

  3. Response duration

    Measured: 60 months

  4. Treatment toxicity

    Measured: 60 months

  5. Event free survival

    Measured: 60 months

  6. Overall survival

    Measured: 60 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Dec 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2001
  3. Primary completionSep 2009
  4. Study completionDec 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
414 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00566332
Sponsor's protocol ID
WM1
Status last verified
Aug 2015
First submitted
30 Nov 2007
Last updated
19 Aug 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Leblond V, Johnson S, Chevret S, Copplestone A, Rule S, Tournilhac O, Seymour JF, Patmore RD, Wright D, Morel P, Dilhuydy MS, Willoughby S, Dartigeas C, Malphettes M, Royer B, Ewings M, Pratt G, Lejeune J, Nguyen-Khac F, Choquet S, Owen RG. Results of a randomized trial of chlorambucil versus fludarabine for patients with untreated Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, marginal zone lymphoma, or lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 20;31(3):301-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.7920. Epub 2012 Dec 10.

    PubMed 23233721
  • Nguyen-Khac F, Lambert J, Chapiro E, Grelier A, Mould S, Barin C, Daudignon A, Gachard N, Struski S, Henry C, Penther D, Mossafa H, Andrieux J, Eclache V, Bilhou-Nabera C, Luquet I, Terre C, Baranger L, Mugneret F, Chiesa J, Mozziconacci MJ, Callet-Bauchu E, Veronese L, Blons H, Owen R, Lejeune J, Chevret S, Merle-Beral H, Leblondon V; Groupe Francais d'Etude de la Leucemie Lymphoide Chronique et Maladie de Waldenstrom (GFCLL/MW); Groupe Ouest-Est d'etude des Leucemie Aigues et Autres Maladies du Sang (GOELAMS); Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA). Chromosomal aberrations and their prognostic value in a series of 174 untreated patients with Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. Haematologica. 2013 Apr;98(4):649-54. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2012.070458. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

    PubMed 23065509

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Chlorambucil and Fludarabine in people with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia and Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma, run by French Study Group on Chronic Lymphoid Leukemia at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient overall response (time frame: At the end of treatment whether 6 or 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00566332, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in