AzTrials
AzTrials

AsthmaPhase 4NCT00567476

Omalizumab Use and Asthma-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Severe Persistent Allergic Asthma

A Phase 4 study testing Omalizumab, Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and Long-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist (LABA) in people with Asthma, run by Novartis at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study investigated asthma-related quality of life in Brazilian patients using omalizumab. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Asthma
What is being tested?
Omalizumab, Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and Long-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist (LABA)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
116 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Nov 2007to Apr 2010
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 12 to 75 years-old during screening visit.
  • Body weight > 20 kg and < 150 kg.
  • Daily or persistent asthma symptoms.
  • Night symptoms at least once a week.
  • Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) > 40% and < 80% of predicted normal value and continuing asthma symptoms.
  • FEV1 increased > 12% from baseline within 30 minutes of inhaled (up to 400 mcg) or nebulized (up to 5 mg) salbutamol.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Subject taking more than 500 mcg/day of fluticasone or equivalent associated to a long-acting β2-agonist.
  • Inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta-2 adrenergic agonist (LABA) doses that remained fixed during the last 12 weeks prior to screening.
  • Medical history of at least two episodes of asthma exacerbation treated with systemic corticoid or at least one severe asthma exacerbation treated with systemic corticoid and hospitalization or emergency room visit in the last 12 months prior to screening.
  • Positive skin prick test (diameter of wheal > 3mm) to at least one perennial aeroallergen (dust mite, cat/dog dander, cockroaches), to which the subject was likely to be exposed during the study.
  • Subject capable to read and understand asthma related quality of life questionnaire (Juniper's questionnaire).

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant, nursing female subjects.
  • Female subjects without current acceptable contraceptive method.
  • Previous history of allergy or hypersensitivity to omalizumab.
  • Subjects with prior treatment with omalizumab.
  • Subjects with medical history of psychiatric disorder.
  • Subject had been treated with systemic corticosteroid for any reason other than asthma.
Show all 22Show fewer
  • Subject took β2 antagonist medication in the last 3 months prior to screening visit.
  • Subject took protocol prohibited medication prior to screening.
  • Medical history of food or drug related severe anaphylactoid reactions.
  • Medical history of antibiotics allergy. Patients were included if the antibiotics to which they were allergic to were to be avoided for the entire duration of the study.
  • Asthma related to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID).
  • Treatment of exacerbation in the 4 weeks prior to randomization.
  • Other active lung diseases.
  • Medical history of others uncontrolled diseases 3 months prior randomization (eg, infections, coronary heart diseases and metabolic diseases).
  • Any history of cancer.
  • Abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG), laboratory exams (clinically significant abnormalities), and chest X-ray (CXR).
  • Evidence or history of drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Airway infection (eg, pneumonia, acute sinusitis) 4 weeks prior to screening visit.
  • Smokers or smoking history of > 10 pack-years.
  • Subject that had been treated with investigational drugs over the past 30 days or during the course of the trial.
  • Subject had elevated IgE levels for reasons other than allergy.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria applied to the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Novartis Investigator Site

    São Paulo

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effect of Xolair (Omalizumab) as Add-on Therapy to Inhaled Corticosteroid + Long-Acting Beta Agonist in Fixed or Flexible Dosing Compared to Isolated Inhaled Corticosteroid + Long-Acting Beta Agonist in Fixed or Flexible Dosing in the Asthma-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Severe Persistent Allergic Asthma

This study investigated asthma-related quality of life in Brazilian patients using omalizumab.

Conditions
Asthma
Being tested
Omalizumab, Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), Long-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist (LABA), Short-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist (SABA)
Keywords
Asthma, anti-immunoglobulin E, omalizumab
Medical subject headings
Asthma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OmalizumabDrug

    Also called Xolair

    Omalizumab 150 to 375 mg was administered subcutaneously every 2 or 4 weeks to provide a dose of at least 0.016 mg/kg per UI/ml of IgE.

  • Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)Drug

    Any ICS with proprietary drug and device > 500 mcg of fluticasone or equivalent

  • Long-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist (LABA)Drug

    Fixed dose of LABA as prescribed prior to study entry

  • Short-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist (SABA)Drug

    Also called salbutamol, terbutaline

    Home use of nebulized Β2-agonist such as salbutamol 5 mg or terbutaline 10 mg for symptoms of intercurrent bronchospasm.

Study groups in NCT00567476
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Omalizumab + Conventional TherapyActive comparatorOmalizumab was administered subcutaneously every 2 or 4 weeks over a period of 20 weeks to provide a dose of at least 0.016 mg/kg per UI/ml of immunoglobulin E (IgE). Doses (mg) and dosing frequency were determined by serum total IgE level (IU/mL) and body weight (kg). Also, participants continued using their current formulation of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist (LABA). Home use of nebulized beta 2-agonist was allowed for the treatment of symptoms of intercurrent bronchospasm or during an asthma exacerbation if this treatment regimen was already established prior to screening visit.
Receives: Drug: Omalizumab; Drug: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS); Drug: Long-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist (LABA); Drug: Short-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist (SABA)
Conventional TherapyActive comparatorParticipants continued using their current formulation of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a long-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist (LABA). Home use of nebulized beta 2-agonist was allowed for the treatment of symptoms of intercurrent bronchospasm or during an asthma exacerbation if this treatment regimen was already established prior to screening visit.
Receives: Drug: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS); Drug: Long-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist (LABA); Drug: Short-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist (SABA)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 20 in the Overall Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)

    The AQLQ was administered to all patients at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 20. The 32 questions in the AQLQ were divided into four domains; activity limitations, symptoms, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Individual questions are equally weighted. The overall AQLQ score is the mean of the responses to each of the 32 questions, and ranges from 1 to 7. A score 7.0 indicates that the patient has no impairments due to asthma and a score of 1.0 indicates severe impairment.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 20

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Percentage of Participants With an Increase of More Than 1.5 in AQLQ Overall Score at 20 Weeks

    The AQLQ was administered to all patients at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 20. The 32 questions in the AQLQ were divided into four domains; activity limitations, symptoms, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Individual questions are equally weighted. The overall AQLQ score is the mean of the responses to each of the 32 questions and ranges from 1 to 7. A score 7.0 indicates that the patient has no impairments due to asthma and score 1.0 indicates severe impairment.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 20

  2. Percentage of Participants With an Increase of More Than 0.5 in AQLQ Overall Score at Week 20

    The AQLQ was administered to all patients at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 20. The 32 questions in the AQLQ were divided into four domains; activity limitations, symptoms, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Individual questions are equally weighted. The overall AQLQ score is the mean of the responses to each of the 32 questions and ranges from 1 to 7. AQLQ of each domain is the mean of the responses to each of the questions within that domain. A score 7.0 indicates that the patient has no impairments due to asthma and score 1.0 indicates severe impairment.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 20

  3. The Mean Change From Baseline to the End of Study in AQLQ Domain Score

    AQLQ was administered to all patients at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 20, and prior to any clinic visit evaluation and drug administration.

    The 32 questions in the AQLQ were divided into four domains: activity limitations, symptoms, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. AQLQ domain scores were calculated by adding the responses to each of the questions in the domain and dividing by the number of questions in the domain. Each domain score was between 1 and 7. Score 7.0 meant that the patient had no impairments due to asthma and score 1.0 indicated severe impairment.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 20

  4. Number of Asthma Exacerbation Episodes Per Participant

    For the purpose of evaluating efficacy, a clinically significant asthma exacerbation was defined as a worsening of asthma symptoms as judged clinically by the investigator, requiring doubling the baseline ICS dose for at least 3 days and/or treatment with rescue systemic (oral or IV) corticosteroids. The initiation of the above corticosteroid regimens marked the start of an asthma exacerbation episode and cessation of the additional corticosteroid regimens marked the end of an exacerbation episode.

    Measured: From Baseline through 20 weeks

  5. Percentage of Participants Using Rescue Medication

    When necessary, patients were allowed to take rescue medication using inhaled salbutamol or terbutaline for symptoms of intercurrent bronchospasm.

    Measured: From Baseline through 20 Weeks

  6. Free Days With no Rescue Medication

    When necessary, patients were allowed to take rescue medication using inhaled salbutamol or terbutaline for symptoms of intercurrent bronchospasm. Days with no rescue medication intake were the variable of interest for this analysis.

    Measured: From Baseline through 20 weeks (140 days)

  7. Mean Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Taken Per Day

    When necessary, patients were allowed to take rescue medication using inhaled salbutamol or terbutaline for symptoms of intercurrent bronchospasm. The number of puffs taken during each 24 hour period was recorded in the patient dairy. The total number of puffs over 20 weeks of treatment was divided by the number of treatment days (140 days) to calculate the mean number of puffs per day.

    Measured: From Baseline through 20 Weeks

  8. Physician's Global Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness

    At the end of Week 20 a global evaluation of the treatment effectiveness was performed by the investigator using the following scale: Excellent: complete control of asthma; Good: marked improvement of asthma; Moderate: discernible, but limited improvement in asthma; Poor: no appreciable change in asthma; Worsening of asthma

    Measured: 20 Weeks

  9. Patient's Global Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness

    At the end of Week 20, a global evaluation of the treatment effectiveness was performed by the patient using the following scale:

    Excellent: complete control of asthma; Good: marked improvement of asthma; Moderate: discernible, but limited improvement in asthma; Poor: no appreciable change in asthma; Worsening of asthma

    Measured: 20 Weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Dec 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2007
  3. Primary completionApr 2010
  4. Study completionApr 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
116 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00567476
Sponsor's protocol ID
CIGE025ABR01
Status last verified
Jun 2011
First submitted
4 Dec 2007
Last updated
30 Jun 2011

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Omalizumab, Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and Long-acting beta 2-adrenergic agonist (LABA) in people with Asthma, run by Novartis at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jun 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 May 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 20 in the Overall Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (time frame: Baseline and Week 20). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jun 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in