AzTrials
AzTrials

Age-Related Macular DegenerationNCT00568191

Stratus Versus Cirrus OCT in AMD

An observational study of Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Choroidal Neovascularization, run by The Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Retinology and Biomicroscopic Laser Surgery at 1 site in Austria.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Cirrus OCT provides due to the spectral domain technology a 2-fold resolution than Stratus OCT generated in a comparable amount of time. Due to this higher resolution the retinal surface and the retinal pigment epithelium can be identified more clearly, a significantly reduced number of algorithm failures is… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 55 years and older
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteAustria
Study dates
Oct 2007to Dec 2007
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 55 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients aged > 55 years of either sex presenting with age-related macular degeneration

Who may be able to join

  • Age>55 years
  • Age-related macular degeneration

Who cannot join

  • Not consented patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Austria1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Retinology and Biomicroscopic Lasersurgery

    Vienna, State of Vienna, A1030

    Ilse Krebs, MD, +43171165 ext. 4607, Ilse.Krebs@wienkav.at

    Ilse Krebs, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Austria

About this study

Official title: Reliability of Threshold Algorithm in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Stratus Versus Cirrus OCT

The Cirrus OCT provides due to the spectral domain technology a 2-fold resolution than Stratus OCT generated in a comparable amount of time. Due to this higher resolution the retinal surface and the retinal pigment epithelium can be identified more clearly, a significantly reduced number of algorithm failures is expected

Keywords
Age-related macular degeneration, choroidal neovascularization, Stratus OCT, Cirrus OCT
Medical subject headings
Macular Degeneration, Choroidal Neovascularization

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00568191
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1retinal thickness program Stratus OCT software 4.0
2retinal cube 200x200 program of Cirrus OCT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of algorithm failures assessed by Stratus OCT versus Cirrus OCT in the horizontal central line

    Measured: only 1 examination

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Number of algorrithm failures in Stratus versus Cirrus OCT assessed in the whole scan

    Measured: 1 examination

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Dec 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2007
  3. Study completionDec 2007 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00568191
Sponsor's protocol ID
EK 06-007-VK1
Status last verified
Dec 2007
First submitted
4 Dec 2007
Last updated
5 Dec 2007
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Krebs I, Falkner-Radler C, Hagen S, Haas P, Brannath W, Lie S, Ansari-Shahrezaei S, Binder S. Quality of the threshold algorithm in age-related macular degeneration: Stratus versus Cirrus OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Mar;50(3):995-1000. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2617. Epub 2008 Nov 21.

    PubMed 19029035

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Choroidal Neovascularization, run by The Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Retinology and Biomicroscopic Laser Surgery at 1 site in Austria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Dec 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ilse Krebs, MD (+43171165 ext. 94607, Ilse.Krebs@wienkav.at), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of algorithm failures assessed by Stratus OCT versus Cirrus OCT in the horizontal central line (time frame: only 1 examination). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00568191, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Dec 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in