Multiple MyelomaPhase 2NCT00574288
Daratumumab (HuMax®-CD38) Safety Study in Multiple Myeloma
A Phase 2 study testing Part 1: Daratumumab, Part 2: Daratumumab and Methylprednisolone in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 7 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
Establishment of safety profile of HuMax-CD38 when given as monotherapy in participants with multiple myeloma relapsed from or refractory to at least 2 different cytoreductive therapies and without further established treatment options. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Part 1: Daratumumab, Part 2: Daratumumab and Methylprednisolone
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 104 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 26 Mar 2008to 3 Apr 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) requiring systemic therapy
- Age greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2
- Life expectancy greater than (>) 3 months
- Relapsed from or refractory to two or more different prior therapies
- Signed Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Plasma cell leukemia defined as a plasma cell count > 2000/millimeter^3 (mm^3)
- Known amyloidosis
- Participants who previously have received an allogeneic stem cell transplant
- Sensory or motor neuropathy of >= grade 3
- Past or current malignancy
- Chronic or ongoing active infectious disease
Show all 24Show fewer
- Clinically significant cardiac disease
- Significant concurrent, uncontrolled medical condition including, but not limited to, renal (except related to MM), hepatic, hematological except MM, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, neurological, cerebral or psychiatric disease
- A baseline QT interval as corrected by Fridericia's formula > 470 millisecond (msec) for female participants or > 450 msec for male participants or a complete left bundle branch block (defined as a QRS interval >= 120 msec in left bundle branch block form)
- Hypokalemia
- Clinical signs of meningeal involvement of MM
- Known severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma defined as forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) less than (<) 60 percentage (%) of expected
- History of significant cerebrovascular disease
- Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus seropositivity
- Positive serology for hepatitis B
- Screening laboratory values
- Concomitant corticosteroid
- Other chemotherapy that is or may be active against myeloma within 3 weeks prior to Visit 2 (Part 1) or the first dose of daratumumab (Part 2). However, corticosteroid for myeloma (less than a 4-day course) could be administered within 1 week before Visit 2 (Part 1) or the first dose of daratumumab (Part 2)
- Known hypersensitivity to components of the investigational product or severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to humanized products
- Participants who have received treatment with any nonmarket drug substance within 4 weeks before the first dose of daratumumab
- Current participation in any other interventional clinical trial
- Participants known or suspected of not being able to comply with a trial protocol (example, due to alcoholism, drug dependency, or psychological disorder)
- Breastfeeding women or women with a positive pregnancy test at Screening
- Women of childbearing potential not willing to use adequate contraception, defined as hormonal birth control or intrauterine device, during the trial and for 1 year after the last dose of daratumumab. For participants in the United States, the use of a double-barrier method is also considered adequate
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 4 countries.
7 sites in 4 countries
About this study
Official title: Daratumumab (HuMax®-CD38) Safety Study in Multiple Myeloma - Open Label, Dose-escalation Followed by Open Label, Single-arm Study
Establishment of safety profile of HuMax-CD38 when given as monotherapy in participants with multiple myeloma relapsed from or refractory to at least 2 different cytoreductive therapies and without further established treatment options.
Read the detailed description
This study is conducted in two parts. In part I, participants are enrolled into cohorts at increasing dose levels. Participant safety and efficacy during part I will determine the doses used for Part II. In part II participants will be enrolled into one of two sequential treatment arms using two of the doses defined in part 1 of the study. Part II was 5 cohorts, 3 with 8 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) and 2 with 16 mg/kg. Part I and all but the last cohort in Part II were dosed with Phase 1/ 2 drug product. The last cohort in Part II was dosed with Phase 3 drug product. Both Part I and Part II are open-label/unmasked.
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- Part 1: Daratumumab, Part 2: Daratumumab, Methylprednisolone, Dexamethasone
- Keywords
- Multiple Myeloma, Daratumumab, Safety, HuMax-CD38, Dose-escalation
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Part 1: DaratumumabDrug
Also called HuMax-CD38
First participant will receive intravenous (injection of a substance into a vein) 0.005 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (planned dose) infusion of daratumumab and other participants will receive different doses. The participants will receive 7 full infusions of daratumumab and 2 predose infusions every 2 weeks. The dose of daratumumab will be escalated sequentially and considering the safety and efficacy of dose in Part 1, dose for Part 2 of the study will be decided. A predose infusion of 10% of the full dose of daratumumab will be administered a day before the first 2 full infusions.
Part 2: DaratumumabDrug
Also called HuMax-CD38
In Part 2, the participants will receive dose of daratumumab as determined in part 1 (16 mg/kg) of the study. Participants will receive 8 full infusions at weekly intervals followed by biweekly (every 2 weeks) infusions for 16 additional weeks and monthly infusions until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity, whichever comes first. Predose was dropped at some point in Part 2. A predose infusion of 10 mg daratumumab will be administered on the day before the first full infusion in select cohorts.
MethylprednisoloneOther
Pre-dose: Participants (part 1) will receive methylprednisolone 80 mg intravenous (IV) injection 30 minutes to 2 hours before treatment. Participants (part 2) will receive 100 mg methylprednisolone IV 60 minutes to 2 hours before treatment; if a patient experiences no significant infusion-related reactions, the dose of methylprednisolone may be decreased to 50 mg after Visit 4.
Post-dose: All participants (part 1) will receive 40 mg methylprednisolone orally on the first and the second day after all full infusions. During Part 2, all participants will receive 20-25 mg methylprednisolone orally or equivalent on the first and second days after all full-dose infusions.
DexamethasoneOther
Participants (Part 2) will receive 20 mg dexamethasone intravenous (IV) injection pre-dose, on the first and second days after every full-dose infusions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation: Daratumumab | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Part 1: Daratumumab; Other: Methylprednisolone |
| Dose Expansion: Daratumumab | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Part 2: Daratumumab; Other: Methylprednisolone; Other: Dexamethasone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Measured: Up to Week 28 (for Part 1) and up to approximately 2.5 years (for Part 2)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Overall Response Rate
Overall response defined as percentage of participants who achieved stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR). Per IMWG criteria, sCR: is defined as normal free light chain (FLC) ratio, and absence of clonal plasma cells (PCs) by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry; CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5 % plasma cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100mg/24 hours; PR: >= 50 % reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urinary M-protein by >= 90% or to <200 mg/24 hours; if the serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of >=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria.
Measured: Up to Week 28 (for Part 1) and Week 27 (for Part 2)
Part 1: Time to Response
Time to first response was defined as the time from the date of first dose of daratumumab to the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better). Time to best response was defined as the time between the date of first dose of daratumumab and the date of the initial evaluation of the best response (PR or better) to treatment. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the distribution of time to response and time to best response.
Measured: Up to Week 28
Part 2: Time to Progression (TTP)
TTP was defined as the number of days from the date of first infusion (Day 1) to the date of first record of disease progression. Disease progression (IMWG criteria): increase of 25 percent (%) from lowest response level in Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dL); urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24 hour; only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain levels (absolute increase must be >10 mg/dL); Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 2.65 mmol/L) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder. Median TTP was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Up to Week 27
Part 2: Duration of Response as Assessed Using the Method of Kaplan-Meier
Duration of response was calculated from the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better) to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease, as defined in the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.
Measured: Up to Week 27
Part 2: Progression-Free Survival
Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of first dose of daratumumab and either disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.
Measured: Up to Week 27
Part 2: Time to Response
Time to first response was defined as the time from the date of first dose of daratumumab to the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better). Time to best response was defined as the time between the date of first dose of daratumumab and the date of the initial evaluation of the best response (PR or better) to treatment. Time to VGPR (very good partial response) was defined as the time from the date of first dose of daratumumab to the date of initial documentation of VGPR response. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to response.
Measured: Up to Week 27
Part 2: Overall Survival
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the number of days from administration of the first infusion (Day 1) to date of death. Median Overall Survival was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Approximately 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Study start26 Mar 2008
- Primary completion9 Jan 2015
- Study completion3 Apr 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00574288
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR101876
- Other IDs
- GEN501, DARA-GEN501, 2007-003783-22
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 14 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 27 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Li X, Dosne AG, Perez Ruixo C, Perez Ruixo JJ. Pharmacodynamic-Mediated Drug Disposition (PDMDD) Model of Daratumumab Monotherapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 May;62(5):761-777. doi: 10.1007/s40262-023-01232-8. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
PubMed 37022569Usmani SZ, Nahi H, Plesner T, Weiss BM, Bahlis NJ, Belch A, Voorhees PM, Laubach JP, van de Donk NWCJ, Ahmadi T, Uhlar CM, Wang J, Feng H, Qi M, Richardson PG, Lonial S. Daratumumab monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: final results from the phase 2 GEN501 and SIRIUS trials. Lancet Haematol. 2020 Jun;7(6):e447-e455. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30081-8.
PubMed 32470437Adams HC 3rd, Stevenaert F, Krejcik J, Van der Borght K, Smets T, Bald J, Abraham Y, Ceulemans H, Chiu C, Vanhoof G, Usmani SZ, Plesner T, Lonial S, Nijhof I, Lokhorst HM, Mutis T, van de Donk NWCJ, Sasser AK, Casneuf T. High-Parameter Mass Cytometry Evaluation of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Daratumumab Demonstrates Immune Modulation as a Novel Mechanism of Action. Cytometry A. 2019 Mar;95(3):279-289. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.23693. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
PubMed 30536810Krejcik J, Frerichs KA, Nijhof IS, van Kessel B, van Velzen JF, Bloem AC, Broekmans MEC, Zweegman S, van Meerloo J, Musters RJP, Poddighe PJ, Groen RWJ, Chiu C, Plesner T, Lokhorst HM, Sasser AK, Mutis T, van de Donk NWCJ. Monocytes and Granulocytes Reduce CD38 Expression Levels on Myeloma Cells in Patients Treated with Daratumumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Dec 15;23(24):7498-7511. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2027. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
PubMed 29025767Nijhof IS, Casneuf T, van Velzen J, van Kessel B, Axel AE, Syed K, Groen RW, van Duin M, Sonneveld P, Minnema MC, Zweegman S, Chiu C, Bloem AC, Mutis T, Lokhorst HM, Sasser AK, van de Donk NW. CD38 expression and complement inhibitors affect response and resistance to daratumumab therapy in myeloma. Blood. 2016 Aug 18;128(7):959-70. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-703439. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
PubMed 27307294Lokhorst HM, Plesner T, Laubach JP, Nahi H, Gimsing P, Hansson M, Minnema MC, Lassen U, Krejcik J, Palumbo A, van de Donk NW, Ahmadi T, Khan I, Uhlar CM, Wang J, Sasser AK, Losic N, Lisby S, Basse L, Brun N, Richardson PG. Targeting CD38 with Daratumumab Monotherapy in Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Sep 24;373(13):1207-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506348. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
PubMed 26308596
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Daratumumab (HuMax®-CD38) Safety Study in Multiple Myeloma - Open Label, Dose-escalation Followed by Open Label, Single-arm Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00574288
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR101876
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Keywords
- Multiple Myeloma, Daratumumab, Safety, HuMax-CD38, Dose-escalation
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 26 Mar 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Jan 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Apr 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Mar 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Establishment of safety profile of HuMax-CD38 when given as monotherapy in participants with multiple myeloma relapsed from or refractory to at least 2 different cytoreductive therapies and without further established treatment options.
Detailed description
This study is conducted in two parts. In part I, participants are enrolled into cohorts at increasing dose levels. Participant safety and efficacy during part I will determine the doses used for Part II. In part II participants will be enrolled into one of two sequential treatment arms using two of the doses defined in part 1 of the study. Part II was 5 cohorts, 3 with 8 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) and 2 with 16 mg/kg. Part I and all but the last cohort in Part II were dosed with Phase 1/ 2 drug product. The last cohort in Part II was dosed with Phase 3 drug product. Both Part I and Part II are open-label/unmasked.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation: Daratumumab | Experimental | Drug: Part 1: Daratumumab, Other: Methylprednisolone |
| Dose Expansion: Daratumumab | Experimental | Drug: Part 2: Daratumumab, Other: Methylprednisolone, Other: Dexamethasone |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) requiring systemic therapy
- Age greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2
- Life expectancy greater than (>) 3 months
- Relapsed from or refractory to two or more different prior therapies
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Plasma cell leukemia defined as a plasma cell count > 2000/millimeter^3 (mm^3)
- Known amyloidosis
- Participants who previously have received an allogeneic stem cell transplant
- Sensory or motor neuropathy of >= grade 3
- Past or current malignancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1: DaratumumabAlso: HuMax-CD38First participant will receive intravenous (injection of a substance into a vein) 0.005 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (planned dose) infusion of daratumumab and other participants will receive different doses. The participants will receive 7 full infusions of daratumumab and 2 predose infusions every 2 weeks. The dose of daratumumab will be escalated sequentially and considering the safety and efficacy of dose in Part 1, dose for Part 2 of the study will be decided. A predose infusion of 10% of the full dose of daratumumab will be administered a day before the first 2 full infusions. | Drug | Dose Escalation: Daratumumab |
| Part 2: DaratumumabAlso: HuMax-CD38In Part 2, the participants will receive dose of daratumumab as determined in part 1 (16 mg/kg) of the study. Participants will receive 8 full infusions at weekly intervals followed by biweekly (every 2 weeks) infusions for 16 additional weeks and monthly infusions until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity, whichever comes first. Predose was dropped at some point in Part 2. A predose infusion of 10 mg daratumumab will be administered on the day before the first full infusion in select cohorts. | Drug | Dose Expansion: Daratumumab |
| MethylprednisolonePre-dose: Participants (part 1) will receive methylprednisolone 80 mg intravenous (IV) injection 30 minutes to 2 hours before treatment. Participants (part 2) will receive 100 mg methylprednisolone IV 60 minutes to 2 hours before treatment; if a patient experiences no significant infusion-related reactions, the dose of methylprednisolone may be decreased to 50 mg after Visit 4. Post-dose: All participants (part 1) will receive 40 mg methylprednisolone orally on the first and the second day after all full infusions. During Part 2, all participants will receive 20-25 mg methylprednisolone orally or equivalent on the first and second days after all full-dose infusions. | Other | Dose Escalation: Daratumumab, Dose Expansion: Daratumumab |
| DexamethasoneParticipants (Part 2) will receive 20 mg dexamethasone intravenous (IV) injection pre-dose, on the first and second days after every full-dose infusions. | Other | Dose Expansion: Daratumumab |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame: Up to Week 28 (for Part 1) and up to approximately 2.5 years (for Part 2)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
7 secondary outcomes
Overall Response Rate
Time frame: Up to Week 28 (for Part 1) and Week 27 (for Part 2)
Part 1: Time to Response
Time frame: Up to Week 28
Part 2: Time to Progression (TTP)
Time frame: Up to Week 27
Part 2: Duration of Response as Assessed Using the Method of Kaplan-Meier
Time frame: Up to Week 27
Part 2: Progression-Free Survival
Time frame: Up to Week 27
Part 2: Time to Response
Time frame: Up to Week 27
Part 2: Overall Survival
Time frame: Approximately 3 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Apr 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37022569Li X, Dosne AG, Perez Ruixo C, Perez Ruixo JJ. Pharmacodynamic-Mediated Drug Disposition (PDMDD) Model of Daratumumab Monotherapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 May;62(5):761-777. doi: 10.1007/s40262-023-01232-8. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32470437Usmani SZ, Nahi H, Plesner T, Weiss BM, Bahlis NJ, Belch A, Voorhees PM, Laubach JP, van de Donk NWCJ, Ahmadi T, Uhlar CM, Wang J, Feng H, Qi M, Richardson PG, Lonial S. Daratumumab monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: final results from the phase 2 GEN501 and SIRIUS trials. Lancet Haematol. 2020 Jun;7(6):e447-e455. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30081-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30536810Adams HC 3rd, Stevenaert F, Krejcik J, Van der Borght K, Smets T, Bald J, Abraham Y, Ceulemans H, Chiu C, Vanhoof G, Usmani SZ, Plesner T, Lonial S, Nijhof I, Lokhorst HM, Mutis T, van de Donk NWCJ, Sasser AK, Casneuf T. High-Parameter Mass Cytometry Evaluation of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Daratumumab Demonstrates Immune Modulation as a Novel Mechanism of Action. Cytometry A. 2019 Mar;95(3):279-289. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.23693. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29025767Krejcik J, Frerichs KA, Nijhof IS, van Kessel B, van Velzen JF, Bloem AC, Broekmans MEC, Zweegman S, van Meerloo J, Musters RJP, Poddighe PJ, Groen RWJ, Chiu C, Plesner T, Lokhorst HM, Sasser AK, Mutis T, van de Donk NWCJ. Monocytes and Granulocytes Reduce CD38 Expression Levels on Myeloma Cells in Patients Treated with Daratumumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Dec 15;23(24):7498-7511. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2027. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27307294Nijhof IS, Casneuf T, van Velzen J, van Kessel B, Axel AE, Syed K, Groen RW, van Duin M, Sonneveld P, Minnema MC, Zweegman S, Chiu C, Bloem AC, Mutis T, Lokhorst HM, Sasser AK, van de Donk NW. CD38 expression and complement inhibitors affect response and resistance to daratumumab therapy in myeloma. Blood. 2016 Aug 18;128(7):959-70. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-703439. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26308596Lokhorst HM, Plesner T, Laubach JP, Nahi H, Gimsing P, Hansson M, Minnema MC, Lassen U, Krejcik J, Palumbo A, van de Donk NW, Ahmadi T, Khan I, Uhlar CM, Wang J, Sasser AK, Losic N, Lisby S, Basse L, Brun N, Richardson PG. Targeting CD38 with Daratumumab Monotherapy in Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Sep 24;373(13):1207-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506348. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
7 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Part 1: Daratumumab, Part 2: Daratumumab and Methylprednisolone in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 7 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in Denmark, Netherlands, Sweden, United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Mar 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (time frame: Up to Week 28 (for Part 1) and up to approximately 2.5 years (for Part 2)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00574288, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2018.