Congestive Heart FailurePhase 2NCT00575484
Concentrated Saline Infusions and Increased Dietary Sodium With Diuretics for Heart Failure With Kidney Dysfunction
A Phase 2 study testing Hypertonic saline, then oral sodium chloride in people with Congestive Heart Failure and Renal Insufficiency, run by Barnes-Jewish Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
At present the standard management of fluid overload in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) involves limiting the intake of salt and water while administering high dose diuretics, often at the cost of deteriorating kidney function. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Congestive Heart Failure, Renal Insufficiency
- What is being tested?
- Hypertonic saline, then oral sodium chloride
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 11 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2007to Jul 2008
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients (age ≥18) admitted with CHF exacerbation with NYHA Class III-IV symptoms at screening.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction </= 45%, as determined by previous echocardiogram, left ventricular angiogram, or thallium myocardial imaging.
- Estimated GFR <60 ml/min/1.7m² with significant prerenal physiology as judged by prior documented volume mediated changes in renal function, a fractional excretion of urea <35%, or a fractional excretion of sodium <1%. For GFR 30-60: must have serum sodium </= 135 mEq/L OR large home diuretic dose (total daily loop diuretic dose >/= 120 mg/d in furosemide equivalents OR concomitant thiazide use). For GFR <30: no additional criteria needed.
Who cannot join
- Admit estimated GFR < 15mL/min or predicted need for chronic hemodialysis within the next 60 days.
- Cause of acute kidney injury other than prerenal physiology.
- No loop diuretic prior to admission or loop diuretic initiated within the 2 wks prior to admission.
- Medicine or dietary noncompliance expected to prevent successful study participation.
- > 36hrs since presentation to screening.
- Serum Na > 145 mEq/L OR < 120 mEq/L at screening.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Systolic blood pressure > 180 mmHg at screening.
- Presentation with acute coronary syndrome OR left heart catheterization planned at screening.
- Current or impending respiratory failure at screening.
- Current calcineurin inhibitor or nesiritide use.
- Nephrotic-range proteinuria.
- Clinical evidence for the presence of cirrhosis with bilirubin >/= 2mg/dL or international normalized ratio (not on coumadin) >/= 1.7.
- Presence of another active medical issue which may prolong hospital admission or delay aggressive CHF therapy.
- Participation in another interventional study.
- Pregnancy.
- Prisoners.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Barnes-Jewish Hospital; Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
About this study
Official title: Hypertonic Saline With Furosemide and a Normosodic Diet for the Treatment of Decompensated Congestive Heart Failure With Prerenal Physiology
At present the standard management of fluid overload in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) involves limiting the intake of salt and water while administering high dose diuretics, often at the cost of deteriorating kidney function. However, another group of researchers has previously shown that intravenously infusing small volumes of concentrated saline during diuretic dosing and liberalizing dietary salt intake while continuing to limit water consumption resulted in improved fluid removal in CHF patients. Furthermore, less deterioration in kidney function, shorter hospitalizations, reduced readmission rates, and even reduced mortality were observed. The present study will examine this novel therapy in a population of 60 patients with underlying severe CHF and kidney dysfunction hospitalized for the management of fluid overload. Half of these patients will receive investigational treatment with concentrated salt infusions and liberalized salt consumption during diuretic therapy. All patients will otherwise receive the standard therapies for heart failure, including restrictions on water consumption. This study will attempt to verify the improvements in clinical endpoints previously described and define the mechanisms of enhanced fluid removal.
- Conditions
- Congestive Heart Failure, Renal Insufficiency
- Being tested
- Hypertonic saline, then oral sodium chloride, Normal saline, then oral placebo capsule
- Keywords
- Congestive Heart Failure, Renal Insufficiency, Hypertonic Saline Solution, Diuretic Resistance, Cardiorenal Syndrome
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure, Renal Insufficiency, Cardio-Renal Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hypertonic saline, then oral sodium chlorideDrug
2mL/kg hypertonic saline (4.4% NaCl if serum sodium </=135, else 2.8% NaCl) infused over 30min BID and dosed simultaneously with IV bolus furosemide BID (latter dose per treating physician) until patient is switched to oral loop diuretic. After switch to oral diuretic, subject will receive oral 0.75gm sodium (NaCL) capsule dosed BID with loop diuretic (latter dose per treating physician) until 60d after discharge.
Normal saline, then oral placebo capsuleDrug
20mL normal saline infusion X 30min BID dosed simultaneously with IV bolus furosemide BID (latter dose per treating physician) PLUS 2gm sodium diet PLUS 1.5L fluid restriction. After switch to oral diuretic, begin oral placebo capsule BID, dosed with loop diuretic (dose per treating physician) PLUS 2gm sodium diet PLUS 1.5L fluid restriction.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Normal saline, then oral placebo capsule |
| 2 | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Hypertonic saline, then oral sodium chloride |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
duration of hospitalization
Measured: duration of hospitalization
weight loss at discharge
Measured: duration of hospitalization
weight loss at 60 days
Measured: 60 days after discharge
Secondary outcomes (5)
number of readmissions
Measured: 60 days after discharge
GFR by creatinine clearance at discharge
Measured: duration of hospitalization
estimated GFR at 60 days after discharge
Measured: 60 days after discharge
24hr urine output at discharge
Measured: last 24hrs of hospitalization
need for inotrope or extracorporeal volume removal
Measured: 60 days after discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2007
- Primary completionJul 2008
- Study completionJul 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Congestive Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Barnes-Jewish Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Washington University School of Medicine
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anitha Vijayan, MD, Washington University School of Medicine
- Investigators
- Anitha Vijayan, M.D., Principal investigator, Renal Division, Washington University School of MedicineKamalanathan K Sambandam, M.D., Principal investigator, Renal Division, Washington University School of MedicineGregory A Ewald, M.D., Principal investigator, Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00575484
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 00904-0407-01
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 17 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 24 Jan 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Paterna S, Parrinello G, Amato P, Dominguez L, Pinto A, Maniscalchi T, Cardinale A, Licata A, Amato V, Licata G, Di Pasquale P. Tolerability and efficacy of high-dose furosemide and small-volume hypertonic saline solution in refractory congestive heart failure. Adv Ther. 1999 Sep-Oct;16(5):219-28.
PubMed 10915397Paterna S, Di Pasquale P, Parrinello G, Amato P, Cardinale A, Follone G, Giubilato A, Licata G. Effects of high-dose furosemide and small-volume hypertonic saline solution infusion in comparison with a high dose of furosemide as a bolus, in refractory congestive heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2000 Sep;2(3):305-13. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(00)00094-5.
PubMed 10938493Licata G, Di Pasquale P, Parrinello G, Cardinale A, Scandurra A, Follone G, Argano C, Tuttolomondo A, Paterna S. Effects of high-dose furosemide and small-volume hypertonic saline solution infusion in comparison with a high dose of furosemide as bolus in refractory congestive heart failure: long-term effects. Am Heart J. 2003 Mar;145(3):459-66. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.166.
PubMed 12660669Paterna S, Di Pasquale P, Parrinello G, Fornaciari E, Di Gaudio F, Fasullo S, Giammanco M, Sarullo FM, Licata G. Changes in brain natriuretic peptide levels and bioelectrical impedance measurements after treatment with high-dose furosemide and hypertonic saline solution versus high-dose furosemide alone in refractory congestive heart failure: a double-blind study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jun 21;45(12):1997-2003. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.059.
PubMed 15963399
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jan 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Hypertonic Saline With Furosemide and a Normosodic Diet for the Treatment of Decompensated Congestive Heart Failure With Prerenal Physiology
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00575484
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 00904-0407-01
- Conditions
- Congestive Heart Failure, Renal Insufficiency
- Keywords
- Congestive Heart Failure, Renal Insufficiency, Hypertonic Saline Solution, Diuretic Resistance, Cardiorenal Syndrome
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Barnes-Jewish HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Washington University School of Medicine
- Study start
- Nov 2007
- Primary completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
At present the standard management of fluid overload in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) involves limiting the intake of salt and water while administering high dose diuretics, often at the cost of deteriorating kidney function. However, another group of researchers has previously shown that intravenously infusing small volumes of concentrated saline during diuretic dosing and liberalizing dietary salt intake while continuing to limit water consumption resulted in improved fluid removal in CHF patients. Furthermore, less deterioration in kidney function, shorter hospitalizations, reduced readmission rates, and even reduced mortality were observed. The present study will examine this novel therapy in a population of 60 patients with underlying severe CHF and kidney dysfunction hospitalized for the management of fluid overload. Half of these patients will receive investigational treatment with concentrated salt infusions and liberalized salt consumption during diuretic therapy. All patients will otherwise receive the standard therapies for heart failure, including restrictions on water consumption. This study will attempt to verify the improvements in clinical endpoints previously described and define the mechanisms of enhanced fluid removal.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Placebo comparator | Drug: Normal saline, then oral placebo capsule |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: Hypertonic saline, then oral sodium chloride |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult patients (age ≥18) admitted with CHF exacerbation with NYHA Class III-IV symptoms at screening.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction </= 45%, as determined by previous echocardiogram, left ventricular angiogram, or thallium myocardial imaging.
- Estimated GFR <60 ml/min/1.7m² with significant prerenal physiology as judged by prior documented volume mediated changes in renal function, a fractional excretion of urea <35%, or a fractional excretion of sodium <1%. For GFR 30-60: must have serum sodium </= 135 mEq/L OR large home diuretic dose (total daily loop diuretic dose >/= 120 mg/d in furosemide equivalents OR concomitant thiazide use). For GFR <30: no additional criteria needed.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Admit estimated GFR < 15mL/min or predicted need for chronic hemodialysis within the next 60 days.
- Cause of acute kidney injury other than prerenal physiology.
- No loop diuretic prior to admission or loop diuretic initiated within the 2 wks prior to admission.
- Medicine or dietary noncompliance expected to prevent successful study participation.
- > 36hrs since presentation to screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hypertonic saline, then oral sodium chloride2mL/kg hypertonic saline (4.4% NaCl if serum sodium </=135, else 2.8% NaCl) infused over 30min BID and dosed simultaneously with IV bolus furosemide BID (latter dose per treating physician) until patient is switched to oral loop diuretic. After switch to oral diuretic, subject will receive oral 0.75gm sodium (NaCL) capsule dosed BID with loop diuretic (latter dose per treating physician) until 60d after discharge. | Drug | 2 |
| Normal saline, then oral placebo capsule20mL normal saline infusion X 30min BID dosed simultaneously with IV bolus furosemide BID (latter dose per treating physician) PLUS 2gm sodium diet PLUS 1.5L fluid restriction. After switch to oral diuretic, begin oral placebo capsule BID, dosed with loop diuretic (dose per treating physician) PLUS 2gm sodium diet PLUS 1.5L fluid restriction. | Drug | 1 |
Primary outcome
duration of hospitalization
Time frame: duration of hospitalization
weight loss at discharge
Time frame: duration of hospitalization
weight loss at 60 days
Time frame: 60 days after discharge
5 secondary outcomes
number of readmissions
Time frame: 60 days after discharge
GFR by creatinine clearance at discharge
Time frame: duration of hospitalization
estimated GFR at 60 days after discharge
Time frame: 60 days after discharge
24hr urine output at discharge
Time frame: last 24hrs of hospitalization
need for inotrope or extracorporeal volume removal
Time frame: 60 days after discharge
Results and safety
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jan 2014.
- Background: PubMed 10915397Paterna S, Parrinello G, Amato P, Dominguez L, Pinto A, Maniscalchi T, Cardinale A, Licata A, Amato V, Licata G, Di Pasquale P. Tolerability and efficacy of high-dose furosemide and small-volume hypertonic saline solution in refractory congestive heart failure. Adv Ther. 1999 Sep-Oct;16(5):219-28.
- Background: PubMed 10938493Paterna S, Di Pasquale P, Parrinello G, Amato P, Cardinale A, Follone G, Giubilato A, Licata G. Effects of high-dose furosemide and small-volume hypertonic saline solution infusion in comparison with a high dose of furosemide as a bolus, in refractory congestive heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2000 Sep;2(3):305-13. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(00)00094-5.
- Background: PubMed 12660669Licata G, Di Pasquale P, Parrinello G, Cardinale A, Scandurra A, Follone G, Argano C, Tuttolomondo A, Paterna S. Effects of high-dose furosemide and small-volume hypertonic saline solution infusion in comparison with a high dose of furosemide as bolus in refractory congestive heart failure: long-term effects. Am Heart J. 2003 Mar;145(3):459-66. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.166.
- Background: PubMed 15963399Paterna S, Di Pasquale P, Parrinello G, Fornaciari E, Di Gaudio F, Fasullo S, Giammanco M, Sarullo FM, Licata G. Changes in brain natriuretic peptide levels and bioelectrical impedance measurements after treatment with high-dose furosemide and hypertonic saline solution versus high-dose furosemide alone in refractory congestive heart failure: a double-blind study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jun 21;45(12):1997-2003. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.059.
Related trials for Congestive Heart Failure
Active, not recruiting
Neural Cardiac Therapy for Heart Failure Study (NECTAR-HF)
Heart Failure, Congestive Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
DECONGEST-AHF: Vasodilatation or Loop Diuretics in Acute Heart Failure
Pulmonary Edema, Congestive Heart Failure
Recruiting
Routine Versus Provisional Distal Perfusion Catheter Placement in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support
Cardiogenic Shock, Acute Myocardial Infarction of Inferior Wall
Recruiting
Peripheral Venous Pressure (PVP) Trial
Congestive Heart Failure
Not yet recruiting
Digital Outreach for Heart Failure Adherence
CHF - Congestive Heart Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anitha Vijayan, M.D. principal investigator
Renal Division, Washington University School of Medicine
Kamalanathan K Sambandam, M.D. principal investigator
Renal Division, Washington University School of Medicine
Gregory A Ewald, M.D. principal investigator
Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Hypertonic saline, then oral sodium chloride in people with Congestive Heart Failure and Renal Insufficiency, run by Barnes-Jewish Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
duration of hospitalization (time frame: duration of hospitalization). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00575484, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.