Colorectal CancerPhase 4NCT00577031
OBELIX Study: A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With XELOX in Patients With Metastatic Cancer of the Colon or Rectum.
A Phase 4 study testing bevacizumab [Avastin], Oxaliplatin and Xeloda in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 38 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
This single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of a first-line regimen of Avastin and XELOX (oxaliplatin + Xeloda) in patients with metastatic cancer of the colon or rectum. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- bevacizumab [Avastin], Oxaliplatin and Xeloda
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 205 participants
- Where
- 38 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- Feb 2008to Aug 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients, >=18 years of age;
- locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer;
- no previous treatment with chemotherapy for metastatic disease;
- at least one measurable lesion.
Who cannot join
- radiotherapy to any site within 4 weeks before study;
- untreated brain metastases or primary brain tumors;
- clinically significant cardiovascular disease;
- chronic daily treatment with high dose aspirin (>325 mg/day);
- other co-existing malignancies or malignancies diagnosed within last 5 years.
Trial locations and contacts
38 sites in 1 country.
38 sites in 1 country
Italy38 sites
Study site
Bologna, 40138
Study site
Brescia, 25122
Study site
Cagliari, 09100
Study site
Cagliari, 09121
Study site
Caserta, 81100
Study site
Catanzaro, 88100
Study site
Cefalù, 90015
Study site
Fano, 61032
Study site
Florence, 50139
Study site
Frattaminore, 80026
Study site
Grosseto, 58100
Study site
Ivrea, 10015
Study site
Latisana, 33053
Study site
Lecce, 73100
Study site
Legnago, 37045
Study site
Legnano, 20025
Study site
Naples, 80131
Study site
Negrar, 37024
Study site
Orbassano, 10043
Study site
Padova, 35128
Study site
Palermo, 90127
Study site
Palermo, 90146
Study site
Pavia, 27100
Study site
Province of Macerata, 62100
Study site
Reggio Calabria, 89100
Study site
Reggio Emilia, 42100
Study site
Rionero in Vulture, 85028
Study site
Roma, 00152
Study site
Roma, 00184
Study site
Roma, 00186
Study site
Roma, 00189
Study site
Salerno, 84131
Study site
San Giovanni Rotondo, 71013
Study site
Sondrio, 23100
Study site
Taormina, 98030
Study site
Torino, 10125
Study site
Torino, 10153
Study site
Verbania, 28921
About this study
Official title: Open-label, Efficacy and Safety Study of Bevacizumab (Avastin®) in Combination With XELOX (Oxaliplatin Plus Xeloda®) for the First-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Cancer of the Colon or Rectum - 'OBELIX'
This single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of a first-line regimen of Avastin and XELOX (oxaliplatin + Xeloda) in patients with metastatic cancer of the colon or rectum. Patients will receive 21-day cycles of treatment, comprising Avastin 7.5mg/kg iv on day 1, oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 iv on day 1, and Xeloda 1000mg/m2 po twice daily on days 1-14, for a maximum of 6 months. Patients with stable disease or complete or partial response may continue on Avastin therapy. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- bevacizumab [Avastin], Oxaliplatin, Xeloda
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
bevacizumab [Avastin]Drug
7.5mg iv on day 1 of each 3 week cycle
OxaliplatinDrug
130mg/m2 iv on day 1 of each 3 week cycle
XelodaDrug
1000mg/m2 po bid on days 1-14 of each 3 week cycle
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: bevacizumab [Avastin]; Drug: Oxaliplatin; Drug: Xeloda |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Percentage of Participants With Progressive Disease or Death
PFS was defined as the time period in months from the start of study treatment to the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Data for participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cutoff were censored at Day 1. Participants who underwent surgery after experiencing a sufficient shrinkage of the tumor, had any relapse, new occurrence of colorectal cancer, or who died were all considered as having had an event. Participants who underwent surgery without any such event were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment that documented neither a relapse nor a new colorectal cancer had occurred. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
Measured: Baseline and Day 1 of every cycle until disease progression or death up to 5 years
PFS: Time to Event
PFS was defined as the time period in months from the start of study treatment to the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Data for participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cutoff were censored at Day 1. Participants who underwent surgery after experiencing a sufficient shrinkage of the tumor, had any relapse, new occurrence of colorectal cancer, or who died were all considered as having had an event. Participants who underwent surgery without any such event were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment that documented that neither a relapse nor a new colorectal cancer had occurred. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Baseline and Day 1 of every cycle until disease progression or death up to 5 years
Secondary outcomes (14)
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) Among Participants in the ITT Population Who Had at Least 1 Post-Baseline Assessment
The percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR according to RECIST. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis less than [<]10 millimeters [mm]). No new lesions. PR was defined as a greater than or equal to (≥) 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.
Measured: Baseline, every 9 weeks (every 3 cycles) until end of treatment, disease progression, or withdrawal up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants With a CR or PR Among Participants in the ITT Population
CR and PR were defined using RECIST v1.0. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis <10 mm). No new lesions. PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.
Measured: Baseline, every 9 weeks (every 3 cycles) until end of treatment, disease progression, or withdrawal up to 5 years
Time to CR or PR Overall Response - Time to Event
Time to overall response (CR or PR) was calculated as the time between the date of start of treatment until first documented response (CR or PR defined per RECIST v1.0). Participants who did not achieve CR or PR were censored at the date of progression, death, or at last adequate tumor assessment date. Median time to CR or PR overall response was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Baseline, every 9 weeks (every 3 cycles) until end of treatment, disease progression, or withdrawal up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of CR or PR During First Line Treatment
CR and PR were defined using RECIST v1.0 criteria. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis <10 mm). No new lesions. PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. Short axis was used in sum for target nodes, while longest diameter was used in sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Duration of Overall Response Among Participants Whose Best Response Was CR or PR During First Line Treatment - Time to Event
For participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, the duration of overall response was measured from the time that the criteria for CR or PR (whichever occurred first) was met until the first date that progressive disease was objectively documented or until the date of death due to underlying cancer, whichever occurred first. Data for participants who did not have an event or who were alive without an objectively documented progressive disease were censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Median duration of overall response was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants With a Stable Response During First Line Treatment
Stable response defined as participants with a best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD), defined using RECIST v1.0 criteria. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis <10 mm). No new lesions. PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. SD defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Duration of Stable Response
For participants with a best overall response of CR, PR, or SD during first line treatment, the duration of stable response was measured from the time that the criteria for CR, PR, or SD (whichever occurred first) was met until the first date that progressive disease was objectively documented or until the date of death due to underlying cancer, whichever occurred first. Data for participants who did not have an event or who were alive without an objectively documented progressive disease were censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Median duration of stable response was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure
Treatment-failure was defined as discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including the following qualifying events: death due to any cause, adverse event, insufficient therapeutic response (progression of disease), failure to return (lost to follow-up), refusing treatment (participant non-compliance), being unwilling to cooperate and withdrawing consent (participant withdrew consent).
Measured: Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Time to Treatment Failure
Time to treatment-failure was defined as the time from the first day of treatment to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including: death due to any cause, adverse event, insufficient therapeutic response (progression of disease), failure to return (lost to follow-up), refusing treatment (participant non-compliance), being unwilling to cooperate and withdrawing consent (participant withdrew consent). For participants who did not experience a qualifying event, their data were censored at the earlier of either the date of last tumour assessment or the date of the last intake of study medication. Median time to treatment-failure was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Overall Survival: Percentage of Participants That Died Due to Any Cause
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of the first day of treatment until the date of death from any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, survival was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of every cycle to end-of-treatment, every 3 months during longer-term follow-up, or to death due to any cause up to 5 years
Overall Survival: Time to Event
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of the first day of treatment until the date of death from any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, survival was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. Median overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of every cycle to end-of-treatment, every 3 months during longer-term follow-up, or to death due to any cause up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants Undergoing Surgical Intervention With Residual Disease Status Post-surgery
The percentage of participants who underwent surgery during the study period with an evaluation of their disease status after surgery. The surgery during the study period was described by reason: curative, palliative, biopsy, other, or unknown. Residual disease status after surgery was described as: no residual disease due to radical surgery, presence of residual disease, unknown or not applicable.
Measured: At surgery, at least 6 to 8 weeks after last dose of bevacizumab up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response of CR or PR by Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (K-Ras)/V-Raf Murine Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog B (B-Raf) Mutation Status
The percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR according to RECIST. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis <10 mm). No new lesions. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.
The K-Ras and/or the B-Raf gene mutation status of participants was evaluated by the central laboratory using tumor samples. Wild-type participants did not have a mutation in either gene.
Measured: Baseline, every 9 weeks (every 3 cycles) until end of treatment, disease progression, or withdrawal up to 5 years
European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Raw-Index Score
Quality of life (QoL) assessments were used to derive pre-specified QoL scores according to the QoL manual "EQ-5D-3 Level (3L)" user guide for instrument version 4.0. The EQ-5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The visual analog scale (VAS) component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. The overall health score absolute changes were calculated for each participant as follows: (score at the end of treatment minus score at baseline). EQ-5D health states were converted into EQ-5D-3L raw index value by applying the scoring algorithm based on the European EQ-net VAS set. The raw index was chosen instead of rescaled index, since the questionnaire was used in order to obtain a quality of life assessment. The raw index scores ranged from 0 (worst health state) to 100 (best health state).
Measured: Baseline, every 9 weeks (every 3 cycles), at end-of-treatment up to 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2008
- Primary completionAug 2011
- Study completionAug 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 205 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00577031
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML21380
- Status last verified
- Jul 2015
- First submitted
- 18 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 18 Aug 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Antonuzzo L, Giommoni E, Pastorelli D, Latiano T, Pavese I, Azzarello D, Aieta M, Pastina I, Di Fabio F, Bertolini A, Corsi DC, Mogavero S, Angelini V, Pazzagli M, Di Costanzo F. Bevacizumab plus XELOX as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: The OBELIX study. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 21;21(23):7281-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i23.7281.
PubMed 26109816
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Aug 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Open-label, Efficacy and Safety Study of Bevacizumab (Avastin®) in Combination With XELOX (Oxaliplatin Plus Xeloda®) for the First-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Cancer of the Colon or Rectum - 'OBELIX'
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00577031
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML21380
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 205 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2008
- Primary completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Aug 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of a first-line regimen of Avastin and XELOX (oxaliplatin + Xeloda) in patients with metastatic cancer of the colon or rectum. Patients will receive 21-day cycles of treatment, comprising Avastin 7.5mg/kg iv on day 1, oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 iv on day 1, and Xeloda 1000mg/m2 po twice daily on days 1-14, for a maximum of 6 months. Patients with stable disease or complete or partial response may continue on Avastin therapy. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: bevacizumab [Avastin], Drug: Oxaliplatin, Drug: Xeloda |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- adult patients, >=18 years of age;
- locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer;
- no previous treatment with chemotherapy for metastatic disease;
- at least one measurable lesion.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- radiotherapy to any site within 4 weeks before study;
- untreated brain metastases or primary brain tumors;
- clinically significant cardiovascular disease;
- chronic daily treatment with high dose aspirin (>325 mg/day);
- other co-existing malignancies or malignancies diagnosed within last 5 years.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| bevacizumab [Avastin]7.5mg iv on day 1 of each 3 week cycle | Drug | 1 |
| Oxaliplatin130mg/m2 iv on day 1 of each 3 week cycle | Drug | 1 |
| Xeloda1000mg/m2 po bid on days 1-14 of each 3 week cycle | Drug | 1 |
Primary outcome
Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Percentage of Participants With Progressive Disease or Death
Time frame: Baseline and Day 1 of every cycle until disease progression or death up to 5 years
PFS was defined as the time period in months from the start of study treatment to the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Data for participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cutoff were censored at Day 1. Participants who underwent surgery after experiencing a sufficient shrinkage of the tumor, had any relapse, new occurrence of colorectal cancer, or who died were all considered as having had an event. Participants who underwent surgery without any such event were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment that documented neither a relapse nor a new colorectal cancer had occurred. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
PFS: Time to Event
Time frame: Baseline and Day 1 of every cycle until disease progression or death up to 5 years
PFS was defined as the time period in months from the start of study treatment to the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Data for participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cutoff were censored at Day 1. Participants who underwent surgery after experiencing a sufficient shrinkage of the tumor, had any relapse, new occurrence of colorectal cancer, or who died were all considered as having had an event. Participants who underwent surgery without any such event were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment that documented that neither a relapse nor a new colorectal cancer had occurred. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
14 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) Among Participants in the ITT Population Who Had at Least 1 Post-Baseline Assessment
Time frame: Baseline, every 9 weeks (every 3 cycles) until end of treatment, disease progression, or withdrawal up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants With a CR or PR Among Participants in the ITT Population
Time frame: Baseline, every 9 weeks (every 3 cycles) until end of treatment, disease progression, or withdrawal up to 5 years
Time to CR or PR Overall Response - Time to Event
Time frame: Baseline, every 9 weeks (every 3 cycles) until end of treatment, disease progression, or withdrawal up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of CR or PR During First Line Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Duration of Overall Response Among Participants Whose Best Response Was CR or PR During First Line Treatment - Time to Event
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants With a Stable Response During First Line Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Duration of Stable Response
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Time to Treatment Failure
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 weeks (every cycle) to disease progression or death up to 5 years
Overall Survival: Percentage of Participants That Died Due to Any Cause
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of every cycle to end-of-treatment, every 3 months during longer-term follow-up, or to death due to any cause up to 5 years
Overall Survival: Time to Event
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of every cycle to end-of-treatment, every 3 months during longer-term follow-up, or to death due to any cause up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants Undergoing Surgical Intervention With Residual Disease Status Post-surgery
Time frame: At surgery, at least 6 to 8 weeks after last dose of bevacizumab up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response of CR or PR by Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (K-Ras)/V-Raf Murine Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog B (B-Raf) Mutation Status
Time frame: Baseline, every 9 weeks (every 3 cycles) until end of treatment, disease progression, or withdrawal up to 5 years
European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Raw-Index Score
Time frame: Baseline, every 9 weeks (every 3 cycles), at end-of-treatment up to 5 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Aug 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26109816Antonuzzo L, Giommoni E, Pastorelli D, Latiano T, Pavese I, Azzarello D, Aieta M, Pastina I, Di Fabio F, Bertolini A, Corsi DC, Mogavero S, Angelini V, Pazzagli M, Di Costanzo F. Bevacizumab plus XELOX as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: The OBELIX study. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 21;21(23):7281-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i23.7281.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
38 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing bevacizumab [Avastin], Oxaliplatin and Xeloda in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 38 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 38 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Aug 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Percentage of Participants With Progressive Disease or Death (time frame: Baseline and Day 1 of every cycle until disease progression or death up to 5 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00577031, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2015.