Breast CancerNCT00579735
Histologic Diagnoses of Incidentally Detected Lesions on MRI
An observational study of Breast Cancer, run by University of Arkansas.
Trial summary
Patients who received breast MRI will be evaluated for a variety of indications including : # each indication : 1) known cancer staging for local exent, 2)high risk, 3)high suspicion clinical finding, 4)questionable mammo finding, 5)silicone leak The number of incidental lesions not detected by any other method that… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2005to Mar 2009
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: mammography clinic in Northwest Arkansas
Who may be able to join
- All patients subjected to biopsy as a result of findings seen only on MRI
Who cannot join
- None
About this study
Patients who received breast MRI will be evaluated for a variety of indications including : # each indication : 1) known cancer staging for local exent, 2)high risk, 3)high suspicion clinical finding, 4)questionable mammo finding, 5)silicone leak The number of incidental lesions not detected by any other method that were subsequently subjected to biopsy with the following BIRADS categories 3-# reasons for bx 4-# 5-# Of the lesions detected % of each BIRADS category were postive histologies-ductal, lobular, DCIS, etc. and negative (fibrosis, hyperplasia, etc.) Criteria for classification: morphology, dynamics, clinical significance will be evaluated and a predictive value established.
Read the detailed description
Patients who received breast MRI will be evaluated for a variety of indications including ? # each indication : 1) known cancer staging for local exent, 2)high risk, 3)high suspicion clinical finding, 4)questionable mammo finding, 5)silicone leak The number of incidental lesions not detected by any other method that were subsequently subjected to biopsy with the following BIRADS categories 3-# reasons for bx 4-# 5-# Of the lesions detected % of each BIRADS category were postive histologies-ductal, lobular, DCIS, etc. and negative (fibrosis, hyperplasia, etc.) Criteria for classification: morphology, dynamics, clinical significance will be evaluated and a predictive value established. This study is limited to retrospective chart review with the only foreseeable risk being that of disclosure of PHI. To minimize this risk, data collection forms will be identified by subject ID number. A master list of these ID numbers linked to subject medical record number will be maintained in the investigator's file and kept in a secure location accessible only to the study team for purposes of verification of data and validation of results. The medical record number will not be recorded on any other form containing subject PHI. The only foreseeable breach of confidentiality would be for the security of the investigator's files to be compromised
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Breast cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2005
- Primary completionMar 2009 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2009 (estimated)
Why it stopped: No subjects were ever enrolled. This study was closed at the IRB.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ArkansasThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Arkansas
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Steven E Harms, MD, Principal investigator, University of Arkansas
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00579735
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 37640
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 20 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Histologic Diagnoses of Incidentally Detected Lesions on MRI
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00579735
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 37640
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Breast cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: No subjects were ever enrolled. This study was closed at the IRB.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ArkansasUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2005
- Primary completion
- Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2009 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients who received breast MRI will be evaluated for a variety of indications including : # each indication : 1) known cancer staging for local exent, 2)high risk, 3)high suspicion clinical finding, 4)questionable mammo finding, 5)silicone leak The number of incidental lesions not detected by any other method that were subsequently subjected to biopsy with the following BIRADS categories 3-# reasons for bx 4-# 5-# Of the lesions detected % of each BIRADS category were postive histologies-ductal, lobular, DCIS, etc. and negative (fibrosis, hyperplasia, etc.) Criteria for classification: morphology, dynamics, clinical significance will be evaluated and a predictive value established.
Detailed description
Patients who received breast MRI will be evaluated for a variety of indications including ? # each indication : 1) known cancer staging for local exent, 2)high risk, 3)high suspicion clinical finding, 4)questionable mammo finding, 5)silicone leak The number of incidental lesions not detected by any other method that were subsequently subjected to biopsy with the following BIRADS categories 3-# reasons for bx 4-# 5-# Of the lesions detected % of each BIRADS category were postive histologies-ductal, lobular, DCIS, etc. and negative (fibrosis, hyperplasia, etc.) Criteria for classification: morphology, dynamics, clinical significance will be evaluated and a predictive value established. This study is limited to retrospective chart review with the only foreseeable risk being that of disclosure of PHI. To minimize this risk, data collection forms will be identified by subject ID number. A master list of these ID numbers linked to subject medical record number will be maintained in the investigator's file and kept in a secure location accessible only to the study team for purposes of verification of data and validation of results. The medical record number will not be recorded on any other form containing subject PHI. The only foreseeable breach of confidentiality would be for the security of the investigator's files to be compromised
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- mammography clinic in Northwest Arkansas
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients subjected to biopsy as a result of findings seen only on MRI
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2015.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Steven E Harms, MD principal investigator
University of Arkansas
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Breast Cancer, run by University of Arkansas.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2015.