Carcinoma, HepatocellularPhase 2NCT00582400
A Phase II Protocol of Arsenic Trioxide (Trisenox) in Subjects With Advanced Primary Carcinoma of the Liver
A Phase 2 study testing arsenic trioxide in people with Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is: evaluate the safety and activity of administering arsenic trioxide (Trisenox) in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic primary liver cancer, to evaluate the qualitative and quantitative toxicities of this treatment, and to measure the response to treatment and the patterns of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- What is being tested?
- arsenic trioxide
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 9 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2004to Apr 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed Informed Consent
- ECOG/Zubrod/SWOG Performance Status < 2
- Life expectancy > 12 weeks
- Male or female' age >18 years Subjects of childbearing potential must be using an effective means of contraception.
- Histologic diagnosis of HCC or cholangiocarcinoma that is locally advanced but cannot be treated adequately by radiotherapy or surgery (more than one lesion, portal vein involvement, or poor hepatic reserve); or metastatic disease or an AFB > 20 w/CT scan consistent with HCC
- Renal function: Serum creatinine < 2.0 mg/dl
- Serum calcium < 12 mg/dl
- Serum electrolytes, including magnesium and potassium, within normal limits
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or lactating females
- Myocardial infarction or ischemia within the 6 months before Cycle 0' Day 0
- Uncontrolled' clinically significant dysrhythmia
- Known left ventricular Ejection Fraction below the normal limit for UTMB
- History of prior malignancy within the prior five years, with the exception of non-melanoma carcinomas of the skin, and carcinoma in situ of the cervix
- More than one prior chemotherapy regimens for liver cancer (subjects who are receiving antineoplastic agents for non-malignant conditions, such as methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis, must be off such therapy for at least four weeks prior to receiving the first dose of protocol therapy, and may not receive such therapy while participating in this protocol)
Show all 15Show fewer
- Receiving any other chemotherapy or cytokine therapy
- Subjects receiving radiation therapy (Trisenox will be held during the administration of palliative or emergent radiotherapy)
- Subjects who have received radiofrequency ablation or hepatic arterial embolization within the past four weeks (patients who have received prior RFA or HAE are otherwise eligible)
- Prior radiotherapy to an indicator lesion unless there is objective evidence of tumor growth in that lesion
- Uncontrolled metastatic disease of the central nervous system
- Prior and on-going Grade 2-4 peripheral neuropathy, as measured by NCI Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0
- Radiotherapy within the 2 weeks before Cycle 1' Day 1
- Surgery within the 2 weeks before Cycle 1' Day 1
- Any co morbid condition that' in the view of the attending physician' renders the subject at high risk from treatment complications
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Galveston, Texas, 77555
About this study
The purpose of this study is: evaluate the safety and activity of administering arsenic trioxide (Trisenox) in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic primary liver cancer, to evaluate the qualitative and quantitative toxicities of this treatment, and to measure the response to treatment and the patterns of failure and survival. The primary response measurements will be the achievement of an objective tumor response, response duration and progression-free survival
Read the detailed description
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in some regions of the world, particularly Africa and the Asian portion of the Pacific rim. However, it is an uncommon malignancy in the United States, with less than 14,000 cases diagnosed annually. Malignancies of the gallbladder and biliary tree are also uncommon. As with most solid tumors, unless either neoplasm can be resected completely, the prognosis is grim. A variety of agents have been utilized in the therapy of HCC and cholangiocarcinoma, both as single agents and in combination regimens. However, despite response rates which exceed 50% when hepatic arterial therapy is utilized for HCC, response rates for cholangiocarcinoma and for systemic treatment of HCC are considerably lower. Long term survival remains uncommon. For this reason, new therapeutic approaches must be evaluated.
Trisenox (arsenic trioxide) is a newly-approved pharmaceutical grade arsenic compound antineoplastic agent which has demonstrated clear activity in anthracycline- and all-trans retinoic acid-resistant acute promyelocytic leukemia. Trisenox also has US Compendium listing for acute leukemia, chronic myelogenous and lymphocytic leukemias, myelodysplasia, multiple myeloma, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Similar to the taxanes and vinca alkaloids, Trisenox appears to interfere with microtubule function, which triggers cell differentiation, and induces programmed death, or apoptosis. The mechanism of this is unclear, but appears to involve activation of caspases and the down-regulation of the BCL-2 oncogene. Trisenox also interfere with the function of NF-kappaB, leading to inhibition of cellular proliferative signals, apoptosis, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis.
Trisenox was shown to be effective in a pivotal trial consisting of 40 subjects, ages 5 to 72, at a nine-institution multi-center trial led by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. With Trisenox, 70% of the subjects achieved a complete remission, and 79% of the complete responders achieved a molecular remission as measured by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Complete remission was achieved on average within two months after initiation of Trisenox. Sixty-eight percent of subjects who achieved complete remission were still alive and 58% were disease free, at a median follow-up time of 16 months.
To date, an optimal dose and schedule of Trisenox has not yet been defined. This agent has been administered on daily, twice a week, and weekly doses. As there is no evidence that one regimen is clearly superior to any other, for the sake of convenience, participants on this trial will receive Trisenox on the weekly schedule. Administration of chemotherapy on a weekly schedule is commonly utilized across a broad spectrum of regimens and tumor types. On this trial, subjects will receive a dose of intravenous Trisenox 0.35 mg/kg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 over two hours. Each cycle will be 28 days in length. Subjects will receive two treatment cycles (8 weeks) and then undergo objective radiographic tumor assessments. On this study, subjects may receive up to a maximum of 12 such treatment cycles. As the outlook for subjects with advanced primary liver cancer is so poor, new regimens and treatment strategies must be evaluated.
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- Being tested
- arsenic trioxide
- Keywords
- livers, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
arsenic trioxideDrug
Also called Trisenox
Trisenox will be diluted with 100 to 250 mL 0.9% Sodium Chloride injection, USP, using proper aseptic technique, immediately after withdrawal from the ampule. The Trisenox ampule is single-use and does not contain any preservatives. Unused portions of each ampule should be discarded properly. Trisenox is not to be mixed with other medications.
The loading dose of Trisenox will be administered intravenously over 2 hours. The infusion duration may be extended up to 4 hours if acute vasomotor reactions are observed. The drug will be administered IV through a functional peripheral or central venous line. Trisenox is not a vesicant, and may be a mild irritant if administered into the skin without dilution.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| I | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: arsenic trioxide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Treatment Related Toxicity.
Measured: 6 years
Number of Patients With Response to Treatment (RECIST Criteria)
Response included complete response, partial response or stable disease.
Measured: 6 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Duration of Response.
Time to progression.
Measured: 6 years
Progression Free Survival
Time to progression from start of treatment
Measured: 6 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2004
- Primary completionApr 2010
- Study completionApr 2010
Why it stopped: recruiting or enrolling participants has halted prematurely and will not resume; participants are no longer being examined or treated
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Carcinoma, HepatocellularStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Avi B. Markowitz, MD, Principal investigator, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00582400
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 04-267
- Other IDs
- PI-Initiated
- Status last verified
- Jan 2010
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 19 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Protocol of Arsenic Trioxide (Trisenox) in Subjects With Advanced Primary Carcinoma of the Liver
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00582400
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 04-267
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- Keywords
- livers, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: recruiting or enrolling participants has halted prematurely and will not resume; participants are no longer being examined or treated
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2004
- Primary completion
- Apr 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Dec 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Feb 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is: evaluate the safety and activity of administering arsenic trioxide (Trisenox) in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic primary liver cancer, to evaluate the qualitative and quantitative toxicities of this treatment, and to measure the response to treatment and the patterns of failure and survival. The primary response measurements will be the achievement of an objective tumor response, response duration and progression-free survival
Detailed description
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in some regions of the world, particularly Africa and the Asian portion of the Pacific rim. However, it is an uncommon malignancy in the United States, with less than 14,000 cases diagnosed annually. Malignancies of the gallbladder and biliary tree are also uncommon. As with most solid tumors, unless either neoplasm can be resected completely, the prognosis is grim. A variety of agents have been utilized in the therapy of HCC and cholangiocarcinoma, both as single agents and in combination regimens. However, despite response rates which exceed 50% when hepatic arterial therapy is utilized for HCC, response rates for cholangiocarcinoma and for systemic treatment of HCC are considerably lower. Long term survival remains uncommon. For this reason, new therapeutic approaches must be evaluated.
Trisenox (arsenic trioxide) is a newly-approved pharmaceutical grade arsenic compound antineoplastic agent which has demonstrated clear activity in anthracycline- and all-trans retinoic acid-resistant acute promyelocytic leukemia. Trisenox also has US Compendium listing for acute leukemia, chronic myelogenous and lymphocytic leukemias, myelodysplasia, multiple myeloma, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Similar to the taxanes and vinca alkaloids, Trisenox appears to interfere with microtubule function, which triggers cell differentiation, and induces programmed death, or apoptosis. The mechanism of this is unclear, but appears to involve activation of caspases and the down-regulation of the BCL-2 oncogene. Trisenox also interfere with the function of NF-kappaB, leading to inhibition of cellular proliferative signals, apoptosis, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis.
Trisenox was shown to be effective in a pivotal trial consisting of 40 subjects, ages 5 to 72, at a nine-institution multi-center trial led by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. With Trisenox, 70% of the subjects achieved a complete remission, and 79% of the complete responders achieved a molecular remission as measured by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Complete remission was achieved on average within two months after initiation of Trisenox. Sixty-eight percent of subjects who achieved complete remission were still alive and 58% were disease free, at a median follow-up time of 16 months.
To date, an optimal dose and schedule of Trisenox has not yet been defined. This agent has been administered on daily, twice a week, and weekly doses. As there is no evidence that one regimen is clearly superior to any other, for the sake of convenience, participants on this trial will receive Trisenox on the weekly schedule. Administration of chemotherapy on a weekly schedule is commonly utilized across a broad spectrum of regimens and tumor types. On this trial, subjects will receive a dose of intravenous Trisenox 0.35 mg/kg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 over two hours. Each cycle will be 28 days in length. Subjects will receive two treatment cycles (8 weeks) and then undergo objective radiographic tumor assessments. On this study, subjects may receive up to a maximum of 12 such treatment cycles. As the outlook for subjects with advanced primary liver cancer is so poor, new regimens and treatment strategies must be evaluated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| I | Experimental | Drug: arsenic trioxide |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Signed Informed Consent
- ECOG/Zubrod/SWOG Performance Status < 2
- Life expectancy > 12 weeks
- Male or female' age >18 years Subjects of childbearing potential must be using an effective means of contraception.
- Histologic diagnosis of HCC or cholangiocarcinoma that is locally advanced but cannot be treated adequately by radiotherapy or surgery (more than one lesion, portal vein involvement, or poor hepatic reserve); or metastatic disease or an AFB > 20 w/CT scan consistent with HCC
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Pregnant or lactating females
- Myocardial infarction or ischemia within the 6 months before Cycle 0' Day 0
- Uncontrolled' clinically significant dysrhythmia
- Known left ventricular Ejection Fraction below the normal limit for UTMB
- History of prior malignancy within the prior five years, with the exception of non-melanoma carcinomas of the skin, and carcinoma in situ of the cervix
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| arsenic trioxideAlso: TrisenoxTrisenox will be diluted with 100 to 250 mL 0.9% Sodium Chloride injection, USP, using proper aseptic technique, immediately after withdrawal from the ampule. The Trisenox ampule is single-use and does not contain any preservatives. Unused portions of each ampule should be discarded properly. Trisenox is not to be mixed with other medications. The loading dose of Trisenox will be administered intravenously over 2 hours. The infusion duration may be extended up to 4 hours if acute vasomotor reactions are observed. The drug will be administered IV through a functional peripheral or central venous line. Trisenox is not a vesicant, and may be a mild irritant if administered into the skin without dilution. | Drug | I |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Treatment Related Toxicity.
Time frame: 6 years
Number of Patients With Response to Treatment (RECIST Criteria)
Time frame: 6 years
Response included complete response, partial response or stable disease.
2 secondary outcomes
Duration of Response.
Time frame: 6 years
Progression Free Survival
Time frame: 6 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Feb 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Avi B. Markowitz, MD principal investigator
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing arsenic trioxide in people with Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Treatment Related Toxicity. (time frame: 6 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Feb 2016.