AzTrials
AzTrials

Uterine CancerPhase 2NCT00584909

A Phase II Study of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients With an Elevated-Risk Cancer of the Uterus

A Phase 2 study testing Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination in people with Uterine Cancer, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main purpose of this study us to determine the best treatment for patients with endometrial cancer who are at an elevated risk for recurrence. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Uterine Cancer
What is being tested?
Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
13 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2006to Sep 2011
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must have a elevated risk, surgical stage II, stage IC, grade 2 or 3 adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.
  • Patients must have undergone, a total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, peritoneal washings, and a pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.
  • Patients must have adequate organ function defined as:
  • Platelets >/= 100,000/µ
  • Granulocytes (ANC)>/= 1,500/µl
  • Creatinine</= 1.6 mg/dl
Show all 10Show fewer
  • SGOT (AST) </= 3x upper limits of normal
  • Bilirubin within institutional normal limits
  • Patients must have adequate performance status (ECOG performance status 0-2 or Karnofsky Performance Status >40)
  • Patients must be age 19 or greater and have signed informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with history of other malignancies within 5 years (except non- melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix) are ineligible.
  • Patients with high-risk histologic subtypes of endometrial cancer such as papillary serous or clear cell histology are ineligible.
  • Patients with histologic evidence of uterine sarcoma, including leiomyosarcoma, carcinosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, and adenosarcoma are ineligible.
  • Patients who have received past pelvic radiotherapy are ineligible.
  • Patients receiving any other investigational agents are ineligible.
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to paclitaxel and/or carboplatin are ineligible.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UAB Women's and Infant Center, 1700 6th Avenue South

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase II Study of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Adenocarcinoma of the Endometrium

The main purpose of this study us to determine the best treatment for patients with endometrial cancer who are at an elevated risk for recurrence.

Read the detailed description

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States with 40,880 new cases diagnosed and 7,310 deaths attributable to this malignancy expected in 2005. The majority of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer have early stage disease that is amenable to treatment with hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with excellent clinical outcomes. Surgical staging has improved accuracy over clinical staging for defining a low-risk population of patients who have favorable long-term outcomes with surgery alone. However, approximately 10-15% of patients with surgical stage I endometrial carcinoma (confined to the uterus) will have invasion to the outer one-half of the myometrium (stage IC) and a moderately to poorly differentiated tumor (grade 2 or 3). These patients are at a higher risk for recurrence (approximately 20-25% recurrence rate over 5 years). This patient population has been historically considered at "intermediate-risk" for recurrence because they are at lower risk than patient with disease spread beyond the uterus, but higher risk than patients with a grade 1 tumor or minimally invasive (Stage IA or IB). The optimal mode of postoperative management for this population of patients has yet to be defined.

Historically, radiation therapy has been used in some form in patients diagnosed with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. Two randomized trials published in the last 5 years have evaluated the use of adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial adenocarcinoma. the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) studied the use of adjuvant whole pelvic radiation (WPRT) versus no adjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with stage IB, IC, and II (occult)endometrial adenocarcinoma. In a study of 392 patients, the use of WPRT had a substantial impact on local recurrences (18 in NAT versus 3 in WPRT), but had no impact on the risk of distant recurrence (18 NAT versus 11 in WPRT). Because of the lack of distant control, the use of WPRT did not impact overall survival (estimated 4 year survival 86% in NAT versus 92% in WPRT, p=0.557). The PORTEC trial randomized patients with intermediate-risk Stage I endometrial carcinoma to WPRT versus NAT. Of note, patients in this trial were not surgically staged. Of 714 patients with a median follow-up of 52 months,local recurrence rates were 4% in the WPRT group versus 14% in the control group (p<0.001). The use of WPRT did not impact 5-year overall survival (81% WPRT versus 85% NAT). Furthermore, some clinicians have advocated observation after surgical staging with radiation therapy reserved for those patients who recur locally. Several reports have reported salvage rates of 50-66% for patients with local recurrences. Given that approximately 20-25% patients in this population will recur locally, many clinicians prefer to use local radiation therapy as salvage therapy, thus sparing the majority of patients the potential long-term effects of pelvic radiation therapy. Given that radiation therapy does not affect distant metastasis and carries significant long-term morbidity, other therapies are necessary to improve disease-free survival in this setting. Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy is one potential option for these patients since it may sterilize both local and distant metastases. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy may be more desirable than radiation therapy because most side effects of chemotherapy are short-term and subside once therapy is completed or discontinued.

Multiple chemotherapeutic agents including cisplatin, doxorubicin HCL, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and oral etoposide have been studied for patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. A phase III study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) compared doxorubicin with and without cisplatin (GOG 107) for patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. A higher response rate (42% vs. 25%) was noted for combination therapy and has been considered by many to be the standard chemotherapy regimen for treatment of patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Paclitaxel has also been studied as a single agent and in combination with platinum compounds in this setting. A phase II study that combined paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 reported a 67% response rate. There were seven complete responses and nine partial responses with an 18-month median overall survival. An additional phase II study evaluated the efficacy of combining paclitaxel and carboplatin in both primary and recurrent non-papillary and papillary tumors following radiation therapy. the response rate was 78% in patients with primary advanced non-papillary tumors with a median disease-free survival of 23 months, with the median overall survival of 15 months. Currently, many clinicians are using a combination of paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (TAP), based on a phase III GOG study that demonstrated not only a significantly higher response rate (57% vs. 33%) over the combination of doxorubicin and cisplatin (AP), but also a survival advantage (median, 15.3 vs. 12.3 months; P=.037). Significantly more neurotoxicity was experienced by patients in the TAP arm. Currently, the GOG is evaluating the TAP combination versus the more tolerable regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin in a phase III setting.

The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is considered the standard of care for both high-risk early stage ovarian cancer and advanced ovarian cancer. The safety of this combination is well established in a number of phase III trials and currently is used in the primary setting for patients with ovarian cancer and advanced endometrial cancer. Although this combination is considered active in endometrial carcinoma, there is a paucity of data regarding the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in the setting of intermediate-risk endometrial adenocarcinoma. Accordingly, this phase II study will evaluate the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin as adjuvant therapy for patients with early stage adenocarcinoma of the endometrium at elevated-risk for recurrence.

Conditions
Uterine Cancer
Being tested
Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination
Medical subject headings
Uterine Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Paclitaxel and carboplatin combinationDrug

    Paclitaxel will be administered at an appropriate dose (175 mg/m2) as a 3-hour continuous IV infusion every 21 days. Carboplatin will be administered at an appropriate dose utilizing the Calvert formula for determining the area under the curve (AUC) based on the patient's glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

Study groups in NCT00584909
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Open LabelExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Disease-free Survival

    Number of months of survival with no evidence of disease

    Measured: 4 years - Median follow up time of 45.3 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Toxicity

    Toxicity secondary to paclitaxel and carboplatin based upon the NCI common toxicity criteria version

    Measured: 4 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jan 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2006
  3. Primary completionSep 2010
  4. Study completionSep 2011

Why it stopped: low accrual

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
13 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00584909
Sponsor's protocol ID
F060328016 (UAB 0604)
Other IDs
UAB 0604
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
21 Dec 2007
Last updated
27 Jan 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination in people with Uterine Cancer, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Mar 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Disease-free Survival (time frame: 4 years - Median follow up time of 45.3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in