AzTrials
AzTrials

Ventricular TachycardiaNCT00585871

Clonidine to Prevent Implantable Cardiovertor Defibrillator Firing

A study testing clonidine and metoprolol in people with Ventricular Tachycardia, run by James Martins at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cardiac arrest or sustained VT (ventricular tachycardia) in patients with heart disease is best treated with an ICD (implantable cardioverter defibrillator). However, the ICD alone is not appropriate therapy for patients with frequent VT episodes. In fact frequent shocks for VT may predict a poorer prognosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Ventricular Tachycardia
What is being tested?
clonidine and metoprolol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2006to Jan 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Implantable defibrillator treated patients with 5 episodes of ventricular tachycardia per 3 month period

Who cannot join

  • No more than one shock/3 months
  • No contraindication to clonidine
  • Non-compliance
  • Asthma

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UIHC

    Iowa City, Iowa, 52242

Other trials in United States

About this study

Cardiac arrest or sustained VT (ventricular tachycardia) in patients with heart disease is best treated with an ICD (implantable cardioverter defibrillator). However, the ICD alone is not appropriate therapy for patients with frequent VT episodes. In fact frequent shocks for VT may predict a poorer prognosis. Anti-arrhythmic drugs are co-administered with ICDs in up to 50% of patients to prevent VT episodes, but antiarrhythmic drugs may have harmful effects. Thus improved drugs to prevent VT without interfering with ICD function are needed. Recent data including our own suggest that clonidine may be a new therapy to prevent ICD shocks. It may act centrally on sympathetic outflow and peripherally and selectively on cardiac Purkinje, to suppress and control VT occurring in patients. Our purpose is to test the hypothesis that clonidine reduces frequent VT better than beta blocker in patients with ICDs. After informed consent patients will be randomized in a single blind fashion to either clonidine or metoprolol given three times per day. Other prescribed drugs may be adjusted to promote toleration of the study drug. ICD interrogations of episodes of VT will be the primary endpoint. Device based NIPS (non-invasive programmed stimulation) testing in a subset of these patients will allow mechanistic understanding of the clonidine effect. All of the procedural techniques are in place as performed clinically; preliminary data are given showing feasibility of the project.

Read the detailed description

we had wanted very commonly occurring VT episodes on ICD interrogation: 5 episodes/ 3 months. We could not enroll more than 2 patients most of which have interventions to prevent episodes. Thus we could not enroll patients and discontinued the study in the first year.

Being tested
clonidine, metoprolol
Keywords
ICD patients with 5 VTs per 3 month period
Medical subject headings
Tachycardia, Ventricular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • clonidineDrug

    0.1 mg tid

  • metoprololDrug

    25 mg tid

Study groups in NCT00585871
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Clonidine therapy groupExperimentalclonidine 0.1 TID
Receives: Drug: clonidine
Metoprolol control groupActive comparatormetoprolol 25 TID
Receives: Drug: metoprolol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. defibrillator shocks

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jan 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2006
  3. Primary completionJan 2012
  4. Study completionJan 2012

Why it stopped: could not recruit

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00585871
Sponsor's protocol ID
200602703
Other IDs
study is over no ID is needed
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
29 Dec 2007
Last updated
24 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing clonidine and metoprolol in people with Ventricular Tachycardia, run by James Martins at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in