AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiac SurgeryPhase 2/3NCT00586976

A Phase II/III Study of Continuous Local Anesthetic Infusion in Median Sternotomy Following Cardiac Surgery

A Phase 2/3 study testing Ropivacaine and Normal saline in people with Cardiac Surgery, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cardiac surgery is associated with pain in the post-operative period. We plan to conduct a study of local anesthetic, ropivacaine, infusion into the sternal wound in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery to see if it will be safe and result in improved pain control and reduced time to extubation, duration of ICU… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cardiac Surgery
What is being tested?
Ropivacaine and Normal saline
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
125 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2005to Jun 2008
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Be greater than 18 years of age
  • Be undergoing a cardiac surgical procedure via median sternotomy (i.e., exclude the occasional thoracotomy, since much greater pain with that surgical approach post-operatively)

Who cannot join

  • Are unable to grant informed consent or comply with study procedure
  • Are undergoing emergency open heart-surgery
  • Allergic to any of the excipients in ropivacaine, propofol, and fentanyl
  • Age < 18 years of age (children have dosing and toxicity concerns)
  • Are pregnant (pregnancy changes pain thresholds)
  • Taking preoperative opioids. (Opioid tolerant patients will require significantly more post-operative opioid use.)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Cirrhosis or hepatic failure (may have accumulation of local anesthetic in plasma due to decreased metabolism)
  • Patient receiving lidocaine infusion prior to surgery. (An extremely rare event)
  • Patients having a planned circulatory arrest for their surgical procedure (increased duration of intubation possible)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mayo Clinic College of Medicine

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

Other trials in United States

About this study

Cardiac surgery is associated with pain in the post-operative period. We plan to conduct a study of local anesthetic, ropivacaine, infusion into the sternal wound in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery to see if it will be safe and result in improved pain control and reduced time to extubation, duration of ICU and hospital stay.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Cardiac surgery is associated with pain in the post-operative period. Recently the ability to infuse local anesthetic drugs into the area of the sternal wound has become available. The studies that have been done thus far have shown efficacy in controlling pain but have been too small to show clinically significant patient outcome differences.

Specific Aim:

We plan to conduct a phase II/III study of local anesthetic infusion into the sternal wound in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

In the Phase II study, 40 patients will be enrolled in a prospective observational open label, dose escalation study of safety and efficacy of local anesthetic infusion into the sternal wound. Outcome measures for efficacy will be visual analog pain (VAP) scores and opioid consumption. Outcome measures for safety will be plasma ropivacaine concentrations and adverse events.

The dose determined in the phase II study will be used in the Phase III study. In this study, 200 patients will be enrolled in a double blind prospective, randomized, double blind; placebo controlled trial of local anesthetic infusion into the sternal wound. Outcome measures for efficacy will be visual analog pain (VAP) scores, opioid consumption, time to extubation, pulmonary function tests, duration of ICU and hospital stay, all cause morbidity and mortality. Outcome measure for safety will be adverse events.

Hypothesis:

Local anesthetic infusion into the sternal wound will be safe and result in improved pain control and reduced time to extubation, duration of ICU and hospital stay.

Significance:

This will be the first large randomized controlled clinical trial assessing outcomes with the use of local anesthetic infusion into the sternal wound in patients undergoing open-heart surgery.

Conditions
Cardiac Surgery
Being tested
Ropivacaine, Normal saline
Keywords
pain, ropivacaine, infusion, sternotomy
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RopivacaineDrug

    0.3% ropivacaine infusion at 4 ml/hr for 64 hours.

  • Normal salineDrug

    Normal saline infusion at 4 ml/hour for 64 hours.

Study groups in NCT00586976
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalRopivicaine infusion into the sternal wound
Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine
2Placebo comparatorNormal saline infusion into the sternal wound
Receives: Drug: Normal saline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual analog pain

    Measured: 64 hours

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. drug toxicity

    Measured: 64 hours

  2. infection

    Measured: 64 hours

  3. narcotic usage

    Measured: 64 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jan 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2005
  3. Primary completionJun 2007
  4. Study completionJun 2008

Why it stopped: Stopped by DSMB due to increased wound infection rate.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
125 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00586976
Sponsor's protocol ID
1107-05
Other IDs
Contract number 1a5777
Status last verified
Apr 2015
First submitted
21 Dec 2007
Last updated
7 Apr 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Agarwal S, Nuttall GA, Johnson ME, Hanson AC, Oliver WC Jr. A prospective, randomized, blinded study of continuous ropivacaine infusion in the median sternotomy incision following cardiac surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):145-50. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318281a348.

    PubMed 23386053

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Ropivacaine and Normal saline in people with Cardiac Surgery, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Stopped by DSMB due to increased wound infection rate.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual analog pain (time frame: 64 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00586976, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in