AzTrials
AzTrials

Congestive Heart FailureNCT00587938

BNP Measurement Reduces Resource Utilization for Patients With CHF Admitted Thorough the ED

An observational study of Congestive Heart Failure, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Measurement of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in dyspneic patients increases diagnostic accuracy for congestive heart failure (CHF). Limited information is available regarding economic outcomes attributable to BNP assay. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Congestive Heart Failure
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2003to Mar 2005
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Study population: Dyspneic patients:65 years or older presenting to the ED with chief complaint of shortness of breath, were enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial.

Who may be able to join

  • Dyspneic patients 65 years or older presenting to the ED with chief complaint of shortness of breath.

Who cannot join

  • hemodynamically unstability

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Saint Marys Hospital, Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: BNP Measurement Reduces Resource Utilization for Patients With CHF Admitted Thorough the ED: A Clinical Development Project

Measurement of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in dyspneic patients increases diagnostic accuracy for congestive heart failure (CHF). Limited information is available regarding economic outcomes attributable to BNP assay. The aim of this study was to assess the economic impact of BNP assay in elderly dyspneic patients presenting to the emergency department (ED).

Read the detailed description

Dyspneic patients 65 years were enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial; hemodynamically unstable patients were excluded. BNP (Biosite assay) levels were measured prior to physician assessment with randomization in 1:1 ratio to either BNP 1) level reported or 2) level not reported. ED physicians made triage decisions guided by clinical judgment and nomogram to aid in interpretation of BNP level. Primary outcome was mean total hospital cost per subject. Secondary outcomes included admission rate, service assignment, discharge diagnosis and length of stay. Differences between groups were compared by t-test with bootstrap. Costs reflect 2005 constant dollars.

Keywords
congestive heart failure, Brain naturietic peptide, hospital utilization cost
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00587938
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ABNP level from protocol blood tests initiated in the ED, reported to ED physician prior to ED disposition.
BBNP level from protocol blood tests initiated in the ED, NOT reported to ED physician prior to ED disposition.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean total hospital cost per subject

    Measured: spans from ED eval through hospitalization discharge

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Included admission rate, service assignment, discharge diagnosis, and length of stay.

    Measured: from ED evaluation through hospitalization discharge

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2003
  3. Primary completionMar 2005
  4. Study completionMar 2005

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00587938
Sponsor's protocol ID
1780-03
Status last verified
Dec 2007
First submitted
26 Dec 2007
Last updated
8 Jan 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Schmidt TA, Salo D, Hughes JA, Abbott JT, Geiderman JM, Johnson CX, McClure KB, McKay MP, Razzak JA, Schears RM, Solomon RC; SAEM Ethics Committee. Confronting the ethical challenges to informed consent in emergency medicine research. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Oct;11(10):1082-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.05.028.

    PubMed 15466152
  • Clavell AL, Stingo AJ, Aarhus LL, Burnett JC Jr. Biological actions of brain natriuretic peptide in thoracic inferior vena caval constriction. Am J Physiol. 1993 Dec;265(6 Pt 2):R1416-22. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1993.265.6.R1416.

    PubMed 8285286

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Congestive Heart Failure, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean total hospital cost per subject (time frame: spans from ED eval through hospitalization discharge). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00587938, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in