Precancerous ConditionPhase 2NCT00588822
Rituximab in Treating Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy Caused by Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance
A Phase 2 study testing Rituximab in people with Precancerous Condition, run by Mayo Clinic at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study was done to find out if the investigational medication, rituximab, could help relieve the symptoms of peripheral neuropathy (such as numbness [abnormal protein in the blood] and weakness of the lower and upper extremities) in people who have monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and people with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Precancerous Condition
- What is being tested?
- Rituximab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2005to Feb 2011
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Not pregnant
- Negative serum pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use an acceptable method of birth control during treatment and for 6 months after completion of treatment
- One of the following birth control measures must be used: birth control pills, intrauterine device, contraceptive injections (Depo-Provera), barrier methods such diaphragm, condom or contraceptive sponge with spermicide
- Adequate bone marrow function as indicated by sufficient precursors of all three cell lines and cellularity of at least 20% on bone marrow biopsy within 6 months
- Platelets > 100,000/mm^3
Show all 14Show fewer
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1,000/mm^3
- Hemoglobin > 7 g/dL
- Serum creatinine < 3.0 mg/dL
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) < 2 times upper limit of normal
- No history of psychiatric disorder requiring hospitalization, psychiatric consultation, or psychotropic medications within the last year
- Patients with controlled depression are eligible, as defined by the following:
- Stable for at least 6 months
- No increase in psychotropic medications
Who cannot join
- History of HIV infection or seropositivity
- History or serological profile suggesting prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (i.e., HbsAg or anti-HBs with anti-HBc)
- Prior HBV vaccination with isolated anti-HBs antibodies is not an exclusion criterion
- HBV infection or non-vaccination-related HBV seropositivity
- Active infection
- New York Heart Association class III or IV heart disease
Show all 21Show fewer
- History or baseline ECG tracing demonstrating severe recurrent or severe recent (within 3 months) cardiac dysrhythmia (e.g., ventricular tachycardia, torsades de pointes ("Twisting of the Points," a rapid polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia), or other serious ventricular dysrhythmias) requiring implanted defibrillator treatment
- Confirmed diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
- An isolated low titer positive antinuclear antibody test without clinical evidence of SLE is not an exclusion criterion
- Concomitant malignancies or previous malignancies within the last five years, with the exception of adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
- Malignancy associated with a paraneoplastic neuropathy
- A history of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies
- A history of known severe primary or secondary immunodeficiency (e.g., common variable immunodeficiency)
- Significant other uncontrolled medical illnesses that may interfere with drug delivery or interpretation of results
- PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- No live vaccine therapy within 30 days of enrollment
- No plasmapheresis within 3 months
- No high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin, chemotherapeutic agents, or high-dose corticosteroids (> 10 mg daily or every other day) within 3 months
- No systemic corticosteroids within 3 months (unless needed for adrenal insufficiency or at a stable dose ≤ 10 mg daily)
- No high-dose (> 250 mg/day) vitamin B6 within the past month
- No prior treatment with thalidomide or neurotoxic drugs (e.g., vinca alkaloids, taxol, or platinum)
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
Mayo Clinic - Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259-5499
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Trial of Rituximab for Peripheral Neuropathy Associated With Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS)
This study was done to find out if the investigational medication, rituximab, could help relieve the symptoms of peripheral neuropathy (such as numbness [abnormal protein in the blood] and weakness of the lower and upper extremities) in people who have monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and people with a symptomatic or smoldering Waldestrom macroglobulinemia.
Rituximab is an antibody which attacks a particular type of white blood cell (B Cell). By targeting the B-cells which make the abnormal protein which is involved in causing the nerve trouble, it is hoped that damage to nerve fibers will be stopped and improvement will be allowed to proceed.
Read the detailed description
This was a Phase II single arm trial evaluating the use of Rituximab administered at standard dose and schedule as an initial cycle of therapy, followed by a re-evaluation at 6 months.
If progression in neuropathy (as indicated by an increase in the Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) of greater than or equal to 10 or a modified Rankin Score increase of > 1 grade) the patient was off study. In addition, if the subject elected to pursue other active treatment including but not limited to plasmapheresis, high-dose intravenous immuneglobulin (IVIG), chemotherapeutic agents, or high dose corticosteroids, or if conditions in the exclusion criteria develop subsequent to enrollment, the subject was off study.
If the neuropathy is stable or responding (NIS of < 10 or a modified Rankin Score increase of < 1 grade) the patient would have received Cycle 2 of rituximab followed by a reevaluation at 12 months.
The study had a Simon Optimal two-stage Phase II design (α 5%, β 10%, π0 5%, π1 20%). The minimum clinically important response rate was 20%. The first stage was to include 21 patients and the second stage a total of 41 patients. The treatment would be rejected if there were fewer than 2 responders at the first stage or fewer than 5 responders at the second stage. The treatment would be accepted for further study if there were at least 5 responders out of 41 patients.
- Conditions
- Precancerous Condition
- Being tested
- Rituximab
- Keywords
- monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
- Medical subject headings
- Precancerous Conditions, Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RituximabBiological
Also called Rituxan
Rituximab will be given as a 375 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion once weekly for four doses (days 1, 8, 15, and 22).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Experimental | Subjects will receive rituximab administered at the standard dose and schedule as an initial cycle of therapy, followed by a re-evaluation at 6 months. If the neuropathy is stable or responding at 6 months, the subject will receive Cycle 2 of rituximab, followed by a re-evaluation at 12 months.
Rituximab will be given as a 375 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion once weekly for four doses (days 1, 8, 15, and 22). Receives: Biological: Rituximab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 10 Points Improvement in the Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) for Either Side of the Body at 6 Months
The Neuropathy Impairment Score [previously called the Neurologic Disability Score (NDS)] is derived from a neurologic examination obtained in a standard way by a specially trained neurologist. Decisions are based on the neurologist's judgment of what is normal considering site, age, sex, weight, height, and physical fitness. The instrument has 35 items, each ranked for left and right sides of the body; weakness is scored 0=normal, 1=25% disability, 2=50% disability, 3=75% disability and 4=100% disability. NIS total score was calculated as the sum of the 35 items, ranging from 0 to 140, with higher score indicating greater disability or impairment.
The neurologist measured the NIS score on both sides of the body, but recorded worst score and reported as 1 for each individual subject (i.e., each subject had only 1 reported score.)
Improvement was defined as at least 10 points improvement in NIS total score, that is, reduction in the number of points on the scale.
Measured: baseline, 6 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Percentage of Subjects Whose Disease Has Stabilized or Responded, for Either Side of the Body, as Measured by NIS at 6 Months
The Neuropathy Impairment Score (previously called the Neurologic Disability Score [NDS]) is derived from a neurologic examination obtained in a standard way by a specially trained neurologist. Decisions are based on the neurologist's judgment of what is normal considering site, age, sex, weight, height, and physical fitness. The instrument has 35 items, each ranked for left and right sides of the body; weakness is scored 0=normal, 1=25% disability, 2=50% disability, 3=75% disability and 4=100% disability. NIS total score was calculated as the sum of the 35 items, ranging from 0 to 140, with higher score indicating greater disability or impairment.
The NIS score was measured on both sides of the body, the worst score recorded reported as 1 for each individual subject. Stability was defined as change of less than 10 points in the NIS total score. Improvement was defined as at least 10 points improvement in NIS total score, that is, reduction in the number of points on the scale.
Measured: baseline, 6 months
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Improvement in the Modified Rankin Score at 6 Months
The Modified Rankin Scale was used to determine functional disability as follows: 0 = asymptomatic; 1 = symptoms not interfering with manual activities/walking normally; 2 = minor difficulties in manual activities/walking independently without support; 3 = unable to perform some manual activities/walking independently with support; 4 = unable to eat, dress or wash independently/needing assistance to walk; 5 = no useful tasks performed with upper limbs/confined to wheelchair. Therefore, scores could range from 0 to 5, with higher values indicating greater disability.
Measured: baseline, 6 months
Percentage of Patients Having Improvement in the Hand Grip Strength Ergometry Value for Either Hand at 6 Months
Grip strength was measured by a dynamometer in both hands at baseline and every three months until the final study visit. Response criteria was defined as achieving improvement in hand grip strength dynamometry values (>10% better relative to baseline at the 6 month visit on either side).
Measured: baseline, 6 months
Percentage of Subjects Having One or More Stable Hand Grip Strength Ergometry Values for Either Hand at 6 Months
Grip strength was measured by a dynamometer in both hands at baseline and every three months until the final study visit. Response criteria was defined as achieving stable hand grip strength dynamometry values (no more than 10% better or worse relative to baseline at the 6 month visit on either side).
Measured: baseline, 6 months
Percentage of Subjects With > 50% Reduction of Monoclonal Protein Titer at 6 Months
Monoclonal immunoglobulins measured included Immunoglobulin G (IgG), Immunoglobulin A (IgA), and Immunoglobulin M (IgM).
Measured: baseline, 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2005
- Primary completionJan 2009
- Study completionFeb 2011
Why it stopped: Discontinuation due to the high response rate at the 1st stage and slow accrual.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Precancerous ConditionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mayo ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Genentech, Inc., Biogen, National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
- Investigators
- Benn E. Smith, MD, Principal investigator, Mayo Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00588822
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1191-04
- Other IDs
- UL1RR024150
- Status last verified
- Apr 2014
- First submitted
- 20 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 6 May 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Trial of Rituximab for Peripheral Neuropathy Associated With Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00588822
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1191-04
- Conditions
- Precancerous Condition
- Keywords
- monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Discontinuation due to the high response rate at the 1st stage and slow accrual.
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Genentech, Inc., Biogen, National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
- Study start
- Jan 2005
- Primary completion
- Jan 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 May 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study was done to find out if the investigational medication, rituximab, could help relieve the symptoms of peripheral neuropathy (such as numbness [abnormal protein in the blood] and weakness of the lower and upper extremities) in people who have monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and people with a symptomatic or smoldering Waldestrom macroglobulinemia.
Rituximab is an antibody which attacks a particular type of white blood cell (B Cell). By targeting the B-cells which make the abnormal protein which is involved in causing the nerve trouble, it is hoped that damage to nerve fibers will be stopped and improvement will be allowed to proceed.
Detailed description
This was a Phase II single arm trial evaluating the use of Rituximab administered at standard dose and schedule as an initial cycle of therapy, followed by a re-evaluation at 6 months.
If progression in neuropathy (as indicated by an increase in the Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) of greater than or equal to 10 or a modified Rankin Score increase of > 1 grade) the patient was off study. In addition, if the subject elected to pursue other active treatment including but not limited to plasmapheresis, high-dose intravenous immuneglobulin (IVIG), chemotherapeutic agents, or high dose corticosteroids, or if conditions in the exclusion criteria develop subsequent to enrollment, the subject was off study.
If the neuropathy is stable or responding (NIS of < 10 or a modified Rankin Score increase of < 1 grade) the patient would have received Cycle 2 of rituximab followed by a reevaluation at 12 months.
The study had a Simon Optimal two-stage Phase II design (α 5%, β 10%, π0 5%, π1 20%). The minimum clinically important response rate was 20%. The first stage was to include 21 patients and the second stage a total of 41 patients. The treatment would be rejected if there were fewer than 2 responders at the first stage or fewer than 5 responders at the second stage. The treatment would be accepted for further study if there were at least 5 responders out of 41 patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Experimental | Biological: RituximabSubjects will receive rituximab administered at the standard dose and schedule as an initial cycle of therapy, followed by a re-evaluation at 6 months. If the neuropathy is stable or responding at 6 months, the subject will receive Cycle 2 of rituximab, followed by a re-evaluation at 12 months. Rituximab will be given as a 375 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion once weekly for four doses (days 1, 8, 15, and 22). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Not pregnant
- Negative serum pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use an acceptable method of birth control during treatment and for 6 months after completion of treatment
- Adequate bone marrow function as indicated by sufficient precursors of all three cell lines and cellularity of at least 20% on bone marrow biopsy within 6 months
- Platelets > 100,000/mm^3
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- History of HIV infection or seropositivity
- History or serological profile suggesting prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (i.e., HbsAg or anti-HBs with anti-HBc)
- HBV infection or non-vaccination-related HBV seropositivity
- Active infection
- New York Heart Association class III or IV heart disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RituximabAlso: RituxanRituximab will be given as a 375 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion once weekly for four doses (days 1, 8, 15, and 22). | Biological | Rituximab |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 10 Points Improvement in the Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) for Either Side of the Body at 6 Months
Time frame: baseline, 6 months
The Neuropathy Impairment Score [previously called the Neurologic Disability Score (NDS)] is derived from a neurologic examination obtained in a standard way by a specially trained neurologist. Decisions are based on the neurologist's judgment of what is normal considering site, age, sex, weight, height, and physical fitness. The instrument has 35 items, each ranked for left and right sides of the body; weakness is scored 0=normal, 1=25% disability, 2=50% disability, 3=75% disability and 4=100% disability. NIS total score was calculated as the sum of the 35 items, ranging from 0 to 140, with higher score indicating greater disability or impairment. The neurologist measured the NIS score on both sides of the body, but recorded worst score and reported as 1 for each individual subject (i.e., each subject had only 1 reported score.) Improvement was defined as at least 10 points improvement in NIS total score, that is, reduction in the number of points on the scale.
5 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Subjects Whose Disease Has Stabilized or Responded, for Either Side of the Body, as Measured by NIS at 6 Months
Time frame: baseline, 6 months
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Improvement in the Modified Rankin Score at 6 Months
Time frame: baseline, 6 months
Percentage of Patients Having Improvement in the Hand Grip Strength Ergometry Value for Either Hand at 6 Months
Time frame: baseline, 6 months
Percentage of Subjects Having One or More Stable Hand Grip Strength Ergometry Values for Either Hand at 6 Months
Time frame: baseline, 6 months
Percentage of Subjects With > 50% Reduction of Monoclonal Protein Titer at 6 Months
Time frame: baseline, 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Precancerous Condition
RecruitingObservational study
Biospecimen Procurement for Center for Immuno-Oncology Immunotherapy Protocols
Multiple Myeloma, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers in Barrett's Esophagus (PCAB BE Study)
Barrett Esophagus
RecruitingObservational study
Role of Liquid Biopsies in HPV-associated Cancer Treatment Monitoring
Cervical Cancer, Cervical Dysplasia
RecruitingObservational study
Leveraging Methylated DNA Markers (MDMs) in the Detection of Endometrial Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, and Cervical Cancer
Endometrial Cancer, Cervical Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Reformulated Levulan Kerastick Plus PDT for Actinic Keratosis on Upper Extremities
Actinic Keratosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Benn E. Smith, MD principal investigator
Mayo Clinic
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Rituximab in people with Precancerous Condition, run by Mayo Clinic at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 May 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 10 Points Improvement in the Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) for Either Side of the Body at 6 Months (time frame: baseline, 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2014.