Osteoarthritis, HipNCT00588861
Total Hip Replacement With the Answer® Hip Stem and Ranawat/Burnstein® Shell Using Simplex® or Palacos® Bone Cement
A study testing Answer® hip stem in people with Osteoarthritis, Hip and Traumatic Arthritis of Hip, run by Biomet Orthopedics, LLC at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to document the clinical outcomes of several devices used in total hip replacement, including the Answer® hip stem, the Ranawat/Burnstein® acetabular shell, and Simplex® or Palacos® bone cement. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis, Hip, Traumatic Arthritis of Hip
- What is being tested?
- Answer® hip stem
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2002to May 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Correction of functional deformity
- Treatment of non-union, femoral neck fracture, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable using other techniques
Who cannot join
- Infection, sepsis, and osteomyelitis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Total Hip Replacement With the Answer® Hip Stem and Ranawat/Burnstein® Acetabular Shell Using Simplex® or Palacos® Bone Cement
The purpose of this study is to document the clinical outcomes of several devices used in total hip replacement, including the Answer® hip stem, the Ranawat/Burnstein® acetabular shell, and Simplex® or Palacos® bone cement.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study is to document the clinical outcomes of several devices used in total hip replacement, including the Answer® hip stem, the Ranawat/Burnstein® acetabular shell, and Simplex® or Palacos® bone cement. It was desirable to see if there were any differences in the outcomes of two different types of bone cement in application.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Hip, Traumatic Arthritis of Hip
- Being tested
- Answer® hip stem
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Answer® hip stemDevice
Also called Answer Hip Stem, Simplex Bone Cement
Total hip replacement using Palacos® bone cement, the Answer® hip stem and the Ranawat/Burnstein® acetabular shell.
Answer® hip stemDevice
Also called Answer Hip Stem, Palacos Bone Cement
Total hip replacement using Simplex® bone cement, the Answer® hip stem and the Ranawat/Burnstein® acetabular shell.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Answer® hip stem with Simplex Cement | Active comparator | Femoral stem replacement with Answer® hip stem \& Simplex Bone Cement Receives: Device: Answer® hip stem |
| Answer® hip stem with Palacos Cement | Active comparator | Femoral stem replacement with Answer® hip stem \& Palacos Bone Cement Receives: Device: Answer® hip stem |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Harris Hip Score
The Harris Hip Score is detailed below as a range. 100 being the highest score, and 0 being the lowest score. 90-100 is considered "Excellent." 80-89 is considered "Good." 70-79 is considered "Fair." Less than 70 is considered "Poor."
Measured: 10 Years Post-Operative
Secondary outcomes (1)
Harris Hip Score Pain
Harris Hip Score Pain is detailed below as mean score for the Harris Hip Score Pain question. 44 being the highest score, and 0 being the lowest score. 44 is considered "None/Ignores." 40 is considered "Slight/Occasional." 30 is considered "Mild." 20 is considered "Moderate." 10 is considered "Marked." 0 is considered "Totally Disabled."
Measured: Pre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 4 year, 6 year, 8 year, 10 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2002
- Primary completionMay 2010
- Study completionMay 2010
Why it stopped: Study was terminated due to insufficient data and lack of patient follow-up
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Osteoarthritis, HipStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biomet Orthopedics, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ken Beres, MD, Study director, Zimmer Biomet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00588861
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 101-U-011
- Status last verified
- Jan 2012
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Total Hip Replacement With the Answer® Hip Stem and Ranawat/Burnstein® Acetabular Shell Using Simplex® or Palacos® Bone Cement
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00588861
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 101-U-011
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Hip, Traumatic Arthritis of Hip
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Study was terminated due to insufficient data and lack of patient follow-up
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Biomet Orthopedics, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2002
- Primary completion
- May 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Jan 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to document the clinical outcomes of several devices used in total hip replacement, including the Answer® hip stem, the Ranawat/Burnstein® acetabular shell, and Simplex® or Palacos® bone cement.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to document the clinical outcomes of several devices used in total hip replacement, including the Answer® hip stem, the Ranawat/Burnstein® acetabular shell, and Simplex® or Palacos® bone cement. It was desirable to see if there were any differences in the outcomes of two different types of bone cement in application.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Answer® hip stem with Simplex Cement | Active comparator | Device: Answer® hip stemFemoral stem replacement with Answer® hip stem \& Simplex Bone Cement |
| Answer® hip stem with Palacos Cement | Active comparator | Device: Answer® hip stemFemoral stem replacement with Answer® hip stem \& Palacos Bone Cement |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Correction of functional deformity
- Treatment of non-union, femoral neck fracture, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable using other techniques
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Infection, sepsis, and osteomyelitis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Answer® hip stemAlso: Answer Hip Stem, Simplex Bone CementTotal hip replacement using Palacos® bone cement, the Answer® hip stem and the Ranawat/Burnstein® acetabular shell. | Device | Answer® hip stem with Palacos Cement, Answer® hip stem with Simplex Cement |
| Answer® hip stemAlso: Answer Hip Stem, Palacos Bone CementTotal hip replacement using Simplex® bone cement, the Answer® hip stem and the Ranawat/Burnstein® acetabular shell. | Device | Answer® hip stem with Palacos Cement, Answer® hip stem with Simplex Cement |
Primary outcome
Harris Hip Score
Time frame: 10 Years Post-Operative
The Harris Hip Score is detailed below as a range. 100 being the highest score, and 0 being the lowest score. 90-100 is considered "Excellent." 80-89 is considered "Good." 70-79 is considered "Fair." Less than 70 is considered "Poor."
1 secondary outcome
Harris Hip Score Pain
Time frame: Pre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 4 year, 6 year, 8 year, 10 year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Osteoarthritis, Hip
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Telerehabilitation and Usual Rehabilitation After Knee or Hip Surgery
Orthopedic Surgery, Rehabilitation
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training With and Without Hip Abductor Strengthening in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.(BFR)
Knee Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
FRONT Block for Quality of Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis of the Hip, Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Post-Market Clinical Follow-up of Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid in Hip Osteoarthritis
Hip OA
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Validation of SMARTDIAGO for Remote Functional Assessment of Musculoskeletal Conditions
Knee Osteoarthristis, Hip Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ken Beres, MD study director
Zimmer Biomet
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Answer® hip stem in people with Osteoarthritis, Hip and Traumatic Arthritis of Hip, run by Biomet Orthopedics, LLC at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jan 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Harris Hip Score (time frame: 10 Years Post-Operative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2017.