Diabetic KetoacidosisPhase 4NCT00590044
Basal Insulin in the Management of Patients With Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
A Phase 4 study testing insulin glargine+ glulisine and NPH + Regular insulin in people with Diabetic Ketoacidosis, run by Emory University at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The study is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of insulin analogs and human insulins both during acute intravenous treatment and during the transition to subcutaneous insulin in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Ketoacidosis
- What is being tested?
- insulin glargine+ glulisine and NPH + Regular insulin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 74 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2007to Aug 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients admitted to Grady Memorial Hospital who meet diagnosis criteria of DKA and who are willing to participate in the study protocol will be considered candidates for inclusion into the study.
- Diagnostic Criteria for DKA: Blood glucose > 250 mg/dL, arterial or venous phenol hydroxylase (pH) < 7.3, serum bicarbonate < 18 milliequivalent/L, and moderate to severe ketonemia (acetoacetate ≥ 1:4 or βeta-hydroxybutyrate > 3 mmol).
Who cannot join
- Hemodynamic instability (MAP < 50 or patients requiring pressor)
- Significant identifiable medical or surgical illness, including but not limited to: acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure; respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation; acute or chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > 3.0 mg/dl); end stage liver failure, and cirrhosis.
- Patients with dementia or persistent altered mental status that would prevent collection of consent form and reliable information.
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Grady Memorial Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303
University of Minnesota School of Medicine
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
About this study
Official title: Basal Insulin in the Management of Patients With Diabetic Ketoacidosis
The study is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of insulin analogs and human insulins both during acute intravenous treatment and during the transition to subcutaneous insulin in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).
Read the detailed description
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is the most serious emergency in patients with diabetes. With an estimated 100,000 admissions per year in the United States, DKA is also the leading cause of death in children with type 1 diabetes, and accounts for a significant proportion of admissions in adult patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The mainstay in the treatment of DKA involves the continuous intravenous (IV) infusion of regular insulin or the frequent subcutaneous (SC) injections of regular or rapid-acting insulin analogs. Multiple studies have reported successful protocols for insulin administration during the acute management of DKA, but they have failed to address the transition phase from IV to SC maintenance insulin regimen. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) position statement recommends the use of split-mixed insulin combination of regular and intermediate-acting insulin (NPH). This regimen, however, are associated with a high rate of hyperglycemia shortly after discontinuation of IV insulin and a risk of hypoglycemia during the hospital stay. Recently, the long-acting "basal" insulin glargine (Lantus®, Sanofi Aventis Pharmaceuticals) has been shown to facilitate glycemic control with lower rate of hypoglycemic events than intermediate-acting insulin in subjects with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. This study aims i) to determine the effects of giving a dose of glargine insulin shortly after starting an intravenous insulin infusion on glycemic control, time to resolve DKA, and rate of hypoglycemia in patients with DKA, and ii) to compare the safety and efficacy of basal/bolus (glargine/glulisine) insulin versus the standard split-mixed insulin regimen of NPH and regular insulin after the resolution of DKA. The hypothesis is that basal (lantus®) insulin as compared to NPH insulin shortly after the start of insulin infusion will improve inpatient glycemic control in patients with DKA.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Ketoacidosis
- Being tested
- insulin glargine+ glulisine, NPH + Regular insulin
- Keywords
- Diabetic ketoacidosis, insulin therapy, DKA
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Ketoacidosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
insulin glargine+ glulisineDrug
Also called glargine (Lantus) + glulisine (Apidra)
Daily insulin glargine + glulisine before meals
NPH + Regular insulinDrug
Also called Isophane Insulin(NPH), Intermediate acting Insulin (NPH)
Split-mixed NPH + Regular insulin twice daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin glargine+glulisine | Experimental | Daily insulin glargine + glulisine before meals Receives: Drug: insulin glargine+ glulisine |
| Split-mixed NPH + Regular insulin | Active comparator | Split-mixed NPH + Regular insulin twice daily Receives: Drug: NPH + Regular insulin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Hypoglycemia Episodes After the Transition Period From Intravenous Insulin to Subcutaneous Insulin Between 2 Treatment Groups
To determine the safety of the two treatments the number of hypoglycemia episodes that occurred between the 2 groups are measured from the time of transitioning to subcutaneous insulin to day 5. The hypoglycemia events are defined as blood glucose levels <70 mg/dL. The results were obtained from the citation Umpierrez GE, Jones S, Smiley D, Mulligan P, Keyler T, Temponi A, Semakula C, Umpierrez D, Peng L, Cerón M, Robalino G. Insulin analogs versus human insulin in the treatment of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1164-9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0169. Epub 2009 Apr 14. PubMed ID: 19366972.
Measured: 5 days after transitioning to subcutaneous insulin
Secondary outcomes (3)
Mean Daily Blood Glucose Concentration Between the Two Groups After the Resolution of Ketoacidosis and Transition to Subcutaneous Insulin
The primary outcome during the subcutaneous (SC) period (the primary outcome measurement) was to determine differences in glycemic control as measured by mean daily blood glucose(BG) concentration between treatment groups. The results were obtained from the citation Umpierrez GE, Jones S, Smiley D, Mulligan P, Keyler T, Temponi A, Semakula C, Umpierrez D, Peng L, Cerón M, Robalino G. Insulin analogs versus human insulin in the treatment of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1164-9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0169. Epub 2009 Apr 14. PubMed Identification (ID): 19366972.
Measured: Day1 - Day5 after the resolution of ketoacidosis and transition to subcutaneous insulin
Mean Blood Glucose Concentration in mg/dL While on the Insulin Drip Among the 2 Groups
To determine the differences in glycemic control as measured by differences in the mean daily blood glucose levels between treatment groups (insulin drip with regular insulin vs glulisine insulin) during the acute phase of diabetic ketoacidosis(DKA) before transitioning to subcutaneous insulin. The results were obtained from the citation Umpierrez GE, Jones S, Smiley D, Mulligan P, Keyler T, Temponi A, Semakula C, Umpierrez D, Peng L, Cerón M, Robalino G. Insulin analogs versus human insulin in the treatment of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1164-9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0169. Epub 2009 Apr 14. PubMed ID: 19366972.
Measured: up to 20 hours
Difference in Time in Hours to Resolution of DKA Between the 2 Groups
The mean duration of treatment until resolution of ketoacidosis is measured and compared between the 2 groups. The DKA was considered resolved when blood glucose was 250 mg/dl, the serum bicarbonate level was <18 mmol/l, and venous phenol hydroxylase (pH) was 7.30. The results were obtained from the citation Umpierrez GE, Jones S, Smiley D, Mulligan P, Keyler T, Temponi A, Semakula C, Umpierrez D, Peng L, Cerón M, Robalino G. Insulin analogs versus human insulin in the treatment of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1164-9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0169. Epub 2009 Apr 14. PubMed ID: 19366972.
Measured: up to 20 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2007
- Primary completionJun 2008
- Study completionAug 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetic KetoacidosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Emory UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Emory University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Guillermo Umpierrez, MD, Emory University
- Investigators
- Guillermo Umpierrez, MD, Principal investigator, Emory University SOMSidney Jones, MD, Study chair, University of Minnesota
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00590044
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00005062a
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 26 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Umpierrez GE, Jones S, Smiley D, Mulligan P, Keyler T, Temponi A, Semakula C, Umpierrez D, Peng L, Ceron M, Robalino G. Insulin analogs versus human insulin in the treatment of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1164-9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0169. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
PubMed 19366972
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Basal Insulin in the Management of Patients With Diabetic Ketoacidosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00590044
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00005062a
- Conditions
- Diabetic Ketoacidosis
- Keywords
- Diabetic ketoacidosis, insulin therapy, DKA
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Emory UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Study start
- Dec 2007
- Primary completion
- Jun 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Apr 2009
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of insulin analogs and human insulins both during acute intravenous treatment and during the transition to subcutaneous insulin in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).
Detailed description
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is the most serious emergency in patients with diabetes. With an estimated 100,000 admissions per year in the United States, DKA is also the leading cause of death in children with type 1 diabetes, and accounts for a significant proportion of admissions in adult patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The mainstay in the treatment of DKA involves the continuous intravenous (IV) infusion of regular insulin or the frequent subcutaneous (SC) injections of regular or rapid-acting insulin analogs. Multiple studies have reported successful protocols for insulin administration during the acute management of DKA, but they have failed to address the transition phase from IV to SC maintenance insulin regimen. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) position statement recommends the use of split-mixed insulin combination of regular and intermediate-acting insulin (NPH). This regimen, however, are associated with a high rate of hyperglycemia shortly after discontinuation of IV insulin and a risk of hypoglycemia during the hospital stay. Recently, the long-acting "basal" insulin glargine (Lantus®, Sanofi Aventis Pharmaceuticals) has been shown to facilitate glycemic control with lower rate of hypoglycemic events than intermediate-acting insulin in subjects with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. This study aims i) to determine the effects of giving a dose of glargine insulin shortly after starting an intravenous insulin infusion on glycemic control, time to resolve DKA, and rate of hypoglycemia in patients with DKA, and ii) to compare the safety and efficacy of basal/bolus (glargine/glulisine) insulin versus the standard split-mixed insulin regimen of NPH and regular insulin after the resolution of DKA. The hypothesis is that basal (lantus®) insulin as compared to NPH insulin shortly after the start of insulin infusion will improve inpatient glycemic control in patients with DKA.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin glargine+glulisine | Experimental | Drug: insulin glargine+ glulisineDaily insulin glargine + glulisine before meals |
| Split-mixed NPH + Regular insulin | Active comparator | Drug: NPH + Regular insulinSplit-mixed NPH + Regular insulin twice daily |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- All patients admitted to Grady Memorial Hospital who meet diagnosis criteria of DKA and who are willing to participate in the study protocol will be considered candidates for inclusion into the study.
- Diagnostic Criteria for DKA: Blood glucose > 250 mg/dL, arterial or venous phenol hydroxylase (pH) < 7.3, serum bicarbonate < 18 milliequivalent/L, and moderate to severe ketonemia (acetoacetate ≥ 1:4 or βeta-hydroxybutyrate > 3 mmol).
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Hemodynamic instability (MAP < 50 or patients requiring pressor)
- Significant identifiable medical or surgical illness, including but not limited to: acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure; respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation; acute or chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > 3.0 mg/dl); end stage liver failure, and cirrhosis.
- Patients with dementia or persistent altered mental status that would prevent collection of consent form and reliable information.
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| insulin glargine+ glulisineAlso: glargine (Lantus) + glulisine (Apidra)Daily insulin glargine + glulisine before meals | Drug | Insulin glargine+glulisine |
| NPH + Regular insulinAlso: Isophane Insulin(NPH), Intermediate acting Insulin (NPH)Split-mixed NPH + Regular insulin twice daily | Drug | Split-mixed NPH + Regular insulin |
Primary outcome
Number of Hypoglycemia Episodes After the Transition Period From Intravenous Insulin to Subcutaneous Insulin Between 2 Treatment Groups
Time frame: 5 days after transitioning to subcutaneous insulin
To determine the safety of the two treatments the number of hypoglycemia episodes that occurred between the 2 groups are measured from the time of transitioning to subcutaneous insulin to day 5. The hypoglycemia events are defined as blood glucose levels <70 mg/dL. The results were obtained from the citation Umpierrez GE, Jones S, Smiley D, Mulligan P, Keyler T, Temponi A, Semakula C, Umpierrez D, Peng L, Cerón M, Robalino G. Insulin analogs versus human insulin in the treatment of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1164-9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0169. Epub 2009 Apr 14. PubMed ID: 19366972.
3 secondary outcomes
Mean Daily Blood Glucose Concentration Between the Two Groups After the Resolution of Ketoacidosis and Transition to Subcutaneous Insulin
Time frame: Day1 - Day5 after the resolution of ketoacidosis and transition to subcutaneous insulin
Mean Blood Glucose Concentration in mg/dL While on the Insulin Drip Among the 2 Groups
Time frame: up to 20 hours
Difference in Time in Hours to Resolution of DKA Between the 2 Groups
Time frame: up to 20 hours
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Sep 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 19366972Umpierrez GE, Jones S, Smiley D, Mulligan P, Keyler T, Temponi A, Semakula C, Umpierrez D, Peng L, Ceron M, Robalino G. Insulin analogs versus human insulin in the treatment of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1164-9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0169. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
Related trials for Diabetic Ketoacidosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of PAL-119 in Healthy Volunteers and Adult Participants With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes
Healthy Volunteers and Diabetes Participants
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Mitigating DKA in Type 1 Diabetes for Safe Use of SGLT Inhibitors Using Dual Continuous Ketone and Glucose Monitoring.
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) With Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
RecruitingObservational study
The Real-World Control-IQ Glycemic Control and Quality of Life Study in Type 1 Diabetes in France
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
RecruitingObservational study
Perfusion Index for Predicting Diabetic Ketoacidosis Severity in the Emergency Department
Diabetic Ketoacidosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Leukocyte Glucose Index and Severity of Diabetic Ketoacidosis
Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Diabetes Mellitus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Guillermo Umpierrez, MD principal investigator
Emory University SOM
Sidney Jones, MD study chair
University of Minnesota
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing insulin glargine+ glulisine and NPH + Regular insulin in people with Diabetic Ketoacidosis, run by Emory University at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Apr 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Hypoglycemia Episodes After the Transition Period From Intravenous Insulin to Subcutaneous Insulin Between 2 Treatment Groups (time frame: 5 days after transitioning to subcutaneous insulin). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00590044, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2018.