LymphomaNCT00590941
Genetic Determinations for Side Effects and Response Rate for Patients Receiving Chemotherapy With Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma
A study testing Blood draw in people with Lymphoma and Diffuse Large Cell, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether people have genes that make them more likely to respond to chemotherapy and/or have side effects from chemotherapy for diffuse large cell lymphoma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lymphoma, Diffuse Large Cell
- What is being tested?
- Blood draw
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2005to Apr 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically proven diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma according to the WHO classification, with measurable or evaluable disease
- No prior therapy for NHL. Patient may be enrolled in this study after the first cycle of R-CHOP if all screening evaluations were performed prior to the first cycle of chemotherapy.
- Ann Arbor stage 3 or 4
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years
- Patient must give written informed consent.
- A patient enrolled in another clinical trial may also enroll in this study if the other trial has an R-CHOP treatment arm and the patient is randomized to the R-CHOP only arm. Registration to this study must occur after randomization in the other trial.
Who cannot join
- CNS involvement
- Known HIV positive
- T-cell lymphoma or history of indolent NHL
- Patients who will be treated with radiation therapy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
About this study
Official title: Candidate Gene Polymorphisms and Response to Rituximab-CHOP in Patients With Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma
The purpose of this study is to determine whether people have genes that make them more likely to respond to chemotherapy and/or have side effects from chemotherapy for diffuse large cell lymphoma.
Read the detailed description
Upon enrollment in the study, patients will have a blood sample collected for genotyping of the FCGR3A gene (immunoglobulin Fc G receptor IIIa), the ABCB1 gene (ATP Binding Cassette Beta 1; also called MDR1), and other candidate genes. Patients will be treated with R-CHOP for six cycles, which is standard therapy for advanced stage DLCL. Response will be monitored by an FDG-PET scan performed after 2 cycles of R-CHOP and restaging exams performed upon completion of chemotherapy. Gene polymorphisms will be analyzed to establish which polymorphisms predict response to R-CHOP.
- Conditions
- Lymphoma, Diffuse Large Cell
- Being tested
- Blood draw
- Keywords
- Lymphoma, Rituximab, CHOP
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood drawProcedure or surgery
Sample Collection for Genotyping prior to cycle 1 treatment of R-CHOP, if patient is enrolled after cycle 1, sample for genotyping should be collected prior to cycle 2.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| R-CHOP | No intervention | Patients receiving R-CHOP via standard of care which consists of cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 IV day 1 of each 21 day cycle, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 IV day 1 of each 21 day cycle, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV day 1 of each 21 day cycle, prednisone 100 mg PO days 1-5 of each 21 day cycle, and rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV day 1 of each 21 day cycle. Receives: Procedure: Blood draw |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Negative [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan after 2 cycles of R-CHOP
Measured: Approximately 42 days (2 cycles of R-CHOP)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Response after six cycles of R-CHOP
Measured: Approximately 126 days (6 Cycles of R-CHOP)
Progression free survival
Measured: 3 years
Grade 3-4 toxicity
Measured: Approximately 156 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2005
- Primary completionJul 2008
- Study completionApr 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (46)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Washington University School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Amanda Cashen, MD, Principal investigator, Washington University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00590941
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 05-0122
- Other IDs
- 05-0122
- Status last verified
- May 2013
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 16 May 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project. Blood. 1997 Jun 1;89(11):3909-18.
PubMed 9166827McKelvey EM, Gottlieb JA, Wilson HE, Haut A, Talley RW, Stephens R, Lane M, Gamble JF, Jones SE, Grozea PN, Gutterman J, Coltman C, Moon TE. Hydroxyldaunomycin (Adriamycin) combination chemotherapy in malignant lymphoma. Cancer. 1976 Oct;38(4):1484-93. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197610)38:43.0.co;2-i.
PubMed 791473Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S, Oken MM, Grogan TM, Mize EM, Glick JH, Coltman CA Jr, Miller TP. Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 8;328(14):1002-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304083281404.
PubMed 7680764Vose JM, Link BK, Grossbard ML, Czuczman M, Grillo-Lopez A, Gilman P, Lowe A, Kunkel LA, Fisher RI. Phase II study of rituximab in combination with chop chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jan 15;19(2):389-97. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.2.389.
PubMed 11208830Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, Herbrecht R, Tilly H, Bouabdallah R, Morel P, Van Den Neste E, Salles G, Gaulard P, Reyes F, Lederlin P, Gisselbrecht C. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):235-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011795.
PubMed 11807147Habermann TM, Weller EA et al. Phase III Trial of Rituximab-CHOP (R-CHOP) vs. CHOP with a Second Randomization to Maintenance Rituximab (MR) or Observation in Patients 60 Years of Age and Older with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). Blood 102: abstract #8, 2003
Elstrom R, Guan L, Baker G, Nakhoda K, Vergilio JA, Zhuang H, Pitsilos S, Bagg A, Downs L, Mehrotra A, Kim S, Alavi A, Schuster SJ. Utility of FDG-PET scanning in lymphoma by WHO classification. Blood. 2003 May 15;101(10):3875-6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-09-2778. Epub 2003 Jan 16.
PubMed 12531812Lavely WC, Delbeke D, Greer JP, Morgan DS, Byrne DW, Price RR, Hallahan DE. FDG PET in the follow-up management of patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma after first-line chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Oct 1;57(2):307-15. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00599-6.
PubMed 12957239Zinzani PL, Magagnoli M, Chierichetti F, Zompatori M, Garraffa G, Bendandi M, Gherlinzoni F, Cellini C, Stefoni V, Ferlin G, Tura S. The role of positron emission tomography (PET) in the management of lymphoma patients. Ann Oncol. 1999 Oct;10(10):1181-4. doi: 10.1023/a:1008327127033.
PubMed 10586334Mikhaeel NG, Timothy AR, O'Doherty MJ, Hain S, Maisey MN. 18-FDG-PET as a prognostic indicator in the treatment of aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma-comparison with CT. Leuk Lymphoma. 2000 Nov;39(5-6):543-53. doi: 10.3109/10428190009113384.
PubMed 11342337Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Vandenberghe P, Thomas J, de Groot T, Balzarini J, De Wolf-Peeters C, Mortelmans L, Verhoef G. Early restaging positron emission tomography with ( 18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2002 Sep;13(9):1356-63. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf256.
PubMed 12196360Jerusalem G, Beguin Y, Fassotte MF, Najjar F, Paulus P, Rigo P, Fillet G. Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for posttreatment evaluation in Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has higher diagnostic and prognostic value than classical computed tomography scan imaging. Blood. 1999 Jul 15;94(2):429-33.
PubMed 10397709Romer W, Hanauske AR, Ziegler S, Thodtmann R, Weber W, Fuchs C, Enne W, Herz M, Nerl C, Garbrecht M, Schwaiger M. Positron emission tomography in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: assessment of chemotherapy with fluorodeoxyglucose. Blood. 1998 Jun 15;91(12):4464-71.
PubMed 9616140Kostakoglu L, Coleman M, Leonard JP, Kuji I, Zoe H, Goldsmith SJ. PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease. J Nucl Med. 2002 Aug;43(8):1018-27.
PubMed 12163626Jerusalem G, Beguin Y, Fassotte MF, Najjar F, Paulus P, Rigo P, Fillet G. Persistent tumor 18F-FDG uptake after a few cycles of polychemotherapy is predictive of treatment failure in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Haematologica. 2000 Jun;85(6):613-8.
PubMed 10870118
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 May 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Candidate Gene Polymorphisms and Response to Rituximab-CHOP in Patients With Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00590941
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 05-0122
- Conditions
- Lymphoma, Diffuse Large Cell
- Keywords
- Lymphoma, Rituximab, CHOP
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2005
- Primary completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether people have genes that make them more likely to respond to chemotherapy and/or have side effects from chemotherapy for diffuse large cell lymphoma.
Detailed description
Upon enrollment in the study, patients will have a blood sample collected for genotyping of the FCGR3A gene (immunoglobulin Fc G receptor IIIa), the ABCB1 gene (ATP Binding Cassette Beta 1; also called MDR1), and other candidate genes. Patients will be treated with R-CHOP for six cycles, which is standard therapy for advanced stage DLCL. Response will be monitored by an FDG-PET scan performed after 2 cycles of R-CHOP and restaging exams performed upon completion of chemotherapy. Gene polymorphisms will be analyzed to establish which polymorphisms predict response to R-CHOP.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| R-CHOP | No intervention | Procedure: Blood drawPatients receiving R-CHOP via standard of care which consists of cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 IV day 1 of each 21 day cycle, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 IV day 1 of each 21 day cycle, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV day 1 of each 21 day cycle, prednisone 100 mg PO days 1-5 of each 21 day cycle, and rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV day 1 of each 21 day cycle. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Histologically proven diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma according to the WHO classification, with measurable or evaluable disease
- No prior therapy for NHL. Patient may be enrolled in this study after the first cycle of R-CHOP if all screening evaluations were performed prior to the first cycle of chemotherapy.
- Ann Arbor stage 3 or 4
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years
- Patient must give written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- CNS involvement
- Known HIV positive
- T-cell lymphoma or history of indolent NHL
- Patients who will be treated with radiation therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood drawSample Collection for Genotyping prior to cycle 1 treatment of R-CHOP, if patient is enrolled after cycle 1, sample for genotyping should be collected prior to cycle 2. | Procedure or surgery | R-CHOP |
Primary outcome
Negative [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan after 2 cycles of R-CHOP
Time frame: Approximately 42 days (2 cycles of R-CHOP)
3 secondary outcomes
Response after six cycles of R-CHOP
Time frame: Approximately 126 days (6 Cycles of R-CHOP)
Progression free survival
Time frame: 3 years
Grade 3-4 toxicity
Time frame: Approximately 156 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 May 2013.
- Background: PubMed 9166827A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project. Blood. 1997 Jun 1;89(11):3909-18.
- Background: PubMed 791473McKelvey EM, Gottlieb JA, Wilson HE, Haut A, Talley RW, Stephens R, Lane M, Gamble JF, Jones SE, Grozea PN, Gutterman J, Coltman C, Moon TE. Hydroxyldaunomycin (Adriamycin) combination chemotherapy in malignant lymphoma. Cancer. 1976 Oct;38(4):1484-93. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197610)38:43.0.co;2-i.
- Background: PubMed 7680764Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S, Oken MM, Grogan TM, Mize EM, Glick JH, Coltman CA Jr, Miller TP. Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 8;328(14):1002-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304083281404.
- Background: PubMed 11208830Vose JM, Link BK, Grossbard ML, Czuczman M, Grillo-Lopez A, Gilman P, Lowe A, Kunkel LA, Fisher RI. Phase II study of rituximab in combination with chop chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jan 15;19(2):389-97. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.2.389.
- Background: PubMed 11807147Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, Herbrecht R, Tilly H, Bouabdallah R, Morel P, Van Den Neste E, Salles G, Gaulard P, Reyes F, Lederlin P, Gisselbrecht C. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):235-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011795.
- BackgroundHabermann TM, Weller EA et al. Phase III Trial of Rituximab-CHOP (R-CHOP) vs. CHOP with a Second Randomization to Maintenance Rituximab (MR) or Observation in Patients 60 Years of Age and Older with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). Blood 102: abstract #8, 2003
- Background: PubMed 12531812Elstrom R, Guan L, Baker G, Nakhoda K, Vergilio JA, Zhuang H, Pitsilos S, Bagg A, Downs L, Mehrotra A, Kim S, Alavi A, Schuster SJ. Utility of FDG-PET scanning in lymphoma by WHO classification. Blood. 2003 May 15;101(10):3875-6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-09-2778. Epub 2003 Jan 16.
- Background: PubMed 12957239Lavely WC, Delbeke D, Greer JP, Morgan DS, Byrne DW, Price RR, Hallahan DE. FDG PET in the follow-up management of patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma after first-line chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Oct 1;57(2):307-15. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00599-6.
- Background: PubMed 10586334Zinzani PL, Magagnoli M, Chierichetti F, Zompatori M, Garraffa G, Bendandi M, Gherlinzoni F, Cellini C, Stefoni V, Ferlin G, Tura S. The role of positron emission tomography (PET) in the management of lymphoma patients. Ann Oncol. 1999 Oct;10(10):1181-4. doi: 10.1023/a:1008327127033.
- Background: PubMed 11342337Mikhaeel NG, Timothy AR, O'Doherty MJ, Hain S, Maisey MN. 18-FDG-PET as a prognostic indicator in the treatment of aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma-comparison with CT. Leuk Lymphoma. 2000 Nov;39(5-6):543-53. doi: 10.3109/10428190009113384.
- Background: PubMed 12196360Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Vandenberghe P, Thomas J, de Groot T, Balzarini J, De Wolf-Peeters C, Mortelmans L, Verhoef G. Early restaging positron emission tomography with ( 18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2002 Sep;13(9):1356-63. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf256.
- Background: PubMed 10397709Jerusalem G, Beguin Y, Fassotte MF, Najjar F, Paulus P, Rigo P, Fillet G. Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for posttreatment evaluation in Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has higher diagnostic and prognostic value than classical computed tomography scan imaging. Blood. 1999 Jul 15;94(2):429-33.
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of MedicineLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
A Clinical Trial of MK-1045 in People With B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (MK-1045-005)
B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Tafasitamab, Retifanlimab, and Rituximab in Combination With Standard Therapy for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Grade 3b Follicular Lymphoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
Tau PET Outcomes With Anti-amyloid Immunotherapies
Cognitive Impairment, Mild, Dementia, Mild
RecruitingPhase 1
225Ac-DOTA-Anti-CD38 Daratumumab Monoclonal Antibody With Fludarabine, Melphalan and Total Marrow and Lymphoid Irradiation as Conditioning Treatment for Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Recruiting
More Than Just X-Rays - Imaging of Chemotherapy-induced Morphological and Functional Cardiovascular and Lung Changes After Childhood ALL and Other Cancers - a Monocentric Late Effects Study (MaximALL)
Acute Lymphatic Leukemia, Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amanda Cashen, MD principal investigator
Washington University School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Blood draw in people with Lymphoma and Diffuse Large Cell, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Negative [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan after 2 cycles of R-CHOP (time frame: Approximately 42 days (2 cycles of R-CHOP)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00590941, which also lists 46 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2013.