AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney TransplantationNCT00592020

Short Transverse Versus Conventional Hockey Stick Incision in Kidney Transplantation

A study testing Short Transverse Incision and Hockey Stick Incision in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Today the minimal invasive access is used for a lot of different operations. This technique takes the advantage of less postoperative pain, better cosmetic results, and a lower surgical complication rate (e.g. hernia, wound infection). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Transplantation
What is being tested?
Short Transverse Incision and Hockey Stick Incision
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
Jan 2008to May 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age equal or over 18 years
  • Sole kidney transplantation
  • Consent form

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • University Hospital Inselspital

    Bern, Canton of Bern, 3010

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: "Short Transverse" Versus Conventional "Hockey Stick" Incision in Kidney Transplantation

Today the minimal invasive access is used for a lot of different operations. This technique takes the advantage of less postoperative pain, better cosmetic results, and a lower surgical complication rate (e.g. hernia, wound infection).

Especially patients under immunosuppressive therapy could benefit from this technique. First results in minimally invasive kidney transplantation indicate that it may be performed quickly and safely. Benefits are expectable on postoperative pain, recovery, and surgical complications. Another retrospective study showed lower rates of hernia, abdominal wall relaxations, and a better postoperative cosmetic.

The aim of this study is to compare the classic hockey stick incision with a minimal invasive incision in a randomized clinical trial.

Being tested
Short Transverse Incision, Hockey Stick Incision
Keywords
kidney, transplantation, minimal invasive, short transverse, hockey stick, incision, quality of life, planned kidney transplantation
Medical subject headings
Surgical Wound

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Short Transverse IncisionProcedure or surgery

    Short Transverse Incision for kidney transplantation

  • Hockey Stick IncisionProcedure or surgery

    Hockey Stick Incision for kidney transplantation

Study groups in NCT00592020
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorShort Transverse Incision
Receives: Procedure: Short Transverse Incision
2Active comparatorHockey Stick Incision
Receives: Procedure: Hockey Stick Incision

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. QoR (Quality of Recovery) - Score

    Measured: preoperative, day 1/3/5/7 postoperative

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Quality of Life by SF (Short Form) 36

    Measured: preoperative, day 7, week 4, month 6 postoperative

  2. Operation time

    Measured: intraoperative

  3. Warm ischemic time

    Measured: intraoperative

  4. Postoperative pain measured by VAS (visual analog scale) and amount of analgesia

    Measured: day 1/2/3/4/5/6/7 postoperative

  5. Surgical complications

    Measured: day 7, week 4, month 6, month 12 postoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jan 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2008
  3. Primary completionMay 2011
  4. Study completionMay 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00592020
Sponsor's protocol ID
220/07
Status last verified
May 2011
First submitted
31 Dec 2007
Last updated
23 May 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Short Transverse Incision and Hockey Stick Incision in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

QoR (Quality of Recovery) - Score (time frame: preoperative, day 1/3/5/7 postoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in