AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 2AUGUST IINCT00595413

Atacicept in Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha-naïve Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis (AUGUST II)

A Phase 2 study testing Atacicept: with loading dose, Atacicept and Adalimumab in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by EMD Serono at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of atacicept compared to placebo in the treatment of signs and symptoms in a subject population with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) and no previous exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha)… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
Atacicept: with loading dose, Atacicept and Adalimumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
311 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Sep 2007to Oct 2009
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female subjects greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years of age at the time of informed consent who have RA satisfying American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria with a disease history of at least 6 months
  • Subjects must have active disease, defined by >=8 swollen joints (out of 66), >=8 tender joints (out of 68) and CRP >=10 milligram per liter (mg/L) and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) >=28 millimeter per hour (mm/hr), despite treatment with MTX at a dose of >=15 milligram per week (mg/week) for greater than (>) 3 months
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria could apply

Who cannot join

  • Inflammatory joint disease other than RA
  • Previous or concurrent treatment with any approved or investigational biological compound for RA, including but not restricted to any anti-TNFalpha agents, rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) and belimumab
  • Treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARDs) other than MTX
  • Participation in any interventional clinical trial within 1 month before study Day 1
  • MTX dose >25 mg/week, prednisone dose >10 mg/day (or equivalent), or change in steroid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) dosing regimen within 28 days before study Day 1
  • Immunization with live vaccine or immunoglobulin (Ig) treatment within 28 days before study Day 1 or need for such treatment during the study (including follow-up)
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Any history or presence of active or latent tuberculosis, major infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous anti-infectives within 28 days before study Day 1
  • Other major concurrent illness or organ dysfunction as specified in the protocol
  • Serum IgG below 6 gram per liter (g/L)
  • Known hypersensitivity to atacicept or to any of the components of the formulated atacicept
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria could apply

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

United States1 site
  • Please Contact US Medical Information

    Rockland, Massachusetts

Other trials in United States

Germany1 site
  • Please contact the Merck KGaA Communication Center

    Darmstadt

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Multi-centre Phase II Study of Atacicept in Anti-TNFα-naïve Patients With Moderate to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of atacicept compared to placebo in the treatment of signs and symptoms in a subject population with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) and no previous exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha) therapy.

Being tested
Placebo matched to atacicept, Atacicept: with loading dose, Atacicept, Adalimumab
Keywords
Rheumatoid arthritis, Atacicept, Adalimumab, Humira®
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Placebo matched to ataciceptDrug

    Placebo matched to atacicept will be administered subcutaneously twice a week for initial 4 weeks, followed by once a week for subsequent 21 weeks.

  • Atacicept: with loading doseDrug

    Atacicept will be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 milligram (mg) twice a week for initial 4 weeks as loading dose, followed by 150 mg once a week for subsequent 21 weeks.

  • AtaciceptDrug

    Atacicept will be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 mg once a week for 25 weeks.

  • AdalimumabBiological

    Also called Humira®

    Adalimumab (Humira®) will be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 40 mg every other week for 25 weeks.

Study groups in NCT00595413
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Atacicept 150 mg with loading doseExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Atacicept: with loading dose
Atacicept 150 mg without loading doseExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Atacicept
AdalimumabActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Biological: Adalimumab
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo matched to atacicept

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP) at Week 26

    ACR20-CRP response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with >=20% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP).

    Measured: Week 26

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Based on CRP (ACR50-CRP) at Week 26

    ACR50-CRP response is defined as >=50% improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with >=50% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP).

    Measured: Week 26

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Based on CRP (ACR70-CRP) at Week 26

    ACR70-CRP response is defined as >=70% improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with >=70% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP).

    Measured: Week 26

  3. Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 26

    The EULAR response criteria evaluate change in DAS28 scores represented as "good response", "moderate response", or "no response" considering both the current DAS28 score and the observed improvement from baseline. Participants were considered to have "good" or "moderate" EULAR response if at the time of assessment, their DAS28 score was less than or equal to (<=) 5.1 and the improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score was greater than (>) 0.6; or if at the time of assessment, their DAS28 score was >5.1 and improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score was >1.2.

    Measured: Week 26

  4. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any new untoward medical occurrences/worsening of pre-existing medical condition without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect.

    Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug, assessed up to Week 38

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jan 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2007
  3. Primary completionOct 2009
  4. Study completionOct 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
311 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00595413
Sponsor's protocol ID
27905
Other IDs
2007-002536-29
Acronym
AUGUST II
Status last verified
Jan 2016
First submitted
7 Jan 2008
Last updated
17 Feb 2016
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • van Vollenhoven RF, Kinnman N, Vincent E, Wax S, Bathon J. Atacicept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Jul;63(7):1782-92. doi: 10.1002/art.30372.

    PubMed 21452294

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Atacicept: with loading dose, Atacicept and Adalimumab in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by EMD Serono at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP) at Week 26 (time frame: Week 26). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00595413, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in