Coronary Heart DiseasePhase 4ISAR-TEST-5NCT00598533
Efficacy Study of Rapamycin- vs. Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents to Reduce Coronary Restenosis
A Phase 4 study testing Rapamycin + Probucol-eluting stent (ISAR stent) and polymer based Zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor Resolute) in people with Coronary Heart Disease, run by Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen at 2 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of Rapamycin- and Zotarolimus-Eluting stents for the reduction of Coronary Restenosis Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Heart Disease
- What is being tested?
- Rapamycin + Probucol-eluting stent (ISAR stent) and polymer based Zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor Resolute)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3,002 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Feb 2008to Sep 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients older than age 18 with ischemic symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia in the presence of ≥ 50% de novo stenosis located in native coronary vessels
- Written, informed consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study
- In women with childbearing potential a negative pregnancy test is mandatory.
Who cannot join
- Target lesion located in the left main trunk.
- Target lesion located in the bypass graft.
- In-stent restenosis.
- Cardiogenic shock.
- Malignancies or other comorbid conditions (for example severe liver, renal and pancreatic disease) with life expectancy less than 12 months or that may result in protocol non-compliance.
- Known allergy to the study medications: Clopidogrel, Rapamycin, Probucol, Zotarolimus, stainless steel or cobalt chrome.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Inability to take clopidogrel for at least 6 months.
- Pregnancy (present, suspected or planned) or positive pregnancy test.
- Previous enrollment in this trial.
- Patient's inability to fully cooperate with the study protocol.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Germany2 sites
Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar
München, 81675
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Munich, 80636
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Randomized Trial of Rapamycin- and Zotarolimus-eluting Stents for the Reduction of Coronary Restenosis
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of Rapamycin- and Zotarolimus-Eluting stents for the reduction of Coronary Restenosis
Read the detailed description
This prospective, randomized trial will compare the efficacy and safety of a Rapamycin plus Probucol-eluting stent with a polymer based Zotarolimus-eluting stent. Patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease without cardiogenic shock who will undergo coronary angiography and willing to participate in the trial will receive a loading dose of 600mg clopidogrel at least 2 hours before the procedure. They will be randomized to receive one of the above mentioned stents.
- Conditions
- Coronary Heart Disease
- Being tested
- Rapamycin + Probucol-eluting stent (ISAR stent), polymer based Zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor Resolute)
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rapamycin + Probucol-eluting stent (ISAR stent)Device
Also called ISAR stent
due to randomization, Rapamycin- + Probucol-eluting stent will be implanted
polymer based Zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor Resolute)Device
Also called Endeavor Resolute
due to randomization, Zotarolimus-eluting stent with polymer will be implanted
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dual-DES | Experimental | Rapamycin + Probucol-eluting stent Receives: Device: Rapamycin + Probucol-eluting stent (ISAR stent) |
| ZES | Active comparator | Polymer based Zotarolimus-eluting stent Receives: Device: polymer based Zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor Resolute) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
A composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction related to the target vessel or target lesion revascularisation
Measured: at one year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Late luminal loss
Measured: at 6-8 months follow-up angiography
stent thrombosis
Measured: at one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2008
- Primary completionAug 2010
- Study completionSep 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Heart DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 3,002 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Adnan Kastrati, MD, Study chair, Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00598533
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GE IDE No. S02907
- Acronym
- ISAR-TEST-5
- Status last verified
- Jan 2012
- First submitted
- 10 Jan 2008
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Coughlan JJ, Aytekin A, Xhepa E, Cassese S, Joner M, Koch T, Wiebe J, Lenz T, Rheude T, Pellegrini C, Gewalt S, Ibrahim T, Laugwitz KL, Schunkert H, Kastrati A, Kufner S. Target and non-target vessel related events at 10 years post percutaneous coronary intervention. Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Jul;111(7):787-794. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-01986-4. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
PubMed 35147767Koch T, Lenz T, Joner M, Xhepa E, Koppara T, Wiebe J, Coughlan JJ, Aytekin A, Ibrahim T, Kessler T, Cassese S, Laugwitz KL, Schunkert H, Kastrati A, Kufner S; Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus Zotarolimus- Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) Investigators. Ten-year clinical outcomes of polymer-free versus durable polymer new-generation drug-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease with and without diabetes mellitus : Results of the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol- and Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) trial. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Oct;110(10):1586-1598. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01854-7. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
PubMed 34156521Kufner S, Ernst M, Cassese S, Joner M, Mayer K, Colleran R, Koppara T, Xhepa E, Koch T, Wiebe J, Ibrahim T, Fusaro M, Laugwitz KL, Schunkert H, Kastrati A, Byrne RA; ISAR-TEST-5 Investigators. 10-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of Polymer-Free Versus Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 14;76(2):146-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.026.
PubMed 32646563Harada Y, Colleran R, Kufner S, Giacoppo D, Rheude T, Michel J, Cassese S, Ibrahim T, Laugwitz KL, Kastrati A, Byrne RA; Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol- and Zotarolimus- Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) Investigators. Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016 Sep 1;15(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0429-y.
PubMed 27586678Colleran R, Kufner S, Harada Y, Giacoppo D, Cassese S, Repp J, Wiebe J, Lohaus R, Lahmann A, Schneider S, Ibrahim T, Laugwitz KL, Kastrati A, Byrne RA; Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) Investigators. Five-year follow-up of polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients presenting with st-elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 15;89(3):367-374. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26597. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
PubMed 27377301Kufner S, Sorges J, Mehilli J, Cassese S, Repp J, Wiebe J, Lohaus R, Lahmann A, Rheude T, Ibrahim T, Massberg S, Laugwitz KL, Kastrati A, Byrne RA; ISAR-TEST-5 Investigators. Randomized Trial of Polymer-Free Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents: 5-Year Results of the ISAR-TEST-5 Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr 25;9(8):784-792. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
PubMed 27017366Massberg S, Byrne RA, Kastrati A, Schulz S, Pache J, Hausleiter J, Ibrahim T, Fusaro M, Ott I, Schomig A, Laugwitz KL, Mehilli J; Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus Zotarolimus- Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) Investigators. Polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting versus Zotarolimus-eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) trial. Circulation. 2011 Aug 2;124(5):624-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.026732. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
PubMed 21768546
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Randomized Trial of Rapamycin- and Zotarolimus-eluting Stents for the Reduction of Coronary Restenosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00598533
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ISAR-TEST-5 / GE IDE No. S02907
- Conditions
- Coronary Heart Disease
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 3,002 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Deutsches Herzzentrum MuenchenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2008
- Primary completion
- Aug 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of Rapamycin- and Zotarolimus-Eluting stents for the reduction of Coronary Restenosis
Detailed description
This prospective, randomized trial will compare the efficacy and safety of a Rapamycin plus Probucol-eluting stent with a polymer based Zotarolimus-eluting stent. Patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease without cardiogenic shock who will undergo coronary angiography and willing to participate in the trial will receive a loading dose of 600mg clopidogrel at least 2 hours before the procedure. They will be randomized to receive one of the above mentioned stents.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dual-DES | Experimental | Device: Rapamycin + Probucol-eluting stent (ISAR stent)Rapamycin + Probucol-eluting stent |
| ZES | Active comparator | Device: polymer based Zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor Resolute)Polymer based Zotarolimus-eluting stent |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients older than age 18 with ischemic symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia in the presence of ≥ 50% de novo stenosis located in native coronary vessels
- Written, informed consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study
- In women with childbearing potential a negative pregnancy test is mandatory.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Target lesion located in the left main trunk.
- Target lesion located in the bypass graft.
- In-stent restenosis.
- Cardiogenic shock.
- Malignancies or other comorbid conditions (for example severe liver, renal and pancreatic disease) with life expectancy less than 12 months or that may result in protocol non-compliance.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rapamycin + Probucol-eluting stent (ISAR stent)Also: ISAR stentdue to randomization, Rapamycin- + Probucol-eluting stent will be implanted | Device | Dual-DES |
| polymer based Zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor Resolute)Also: Endeavor Resolutedue to randomization, Zotarolimus-eluting stent with polymer will be implanted | Device | ZES |
Primary outcome
A composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction related to the target vessel or target lesion revascularisation
Time frame: at one year
2 secondary outcomes
Late luminal loss
Time frame: at 6-8 months follow-up angiography
stent thrombosis
Time frame: at one year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2012.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35147767Coughlan JJ, Aytekin A, Xhepa E, Cassese S, Joner M, Koch T, Wiebe J, Lenz T, Rheude T, Pellegrini C, Gewalt S, Ibrahim T, Laugwitz KL, Schunkert H, Kastrati A, Kufner S. Target and non-target vessel related events at 10 years post percutaneous coronary intervention. Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Jul;111(7):787-794. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-01986-4. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34156521Koch T, Lenz T, Joner M, Xhepa E, Koppara T, Wiebe J, Coughlan JJ, Aytekin A, Ibrahim T, Kessler T, Cassese S, Laugwitz KL, Schunkert H, Kastrati A, Kufner S; Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus Zotarolimus- Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) Investigators. Ten-year clinical outcomes of polymer-free versus durable polymer new-generation drug-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease with and without diabetes mellitus : Results of the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol- and Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) trial. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Oct;110(10):1586-1598. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01854-7. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32646563Kufner S, Ernst M, Cassese S, Joner M, Mayer K, Colleran R, Koppara T, Xhepa E, Koch T, Wiebe J, Ibrahim T, Fusaro M, Laugwitz KL, Schunkert H, Kastrati A, Byrne RA; ISAR-TEST-5 Investigators. 10-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of Polymer-Free Versus Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 14;76(2):146-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27586678Harada Y, Colleran R, Kufner S, Giacoppo D, Rheude T, Michel J, Cassese S, Ibrahim T, Laugwitz KL, Kastrati A, Byrne RA; Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol- and Zotarolimus- Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) Investigators. Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016 Sep 1;15(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0429-y.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27377301Colleran R, Kufner S, Harada Y, Giacoppo D, Cassese S, Repp J, Wiebe J, Lohaus R, Lahmann A, Schneider S, Ibrahim T, Laugwitz KL, Kastrati A, Byrne RA; Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) Investigators. Five-year follow-up of polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients presenting with st-elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 15;89(3):367-374. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26597. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27017366Kufner S, Sorges J, Mehilli J, Cassese S, Repp J, Wiebe J, Lohaus R, Lahmann A, Rheude T, Ibrahim T, Massberg S, Laugwitz KL, Kastrati A, Byrne RA; ISAR-TEST-5 Investigators. Randomized Trial of Polymer-Free Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents: 5-Year Results of the ISAR-TEST-5 Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr 25;9(8):784-792. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21768546Massberg S, Byrne RA, Kastrati A, Schulz S, Pache J, Hausleiter J, Ibrahim T, Fusaro M, Ott I, Schomig A, Laugwitz KL, Mehilli J; Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus Zotarolimus- Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) Investigators. Polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting versus Zotarolimus-eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) trial. Circulation. 2011 Aug 2;124(5):624-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.026732. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
Related trials for Coronary Heart Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Adnan Kastrati, MD study chair
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Rapamycin + Probucol-eluting stent (ISAR stent) and polymer based Zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor Resolute) in people with Coronary Heart Disease, run by Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen at 2 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
A composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction related to the target vessel or target lesion revascularisation (time frame: at one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00598533, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2012.