LeukemiaPhase 2AlloTreoNCT00598624
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Treosulfan Based Conditioning Prior to Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
A Phase 2 study testing Treosulfan IV in people with Leukemia and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 12 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
This is a multicentric, non-randomized, non-controlled open-label phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treosulfan in a combination regimen with fludarabine as conditioning therapy prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients with haematological malignancies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 69 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Treosulfan IV
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 175 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- Sep 2005to Dec 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 69 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with haematological malignancies, according to WHO classification, such as:
- acute myeloid leukaemia -AML- in CR1 except "low-risk cases" defined by t(15;17), t(8;21), inv 16 or normal cytogenetics at diagnosis with FLT3-ITD negative and NPM-1 positive, with no high risk clinical criteria
- any AML beyond CR1
- acute lymphoblast leukaemia -ALL- in CR1 only if at "high risk" defined by cytogenetics as t(9;22), t(4;11) or for persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD)
- any ALL beyond CR1
- chronic myeloid leukaemia -CML- in chronic phase (CP) or accelerated phase (AP) intolerant/not responsive to TK-inhibitors
Show all 30Show fewer
- myeloproliferative disorders -MPD-
- myelodysplastic syndrome -MDS- with intermediate or high risk International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)
- diffuse large cell lymphoma -DLCL- with a chemosensitive relapse or beyond CR1
- lymphoblastic and Burkitt lymphoma with a chemosensitive relapse or beyond CR1
- mantle cell lymphoma -MCL- with a chemosensitive relapse or beyond CR1
- follicular lymphoma -FCL- with a chemosensitive relapse or beyond CR2
- Hodgkin lymphoma -HD- with a chemosensitive relapse or beyond CR1
- chronic lymphocytic leukaemia -CLL- at "poor risk" in CR1 or with a chemosensitive relapse
- CLL relapsing after high dose chemotherapy
- T-cell non Hodgkin lymphoma -T-NHL- in CR1 or beyond
- multiple myeloma -MM- at high risk for cytogenetics or ISS stage 3 in CR1 following high dose chemotherapy
- MM at any relapse/progression except refractory disease
- Availability of an HLA-identical sibling donor (MRD) or HLA-identical unrelated donor (MUD)
- HLA-identity defined by the following markers: A, B, DRB1, DQB1 or a single or double Cord Blood unit (CB) with at least a 4 out of 6 HLA-matching by the following markers: A, B and DRB.
- identity between the 2 CB units and the recipient;
- Two identical CB units with one or two mismatches with the recipient;
- Two CB units with one mismatch between them and two mismatches with the recipient. We will prefer mismatches either for class I or for class II antigens; we will avoid mismatches concerning both classes I and II together.
- Target graft size (unmanipulated, preferably not cryopreserved)
- bone marrow: 2 to 10 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg BW recipient or > 2 x 108 nucleated cells/kg BW recipient or
- peripheral blood: 4 to 10 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg BW recipient
- Age > 18 and < 70 years
- Karnofsky Index > 80 %
- Adequate contraception in female patients of child-bearing potential
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Secondary malignancies
- Previous allogeneic transplantation
- Hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index > 4 (HCT-CI Sorror et al, Appendix M)
- Known and manifested malignant involvement of the CNS
- Active infectious disease
- HIV- positivity or active hepatitis infection
Show all 14Show fewer
- Impaired liver function (Bilirubin > upper normal limit; Transaminases > 3.0 x upper normal limit)
- Impaired renal function (Creatinine-clearance < 60 ml/min; Serum Creatinine > 1.5 x upper normal limit).
- Pleural effusion or ascites > 1.0 L
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Known hypersensitivity to treosulfan and/or fludarabine
- Participation in another experimental drug trial within 4 weeks before day -6
- Non-co-operative behaviour or non-compliance
- Psychiatric diseases or conditions that might impair the ability to give informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country.
12 sites in 1 country
Italy12 sites, 12 recruiting
- Recruiting
USC Ematologia, Ospedali Riuniti
Bergamo
Anna Grassi, MD, agrassi@ospedaliriuniti.bergamo.it
Maria Luisa Ferrari, DM, mlferrari@ospedaliriuniti.bergamo.it
- Recruiting
Ospedale centrale di Bolzano - Reparto di Ematologia
Bolzano
Enrico Morello, MD, +390471908807, enrico.morello@asbz.it
Enrico Morello, MD
- Recruiting
PO "R.Binaghi" - CTMO
Cagliari
Adriana Vacca, MD, +393285452813, vaadriana@tiscali.it
Giorgio La Nasa, MD
- Recruiting
AO "Santa Croce" e Carle - Reparto di Ematologia
Cuneo
Laura Bertolotti, Data Manager, +390171642229, laura.bertolotti@libero.it
Andrea Gallamini, MD
- Recruiting
IRCCS San Raffaele; Unità Operativa di Ematologia
Milan, MI, 20100
Alessandro Crotta, MD, +39 0226433903, a.crotta@hsr.it
Stefania Trinca, +39 0226434289, stefania.trinca@hsr.it
- Recruiting
Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - Divisione di Ematologia
Milan
Liliana Calabrese, Data Manager, +390257489536, liliana.calabrese@ieo.it
Giovanni Martinelli, MD
- Recruiting
Ospedale Civile - UTI ematologia per il trapianto emopoietico
Pescara
Paolo Di Bartolomei, MD, pescaratmo@virgilio.it
Paolo Di Bartolomei, MD
- Recruiting
Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova - SC di Ematologia
Reggio Emilia
Alessandro Bonini, MD, bonini.alessandro@asmn.re.it
Luigi Gugliotta, MD
- Recruiting
Dipartimento Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia; Azienda Policlinico Umberto I
Roma, Roma, 00100
Emilia Iannella, MD, +39 3202233365, emiliaiannella@libero.it
Roberto Ricci, +39 3477578735, r.ricci@bce.uniroma1.it
- Recruiting
AO San Camillo Forlanini - UOC ematologia e trapianto
Roma
Beatrice Pinazzi, MD, mpinazzi@scamilloforlanini.rm.it
Ignazio Majolino, MD
- Recruiting
Ematologia, Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza
San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia
Angelo Michele Carella, MD, am.carella@operapadrepio.it
Marzia Tricarico, DM, m.tricarico@operapadrepio.it
- Recruiting
AOU Santa Maria della Misericordia - Clinica Ematologica
Udine
Francesca Patriarca, MD, patriarca.francesca@aoud.sanita.fvg.it
Michela Cerno, MD
About this study
Official title: Clinical Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Treosulfan Based Conditioning Prior to Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Haematological Malignancies
This is a multicentric, non-randomized, non-controlled open-label phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treosulfan in a combination regimen with fludarabine as conditioning therapy prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients with haematological malignancies.
The aim is to demonstrate a clinical benefit compared with historical data on intravenous busulfan (BusulfexTM, BusilvexTM), the only drug so far registered in the indication conditioning before allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
- Conditions
- Leukemia, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma, Hodgkin Lymphoma, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
- Being tested
- Treosulfan IV
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse, Hodgkin Disease, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Treosulfan IVDrug
Treosulfan i.v.: 14 g/m²/d from day -6 to day -4
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Treosulfan IV |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy: Evaluation of engraftment
Measured: 28 days
Safety: Evaluation of the incidence of CTC grade 3 and 4 adverse events
Measured: between day -6 and day +28
Secondary outcomes (8)
Efficacy: Evaluation of disease free survival (DFS)
Measured: 1 year
Efficacy: Evaluation of overall survival (OS)
Measured: 1 year
Efficacy: Evaluation of relapse incidence (RI)
Measured: 1 year
Efficacy: Documentation of donor chimerism
Measured: on day +28, +56 and +100
Safety: Evaluation of incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM)
Measured: on day +28 and day +100
Safety: cumulative incidence of NRM
Measured: 1 year
Safety: Evaluation of cumulative incidence and severity of acute and chronic graft vs. host disease (GvHD)
Measured: 1 year
Safety: EBV reactivation
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2005
- Primary completionDec 2009 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2010 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IRCCS San RaffaeleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 175 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS San Raffaele
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Fabio FC Ciceri, MD, Study director
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00598624
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2005-005182-11
- Other IDs
- 2005
- Acronym
- AlloTreo
- Status last verified
- Aug 2009
- First submitted
- 10 Jan 2008
- Last updated
- 11 Aug 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Lazzari L, Ruggeri A, Lupo Stanghellini MT, Mastaglio S, Messina C, Giglio F, Lorusso A, Perini T, Piemontese S, Marcatti M, Lorentino F, Xue E, Clerici D, Corti C, Bernardi M, Assanelli A, Greco R, Ciceri F, Peccatori J. Treosulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Long-Term Results From a Phase 2 Clinical Trial. Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 10;11:731478. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.731478. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34568066
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Aug 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Treosulfan Based Conditioning Prior to Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Haematological Malignancies
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00598624
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AlloTreo / 2005-005182-11
- Conditions
- Leukemia, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma, Hodgkin Lymphoma, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 175 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS San RaffaeleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2005
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2010 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a multicentric, non-randomized, non-controlled open-label phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treosulfan in a combination regimen with fludarabine as conditioning therapy prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients with haematological malignancies.
The aim is to demonstrate a clinical benefit compared with historical data on intravenous busulfan (BusulfexTM, BusilvexTM), the only drug so far registered in the indication conditioning before allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Drug: Treosulfan IV |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 69 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (30 listed)
- Patients with haematological malignancies, according to WHO classification, such as:
- Availability of an HLA-identical sibling donor (MRD) or HLA-identical unrelated donor (MUD)
- Target graft size (unmanipulated, preferably not cryopreserved)
- Age > 18 and < 70 years
- Karnofsky Index > 80 %
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Secondary malignancies
- Previous allogeneic transplantation
- Hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index > 4 (HCT-CI Sorror et al, Appendix M)
- Known and manifested malignant involvement of the CNS
- Active infectious disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Treosulfan IVTreosulfan i.v.: 14 g/m²/d from day -6 to day -4 | Drug | A |
Primary outcome
Efficacy: Evaluation of engraftment
Time frame: 28 days
Safety: Evaluation of the incidence of CTC grade 3 and 4 adverse events
Time frame: between day -6 and day +28
8 secondary outcomes
Efficacy: Evaluation of disease free survival (DFS)
Time frame: 1 year
Efficacy: Evaluation of overall survival (OS)
Time frame: 1 year
Efficacy: Evaluation of relapse incidence (RI)
Time frame: 1 year
Efficacy: Documentation of donor chimerism
Time frame: on day +28, +56 and +100
Safety: Evaluation of incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM)
Time frame: on day +28 and day +100
Safety: cumulative incidence of NRM
Time frame: 1 year
Safety: Evaluation of cumulative incidence and severity of acute and chronic graft vs. host disease (GvHD)
Time frame: 1 year
Safety: EBV reactivation
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Aug 2009.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34568066Lazzari L, Ruggeri A, Lupo Stanghellini MT, Mastaglio S, Messina C, Giglio F, Lorusso A, Perini T, Piemontese S, Marcatti M, Lorentino F, Xue E, Clerici D, Corti C, Bernardi M, Assanelli A, Greco R, Ciceri F, Peccatori J. Treosulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Long-Term Results From a Phase 2 Clinical Trial. Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 10;11:731478. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.731478. eCollection 2021.
Related trials for Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fabio FC Ciceri, MD study director
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Treosulfan IV in people with Leukemia and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 12 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 30 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Luciano LC Callegaro, Monitor (+390226433903, callegaro.luciano@hsr.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy: Evaluation of engraftment (time frame: 28 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00598624, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2009.