AzTrials
AzTrials

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticNCT00604045

DoD PTSD November 13 - Information Processing Modification in the Treatment of PTSD

A study testing Attention Bias Modification (ABM) in people with Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, run by San Diego State University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a computerized intervention designed to change the nature of attention biases will be effective in reducing the symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in American combat veterans returning from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
What is being tested?
Attention Bias Modification (ABM)
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
25 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2009to May 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Primary DSM-IV-TR Axis I diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder
  • Combat veteran from Iraq and/or Afghanistan

Who cannot join

  • No change in medication type or dose during the twelve weeks prior to treatment
  • No current psychotherapy
  • No evidence of suicidal intent
  • No evidence of current substance dependence in the past 6 months
  • No evidence of current or past schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or organic mental disorder

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Center for Understanding and Treating Anxiety

    San Diego, California, 92120

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Information Processing Modification in the Treatment of PTSD

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a computerized intervention designed to change the nature of attention biases will be effective in reducing the symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in American combat veterans returning from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Read the detailed description

Thirty percent of returning veterans present with mental health problems with Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as the most common problem in this group (52% of overall diagnoses). This translates into PTSD prevalence rates of 12% in Afghani veterans and 19% for Iraqi veterans, rates that are two to three times higher than the overall lifetime prevalence rate in the general population (8%). Moreover, 70% have not received any mental health services. Thus the majority are not receiving any help. Those with PTSD are likely to experience problems across several life domains including higher rates of divorce, problems raising children, and engaging in domestic violence. They are also more likely to suffer from other mental health problems including depression, substance abuse, and generalized anxiety disorder. Forty four percent of individuals with PTSD do not respond to psychosocial and pharmacological treatments. Thus, there is a clear need to develop highly effective and efficient treatments for PTSD. Researchers have established a relationship between PTSD and difficulty disengaging attention from threat relevant information. This knowledge; however, has not been translated into more effective treatments for this disorder. This five-year proposal aims to test a computerized treatment for PTSD in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study that would bridge research on attention bias and treatment development. Those in the active condition will receive a computer-delivered attention modification program (AMP) designed to enhance attention disengagement from threatening stimuli. The AMP protocol includes six weeks of biweekly sessions in which participants see 240 trials consisting of the various combinations of probe type (E or F), probe position (top or bottom), and word type (Neutral or Trauma). Of the 240 trials, 48 include only neutral words: 2 (probe type) X 2 (probe position) X 12 (word pairs). The remaining 192 trials include one neutral word and one trauma word: 2 (probe type) X 2 (probe position) X 2 (repetitions) X 24 (word pairs). On trials where participants see one neutral word and one trauma word (i.e., 80% of the trials), the probe always follows the neutral word. Thus, although there is no specific instruction to direct attention away from threat word, on 80% of the trials the position of the threat word indicates the position of the probe (i.e., in the location opposite the threat word). The placebo condition (PC) will be identical to the AMP condition except that during the presentation of threat/neutral word pairs, the probe will appear with equal frequency in the position of threat and neutral words. Thus, neither threat nor neutral words have signal value. We have used this intervention to successfully establish a pattern of enhanced attention disengagement to threat words in 3 studies. We present the results from 3 clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of attention modification programs (AMP) in ameliorating symptoms of anxiety. Specifically, we report results from studies of individuals with generalized social phobia (GSP; n=53) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD; n=24) demonstrating the effectiveness of the procedures described in this proposal. In brief, our intervention was effective in: a) changing biased attention, b) reducing clinical symptoms of anxiety, c) maintaining its effects in up to one year follow-up. This efficient and efficacious technique for changing attention bias in anxiety can provide a low cost, easy to administer treatment that is grounded in basic cognitive science that may help reduce suffering in individuals with anxiety. The goal of the current proposal is to extend these findings to the highly related disorder of PTSD, and to examine the generalizability of the results to individuals with comorbid conditions. In the current proposal we will test two hypotheses: 1) Individuals with PTSD completing the AMP will show a larger reduction in their attention bias to threat compared to the placebo group, 2) Individuals with PTSD completing AMP will show a larger reduction in anxiety symptoms compared to the placebo group.

Being tested
Attention Bias Modification (ABM), Attention Control Condition (ACC)
Keywords
post traumatic stress disorder, cognitive bias, attention, combat, neuroimaging
Medical subject headings
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Attention Bias Modification (ABM)Behavioural

    The ABM comprised a probe detection paradigm described above, modified to facilitate the allocation of attention away from threatening material. In this task, the probe always replaced the neutral word. Stimuli comprised a different set of 12 threat-neutral word pairs different than those used in the attention bias assessment. Participants completed 288 training trials: 2 (probe type) x 2 (probe location) x 2 (threat location) x 12 (threat-neutral word pairs) x 3 (repetition). Thus, although there were no explicit instructions to direct attention away from threat words, on all trials, the position of the neutral word indicated the position of the probe.

  • Attention Control Condition (ACC)Behavioural

    The ACC condition was identical to the ABM procedure with the exception that the probe appeared with equal frequency in the position of the threat and neutral words, such that attention was neither trained towards nor away from threat.

Study groups in NCT00604045
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1 Attention Bias Modification (ABM)ExperimentalThe ABM comprised a probe detection paradigm described above, modified to facilitate the allocation of attention away from threatening material. In this task, the probe always replaced the neutral word. Stimuli comprised a different set of 12 threat-neutral word pairs different than those used in the attention bias assessment. Participants completed 288 training trials: 2 (probe type) x 2 (probe location) x 2 (threat location) x 12 (threat-neutral word pairs) x 3 (repetition). Thus, although there were no explicit instructions to direct attention away from threat words, on all trials, the position of the neutral word indicated the position of the probe.
Receives: Behavioral: Attention Bias Modification (ABM)
2 Attention Control Condition (ACC)Placebo comparatorThe ACC condition was identical to the ABM procedure with the exception that the probe appeared with equal frequency in the position of the threat and neutral words, such that attention was neither trained towards nor away from threat.
Receives: Behavioral: Attention Control Condition (ACC)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Military Version (PCL-M)

    The PCL-5 is a 20-item self-report measure that assesses the 20 DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD. Scores range from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

    Measured: Pre-Treatment, Post-Treatment (after 4 weeks of treatment)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jan 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2009
  3. Primary completionMay 2012
  4. Study completionMay 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00604045
Sponsor's protocol ID
PT075321
Other IDs
PT075321
Status last verified
Jan 2008
First submitted
16 Jan 2008
Last updated
28 Mar 2014
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Attention Bias Modification (ABM) in people with Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, run by San Diego State University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Mar 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Military Version (PCL-M) (time frame: Pre-Treatment, Post-Treatment (after 4 weeks of treatment)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2014.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT00604045 | AzTrials