AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationPhase 4PAVAVNCT00605748

Pulmonary Vein (PV) -Isolation: Arrhythmogenic Vein(s) Versus All Veins

A Phase 4 study testing Segmental PV-Isolation of the arrhythmogenic vein(s) and Segmental PV-Isolation of all veins in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen at 1 site in Germany.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We conduct a randomized study comparing the safety and effectiveness of two interventional ablation techniques for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the segmental pulmonary vein ablation approach, (1) with empiric isolation of all pulmonary veins or (2) Segmental Isolation of the arrhythmogenic pulmonary… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation
What is being tested?
Segmental PV-Isolation of the arrhythmogenic vein(s) and Segmental PV-Isolation of all veins
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
212 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Dec 2007to Dec 2009
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients between 18 and 80 years old with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
  • Episodes with a maximum duration for 7 days
  • at least 4 episodes / month
  • at least one attempt with Class I or III anti-arrhythmic drugs and/or with ß-blockers without success
  • sufficient oral anticoagulation for a minimum of four weeks previous to ablation

Who cannot join

  • hyperthyroidism
  • mitral regurgitation > II°
  • intracardiac thrombi documented by transesophageal echocardiography
  • left ventricular ejection< fraction 35%,
  • history of ablation, myocardial infarction or cardiac surgery in the previous 3 months
  • history of left-atrial ablation procedure
  • contraindication for oral anticoagulation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Heidi L. Estner, MD contact

+49 89 1218 ext. 2020

estner@dhm.mhn.de

Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

    Munich, 80636

    Heidi L. Estner, MD, 0049 89 1218-2020, estner@dhm.mhn.de

    Heidi L Estner, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: PV-Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Isolation of the Arrhythmogenic Vein(s) vs. Isolation of All Veins

We conduct a randomized study comparing the safety and effectiveness of two interventional ablation techniques for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the segmental pulmonary vein ablation approach, (1) with empiric isolation of all pulmonary veins or (2) Segmental Isolation of the arrhythmogenic pulmonary vein(s)

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ablation procedures typically involve isolation of all pulmonary veins (PVs), yet the need for such an extensive ablation strategy in all patients is unclear.

OBJECTIVE:

We conduct a randomized study comparing the safety and effectiveness of two interventional ablation techniques for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the segmental pulmonary vein ablation approach, (1) with empiric isolation of all pulmonary veins or (2) Segmental Isolation of only the arrhythmogenic pulmonary vein(s). The single-blind interventional, randomized study will include 106 patients in each arm.

A reablation procedure, with the use of the same technique as the first ablation, will be offered to the patient in case of a symptomatic atrial fibrillation recurrence beyond the third month after the ablation procedure.

Follow-Up After discharge, patients w ill be scheduled for repeated visits in the arrhythmia clinic at 3 and 6 months after the first ablation. At each of these visits, intensive questioning for arrhythmia-related symptoms (fatigue, dizziness, and nausea) since the last follow-up visit was performed, especially for those that the patient had experienced before ablation. At every follow-up visit, 7-day Holter monitoring w ill be performed. Multislice CT or MRI of the pulmonary vein w ill be obtained before and 3 months after the ablation procedure for evaluation of the pulmonary vein anatomy and for detection of radiofrequency ablation-induced pulmonary vein stenosis .

Study End Points and Definitions The primary end point of the study will be freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (of > 30-second duration) including atrial fibrillation and atypical atrial flutter documented by 7-day Holter monitoring performed at the 6-month follow-up. Two secondary study end points will be chosen. The first will be freedom from arrhythmia-related symptoms during the 6-month follow-up. Because early recurrences of atrial tachyarrhythmias within the first month after ablation may be a transient phenomenon, this time interval was excluded from analysis. Second, a composite of periprocedural pericardial tamponade, thromboembolic complications, and pulmonary vein stenosis with > 50% lumen loss (main vessel or first branching) was defined as a safety end point

Being tested
Segmental PV-Isolation of the arrhythmogenic vein(s), Segmental PV-Isolation of all veins
Keywords
catheter ablation, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary vein
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Segmental PV-Isolation of the arrhythmogenic vein(s)Procedure or surgery

    isolation of pulmonary veins for curing atrial fibrillation

  • Segmental PV-Isolation of all veinsProcedure or surgery

    isolation of pulmonary veins for curing atrial fibrillation

Study groups in NCT00605748
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorSegmental PV-Isolation of the arrhythmogenic vein(s)
Receives: Procedure: Segmental PV-Isolation of the arrhythmogenic vein(s)
2Active comparatorSegmental PV-Isolation of all veins
Receives: Procedure: Segmental PV-Isolation of all veins

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. freedom of atrial tachycardia 6 months after ablation

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. freedom of symptoms due to atrial tachycardia 6 months after ablation safety

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jan 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2007
  3. Primary completionJun 2009 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2009 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
212 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00605748
Sponsor's protocol ID
GE IDE No. C00807
Acronym
PAVAV
Status last verified
Aug 2008
First submitted
18 Jan 2008
Last updated
27 Aug 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Fichtner S, Hessling G, Ammar S, Reents T, Estner HL, Jilek C, Kathan S, Buchner M, Dillier R, Deisenhofer I. A prospective randomized study comparing isolation of the arrhythmogenic vein versus all veins in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Clin Cardiol. 2013 Jul;36(7):422-6. doi: 10.1002/clc.22132. Epub 2013 May 13.

    PubMed 23670880

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Segmental PV-Isolation of the arrhythmogenic vein(s) and Segmental PV-Isolation of all veins in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Aug 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Heidi L. Estner, MD (+49 89 1218 ext. 2020, estner@dhm.mhn.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

freedom of atrial tachycardia 6 months after ablation (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00605748, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Aug 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in