AzTrials
AzTrials

GoutPhase 2NCT00610363

Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Rilonacept for the Prevention of Gout Flares

A Phase 2 study testing Rilonacept in people with Gout, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 34 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This was a clinical research study to determine the safety and effectiveness of an experimental drug called rilonacept in participants with gout who were beginning another additional treatment. Participants participated in this study for approximately 24 weeks. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Gout
What is being tested?
Rilonacept
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
83 participants
Where
34 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Nov 2007to Oct 2008
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female greater than 18 years of age;
  • Previously met the preliminary criteria of the American Rheumatism Association (ARA) for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout;
  • At least 2 gout flares in the year prior to the screening visit.

Who cannot join

  • Acute gout flare within 2 weeks of the screening visit and during screening;
  • Persistent chronic or active infections;
  • History of an allergic reaction to allopurinol;
  • History or presence of cancer within 5 years of the screening visit.

Trial locations and contacts

34 sites in 1 country.

34 sites in 1 country

United States34 sites
  • Study site

    Albany, New York, 12206

  • Study site

    Billings, Montana, 59101

  • Study site

    Boise, Idaho, 83702

  • Study site

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29406

  • Study site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242

  • Study site

    Colorado Srings, Colorado, 80910

  • Study site

    Dallas, Texas, 75235

  • Study site

    DeLand, Florida, 32720

  • Study site

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • Study site

    Dunwoody, Georgia, 30338

  • Study site

    Grenville, South Carolina, 29601

  • Study site

    Honolulu, Hawaii, 96814

  • Study site

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46268

  • Study site

    Mayfield Village, Ohio, 44143

  • Study site

    Monroe, North Carolina, 28112

  • Study site

    Ocala, Florida, 34471

  • Study site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112

  • Study site

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68114

  • Study site

    Orlando, Florida, 32804

  • Study site

    Owensboro, Kentucky, 42303

  • Study site

    Plainview, New York, 11803

  • Study site

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612

  • Study site

    Reno, Nevada, 89502

  • Study site

    Roslyn, New York, 11576

  • Study site

    San Diego, California, 92108

  • Study site

    Santa Maria, California, 93454

  • Study site

    South Bend, Indiana, 46601

  • Study site

    Spokane, Washington, 99204

  • Study site

    St. Petersburg, Florida, 33710

  • Study site

    Tampa, Florida, 33614

  • Study site

    Tampa, Florida

  • Study site

    West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611

  • Study site

    Wheaton, Maryland, 20902

  • Study site

    Whittier, California, 90601

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Rilonacept for the Prevention of Gout Flares During Initiation of Allopurinol Therapy

This was a clinical research study to determine the safety and effectiveness of an experimental drug called rilonacept in participants with gout who were beginning another additional treatment. Participants participated in this study for approximately 24 weeks. Rilonacept was being studied for use in preventing gout attacks in participants who had gout.

Conditions
Gout
Being tested
Rilonacept, Placebo (for Rilonacept)
Medical subject headings
Gout

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RilonaceptBiological

    Rilonacept 320 mg loading dose on Day 1 followed by Rilonacept 160 mg/2 mL injections qw for 17 weeks.

  • Placebo (for Rilonacept)Other

    Placebo loading dose on Day 1 followed by single placebo injections (2 mL) qw for 17 weeks.

Study groups in NCT00610363
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorTwo subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Rilonacept) as a loading dose on Day 1 followed by a single injection once a week (qw) from Week 1 to Week 16.
Receives: Other: Placebo (for Rilonacept)
Rilonacept 160 mgExperimentalTwo subcutaneous injections of Rilonacept 160 mg (for a total of 320 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1, followed by a single 160 mg injection of Rilonacept qw from Week 1 to Week 16.
Receives: Biological: Rilonacept

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Gout Flares Per Participant Assessed From Day 1 to Day 84 (Week 12)

    A gout flare was defined as participant reported acute articular pain typical of a gout attack that required treatment with an anti-inflammatory therapeutic: had at least 3 of the following 4 signs or symptoms: joint swelling, tenderness, redness, and pain and with at least 1 of the following: rapid onset of pain, decreased range of motion, joint warmth or other symptoms similar to a prior gout flare. Number of gout flares per participant was reported for this outcome measure. For drop-outs, only flares occurred before Day 84 were counted, regardless whether the flares occurred during the treatment period or not.

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84 (Week 12)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Percentage of Participants With at Least One Gout Flare From Day 1 to Day 84 (Week 12)

    Gout flare was defined as acute articular pain typical of a gout attack that required treatment with an anti-inflammatory therapeutic: had at least 3 of the following 4 signs or symptoms: joint swelling, tenderness, redness, and pain; and with at least 1 of the following: rapid onset of pain, decreased range of motion, joint warmth or other symptoms similar to a prior gout flare. Percentage of participants with at least one gout flare was reported for this outcome measure.

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84 (Week 12)

  2. Mean Number of Gout Flares Per Month Per Participant From Day 1 to Day 84 (Week 12)

    Gout flare was defined as acute articular pain typical of a gout attack that required treatment with an anti-inflammatory therapeutic: had at least 3 of the following 4 signs or symptoms: joint swelling, tenderness, redness, and pain, and with at least 1 of the following: rapid onset of pain, decreased range of motion, joint warmth or other symptoms similar to a prior gout flare. Mean number of flares per month = (total number of flares observed)/ (total number of days subject was in the period/28 days).

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84 (Week 12)

  3. Mean Number of Gout Flare Days Per Participant From Day 1 to Day 84 (Week 12)

    Gout flare was defined as acute articular pain typical of a gout attack that required treatment with an anti-inflammatory therapeutic: had at least 3 of the following 4 signs or symptoms: joint swelling, tenderness, redness, and pain, and with at least 1 of the following: rapid onset of pain, decreased range of motion, joint warmth or other symptoms similar to a prior gout flare. Mean number of gout flare days per participant was reported for this outcome measure.

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84 (Week 12)

  4. Mean Number of Gout Flare Days Per Month Per Participant From Day 1 to Day 84 (Week 12)

    Gout flare was defined as acute articular pain typical of a gout attack that required treatment with an anti-inflammatory therapeutic: had at least 3 of the following 4 signs or symptoms: joint swelling, tenderness, redness, and pain, and with at least 1 of the following: rapid onset of pain, decreased range of motion, joint warmth or other symptoms similar to a prior gout flare. Mean number of gout flare days per month per participant was reported for this outcome measure.

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84 (Week 12)

  5. Number of Gout Flare Days With Participant's Pain Score of 5 or More (From Daily Diary) Per Participant From Day 1 to Day 84 (Week 12)

    Participants were asked to complete a telephone diary by calling the IVRS daily beginning at the baseline visit (Day 1) through the follow-up visit (Day 154) and reported their general well-being, gout symptoms, and weekly study drug administrations. At the onset of pain from a gout flare, participants were to answer additional diary questions regarding their gout flare and had to continue daily flare assessments until they reported the flare had ended. If a flare occurred just prior to the follow-up visit (Day 154), participants were to continue completing the daily diary until the flare resolved. Gout flare pain was assessed on a scale from 0 to 10 (with 0=no pain and 10=severe pain) within the past 24 hours.

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84 (Week 12)

  6. Number of Gout Flare Days With Participant's Pain Score of 5 or More (From Daily Diary) Per Month Per Participant From Day 1 to Day 84 (Week 12)

    Participants were asked to complete a telephone diary by calling the IVRS daily beginning at the baseline visit (Day 1) through the follow-up visit (Day 141) and reported their general well-being, gout symptoms, and weekly study drug administrations. At the onset of pain from a gout flare, participants were to answer additional diary questions regarding their gout flare and had to continue daily flare assessments until they reported the flare had ended. If a flare occurred just prior to the follow-up visit (Day 141), participants were to continue completing the daily diary until the flare resolved. Gout flare pain was assessed on a scale from 0 to 10 (with 0=no pain and 10=severe pain) within the past 24 hours.

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84 (Week 12)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Feb 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2007
  3. Primary completionOct 2008
  4. Study completionOct 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
83 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00610363
Sponsor's protocol ID
IL1T-GA-0619
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
24 Jan 2008
Last updated
2 May 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Schumacher HR Jr, Sundy JS, Terkeltaub R, Knapp HR, Mellis SJ, Stahl N, Yancopoulos GD, Soo Y, King-Davis S, Weinstein SP, Radin AR; 0619 Study Group. Rilonacept (interleukin-1 trap) in the prevention of acute gout flares during initiation of urate-lowering therapy: results of a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Mar;64(3):876-84. doi: 10.1002/art.33412.

    PubMed 22223180
  • Khanna D, Sarkin AJ, Khanna PP, Shieh MM, Kavanaugh AF, Terkeltaub RA, Lee SJ, Singh JA, Hirsch JD. Minimally important differences of the gout impact scale in a randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Jul;50(7):1331-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker023. Epub 2011 Mar 3.

    PubMed 21372003

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Rilonacept in people with Gout, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 34 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 34 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Gout Flares Per Participant Assessed From Day 1 to Day 84 (Week 12) (time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 84 (Week 12)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00610363, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in