AzTrials
AzTrials

Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 3NCT00611455

Investigating Clinical Efficacy of Ofatumumab in Adult Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Who Had an Inadequate Response to MTX Therapy

A Phase 3 study testing ofatumumab in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 45 sites in 13 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a phase III, double-blind, randomized, multicenter, and parallel group trial with a duration of 24 weeks, followed by a 120 week Open-label Period. the primary purpose of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy of ofatumumab in reducing clinical signs and symptoms in adult RA patients after a single course of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What is being tested?
ofatumumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
265 participants
Where
45 sitesin 13 countries
Study dates
1 Jan 2008to 15 Jul 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Active disease at the time of screening as defined by:
  • ≥ 8 swollen joints (of 66 joints assessed) and ≥ 8 tender joints (of 68 joints assessed), C-Reactive Protein (CRP) ≥ 1.0 mg/dL or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) ≥ 22 mm/hour, DAS28≥3.2 (based on ESR);
  • Inadequate response to previous or current methotrexate treatment;
  • Treatment with methotrexate (MTX), 7.5-25 mg/week, for at least 12 weeks and at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a history of a rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA or with significant systemic involvement secondary to RA;
  • Previous exposure to biologic anti-rheumatic therapies, including investigational compounds;
  • Previous exposure to biologic DMARDs; Chronic or ongoing active infectious disease requiring systemic treatment;
  • Clinically significant cardiac disease; History of significant cerebrovascular disease;
  • Significant concurrent, uncontrolled medical condition including, but not limited to, renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, neurological, cerebral psychiatric disease, or evidence of demyelinating disease;
  • Known HIV positive; Serologic evidence of Hepatitis B infection; Positive test for Hepatitis C; Positive plasma / white cell JC Virus PCR;
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Serum IgG < lower limit of normal;
  • Breast feeding women or women with a positive pregnancy test at screening;
  • Current participation in any other interventional clinical study;
  • Patients known or suspected of not being able to comply with a study protocol.

Trial locations and contacts

45 sites in 13 countries.

45 sites in 13 countries

Argentina5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1419AHN

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Córdoba, 5000

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Quilmes, Buenos Aires, 1878

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000

  • GSK Investigational Site

    San Miguel de Tucumán, 4000

Other trials in Argentina

Australia5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Clayton, Victoria, 3168

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Malvern, Victoria, 3144

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Maroochydore, Queensland, 4558

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Shenton Park, Western Australia, 6008

Other trials in Australia

Poland5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bialystok, 15-351

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bialystok, 15337

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bydgoszcz, 85168

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Warsaw, 02-256

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Wroclaw, 50-088

Other trials in Poland

Russia5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Moscow, 115522

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saint Petersburg, 190068

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saratov, 410012

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Yaroslavl, 150003

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Yekaterinburg, 620102

Other trials in Russia

Spain5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Granada, 18012

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Málaga, 29010

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Santander, 39008

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Santander

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Seville, 41071

Other trials in Spain

Chile4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Santiago, Región Metro de Santiago, 7501126

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Santiago, Región Metro de Santiago, 8380456

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Santiago, Región Metro de Santiago

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Viña del Mar, Valparaiso, 2570017

Other trials in Chile

United Kingdom4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Cannock, WS11 5XY

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Leytonstone, London, E11 1NR

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Maidstone, ME16 9QQ

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Wigan, Lancashire, WN6 9EP

Other trials in United Kingdom

Czechia3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ostrava Trebovice, 722 00

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Prague, 128 50

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Zlín, 760 01

Other trials in Czechia

Belgium2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Liège, 4000

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Merksem, 2170

Other trials in Belgium

Hungary2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Budapest, 1023

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Győr, 9024

Other trials in Hungary

Peru2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Callao, Callao 2

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Lima, Lima 27

Other trials in Peru

South Africa2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Gauteng, 1459

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Parow, 7505

Other trials in South Africa

Romania1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bucharest, 020047

Other trials in Romania

About this study

Official title: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multi-center, Phase III Trial of Ofatumumab Investigating Clinical Efficacy in Adult Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate Therapy

This is a phase III, double-blind, randomized, multicenter, and parallel group trial with a duration of 24 weeks, followed by a 120 week Open-label Period. the primary purpose of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy of ofatumumab in reducing clinical signs and symptoms in adult RA patients after a single course of ofatumumab.

Read the detailed description

This study consists of a Double-blind , placebo controlled, and parallel group part with eligible patients enrolled into a 24 week Double-Blind Period, and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive ofatumumab (700mg x 2 infusions) or placebo ( saline x 2 infusions) in addition to their background methotrexate treatment. Patients who completed the 24 week Double-Blind period without receiving rescue DMARD treatment will be eligible to proceed into the 120 week Open-Label Period to receive repeat treatment courses with ofatumumab. In the Open-label Period ofatumumab treatment courses will be given at individualized time intervals only if a clinical response has been achieved following the previous treatment course, and followed by a subsequent worsening in disease activity . Patients who have completed the Open-Label Period or have withdrawn will enter a maximum 2 year Follow-up Period, or until their Bcells return to normal or to baseline levels, whichever occurs earlier.

Being tested
ofatumumab, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ofatumumabDrug

    1000 mL dilution of 35ml of ofatumumab in sterile, pyrogen free 0.9% NaCl. Each Treatment Cycle consisting of two 700mg IV infusions taken 14 days apart. A total of 8 infusions cycles given over a 144 week period

  • PlaceboDrug

    1000 mL dilution of 35ml of ofatumumab in sterile, pyrogen free 0.9% NaCl. Each Treatment Cycle consisting of two IV infusions taken 14 days apart. Only one placebo treatment cycle provided over a 24 week period

Study groups in NCT00611455
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ofatumumabExperimental1000 mL dilution of 35ml of ofatumumab in sterile, pyrogen free 0.9% NaCl. Each Treatment Cycle consisting of two 700mg IV infusions taken 14 days apart. A total of 8 infusions cycles given over a 144 week period
Receives: Drug: ofatumumab
1000 ml SalinePlacebo comparator1000 mL dilution of 35ml of ofatumumab in sterile, pyrogen free 0.9% NaCl. Each Treatment Cycle consisting of two IV infusions taken 14 days apart. Only one placebo treatment cycle provided over a 24 week period
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Week 24

    The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR20 if he experienced >=20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

Secondary outcomes (48)
  1. Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20

    The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR20 if he experienced >=20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=20% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20

  2. Number of Participants With a 50% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR50) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR50 if he experienced >=50% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=50% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  3. Number of Participants With a 70% Improvement From Baseline in Their ACR Score (ACR70) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    The ACR score was based on improvement from baseline in tender (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC). A participant had achieved ACR70 if he experienced >=70% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC and a >=70% improvement from baseline in 3 out of 5 of the following assessments: participant pain assessment on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), participant global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, physician global assessment on a 100 mm VAS scale, participant self-assessed disability, and C-reactive protein.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  4. Median ACRn at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    ACRn = the largest integer n for which a participant (par.) met the criteria requiring an improvement of n%. ACRn is a measure characterizing percent (%) improvement from baseline (IFBL). A par. with an ACRn of X had an improvement of >=X% in tender/swollen joints (TJC/SJC), and an improvement of >=X% in 3 of the 5 parameters (patient [pt] pain assessment, pt global assessment [GA], physician GA, pt self-assessed disability, acute phase reactant). ACRn = minimum(TJC % IFBL, SJC % IFBL, composite measure % IFBL). Composite measure % IFBL is the 3rd highest value of % IFBL for the 5 parameters.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  5. Mean Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints (DAS28) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using C-reactive Protein (CRP) as the Acute Phase Reactant (APR)

    The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  6. Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant

    The DAS28 is a clinical index of RA disease activity that combines information from swollen joints, tender joints, the acute phase reactant, and general health (patient global assessment). Change from baseline in DAS28 is calculated as the Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 values minus the baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  7. Mean DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) as the Acute Phase Reactant

    The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity (DA) that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of DA can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. APRs are a class of proteins that are useful markers for inflammation.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  8. Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant

    The DAS28 is a clinical index of RA disease activity that combines information from swollen joints, tender joints, the acute phase reactant, and general health (patient global assessment). Change from baseline in DAS28 is calculated as the Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 values minus the baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  9. Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using CRP as the Acute Phase Reactant

    The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to >5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <=1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to <=5.1); non-responders: change from baseline <=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and <=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  10. Number of Participants With the Indicated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 Using ESR as the Acute Phase Reactant

    The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to >5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <=1.2 with DAS28 <=3.2 to <=5.1); non-responders: change from baseline <=0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and <=1.2 with DAS28 >5.1.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  11. Number of Participants Classified as Responders at Week 24 According to the Self-Assessed Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)

    The HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument used to assess the degree of difficulty a participant had in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (FAs): dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands/chores. Responses for each FA were scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task). The total score (range of 0-3) was calculated by adding the 8 individual FA scores, then dividing this sum by the total number of components answered. Responders were defined as participants achieving an improvement from baseline in the HAQ-DI score at Week 24 of >=0.22.

    Measured: Week 24

  12. Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 24

    Participants achieving clinical remission were defined as those with a low disease activity, i.e., DAS28 score (using CRP) <2.6 at Week 24.

    Measured: Week 24

  13. Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 24

    Change from baseline in tender joint count was calculated as the Week 24 count minus the baseline count. A total of 68 joints were assessed. Joints were classified as either tender or not tender by an independent assessor, who had documented experience in performing joint assessments.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  14. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 24

    Change from baseline in swollen joint count was calculated as the Week 24 count minus the baseline count. A total of 66 joints were assessed. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen by an independent assessor, who had documented experience in performing joint assessments.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  15. Change From Baseline in the Participant-assessed Pain Score at Week 24

    A horizontal VAS of 100 mm was used to report the participant's level of joint pain. The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain). Participants were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate how much joint pain they had. The distance from the "no pain" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the joint pain score. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  16. Change From Baseline in Participant-assessed Global Disease Score at Week 24

    The participant used a horizontal VAS of 100 mm for overall assessment of disease. The scale ranged from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Participants were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate the state of the arthritis. The distance from the "very well" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the global disease assessment score. Change from baseline in participant-assessed global disease was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  17. Change From Baseline in the Physician-assessed Global Disease Score at Week 24

    The physician used a horizontal VAS of 100 mm for overall assessment of disease. The scale ranged from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Physicians were instructed to draw a vertical line through the horizontal line to indicate the state of the arthritis. The distance from the "very well" end to the vertical line drawn by the participant was the global disease assessment score. Change from baseline in the physician-assessed global disease was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  18. Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 24

    The self-assessed HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument used to assess the degree of difficulty a participant had in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (FAs): dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands/chores. Responses for each FA were scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a task). The total score (range of 0-3) was calculated by adding the 8 individual FA scores, then dividing this sum by the total number of components answered. Change from baseline was calculated as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  19. Change From Baseline in CRP at Week 24

    Blood samples for the determination of CRP were taken at pre-specified visits and were sent to the central laboratory for analysis. Change from Baseline in CRP was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. CRP is an acute-phase protein whose plasma concentration increases in response to inflammation. CRP is a useful marker of inflammation.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  20. Change From Baseline in ESR at Week 24

    ESR is measured by a blood test that shows the rate at which red blood cells sediment in a period of 1 hour. Blood samples for the determination of ESR were taken at pre-specified visits and were measured immediately at the trial site. Change from baseline in ESR was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  21. Change From Baseline in the Short-Form 36 (SF-36v2) Norm-based Scores for Physical Component Summary and Physical Items at Week 24

    The SF-36v2 is a standardized questionnaire used to measure overall subjective health status by measuring 8 health-related parameters (each scored from 0 [poorer health] to 100 [better health]): body pain, general mental health (MH), perception of general health, physical functioning, role limitations (RL) caused by mental condition, RL caused by a physical condition, social functioning, and vitality. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores, as well as psychometrically based physical and MH summary measures and a preference-based health utility index.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  22. Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Norm-based Scores for Mental Component Summary and Mental Items at Week 24

    The SF-36v2 is a standardized questionnaire used to measure overall subjective health status by measuring 8 health-related parameters (each scored from 0 [poorer health] to 100 [better health]): body pain, general mental health (MH), perception of general health, physical functioning, role limitations (RL) caused by mental condition, RL caused by a physical condition, social functioning, and vitality. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores, as well as psychometrically based physical and MH summary measures and a preference-based health utility index.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  23. Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Questionnaire Score at Week 24

    The FACIT-F score has a valid range of values from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating a lower burden of fatigue. The subset determining fatigue contains 13 questions. Responses to each question were scored from 0, indicating "Not at all fatigued," to 4, indicating "Very much fatigued."

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  24. Change From Baseline in Levels of Anti-CCP, RF-IgA, RF-IgG, and RF-IgM at Week 24

    The following biomarkers were assessed: Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide 3 antibody (Anti-CCP), Rheumatoid factor IgA (RF-IgA), RF IgG (RF-IgG), and RF IgM (RF-IgM). Measurements of RF were used to characterize participants' disease activity and immune status. Anti-CCP was used to characterize the disease type and the immune status of the participants. Assessments for which results were below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) were reported using a value of LLQ/2. Assessments for which results were above the upper limit of quantification (ULQ) were reported using a value of ULQ.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  25. Change From Baseline in Levels of IL-6 and Serum Amyloid A at Week 24

    The following biomarkers were assessed: Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and Serum Amyloid A. These biomarkers were used to further characterize disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  26. Minimum DAS28-ESR Score During the Double-blind (DB) and Open-label (OL) Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course

    The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. The values summarized are the minimum DAS28 score (i.e. lowest level of disease activity) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course (TC), assessed using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; rate at which red blood cells sediment in 1 hour).

    Measured: First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144)

  27. Minimum DAS28-CRP Score During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course

    The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. The values summarized are the minimum DAS28 score (i.e. lowest level of disease activity) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed using C-reactive Protein (CRP: used to monitor acute inflammatory phases of rheumatoid arthritis).

    Measured: First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144)

  28. Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-ESR Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course

    The level of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity based on the DAS28 score is defined as low if DAS28 <=3.2, moderate if 3.2< DAS28 <=5.1, or high if DAS28 > 5.1. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to clinical remission. The values summarized are the minimum change from baseline DAS28 score (i.e. greatest change in disease activity during the treatment course) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed by using ESR. Baseline score was determined at the start of each treatment course. For change from baseline, participants had to have both a baseline DAS28 value for the treatment course (i.e., the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course, providing it was done within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A) and a DAS28 value during the treatment course (i.e., during first 24 weeks of each treatment course). Change from baseline was calculated as the value during the treatment course minus the baseline value.

    Measured: First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144)

  29. Minimum Change From Baseline in the DAS28-CRP Score, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course

    The level of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity based on the DAS28 score is defined as low if DAS28 <=3.2, moderate if 3.2< DAS28 <=5.1, or high if DAS28 > 5.1. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to clinical remission. The values summarized are the minimum change from baseline DAS28 score (i.e. greatest change in disease activity during the treatment course) achieved by each participant within the first 24 weeks of each treatment course, assessed by using CRP. Baseline score was determined at the start of each treatment course. For change from baseline, participants had to have both a baseline DAS28 value for the treatment course (i.e., the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the treatment course, providing it was done within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A) and a DAS28 value during the treatment course (i.e., during first 24 weeks of each treatment course). Change from baseline was calculated as the value during the treatment course minus the baseline value.

    Measured: First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144)

  30. Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using ESR), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course

    The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. Low disease activity is defined as a DAS28 score >=2.6 and <3.2 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course.

    Measured: First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144)

  31. Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission or Low Disease Activity Based on DAS28 (Using CRP), During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course

    The DAS28 is a clinical index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity that combines information from swollen and tender joints (jts.), the APR, and general health (patient global assessment). The following jts. were assessed on both sides of the body: shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (5 per side), proximal interphalangeal (5 per side), and knee. The level of disease activity can be interpreted as low (DAS28<=3.2), moderate (3.2<DAS28<=5.1), or high (DAS28>5.1); total score, 0-9.4. A DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to remission. Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course. Low disease activity is defined as a DAS28 score >=2.6 and <3.2 at any time during the first 24 weeks of each treatment course.

    Measured: First 24 weeks of each treatment course (assessed up to Week 144)

  32. Time to Retreatment, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course

    Time to retreatment is defined as the time in days between infusion A of each treatment course and infusion A of the following treatment course. For participants randomized to ofatumumab in the Double-blind Period, Treatment Course 1 refers to the course of ofatumumab received in the Double-blind Period. The minimum period allowed per protocol before retreatment was 24 weeks (end of Double-blind Period). For participants randomized to placebo in the Double-blind Period, Treatment Course 1 refers to the first course of ofatumumab received in the Open-label Period. The minimum period allowed per protocol before retreatment during the Open-label Period was 16 weeks.

    Measured: From Baseline up to Week 144

  33. Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event or Serious Adverse Event, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should have been exercised in other situations. Refer to the general AE/SAE module for a list of AEs (occurring at a frequency threshold >=2%) and SAEs.

    Measured: First treatment (Day 0) until the participant terminated the trial, assessed up to Week 144

  34. Number of Participants With a CD19+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course

    The number of participants with a CD19+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga [10^9] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period.

    Measured: From baseline up to Week 144

  35. Number of Participants With a CD3+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course

    The number of participants with a CD3+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga [10^9] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period.

    Measured: From baseline up to Week 144

  36. Number of Participants With a CD4+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course

    The number of participants with a CD4+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga [10^9] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period.

    Measured: From baseline up to Week 144

  37. Number of Participants With a CD8+ Cell Count Greater Than or Equal to the Lower Limit of Normal or the Baseline Value at the Indicated Time Point, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course

    The number of participants with a CD8+ cell count greater than or equal to the lower limit of normal (LLN; reference range 0.11 to 0.66 giga [10^9] per liter) or the baseline value (whichever was lower) is presented. The baseline assessment is defined as the start of the Double-blind Period.

    Measured: From baseline up to Week 144

  38. Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data Outside the Clinical Concern Range at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course

    The baseline value for a treatment course is defined as the value before infusion A of each treatment course. The post-baseline visit is defined as any assessment during or after the start of infusion A during the specified treatment course. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern for vital signs (Low, High) are: Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (millimeters of mercury [mmHg]): 40, 110; Systolic blood pressure (SBP) (mmHg): 90, 170; Heart rate (beats per minute): 35, 120. LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal.

    Measured: From baseline up to Week 144

  39. Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, During the OL Period

    The number of participants with normal, abnormal clinically significant (CS), and abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) ECG findings, as well as the number of participants with no results (NR), during the OL Period are presented. An overall interpretation of the ECG was made by the investigator, or the investigator could delegate this task to a cardiologist, if applicable.

    Measured: From DB Period completion (Week 24) until the completion of the OL Period, assessed up to Week 144

  40. Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course

    Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Baseline (BL) value for a treatment course (TC) is defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the TC. The post-baseline (PBL) visit is defined as any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified TC. Pre-defined limits of potential CC (CC Low [relative to the lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to the upper limit of normal]) are: Albumin: 0.9, 1.5; Alanine amino transferase (ALT): NA, 2; Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): NA, 1.5; Aspartate amino transferase (AST): NA, 2; Bilirubin total (TBIL): NA, 1.5; Calcium: 0.85, 1.08; CO2 content/bicarbonate (BCO): 0.85/0.75, 1.2/1.3, ; Chloride: 0.9, 1.1; Creatine kinase (CK): NA, 2; Creatinine: NA, 1.2; Gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT): NA, 2; Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH): NA, 2; Potassium: 0.9, 1.1; Sodium: 0.93, 1.07; Total protein: 0.8, 1.15; Urea/blood urea nitrogen (BUN): NA, 1.5; Uric acid: NA, 1.5.

    Measured: From baseline up to Week 144

  41. Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern at Baseline or Any Visit Post-baseline, During the DB and OL Periods, by Ofatumumab Treatment Course

    Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. The baseline (BL) value for a treatment course (TC) is defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the TC. The post-baseline (PBL) visit is defined as any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified TC. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to upper limit of normal]) are: Eosinophils: NA, 2; Hematocrit (HCT): 0.75, 1.2; Hemoglobin (Hb): 0.75, 1.2; Lymphocytes: 0.4, 2; Neutrophils total (TNUE): 0.8, 1.6; Platelet count (PC): 0.65, 1.5; Red blood cell count (RBC): 0.75, 2; White blood cell count (WBC): 0.7, 1.6.

    Measured: From baseline up to Week 144

  42. Number of Participants With the Indicated Biomarker Data Outside the Reference Range at Baseline or Any Post-Baseline Visit During the DB and OL Periods by Ofatumumab Treatment Course (TC)

    Only those parameters for a particular flag (<LLN or >ULN) are summarized if at least one value was outside the specified reference range. The Baseline (BL) value for a TC was defined as the latest value on or before the date of infusion A of the TC. However to be evaluable as a baseline value, assessments must have been conducted within a 14 day window prior to the date of infusion A. The post-baseline (PBL) was any visit after the date of infusion A during the specified TC. The pre-defined LLN for biomarkers are: B-lymphocyte stimulator (B-ls):<486.5 nanograms per Liter (ng/L); Interleukin-6 (IL-6):<0.31ng/L and Serum amyloid A: <1951 ng/mL. LLN was not defined for Rheumatoid factor (RF)-IgA, RF-IgG, RF-IgM or anti- cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody and RF. The pre- defined ULN range for biomarkers (RF)-IgA: >6 units; RF-IgG:>6 units; RF-IgM:>6 units; Anti-CCP:>19.9999 units; B-ls:>1343.3 ng/L; IL-6: >5 ng/L; RF:>11.9999 kilounits (KU)/L; Serum amyloid A:>82432 ng/mL.

    Measured: From baseline up to Week 144

  43. Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event During the Follow-up Period

    A serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should have been exercised in other situations. Refer to the general SAE module for a list of SAEs.

    Measured: From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from Last Subject Last Visit [LSLV])

  44. Number of Participants With Immunoglobulin Values Outside the Reference Range During the Follow-up Period

    The reference ranges for immunoglobulins (LLN, ULN) are defined as: IgA (grams/Liter): 0.81, 4.63; IgG (grams/Liter): 6.94, 16.18; IgM (grams/Liter): 0.48, 2.71.

    Measured: From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from LSLV)

  45. Time to First CD19+ B-cell Repopulation Relative to the First Dose and Last Dose of Ofatumumab

    Time to first CD19+ B-cell repopulation (return to normal or baseline level) relative to the first dose was assessed only for those participants whose B-cells repopulated after receiving ofatumumab. Time to first CD19+ B-cell repopulation relative to the last dose of ofatumumab was assessed only for those participants whose B-cells repopulated during their last ofatumumab treatment course or follow-up.

    Measured: From the first dose of ofatumumab until the last Follow-up Period visit (up to Week 248)

  46. Number of Participants With a Positive JC Virus Test Result During the Follow-up Period

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of plasma/white blood cell JC Virus (JCV) using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. A positive JC Virus test result indicated the presence of JC Virus.

    Measured: From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (or maximum of 2 years from LSLV)

  47. Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period

    Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to the lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to the upper limit of normal]) are: ALT: NA, 2; ALP: NA, 1.5; Creatinine: N/A, 1.2; CO2/BCO: 0.85/0.75, 1.2/1.3; CK: NA, 2; GGT: NA, 2; Urea/BUN: NA, 1.5.

    Measured: From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (maximum of 2 years)

  48. Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Concern During the Follow-up Period

    Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to upper limit of normal]) are: Eosinophils: NA, 2; Total neutrophils: 0.8, 1.6; Platelet count: 0.65, 1.5.

    Measured: From the last scheduled visit in the DB or OL Period until B-cells and circulating IgG had returned to normal or baseline levels (maximum of 2 years)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Feb 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Jan 2008
  3. Primary completion8 Jun 2009
  4. Study completion15 Jul 2013

Why it stopped: Ofatumumab IV trials in RA were prematurely terminated because GSK refocused clinical development of autoimmune indications on the subcutaneous delivery.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
265 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00611455
Sponsor's protocol ID
110635
Other IDs
GEN410
Status last verified
Nov 2017
First submitted
16 Jan 2008
Last updated
6 Nov 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Taylor PC, Quattrocchi E, Mallett S, Kurrasch R, Petersen J, Chang DJ. Ofatumumab, a fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in biological-naive, rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Dec;70(12):2119-25. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.151522. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

    PubMed 21859685

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing ofatumumab in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 45 sites in 13 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 45 sites in Argentina, Australia, Poland, Russia, Spain and 8 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Oct 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With a 20% Improvement From Baseline in Their American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20) at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline and Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00611455, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in