TrachomaPhase 4NCT00618449
Impact of Two Alternative Dosing Strategies for Trachoma Control in Niger
A Phase 4 study testing Azithromcyin and Azithromycin in people with Trachoma and Chlamydia Trachomatis, run by University of California, San Francisco at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Trachoma is a disease of poverty, which in the hyperendemic areas affects all individuals by the time they are two years old. Active disease is concentrated in children and occurs sporadically in adults. Infection is more widespread. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Trachoma, Chlamydia Trachomatis
- What is being tested?
- Azithromcyin and Azithromycin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,139 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2008to Aug 2009
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- To be eligible to participate in this study the subject must live in one of the villages selected for this study.
Who cannot join
- All subjects meeting any of the exclusion criteria will be excluded from study participation. Exclusion criteria include:
- history of allergy to ANY macrolide antibiotic
- severe nausea or diarrhea after the first dose of azithromycin
- inability to tolerate oral therapy
- pre-existing serious illness
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
United States1 site
Chlamydia Research Laboratory
San Francisco, California, 94110
About this study
Trachoma is a disease of poverty, which in the hyperendemic areas affects all individuals by the time they are two years old. Active disease is concentrated in children and occurs sporadically in adults. Infection is more widespread. It is anticipated that 25% of the children will be blinded by this disease if they live to be 60 years of age. The blindness rates are higher in women, presumably because of their closer contact with children who can infect them and add to damage from infections the women had while young.
This proposal is to better define how azithromycin in community-based treatment can be used to eliminate blinding trachoma. We will also take the opportunity to join these field studies with genetic epidemiologic studies to better understand the dynamic epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a trachoma endemic area. The empiric data generated from the treatment/follow-up studies, together with the information on sources and spread patterns from genetic epidemiology will be used to generate more robust models to guide future treatment/re-treatment protocols.
We propose to conduct a randomized, community based trial in the Maradi region of Niger to test the hypothesis that two community wide azithromycin treatments, spaced one month apart, are significantly more effective in reducing ocular C. trachomatis infection and trachoma at one year compared to a single mass azithromycin treatment.
Read the detailed description
Population
We will take advantage of the ongoing work in the ten villages currently being studied in Kornaka West. They have never had mass treatment with azithromycin, and the baseline trachoma and infection rates are greater than 20%. The final survey for that current study will occur in January, 2008. Within villages, we will use the updated complete village census lists generated in the January 2008 survey. The children for that survey were randomly selected from the baseline census to provide a sample of approximately 50-60 children in the village ages 0 to five years. They are now a cohort of children ages 2 to 7 years. We propose to add approximately 15 children ages 0-2 from the updated census list for a total of 65-70 children per village.
Sample
We propose to re-randomize the villages, stratified by baseline trachoma rates and former intervention, into treatment intervention (2 rounds of mass treatment) and control (one round of mass treatment) arms. The villages will be balanced by baseline trachoma rates and the original randomization to water and sanitation interventions. Within villages, we propose to use the same sample of children ages 2-7 years and add a random sample of 15 children ages 0 to 2 years.
It will also be important to determine the effect of the two mass drug administration arms on infection in adults, so we propose to randomly select one adult from each household where there is an index child. If the adult is out of the village at the time of the survey, then the next randomly assigned adult will be selected for the study.
Statistical plan including sample size justification and interim data analysis
We intend to analyze the data starting by determining comparability of sample children and adults in intervention and control villages. Village characteristics, household characteristics, and age and gender distributions will be compared by intervention and control status. Importantly, baseline assessment of trachoma, and C. trachomatis infection, will be used to assure comparability. Variables that differ will be used as potentially confounding factors. We will determine the change from baseline to one month and one year in the trachoma prevalence and prevalence of C. trachomatis in the sentinel sample, stratified by children and adults. We will compare the average prevalence in the intervention villages compared to the control villages, by way of preserving the unit of randomization. We will then use logistic regression models to predict trachoma/infection at each time point, adjusting for clustering within villages and other confounding factors. Coverage of mass treatment will also be included as a predictor of trachoma/infection.
We use our sample of children to estimate power, as they are the risk group with highest rates of infection and trachoma. With our sample size of 350 children per group, we have 80% power (at α=0.5) to detect a 15% difference in decline in active trachoma or infection, assuming modest village level clustering.
We will sample 140 subjects per village (70 children plus one randomly selected adult from the same household) for a total of 1400 subjects. Subjects will be sampled at baseline, one-month post-treatment, and at one-year post-treatment.
Prior to the surveys, a training program will take place to accomplish the following objectives for the survey team:
- All persons who will be grading trachoma are standardized against a senior grader, with reliability of kappa=0.65 for TF and for TI, at least. Consistency across graders is essential so that differences are not attributable to grader variations. In any case, all graders must work in all villages, so that the effect of variation by grader does not confound the effect of variation by village.
- All persons who will be taking or assisting with laboratory specimens are trained in proper techniques for taking and storing specimens in the field.
- Proper completion of the survey form, "Examen Oculaire" for each child and adult in the sample, and the completion of the census list on treatment receipt for all persons in the village
The Baseline survey for trachoma in the sample of children and adults will take place prior to any antibiotic intervention. The surveys will consist of the following steps:
- Prior to the survey in the village, a member of the team will alert the village leadership that the survey team is coming, that mass treatment for all members of the community, as part of the Niger Trachoma Control Program will be part of the survey.
- The day of the baseline survey, all members of the household will be asked to stay in their concession for the examination and mass treatment, which is done house to house. As they come, the name will be checked on the list of those in the sample survey, and those who are in need of treatment only. If the person in the house is part of the trachoma survey, a form is prepared and a single specimen label filled out for the examiner and the laboratory technician. The label consists of the type of visit (b=baseline, 1=one month, 2=one year) and the full study identification number of the sample person: (village number)-(concession number)-(person number). Thus, during the baseline survey, a person who lives in village number 2, in concession number A-034 and who is on the census list as person 16 would have a study identification number of 02-A-034-16, and a label for the vial of B-02-A-034-16
- The trachoma grader will be everting the eyelids. Therefore, his fingers are the primary source of contamination for the laboratory specimen. He will change gloves between each exam (or wash his gloves with soap and water) between each child, even children in the same house and even if the child does not appear to have trachoma. This is because about 20% of children without trachoma can still have infection with C. trachomatis (sub-clinical infection). The trachoma grader, wearing 2.5X loupes and using a torche (or in sunlight), will assess the trachoma status of the tarsal plate, using the WHO Simplified grading scheme. The assistant will first evert the right eyelid, grade the tarsal plate, then evert the left eyelid and grade the trachoma status of the tarsal plate. A scribe will record the trachoma assessment on the "Examen Oculaire" form.
- While the left eyelid is still everted, the laboratory technician, following careful procedures described in the training manual, will roll the swab three times across the tarsal plate to obtain a specimen. The swab must not touch anything other than the tarsal plate. The lab technician can also not touch anything other than the swab and the vial. Once the swab has been taken, it is inserted in an open NUC vial, broken off, and the NUC vial is closed. The sealed vial is labeled with a pre-printed label and placed in a cold box with ice packs while in the field. The scribe will record that the specimen has been taken, or any reason why it was not taken.
- At this point, the sample person is eligible for azithromycin, which is administered at 20mg/kg. A height stick will be used to estimate dose. For children younger than 2 months, topical tetracycline will be used for 4-6 weeks. The form is reviewed for completeness, and stored safely for eventual data entry. Please note: The first azithromycin treatment in each study arm is administered as part of Niger's trachoma control program; only the second azithromycin treatment is provided to Arm 2 as part of the experimental protocol
- The concession is then checked to see if all members of the sample have been examined and a swab obtained. If so, the remainder of the concession is treated with azithromycin in accordance with program guidelines.
- The second treatment team assigned to the village will be providing azithromycin treatment to households who do NOT have anyone in the sample, in order to expedite treatment of the entire village.
- At the end of each day in the field, all specimens are transferred to a freezer in World Vision in Maradi, awaiting return to the freezer in Niamey. During the drive to Niamey, specimens must be kept frozen as well, with ice packs.
- The data entry clerk will enter the survey form into the "baseline" database if the survey is the baseline survey, or the "one month" or "one year" database, depending on the follow-up survey. The data entry clerk will also enter the data on those who received treatment at baseline, and at two months into the treatment data base.
The same sample of children and adults will be surveyed for trachoma and infection at one month post the last treatment, and at one year. No additional persons will be added to the sample to replace any who have died or moved away, as we will not have baseline data for any replacements. The procedures for the one month and one year follow up surveys are exactly the same as for the baseline survey, except the following: the laboratory label is changed from a "B" to a "1" or a "2" as the first part of the label, and the survey forms are entered into the one month or one year data bases.
All positive specimens will have the major outer membrane gene amplified and sequenced. The genovars will be mapped for location within villages and families and then their distribution will be followed over time, after treatment to provide a better understanding of the epidemiology of the infection. Results of the study will be used as data input for the generation of mathematical models to predict whether community-wide retreatment (or alternate strategies) will be needed, and the optimal timing for such retreatment.
- Conditions
- Trachoma, Chlamydia Trachomatis
- Being tested
- Azithromcyin, Azithromycin
- Keywords
- Trachoma, Chlamydia trachomatis
- Medical subject headings
- Trachoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AzithromcyinDrug
1 gm Azithromycin orally, provided as four 250 mg tablets for adults; pediatric suspension will be provided to children > 1 year old (20 mg/kg body weight) to a maximal dose of 500 mg - Given 30 days apart; at Day 0 \& Day 30 for a total of 2 doses.
AzithromycinDrug
1 gm Azithromycin orally, provided as four 250 mg tablets for adults; pediatric suspension will be provided to children > 1 year old (20 mg/kg body weight) to a maximal dose of 500 mg - Given at Day 30 for a total of 1 dose.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Subjects residing in villages assigned to treatment arm 2 will receive a clinical evaluation for trachoma and provide a swab specimen of conjunctivae of the R eye at enrollment (Day 0), as well as receive an initial treatment with 1 gm oral dose of Azithromycin; receive a second 1 gm oral dose of Azithromycin at Day 30; be re-screened (clinical evaluation and swab specimen of R eye collected) at Day 60 and Day 360. Receives: Drug: Azithromcyin |
| Arm 1 | Active comparator | Subjects residing in villages assigned to treatment arm 1 will receive a clinical evaluation for trachoma and provide a swab specimen of conjunctivae of the R eye at enrollment (Day 0); be treated at Day 30 with the WHO standard of care for trachoma - 1 gm oral dose of Azithromycin; be re-screened (clinical evaluation and swab specimen of R eye collected) at Day 60 and Day 360. Receives: Drug: Azithromycin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Infection With Chlamydia Trachomatis Diagnosed by Use of NAATs [Nucleic Acid Amplification Test]
Measured: 1-year post-treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Feb 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2008
- Primary completionMay 2009
- Study completionAug 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TrachomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1,139 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Julius Schachter, PhD, Principal investigator, University of California, San FranciscoAbdou Amza, MD, Study director, Programme National de Lutte Contre la Cécité
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00618449
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H1079-31932
- Other IDs
- 5R01AI048789
- Status last verified
- Apr 2012
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2008
- Last updated
- 8 May 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Thylefors B, Negrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, Dadzie KY. Global data on blindness. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(1):115-21.
PubMed 7704921Dawson CR, Jones BR, Tarizzo ML. A Guide to Trachoma Control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1981.
Dawson CR, Schachter J. Strategies for treatment and control of blinding trachoma: cost-effectiveness of topical or systemic antibiotics. Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Nov-Dec;7(6):768-73. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.6.768.
PubMed 4070912Thylefors B. Development of trachoma control programs and the involvement of national resources. Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Nov-Dec;7(6):774-6. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.6.774.
PubMed 4070913World Health Organization. Future Approaches to Trachoma Control. Report of a global scientific meeting. 17 - 20 June 1996.
Dawson CR, Daghfous T, Hoshiwara I, Ramdhane K, Kamoun M, Yoneda C, Schachter J. Trachoma therapy with topical tetracycline and oral erythromycin: a comparative trial. Bull World Health Organ. 1982;60(3):347-55.
PubMed 6754118Malaty R, Zaki S, Said ME, Vastine DW, Dawson DW, Schachter J. Extraocular infections in children in areas with endemic trachoma. J Infect Dis. 1981 Jun;143(6):853. doi: 10.1093/infdis/143.6.853. No abstract available.
PubMed 7252266West S, Munoz B, Bobo L, Quinn TC, Mkocha H, Lynch M, Mmbaga BB, Viscidi R. Nonocular Chlamydia infection and risk of ocular reinfection after mass treatment in a trachoma hyperendemic area. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993 Oct;34(11):3194-8.
PubMed 8407229Grayston JT, Wang S. New knowledge of chlamydiae and the diseases they cause. J Infect Dis. 1975 Jul;132(1):87-105. doi: 10.1093/infdis/132.1.87.
PubMed 1097546Treharne JD. The community epidemiology of trachoma. Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Nov-Dec;7(6):760-4. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.6.760.
PubMed 4070910Katz J, Zeger SL, Tielsch JM. Village and household clustering of xerophthalmia and trachoma. Int J Epidemiol. 1988 Dec;17(4):865-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/17.4.865.
PubMed 3265700Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines 2002. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002 May 10;51(RR-6):1-78.
PubMed 12184549Martin DH, Mroczkowski TF, Dalu ZA, McCarty J, Jones RB, Hopkins SJ, Johnson RB. A controlled trial of a single dose of azithromycin for the treatment of chlamydial urethritis and cervicitis. The Azithromycin for Chlamydial Infections Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1992 Sep 24;327(13):921-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199209243271304.
PubMed 1325036Adair CD, Gunter M, Stovall TG, McElroy G, Veille JC, Ernest JM. Chlamydia in pregnancy: a randomized trial of azithromycin and erythromycin. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Feb;91(2):165-8. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00586-3.
PubMed 9469269Bailey RL, Arullendran P, Whittle HC, Mabey DC. Randomised controlled trial of single-dose azithromycin in treatment of trachoma. Lancet. 1993 Aug 21;342(8869):453-6. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91591-9.
PubMed 8102427
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 May 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Two Alternative Dosing Strategies for Trachoma Control in Niger
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00618449
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H1079-31932
- Conditions
- Trachoma, Chlamydia Trachomatis
- Keywords
- Trachoma, Chlamydia trachomatis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,139 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
- Study start
- Jan 2008
- Primary completion
- May 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Feb 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 May 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Trachoma is a disease of poverty, which in the hyperendemic areas affects all individuals by the time they are two years old. Active disease is concentrated in children and occurs sporadically in adults. Infection is more widespread. It is anticipated that 25% of the children will be blinded by this disease if they live to be 60 years of age. The blindness rates are higher in women, presumably because of their closer contact with children who can infect them and add to damage from infections the women had while young.
This proposal is to better define how azithromycin in community-based treatment can be used to eliminate blinding trachoma. We will also take the opportunity to join these field studies with genetic epidemiologic studies to better understand the dynamic epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a trachoma endemic area. The empiric data generated from the treatment/follow-up studies, together with the information on sources and spread patterns from genetic epidemiology will be used to generate more robust models to guide future treatment/re-treatment protocols.
We propose to conduct a randomized, community based trial in the Maradi region of Niger to test the hypothesis that two community wide azithromycin treatments, spaced one month apart, are significantly more effective in reducing ocular C. trachomatis infection and trachoma at one year compared to a single mass azithromycin treatment.
Detailed description
Population
We will take advantage of the ongoing work in the ten villages currently being studied in Kornaka West. They have never had mass treatment with azithromycin, and the baseline trachoma and infection rates are greater than 20%. The final survey for that current study will occur in January, 2008. Within villages, we will use the updated complete village census lists generated in the January 2008 survey. The children for that survey were randomly selected from the baseline census to provide a sample of approximately 50-60 children in the village ages 0 to five years. They are now a cohort of children ages 2 to 7 years. We propose to add approximately 15 children ages 0-2 from the updated census list for a total of 65-70 children per village.
Sample
We propose to re-randomize the villages, stratified by baseline trachoma rates and former intervention, into treatment intervention (2 rounds of mass treatment) and control (one round of mass treatment) arms. The villages will be balanced by baseline trachoma rates and the original randomization to water and sanitation interventions. Within villages, we propose to use the same sample of children ages 2-7 years and add a random sample of 15 children ages 0 to 2 years.
It will also be important to determine the effect of the two mass drug administration arms on infection in adults, so we propose to randomly select one adult from each household where there is an index child. If the adult is out of the village at the time of the survey, then the next randomly assigned adult will be selected for the study.
Statistical plan including sample size justification and interim data analysis
We intend to analyze the data starting by determining comparability of sample children and adults in intervention and control villages. Village characteristics, household characteristics, and age and gender distributions will be compared by intervention and control status. Importantly, baseline assessment of trachoma, and C. trachomatis infection, will be used to assure comparability. Variables that differ will be used as potentially confounding factors. We will determine the change from baseline to one month and one year in the trachoma prevalence and prevalence of C. trachomatis in the sentinel sample, stratified by children and adults. We will compare the average prevalence in the intervention villages compared to the control villages, by way of preserving the unit of randomization. We will then use logistic regression models to predict trachoma/infection at each time point, adjusting for clustering within villages and other confounding factors. Coverage of mass treatment will also be included as a predictor of trachoma/infection.
We use our sample of children to estimate power, as they are the risk group with highest rates of infection and trachoma. With our sample size of 350 children per group, we have 80% power (at α=0.5) to detect a 15% difference in decline in active trachoma or infection, assuming modest village level clustering.
We will sample 140 subjects per village (70 children plus one randomly selected adult from the same household) for a total of 1400 subjects. Subjects will be sampled at baseline, one-month post-treatment, and at one-year post-treatment.
Prior to the surveys, a training program will take place to accomplish the following objectives for the survey team:
- All persons who will be grading trachoma are standardized against a senior grader, with reliability of kappa=0.65 for TF and for TI, at least. Consistency across graders is essential so that differences are not attributable to grader variations. In any case, all graders must work in all villages, so that the effect of variation by grader does not confound the effect of variation by village.
- All persons who will be taking or assisting with laboratory specimens are trained in proper techniques for taking and storing specimens in the field.
- Proper completion of the survey form, "Examen Oculaire" for each child and adult in the sample, and the completion of the census list on treatment receipt for all persons in the village
The Baseline survey for trachoma in the sample of children and adults will take place prior to any antibiotic intervention. The surveys will consist of the following steps:
- Prior to the survey in the village, a member of the team will alert the village leadership that the survey team is coming, that mass treatment for all members of the community, as part of the Niger Trachoma Control Program will be part of the survey.
- The day of the baseline survey, all members of the household will be asked to stay in their concession for the examination and mass treatment, which is done house to house. As they come, the name will be checked on the list of those in the sample survey, and those who are in need of treatment only. If the person in the house is part of the trachoma survey, a form is prepared and a single specimen label filled out for the examiner and the laboratory technician. The label consists of the type of visit (b=baseline, 1=one month, 2=one year) and the full study identification number of the sample person: (village number)-(concession number)-(person number). Thus, during the baseline survey, a person who lives in village number 2, in concession number A-034 and who is on the census list as person 16 would have a study identification number of 02-A-034-16, and a label for the vial of B-02-A-034-16
- The trachoma grader will be everting the eyelids. Therefore, his fingers are the primary source of contamination for the laboratory specimen. He will change gloves between each exam (or wash his gloves with soap and water) between each child, even children in the same house and even if the child does not appear to have trachoma. This is because about 20% of children without trachoma can still have infection with C. trachomatis (sub-clinical infection). The trachoma grader, wearing 2.5X loupes and using a torche (or in sunlight), will assess the trachoma status of the tarsal plate, using the WHO Simplified grading scheme. The assistant will first evert the right eyelid, grade the tarsal plate, then evert the left eyelid and grade the trachoma status of the tarsal plate. A scribe will record the trachoma assessment on the "Examen Oculaire" form.
- While the left eyelid is still everted, the laboratory technician, following careful procedures described in the training manual, will roll the swab three times across the tarsal plate to obtain a specimen. The swab must not touch anything other than the tarsal plate. The lab technician can also not touch anything other than the swab and the vial. Once the swab has been taken, it is inserted in an open NUC vial, broken off, and the NUC vial is closed. The sealed vial is labeled with a pre-printed label and placed in a cold box with ice packs while in the field. The scribe will record that the specimen has been taken, or any reason why it was not taken.
- At this point, the sample person is eligible for azithromycin, which is administered at 20mg/kg. A height stick will be used to estimate dose. For children younger than 2 months, topical tetracycline will be used for 4-6 weeks. The form is reviewed for completeness, and stored safely for eventual data entry. Please note: The first azithromycin treatment in each study arm is administered as part of Niger's trachoma control program; only the second azithromycin treatment is provided to Arm 2 as part of the experimental protocol
- The concession is then checked to see if all members of the sample have been examined and a swab obtained. If so, the remainder of the concession is treated with azithromycin in accordance with program guidelines.
- The second treatment team assigned to the village will be providing azithromycin treatment to households who do NOT have anyone in the sample, in order to expedite treatment of the entire village.
- At the end of each day in the field, all specimens are transferred to a freezer in World Vision in Maradi, awaiting return to the freezer in Niamey. During the drive to Niamey, specimens must be kept frozen as well, with ice packs.
- The data entry clerk will enter the survey form into the "baseline" database if the survey is the baseline survey, or the "one month" or "one year" database, depending on the follow-up survey. The data entry clerk will also enter the data on those who received treatment at baseline, and at two months into the treatment data base.
The same sample of children and adults will be surveyed for trachoma and infection at one month post the last treatment, and at one year. No additional persons will be added to the sample to replace any who have died or moved away, as we will not have baseline data for any replacements. The procedures for the one month and one year follow up surveys are exactly the same as for the baseline survey, except the following: the laboratory label is changed from a "B" to a "1" or a "2" as the first part of the label, and the survey forms are entered into the one month or one year data bases.
All positive specimens will have the major outer membrane gene amplified and sequenced. The genovars will be mapped for location within villages and families and then their distribution will be followed over time, after treatment to provide a better understanding of the epidemiology of the infection. Results of the study will be used as data input for the generation of mathematical models to predict whether community-wide retreatment (or alternate strategies) will be needed, and the optimal timing for such retreatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Drug: AzithromcyinSubjects residing in villages assigned to treatment arm 2 will receive a clinical evaluation for trachoma and provide a swab specimen of conjunctivae of the R eye at enrollment (Day 0), as well as receive an initial treatment with 1 gm oral dose of Azithromycin; receive a second 1 gm oral dose of Azithromycin at Day 30; be re-screened (clinical evaluation and swab specimen of R eye collected) at Day 60 and Day 360. |
| Arm 1 | Active comparator | Drug: AzithromycinSubjects residing in villages assigned to treatment arm 1 will receive a clinical evaluation for trachoma and provide a swab specimen of conjunctivae of the R eye at enrollment (Day 0); be treated at Day 30 with the WHO standard of care for trachoma - 1 gm oral dose of Azithromycin; be re-screened (clinical evaluation and swab specimen of R eye collected) at Day 60 and Day 360. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- To be eligible to participate in this study the subject must live in one of the villages selected for this study.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- All subjects meeting any of the exclusion criteria will be excluded from study participation. Exclusion criteria include:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Azithromcyin1 gm Azithromycin orally, provided as four 250 mg tablets for adults; pediatric suspension will be provided to children > 1 year old (20 mg/kg body weight) to a maximal dose of 500 mg - Given 30 days apart; at Day 0 \& Day 30 for a total of 2 doses. | Drug | Arm 2 |
| Azithromycin1 gm Azithromycin orally, provided as four 250 mg tablets for adults; pediatric suspension will be provided to children > 1 year old (20 mg/kg body weight) to a maximal dose of 500 mg - Given at Day 30 for a total of 1 dose. | Drug | Arm 1 |
Primary outcome
Infection With Chlamydia Trachomatis Diagnosed by Use of NAATs [Nucleic Acid Amplification Test]
Time frame: 1-year post-treatment
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 May 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 7704921Thylefors B, Negrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, Dadzie KY. Global data on blindness. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(1):115-21.
- BackgroundDawson CR, Jones BR, Tarizzo ML. A Guide to Trachoma Control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1981.
- Background: PubMed 4070912Dawson CR, Schachter J. Strategies for treatment and control of blinding trachoma: cost-effectiveness of topical or systemic antibiotics. Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Nov-Dec;7(6):768-73. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.6.768.
- Background: PubMed 4070913Thylefors B. Development of trachoma control programs and the involvement of national resources. Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Nov-Dec;7(6):774-6. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.6.774.
- BackgroundWorld Health Organization. Future Approaches to Trachoma Control. Report of a global scientific meeting. 17 - 20 June 1996.
- Background: PubMed 6754118Dawson CR, Daghfous T, Hoshiwara I, Ramdhane K, Kamoun M, Yoneda C, Schachter J. Trachoma therapy with topical tetracycline and oral erythromycin: a comparative trial. Bull World Health Organ. 1982;60(3):347-55.
- Background: PubMed 7252266Malaty R, Zaki S, Said ME, Vastine DW, Dawson DW, Schachter J. Extraocular infections in children in areas with endemic trachoma. J Infect Dis. 1981 Jun;143(6):853. doi: 10.1093/infdis/143.6.853. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 8407229West S, Munoz B, Bobo L, Quinn TC, Mkocha H, Lynch M, Mmbaga BB, Viscidi R. Nonocular Chlamydia infection and risk of ocular reinfection after mass treatment in a trachoma hyperendemic area. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993 Oct;34(11):3194-8.
- Background: PubMed 1097546Grayston JT, Wang S. New knowledge of chlamydiae and the diseases they cause. J Infect Dis. 1975 Jul;132(1):87-105. doi: 10.1093/infdis/132.1.87.
- Background: PubMed 4070910Treharne JD. The community epidemiology of trachoma. Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Nov-Dec;7(6):760-4. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.6.760.
- Background: PubMed 3265700Katz J, Zeger SL, Tielsch JM. Village and household clustering of xerophthalmia and trachoma. Int J Epidemiol. 1988 Dec;17(4):865-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/17.4.865.
- Background: PubMed 12184549Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines 2002. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002 May 10;51(RR-6):1-78.
- Chlamydia genomeLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Trachoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Evaluation of the Impact of Oral Ivermectin on Musca Sorbens Flies, Putative Vector of Trachoma
Survival of Flies Developing in Faecal Samples
Not yet recruiting
The Effects of Hand and Face Washing With Soap on Active Trachoma Among Children 1-9 Years Old.
Active Trachoma
Recruiting
RESTORE: Comparing Two Approaches to Repeat TT Surgery Performed by Integrated Eye Care Workers (IECWs)
Trachoma, Eye Diseases
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Kebele Elimination of Trachoma for Ocular Health
Trachoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Julius Schachter, PhD principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
Abdou Amza, MD study director
Programme National de Lutte Contre la Cécité
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Azithromcyin and Azithromycin in people with Trachoma and Chlamydia Trachomatis, run by University of California, San Francisco at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States, Niger. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 May 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Infection With Chlamydia Trachomatis Diagnosed by Use of NAATs [Nucleic Acid Amplification Test] (time frame: 1-year post-treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00618449, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2012.