ContraceptionPhase 3NCT00620035
A Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Insertion Characteristics of the Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant Using a Next Generation Applicator (34530)(P05702)
A Phase 3 study testing Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant in people with Contraception, run by Organon and Co.
Trial summary
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of the next generation applicator and its instructions for proper insertion of the Radiopaque Implant. Secondary objectives include: evaluation of implant removal, evaluation of the overall contraceptive efficacy and safety of the Radiopaque Implant, assessment… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Contraception
- What is being tested?
- Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 301 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2007to Oct 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Woman of at least (>=) 18 but not older than (<= )40 years of age at the time of screening;
- Good physical and mental health;
- Regular cycles with a usual length between 24 and 35 days;
- Body mass index >= 18 and <= 35 kg/m^2;
- Willing to give informed consent in writing.
Who cannot join
- Contraindications:
- known or suspected pregnancy;
- active venous thromboembolic disorder (e.g. deep vein thrombosis,
- pulmonary embolism);
- presence or history of severe hepatic disease as long as liver function values have not returned to normal;
- malignancy or pre-malignancy, if sex-steroid-influenced;
Show all 12Show fewer
- undiagnosed vaginal bleeding;
- hypersensitivity to any of the components of Radiopaque Implant.
- Hypertension, i.e. systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg;
- A history during pregnancy or during previous use of sex steroids of: jaundice and/or severe pruritus related to cholestasis, gallstone formation, porphyria, systemic lupus erythematosus, haemolytic uraemic syndrome, Sydenham's chorea, herpes gestationis, otosclerosis-related hearing loss;
- Present use or use during 2 months prior to the start of Radiopaque Implant of one of the following drugs: phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, carbamazepine, rifampicin, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, felbamate, ritonavir, nelfinavir, griseofulvin or the herbal remedy St John's wort;
- Administration of investigational drugs within 2 months prior to the start of Radiopaque Implant
About this study
Official title: An Open-Label, Non-Controlled Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Insertion Characteristics of the Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant Using a Next Generation Applicator
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of the next generation applicator and its instructions for proper insertion of the Radiopaque Implant. Secondary objectives include: evaluation of implant removal, evaluation of the overall contraceptive efficacy and safety of the Radiopaque Implant, assessment of x -ray visibility of the Radiopaque Implant, and to assess participant expectations and satisfaction with the Radiopaque Implant.
- Conditions
- Contraception
- Being tested
- Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Radiopaque Etonogestrel ImplantDrug
Also called SCH 900415
One implant inserted for a 3-year treatment period
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant | Experimental | Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant (drug) inserted with the Next Generation Applicator (NGA)
The Radiopaque Implant is a single rod contraceptive implant of 4 cm length and
2 mm in diameter which is placed at the inner side of the non-dominant upper-arm
about 8-10 cm above the medial epicondyle. The Radiopaque Implant contains
approximately 68 mg etonogestrel (ENG) dispersed in a matrix of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer and barium sulfate, surrounded by an EVA membrane. The barium-sulfate provides radio-opacity and allows detection by X-ray.
The ENG dose released from the implant amounts to about 60-70 mcg/day shortly after insertion and decreases to about 40 mcg/day at the start of the second year, and to about 25-30 mcg/day at the end of the third year. Receives: Drug: Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Design & Technical Aspects
In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the Next Generation Applicator (NGA), the investigator/applicator user (AU) completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Design/technical aspects' consisted of five questions: fit of the applicator in the hand, size, weight, handling, and color of the applicator were assessed. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.
Measured: Day 1
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Functionality
In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Functionality' consisted of six questions assessing functionality of the needle. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.
Measured: Day 1
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire by Domain: Safety
In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Safety' consisted of three questions: removal of the protection cap from applicator, full retraction of the needle into the applicator after insertion, difference in colors of the obturator \& the implant. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.
Measured: Day 1
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Used Time
In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Used Time' consisted of one question: insertion time was assessed. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.
Measured: Day 1
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Applicator Satisfaction
In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Applicator Satisfaction' consisted of one question in order to assess the applicator. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.
Measured: Day 1
Implant Insertion Time (Seconds)
The implant insertion time was the time expressed in seconds, from removal of the protection cap from the applicator until retraction of the needle from the arm after insertion. Data was presented for overall investigators including experienced and non-experienced.
Measured: Day 1
Implant Removal Time (Seconds)
The implant removal time was the time expressed in seconds, from making the removal incision until placing the butterfly closure. Data was presented for overall investigators including experienced and non-experienced.
Measured: Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Feb 2008 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2007
- Primary completionOct 2010
- Study completionOct 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ContraceptionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 301 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Organon and Co
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00620035
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P05702
- Other IDs
- 34530
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2008
- Last updated
- 4 Feb 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Mommers E, Blum GF, Gent TG, Peters KP, Sordal TS, Marintcheva-Petrova M. Nexplanon, a radiopaque etonogestrel implant in combination with a next-generation applicator: 3-year results of a noncomparative multicenter trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;207(5):388.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
PubMed 22939402
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Feb 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-Label, Non-Controlled Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Insertion Characteristics of the Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant Using a Next Generation Applicator
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00620035
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P05702
- Conditions
- Contraception
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 301 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Organon and CoIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2007
- Primary completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Feb 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 31 Oct 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of the next generation applicator and its instructions for proper insertion of the Radiopaque Implant. Secondary objectives include: evaluation of implant removal, evaluation of the overall contraceptive efficacy and safety of the Radiopaque Implant, assessment of x -ray visibility of the Radiopaque Implant, and to assess participant expectations and satisfaction with the Radiopaque Implant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant | Experimental | Drug: Radiopaque Etonogestrel ImplantRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant (drug) inserted with the Next Generation Applicator (NGA) The Radiopaque Implant is a single rod contraceptive implant of 4 cm length and 2 mm in diameter which is placed at the inner side of the non-dominant upper-arm about 8-10 cm above the medial epicondyle. The Radiopaque Implant contains approximately 68 mg etonogestrel (ENG) dispersed in a matrix of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer and barium sulfate, surrounded by an EVA membrane. The barium-sulfate provides radio-opacity and allows detection by X-ray. The ENG dose released from the implant amounts to about 60-70 mcg/day shortly after insertion and decreases to about 40 mcg/day at the start of the second year, and to about 25-30 mcg/day at the end of the third year. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Woman of at least (>=) 18 but not older than (<= )40 years of age at the time of screening;
- Good physical and mental health;
- Regular cycles with a usual length between 24 and 35 days;
- Body mass index >= 18 and <= 35 kg/m^2;
- Willing to give informed consent in writing.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Contraindications:
- pulmonary embolism);
- presence or history of severe hepatic disease as long as liver function values have not returned to normal;
- malignancy or pre-malignancy, if sex-steroid-influenced;
- undiagnosed vaginal bleeding;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Radiopaque Etonogestrel ImplantAlso: SCH 900415One implant inserted for a 3-year treatment period | Drug | Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Design & Technical Aspects
Time frame: Day 1
In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the Next Generation Applicator (NGA), the investigator/applicator user (AU) completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Design/technical aspects' consisted of five questions: fit of the applicator in the hand, size, weight, handling, and color of the applicator were assessed. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Functionality
Time frame: Day 1
In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Functionality' consisted of six questions assessing functionality of the needle. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire by Domain: Safety
Time frame: Day 1
In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Safety' consisted of three questions: removal of the protection cap from applicator, full retraction of the needle into the applicator after insertion, difference in colors of the obturator \& the implant. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Used Time
Time frame: Day 1
In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Used Time' consisted of one question: insertion time was assessed. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Applicator Satisfaction
Time frame: Day 1
In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Applicator Satisfaction' consisted of one question in order to assess the applicator. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.
Implant Insertion Time (Seconds)
Time frame: Day 1
The implant insertion time was the time expressed in seconds, from removal of the protection cap from the applicator until retraction of the needle from the arm after insertion. Data was presented for overall investigators including experienced and non-experienced.
Implant Removal Time (Seconds)
Time frame: Day 1
The implant removal time was the time expressed in seconds, from making the removal incision until placing the butterfly closure. Data was presented for overall investigators including experienced and non-experienced.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Feb 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22939402Mommers E, Blum GF, Gent TG, Peters KP, Sordal TS, Marintcheva-Petrova M. Nexplanon, a radiopaque etonogestrel implant in combination with a next-generation applicator: 3-year results of a noncomparative multicenter trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;207(5):388.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
Related trials for Contraception
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Gender-Transformative Interventions on Contraceptive Use and Reproductive Autonomy in Somalia
Contraceptive Behavior, Social Norms
Recruiting
Impact of Self-Care Family Planning Services on Health and Development in South Sudan (Family Planning Impact Lab)
Contraceptive Behavior, Self Administration
Recruiting
Prospective Multi-Center Trial for FemBloc Permanent Birth Control
Contraception
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Evaluation of the Contraceptive Efficacy and Safety of a New Concentration of an Antiandrogenic Progestogen Combined With a Reduced-Dose Estrogen (LUNA)
Contraception
Not yet recruiting
Safety of a Contraceptive Copper Vaginal Ring
Contraception, Birth Control
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant in people with Contraception, run by Organon and Co.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Oct 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Design & Technical Aspects (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00620035, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.