Lung CancerPhase 2NCT00620269
Induction Chemotherapy Followed by CCRT According to EGFR Mutation Status in NSCLC III
A Phase 2 study testing Erlotinib, Induction or consolidation IP chemotherapy and CCRT with IP chemotherapy (Irinotecan + Cisplatin) in people with Lung Cancer and NSCLC, run by National Cancer Center, Korea at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The use of induction chemotherapy is feasible and effective. It is also logistically beneficial for decreasing micrometastases and radiation-related toxicity by decreasing tumor burden before definite locoregional concurrent therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer, NSCLC
- What is being tested?
- Erlotinib, Induction or consolidation IP chemotherapy and CCRT with IP chemotherapy (Irinotecan + Cisplatin)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 212 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Feb 2008to Mar 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC: it is recommended to obtain adequate tissue samples for EGFR mutation analysis.
- Unresectable stage IIIA (N2) or stage IIIB NSCLC defined as:unresectability confirmed by Surgeon /Stage IIIa T1-3 N2/Stage IIIb T1-4 N3/Stage IIIb T4 N2
- Age 18 years over.
- ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.
- Tumor work-up: within 4 weeks prior 1st day of treatment: chest X-ray; CT of chest, liver, and adrenal glands; bone scan; brain MRI
- Measurable or un-measurable disease (according to RECIST criteria), documented by CT, MRI, X-ray, or physical exam, as appropriate.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Hematology (within 1 week before 1st day of treatment)Absolute Neutrophil Count ³2.0 x 109/L; Platelet ³100 x 109/L; Hemoglobin ³10 g/dl
- Liver function test (within 1 week before 1st day of treatment)Serum bilirubin £1 x UNL; AST \& ALT £2.5 x UNL
- Renal function (within 1 week before 1st day of treatment)Serum creatinine £1 x UNL. In case of borderline value, 24h creatinine clearance should be > 60 mL/min.
- Pulmonary function (within 4 weeks before 1st day of treatment)FEV1 ³ 1 Liter
- ECG without significant abnormalities within 4 weeks before 1st day of treatment.
- Written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- T4 with malignant pleural effusion.
- Any prior therapy (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, biologic therapy such as EGFR-targeted therapy, radiotherapy) for lung cancer.
- History of prior malignancies, except for cured non-melanoma skin cancer, curatively treated in-situ carcinoma of the cervix or other cancer curatively treated and with no evidence of disease for at least 5 years.
- Unintended weight loss > 10% within the last 3 months.
- Other serious concomitant illness or medical conditions:
- Congestive heart failure or angina pectoris except if it is medically controlled. Previous history of myocardial infarction within 1 year from study entry, uncontrolled hypertension or arrhythmia.
Show all 15Show fewer
- History of significant neurological or psychiatric disorders including dementia or seizures.
- Active infection requiring IV antibiotics.
- Active ulcer, unstable diabetes mellitus or other contra-indication of corticosteroid therapy.
- Significant gastrointestinal abnormalities, including requirement for intravenous nutrition, active peptic ulcer disease, prior surgical procedures affecting absorption.
- Pregnant or lactating women-Patients (male or female) with reproductive potential not implementing adequate contraceptive measures.
- Concurrent treatment with any other experimental anti-cancer drugs.
- Concurrent use of phenytoin, carbamazepin, barbiturates, or rifampin.
- Mental condition rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequence of the study.
- Patient unlikely to comply with protocol, i.e., uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits, and not likely to complete the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
National Cancer Center, Korea
Goyang-si, Gyenggi-do, 411-769
Jin Soo Lee, M.D., +82-31-920-1601
Jin Soo Lee, M.D.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase II Study of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy According to EGFR Mutation Status in Patients With Unresectable Stage III NSCLC
The use of induction chemotherapy is feasible and effective. It is also logistically beneficial for decreasing micrometastases and radiation-related toxicity by decreasing tumor burden before definite locoregional concurrent therapy. Previously the investigators conducted several phase II study of IP chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC and demonstrated that IP chemotherapy has a promising activity and readily manageable toxicity profile. Given the encouraging activity of IP chemotherapy in the advanced stage setting, the investigators postulated that their further investigation in the stage III setting might lead to further prolongation of survival times. In addition to cisplatin, Irinotecan has been demonstrated to act as radiation sensitizers in preclinical and clinical setting. Therefore, their use with concurrent radiotherapy might lead to radiation sensitization and improved locoregional control.
Read the detailed description
Concurrent Chemoradiation therapy is widely accepted as a standard treatment of locally advanced unresectable stage III NSCLC. When compared with the result of radiation therapy alone of CALGB 8433 trial (i.e., 9.7 months), the median survival times have almost doubled over the last 2 decades, but rarely exceeded 18 months after chemoradiation therapy in most randomized trials. On the other hand, a significant portion of patients had to endure the side effects of grade 3/4 esophagitis and also pneumonitis, which resulted in treatment-related deaths in some cases. There is a great need to develop more effective but less toxic treatment strategies. Recently, molecular-targeted therapy using EGFR-TKIs brought new enthusiasm to the NSCLC therapy. The investigators observed a median survival time of 20.1 months in chemo-naïve never-smoker Korean patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung. The benefit of EGFR-TKI was also demonstrated in never-smokers who participated in the phase III trial of carboplatin/paclitaxel with or without Erlotinib (TRIBUTE). Despite a lack of benefit in the overall patient population, Erlotinib conferred a survival benefit to those who had never smoked cigarettes, In this analysis, 105 patients who were identified as never smokers had a median survival of 10 months, similar to the entire study population, when treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel plus placebo. However, for the patients in this subpopulation who were treated with Erlotinib and the same chemotherapy regimen, the median survival increased to 22.5 months (P = 0.01). Furthermore, EGFR mutation was associated with significantly higher response rate and longer survival as compared with those without EGFR mutation. More importantly, the median survival time of those patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumors exceeded 20 months in the majority of the studies. These results are very provocative given the fact that only the patients with stage IIIb not amenable to chemoradiation therapy and stage IV NSCLC patients were included in the study and in many studies, the majority of the patients were heavily pre-treated with multiple chemotherapy regimens. The investigators postulate that if the case were properly selected, EGFR-TKI would significantly improve the overall survival of the patients with locally advanced unresectable stage III NSCLC. The investigators therefore propose a randomized phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of EGFR-TKI Erlotinib in selected group of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation-positive stage III tumors. The use of induction chemotherapy is feasible and effective. It is also logistically beneficial for decreasing micrometastases and radiation-related toxicity by decreasing tumor burden before definite locoregional concurrent therapy. Previously the investigators conducted several phase II study of IP chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC and demonstrated that IP chemotherapy has a promising activity and readily manageable toxicity profile. Given the encouraging activity of IP chemotherapy in the advanced stage setting, the investigators postulated that their further investigation in the stage III setting might lead to further prolongation of survival times. In addition to cisplatin, Irinotecan has been demonstrated to act as radiation sensitizers in preclinical and clinical setting. Therefore, their use with concurrent radiotherapy might lead to radiation sensitization and improved locoregional control.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, NSCLC
- Being tested
- Erlotinib, Induction or consolidation IP chemotherapy, CCRT with IP chemotherapy (Irinotecan + Cisplatin), CCRT
- Keywords
- NSCLC, EGFR mutation, Erlotinib, IP chemotherapy, CCRT
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ErlotinibDrug
Erlotinib 150 mg p.o. daily x21 days every 3 weeks
Induction or consolidation IP chemotherapyDrug
Irinotecan 65mg/m2 + Cisplatin 30mg/m2 IV on D1,D8 every 3 weeks X 3 cycles
CCRT with IP chemotherapy (Irinotecan + Cisplatin)Drug
Irinotecan (60mg/m2) + cisplatin (30mg/m2) IV on D1 \& 8 every 3 weeks X 2 cycles
CCRTRadiation
CCRT :Concurrent Thoracic Radiotherapy (2.4 Gy/fr, Total 60 Gy, 25fr over 5 weeks)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| study arm 1 | Experimental | Induction (with Erlotinib X 3 cycles) -> CCRT with Erlotinib (X 2 cycles) -> continue Erlotinib (X 6 cycles) Receives: Drug: Erlotinib; Radiation: CCRT |
| study arm 3 | Experimental | Induction (IP X 3 cycles) -> CCRT with IP (X 2 cycles) Receives: Drug: Induction or consolidation IP chemotherapy; Drug: CCRT with IP chemotherapy (Irinotecan + Cisplatin); Radiation: CCRT |
| control arm | Active comparator | CCRT with IP (X 2 cycles) -> consolidation IP (X 3 cycles) Receives: Drug: Induction or consolidation IP chemotherapy; Drug: CCRT with IP chemotherapy (Irinotecan + Cisplatin); Radiation: CCRT |
| study arm 2 | Experimental | Induction (Erlotinib X 3 cycles) -> CCRT with IP (X 2 cycles) -> recurrence -> Erlotinib (until PD) Receives: Drug: Erlotinib; Drug: CCRT with IP chemotherapy (Irinotecan + Cisplatin); Radiation: CCRT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Response rate
Measured: every 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Time to progression
Measured: evey 8 weeks
Patient's Quality of life(QOL)
Measured: Quality of life is assessed by EORTC-QLQ (C-30 and LC13) questionnaire at baseline, after induction chemotherapy, after 10 weeks and 19 weeks CCRT will be finished
Toxicity
Measured: every 3 weeks
Overall Survival
Measured: every 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Feb 2008 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2008
- Primary completionMar 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 212 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Cancer Center, Korea
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Roche Pharma AG, Pfizer
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jin Soo Lee, National Cancer Center, Korea
- Investigators
- Jin Soo Lee, M.D., Principal investigator, National Cancer Center, Korea
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00620269
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NCCCTS-07-255
- Status last verified
- Nov 2011
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2008
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase II Study of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy According to EGFR Mutation Status in Patients With Unresectable Stage III NSCLC
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00620269
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NCCCTS-07-255
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, NSCLC
- Keywords
- NSCLC, EGFR mutation, Erlotinib, IP chemotherapy, CCRT
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 212 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Cancer Center, KoreaOther government
- Collaborators
- Roche Pharma AG, Pfizer
- Study start
- Feb 2008
- Primary completion
- Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Feb 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The use of induction chemotherapy is feasible and effective. It is also logistically beneficial for decreasing micrometastases and radiation-related toxicity by decreasing tumor burden before definite locoregional concurrent therapy. Previously the investigators conducted several phase II study of IP chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC and demonstrated that IP chemotherapy has a promising activity and readily manageable toxicity profile. Given the encouraging activity of IP chemotherapy in the advanced stage setting, the investigators postulated that their further investigation in the stage III setting might lead to further prolongation of survival times. In addition to cisplatin, Irinotecan has been demonstrated to act as radiation sensitizers in preclinical and clinical setting. Therefore, their use with concurrent radiotherapy might lead to radiation sensitization and improved locoregional control.
Detailed description
Concurrent Chemoradiation therapy is widely accepted as a standard treatment of locally advanced unresectable stage III NSCLC. When compared with the result of radiation therapy alone of CALGB 8433 trial (i.e., 9.7 months), the median survival times have almost doubled over the last 2 decades, but rarely exceeded 18 months after chemoradiation therapy in most randomized trials. On the other hand, a significant portion of patients had to endure the side effects of grade 3/4 esophagitis and also pneumonitis, which resulted in treatment-related deaths in some cases. There is a great need to develop more effective but less toxic treatment strategies. Recently, molecular-targeted therapy using EGFR-TKIs brought new enthusiasm to the NSCLC therapy. The investigators observed a median survival time of 20.1 months in chemo-naïve never-smoker Korean patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung. The benefit of EGFR-TKI was also demonstrated in never-smokers who participated in the phase III trial of carboplatin/paclitaxel with or without Erlotinib (TRIBUTE). Despite a lack of benefit in the overall patient population, Erlotinib conferred a survival benefit to those who had never smoked cigarettes, In this analysis, 105 patients who were identified as never smokers had a median survival of 10 months, similar to the entire study population, when treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel plus placebo. However, for the patients in this subpopulation who were treated with Erlotinib and the same chemotherapy regimen, the median survival increased to 22.5 months (P = 0.01). Furthermore, EGFR mutation was associated with significantly higher response rate and longer survival as compared with those without EGFR mutation. More importantly, the median survival time of those patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumors exceeded 20 months in the majority of the studies. These results are very provocative given the fact that only the patients with stage IIIb not amenable to chemoradiation therapy and stage IV NSCLC patients were included in the study and in many studies, the majority of the patients were heavily pre-treated with multiple chemotherapy regimens. The investigators postulate that if the case were properly selected, EGFR-TKI would significantly improve the overall survival of the patients with locally advanced unresectable stage III NSCLC. The investigators therefore propose a randomized phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of EGFR-TKI Erlotinib in selected group of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation-positive stage III tumors. The use of induction chemotherapy is feasible and effective. It is also logistically beneficial for decreasing micrometastases and radiation-related toxicity by decreasing tumor burden before definite locoregional concurrent therapy. Previously the investigators conducted several phase II study of IP chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC and demonstrated that IP chemotherapy has a promising activity and readily manageable toxicity profile. Given the encouraging activity of IP chemotherapy in the advanced stage setting, the investigators postulated that their further investigation in the stage III setting might lead to further prolongation of survival times. In addition to cisplatin, Irinotecan has been demonstrated to act as radiation sensitizers in preclinical and clinical setting. Therefore, their use with concurrent radiotherapy might lead to radiation sensitization and improved locoregional control.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| study arm 1 | Experimental | Drug: Erlotinib, Radiation: CCRTInduction (with Erlotinib X 3 cycles) -> CCRT with Erlotinib (X 2 cycles) -> continue Erlotinib (X 6 cycles) |
| study arm 3 | Experimental | Drug: Induction or consolidation IP chemotherapy, Drug: CCRT with IP chemotherapy (Irinotecan + Cisplatin), Radiation: CCRTInduction (IP X 3 cycles) -> CCRT with IP (X 2 cycles) |
| control arm | Active comparator | Drug: Induction or consolidation IP chemotherapy, Drug: CCRT with IP chemotherapy (Irinotecan + Cisplatin), Radiation: CCRTCCRT with IP (X 2 cycles) -> consolidation IP (X 3 cycles) |
| study arm 2 | Experimental | Drug: Erlotinib, Drug: CCRT with IP chemotherapy (Irinotecan + Cisplatin), Radiation: CCRTInduction (Erlotinib X 3 cycles) -> CCRT with IP (X 2 cycles) -> recurrence -> Erlotinib (until PD) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC: it is recommended to obtain adequate tissue samples for EGFR mutation analysis.
- Unresectable stage IIIA (N2) or stage IIIB NSCLC defined as:unresectability confirmed by Surgeon /Stage IIIa T1-3 N2/Stage IIIb T1-4 N3/Stage IIIb T4 N2
- Age 18 years over.
- ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.
- Tumor work-up: within 4 weeks prior 1st day of treatment: chest X-ray; CT of chest, liver, and adrenal glands; bone scan; brain MRI
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- T4 with malignant pleural effusion.
- Any prior therapy (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, biologic therapy such as EGFR-targeted therapy, radiotherapy) for lung cancer.
- History of prior malignancies, except for cured non-melanoma skin cancer, curatively treated in-situ carcinoma of the cervix or other cancer curatively treated and with no evidence of disease for at least 5 years.
- Unintended weight loss > 10% within the last 3 months.
- Other serious concomitant illness or medical conditions:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ErlotinibErlotinib 150 mg p.o. daily x21 days every 3 weeks | Drug | study arm 1, study arm 2 |
| Induction or consolidation IP chemotherapyIrinotecan 65mg/m2 + Cisplatin 30mg/m2 IV on D1,D8 every 3 weeks X 3 cycles | Drug | control arm, study arm 3 |
| CCRT with IP chemotherapy (Irinotecan + Cisplatin)Irinotecan (60mg/m2) + cisplatin (30mg/m2) IV on D1 \& 8 every 3 weeks X 2 cycles | Drug | control arm, study arm 2, study arm 3 |
| CCRTCCRT :Concurrent Thoracic Radiotherapy (2.4 Gy/fr, Total 60 Gy, 25fr over 5 weeks) | Radiation | control arm, study arm 1, study arm 2, study arm 3 |
Primary outcome
Response rate
Time frame: every 8 weeks
4 secondary outcomes
Time to progression
Time frame: evey 8 weeks
Patient's Quality of life(QOL)
Time frame: Quality of life is assessed by EORTC-QLQ (C-30 and LC13) questionnaire at baseline, after induction chemotherapy, after 10 weeks and 19 weeks CCRT will be finished
Toxicity
Time frame: every 3 weeks
Overall Survival
Time frame: every 8 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2011.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jin Soo Lee, M.D. principal investigator
National Cancer Center, Korea
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Erlotinib, Induction or consolidation IP chemotherapy and CCRT with IP chemotherapy (Irinotecan + Cisplatin) in people with Lung Cancer and NSCLC, run by National Cancer Center, Korea at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sung JIn Yoon, Rn (+82-31-920-0405, jinijiniya@ncc.re.kr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Response rate (time frame: every 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2011.