NeutropeniaPhase 3RINGNCT00627393
Safety and Effectiveness of Granulocyte Transfusions in Resolving Infection in People With Neutropenia (The RING Study)
A Phase 3 study testing Standard antimicrobial therapy, Granulocyte transfusions and G-CSF/dexamethasone in people with Neutropenia and Infection, run by Carelon Research at 13 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Neutropenia, a condition characterized by an abnormally low number of infection-fighting white blood cells called neutrophils, commonly develops in people who have undergone chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Neutropenia, Infection
- What is being tested?
- Standard antimicrobial therapy, Granulocyte transfusions and G-CSF/dexamethasone
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 114 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2008to May 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Severe neutropenia (Absolute Neutrophil Count < 500/mm^3) due to marrow failure caused by underlying disease or therapy
- Must have one of the following: fungemia; bacteremia; proven or presumptive invasive tissue bacterial infection; or proven, probable, or presumptive invasive fungal infection
Who cannot join
- Unlikely to survive 5 days
- Evidence that patient will not be neutropenic at least 5 days
- Previously enrolled in this study
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country.
13 sites in 1 country
United States13 sites
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21267
Children's Hospital Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
University of Wisconsin at Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53201
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Weill Medical College, Cornell University
New York, New York, 10021
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Chlidren's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
University of Pittsburgh Presbyterian and Shadyside
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10461
About this study
Official title: High Dose Granulocyte Transfusions for the Treatment of Infection in Neutropenia: The RING Study (Resolving Infection in Neutropenia With Granulocytes)
Neutropenia, a condition characterized by an abnormally low number of infection-fighting white blood cells called neutrophils, commonly develops in people who have undergone chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation. The severely reduced immunity of those with neutropenia can put them at risk of entry of life-threatening infections, making the implementation of treatments that increase white blood cell numbers important. Several studies have shown that the transfusion of donor granulocytes, a type of white blood cell that includes neutrophils, is effective in promoting the recovery of adequate numbers of granulocytes. However, granulocyte transfusions can cause side effects, and it is not known whether the success of the therapy outweighs the health risks of the side effects. This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of granulocyte transfusions in treating people with a bacterial or fungal infection during neutropenia.
Read the detailed description
Thousands of people each year are hospitalized for neutropenia, which continues to cause substantial morbidity and mortality for those affected. Neutropenia is primarily caused by chemotherapy and various other cancer treatments, such as radiation therapy, biotherapy, and HSC transplantation. Signs and symptoms of neutropenia may include high fever, chills, sore throat, and diarrhea. In neutropenia, the number of neutrophils, a type of granulocyte, is greatly reduced, weakening the body's immune system and increasing the risk of infection. Therefore, a method to provide adequate numbers of functional granulocytes to people with neutropenia could be of greatest benefit for recovery. Administration of a combination of two drugs, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and dexamethasone, has been show to stimulate the body to produce a large number of granulocytes. Granulocyte transfusions obtained from donors who have received these two drugs may help people with low white blood cell counts fight infections until their own white blood cell counts recover. However, it is not clear whether the benefits of granulocyte transfusions outweigh the risks of side effects. This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of granulocyte transfusions with standard antimicrobial therapy versus the safety and effectiveness of standard antimicrobial therapy alone in increasing granulocyte numbers and in improving survival rates in people with bacterial or fungal infection during neutropenia.
Participation in the research portion of this study will last about 3 months. All participants who were not previously receiving treatment with standard antimicrobial therapy will begin therapy immediately upon study entry. Participants will then be assigned randomly to receive either granulocyte transfusion plus continued antimicrobial therapy or continued antimicrobial therapy alone. All participants will be monitored for a maximum of 42 days, during which they will provide information on medical history and ongoing status of antimicrobial therapy. Daily blood samples to measure white blood cell count will be obtained from participants until samples show that participants are making their own granulocytes. Samples will then be collected weekly until Day 42. There may be additional blood draws depending on the type of infection present in participants.
Granulocyte transfusions will be given daily during the 42-day treatment period, depending on granulocyte donor availability. Blood counts will be checked immediately before and after each transfusion to measure granulocyte levels. Transfusions will be stopped if participants start making their own granulocytes, experience serious side effects, or show a reduction in infection. At Month 3 after study entry, follow-up information will be collected about all participants' health status through reviewing their medical records and contacting their physicians.
Participation for granulocyte donors will last 1 week from the time of donation. Community donors may provide more than one granulocyte donation, but no more than one donation every 3 days. Frequency of donation from a family member will be according to local blood bank criteria with approval from a blood bank physician. Both community donors and family donors are limited to eight donations each year. Twelve hours before each donation, participants will be injected with Neupogen, which contains G-CSF, and they will take one dose of dexamethasone by mouth. Participants will then undergo a blood draw, followed by a procedure using an apheresis machine for granulocyte collection. The procedure will last 3 to 4 hours and will involve the drawing of blood from each arm, the separation of granulocytes from the red blood cells and plasma in the machine, and the return of the red blood cells and plasma to the participants.
- Conditions
- Neutropenia, Infection
- Being tested
- Standard antimicrobial therapy, Granulocyte transfusions, G-CSF/dexamethasone, Apheresis machine
- Keywords
- Granulocyte Transfusions
- Medical subject headings
- Neutropenia, Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Standard antimicrobial therapyDrug
Antimicrobial therapy is broadly defined as therapy within the standard of care for a particular infection and should be consistent within a given institution. Participants will undergo the recommended therapy for specific infections for 42 days.
Granulocyte transfusionsBiological
Participants will receive one granulocyte transfusion per day until one of the following occurs: recovery from neutropenia, life-threatening toxicity, resolution or improvement of infection, or Day 42 after treatment. Granulocyte content of each transfusion is targeted to be at least 4 x 10^10 per collection (or proportionately less for participants less than 30 kg in weight).
G-CSF/dexamethasoneDrug
Also called Neupogen
Twelve hours before each donation, participants will be injected with G-CSF and will take one dose of dexamethasone by mouth.
Apheresis machineDevice
Participants will undergo a procedure using an apheresis machine for granulocyte collection. The procedure will last 3 to 4 hours and will involve the drawing of blood from each arm, the separation of granulocytes from the red cells and plasma in the machine, and the return of the red cells and plasma to the participants.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Participants will receive granulocyte transfusions in addition to standard antimicrobial therapy Receives: Drug: Standard antimicrobial therapy; Biological: Granulocyte transfusions |
| 2 | Active comparator | Participants will receive standard antimicrobial therapy alone Receives: Drug: Standard antimicrobial therapy |
| 3 | Other | Participants will donate granulocytes after receiving a combination of two drugs, G-CSF and dexamethasone Receives: Drug: G-CSF/dexamethasone; Device: Apheresis machine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Are Alive at 42 Days After Treatment and Have Had Microbial Response
Microbial response was defined as follows:
- A negative blood culture test at 42 days after randomization for subjects with fungemia (candidemia or fusariosis) or bacteremia.
- Improvement of signs and symptoms of infectious disease (complete or partial response) at 42 days after randomization.
Measured: Measured at Day 42
Secondary outcomes (12)
Alloimmunization, Defined as the Appearance of Anti-human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) or Antineutrophil Antibodies
Measured: Measured at Days 14 and 42
Serious Granulocyte Transfusion Reactions, Including Febrile, Allergic, and Pulmonary Reactions (Transfusion Arm Only)
Measured: Measured within 6 hours after end of transfusion
Graft Versus Host Disease Among Recipients of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
Time to GVHD incidence between the two treatment groups was compared using Gray's model that takes into account death as a competing risk.
Measured: Measured at Day 42
Overall Incidence of Adverse Effects
Measured: Measured through Day 42
Fever Resolution
Fever resolution between the two treatment groups was compared using Gray's model that takes into account death as a competing risk.
Measured: Measured through Day 42
Time to Negative Test for Fungal Antigenemia (e.g., Galactomannan Antigenemia Among Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis)
Measured: Measured at Days 7, 14, and 42
Time to Negative Blood Culture for Participants With Positive Blood Culture at Baseline
Measured: Measured through Day 42
Long-term Survival
Measured: Measured at Month 3
Serious Adverse Events in Granulocyte Donors
Measured: Measured at Week 1 after G-CSF administration
Donor Availability (Proportion of Scheduled Granulocyte Transfusion Days on Which Granulocytes Were Available)
Measured: Measured through study completion
Evaluation of Granulocyte Yield
Measured: Measured immediately after each granulocyte donation
Discontinuation of Granulocyte Transfusions Due to Toxicity or Intolerance
Measured: Measured through Day 42
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2008
- Primary completionApr 2013
- Study completionMay 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for NeutropeniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Carelon Research
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Susan F. Assmann, PhD, Principal investigator, Carelon ResearchJan McFarland, MD, Principal investigator, Froedtert HospitalEliot Williams, MD, Principal investigator, University of Wisconsin, MadisonEllis Neufeld, MD, Principal investigator, Children's Hospital Boston/Brigham and Women's HospitalJames Bussel, MD, Principal investigator, Weill Medical College, Cornell UniversityCassandra Josephson, MD, Principal investigator, Emory UniversityPaul Ness, MD, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins UniversitySherrill Slichter, MD, Principal investigator, University of Washington
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00627393
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 557
- Other IDs
- U01HL072268, HL072268, HL072291, HL072196, HL072248, HL072191, HL072305, HL072028
- Acronym
- RING
- Status last verified
- Apr 2014
- First submitted
- 28 Feb 2008
- Last updated
- 17 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Price TH, Boeckh M, Harrison RW, McCullough J, Ness PM, Strauss RG, Nichols WG, Hamza TH, Cushing MM, King KE, Young JA, Williams E, McFarland J, Holter Chakrabarty J, Sloan SR, Friedman D, Parekh S, Sachais BS, Kiss JE, Assmann SF. Efficacy of transfusion with granulocytes from G-CSF/dexamethasone-treated donors in neutropenic patients with infection. Blood. 2015 Oct 29;126(18):2153-61. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-05-645986. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
PubMed 26333778
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- High Dose Granulocyte Transfusions for the Treatment of Infection in Neutropenia: The RING Study (Resolving Infection in Neutropenia With Granulocytes)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00627393
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RING / 557
- Conditions
- Neutropenia, Infection
- Keywords
- Granulocyte Transfusions
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Carelon ResearchUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Study start
- Apr 2008
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Dec 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Neutropenia, a condition characterized by an abnormally low number of infection-fighting white blood cells called neutrophils, commonly develops in people who have undergone chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation. The severely reduced immunity of those with neutropenia can put them at risk of entry of life-threatening infections, making the implementation of treatments that increase white blood cell numbers important. Several studies have shown that the transfusion of donor granulocytes, a type of white blood cell that includes neutrophils, is effective in promoting the recovery of adequate numbers of granulocytes. However, granulocyte transfusions can cause side effects, and it is not known whether the success of the therapy outweighs the health risks of the side effects. This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of granulocyte transfusions in treating people with a bacterial or fungal infection during neutropenia.
Detailed description
Thousands of people each year are hospitalized for neutropenia, which continues to cause substantial morbidity and mortality for those affected. Neutropenia is primarily caused by chemotherapy and various other cancer treatments, such as radiation therapy, biotherapy, and HSC transplantation. Signs and symptoms of neutropenia may include high fever, chills, sore throat, and diarrhea. In neutropenia, the number of neutrophils, a type of granulocyte, is greatly reduced, weakening the body's immune system and increasing the risk of infection. Therefore, a method to provide adequate numbers of functional granulocytes to people with neutropenia could be of greatest benefit for recovery. Administration of a combination of two drugs, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and dexamethasone, has been show to stimulate the body to produce a large number of granulocytes. Granulocyte transfusions obtained from donors who have received these two drugs may help people with low white blood cell counts fight infections until their own white blood cell counts recover. However, it is not clear whether the benefits of granulocyte transfusions outweigh the risks of side effects. This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of granulocyte transfusions with standard antimicrobial therapy versus the safety and effectiveness of standard antimicrobial therapy alone in increasing granulocyte numbers and in improving survival rates in people with bacterial or fungal infection during neutropenia.
Participation in the research portion of this study will last about 3 months. All participants who were not previously receiving treatment with standard antimicrobial therapy will begin therapy immediately upon study entry. Participants will then be assigned randomly to receive either granulocyte transfusion plus continued antimicrobial therapy or continued antimicrobial therapy alone. All participants will be monitored for a maximum of 42 days, during which they will provide information on medical history and ongoing status of antimicrobial therapy. Daily blood samples to measure white blood cell count will be obtained from participants until samples show that participants are making their own granulocytes. Samples will then be collected weekly until Day 42. There may be additional blood draws depending on the type of infection present in participants.
Granulocyte transfusions will be given daily during the 42-day treatment period, depending on granulocyte donor availability. Blood counts will be checked immediately before and after each transfusion to measure granulocyte levels. Transfusions will be stopped if participants start making their own granulocytes, experience serious side effects, or show a reduction in infection. At Month 3 after study entry, follow-up information will be collected about all participants' health status through reviewing their medical records and contacting their physicians.
Participation for granulocyte donors will last 1 week from the time of donation. Community donors may provide more than one granulocyte donation, but no more than one donation every 3 days. Frequency of donation from a family member will be according to local blood bank criteria with approval from a blood bank physician. Both community donors and family donors are limited to eight donations each year. Twelve hours before each donation, participants will be injected with Neupogen, which contains G-CSF, and they will take one dose of dexamethasone by mouth. Participants will then undergo a blood draw, followed by a procedure using an apheresis machine for granulocyte collection. The procedure will last 3 to 4 hours and will involve the drawing of blood from each arm, the separation of granulocytes from the red blood cells and plasma in the machine, and the return of the red blood cells and plasma to the participants.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: Standard antimicrobial therapy, Biological: Granulocyte transfusionsParticipants will receive granulocyte transfusions in addition to standard antimicrobial therapy |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: Standard antimicrobial therapyParticipants will receive standard antimicrobial therapy alone |
| 3 | Other | Drug: G-CSF/dexamethasone, Device: Apheresis machineParticipants will donate granulocytes after receiving a combination of two drugs, G-CSF and dexamethasone |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Severe neutropenia (Absolute Neutrophil Count < 500/mm^3) due to marrow failure caused by underlying disease or therapy
- Must have one of the following: fungemia; bacteremia; proven or presumptive invasive tissue bacterial infection; or proven, probable, or presumptive invasive fungal infection
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Unlikely to survive 5 days
- Evidence that patient will not be neutropenic at least 5 days
- Previously enrolled in this study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Standard antimicrobial therapyAntimicrobial therapy is broadly defined as therapy within the standard of care for a particular infection and should be consistent within a given institution. Participants will undergo the recommended therapy for specific infections for 42 days. | Drug | 1, 2 |
| Granulocyte transfusionsParticipants will receive one granulocyte transfusion per day until one of the following occurs: recovery from neutropenia, life-threatening toxicity, resolution or improvement of infection, or Day 42 after treatment. Granulocyte content of each transfusion is targeted to be at least 4 x 10^10 per collection (or proportionately less for participants less than 30 kg in weight). | Biological | 1 |
| G-CSF/dexamethasoneAlso: NeupogenTwelve hours before each donation, participants will be injected with G-CSF and will take one dose of dexamethasone by mouth. | Drug | 3 |
| Apheresis machineParticipants will undergo a procedure using an apheresis machine for granulocyte collection. The procedure will last 3 to 4 hours and will involve the drawing of blood from each arm, the separation of granulocytes from the red cells and plasma in the machine, and the return of the red cells and plasma to the participants. | Device | 3 |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Are Alive at 42 Days After Treatment and Have Had Microbial Response
Time frame: Measured at Day 42
Microbial response was defined as follows: * A negative blood culture test at 42 days after randomization for subjects with fungemia (candidemia or fusariosis) or bacteremia. * Improvement of signs and symptoms of infectious disease (complete or partial response) at 42 days after randomization.
12 secondary outcomes
Alloimmunization, Defined as the Appearance of Anti-human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) or Antineutrophil Antibodies
Time frame: Measured at Days 14 and 42
Serious Granulocyte Transfusion Reactions, Including Febrile, Allergic, and Pulmonary Reactions (Transfusion Arm Only)
Time frame: Measured within 6 hours after end of transfusion
Graft Versus Host Disease Among Recipients of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
Time frame: Measured at Day 42
Overall Incidence of Adverse Effects
Time frame: Measured through Day 42
Fever Resolution
Time frame: Measured through Day 42
Time to Negative Test for Fungal Antigenemia (e.g., Galactomannan Antigenemia Among Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis)
Time frame: Measured at Days 7, 14, and 42
Time to Negative Blood Culture for Participants With Positive Blood Culture at Baseline
Time frame: Measured through Day 42
Long-term Survival
Time frame: Measured at Month 3
Serious Adverse Events in Granulocyte Donors
Time frame: Measured at Week 1 after G-CSF administration
Donor Availability (Proportion of Scheduled Granulocyte Transfusion Days on Which Granulocytes Were Available)
Time frame: Measured through study completion
Evaluation of Granulocyte Yield
Time frame: Measured immediately after each granulocyte donation
Discontinuation of Granulocyte Transfusions Due to Toxicity or Intolerance
Time frame: Measured through Day 42
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Apr 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26333778Price TH, Boeckh M, Harrison RW, McCullough J, Ness PM, Strauss RG, Nichols WG, Hamza TH, Cushing MM, King KE, Young JA, Williams E, McFarland J, Holter Chakrabarty J, Sloan SR, Friedman D, Parekh S, Sachais BS, Kiss JE, Assmann SF. Efficacy of transfusion with granulocytes from G-CSF/dexamethasone-treated donors in neutropenic patients with infection. Blood. 2015 Oct 29;126(18):2153-61. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-05-645986. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
Related trials for Neutropenia
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Screening for Hematology Branch Protocols
Hematologic Disease and Disorders, Donors
RecruitingObservational study
Pivotal Study to Validate a Novel System to Non-Invasively Detect Severe Neutropenia
Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 4
Adjustment of Antibiotic Dosage in Pediatric Oncology Patients With Febrile Neutropenia and Augmented Renal Clearance
Febrile Neutropenia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of Granulocyte-colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Dosage Reduction in Mavorixafor-treated Participants With Acquired Primary Autoimmune and Idiopathic Chronic Neutropenia Disorders
Acquired Primary Autoimmune and Idiopathic Chronic Neutropenia Disorders, Chronic Neutropenia
Not yet recruiting
Diagnostic Accuracy, Clinical Utility and Implementation of Point-of-Care Absolute Neutrophil Count in Suspected Neutropenic Fever (DUCATIS) - Diagnostic Accuracy (S1)
Suspected Neutropenic Fever, Confirmed Neutropenic Fever
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Susan F. Assmann, PhD principal investigator
Carelon Research
Jan McFarland, MD principal investigator
Froedtert Hospital
Eliot Williams, MD principal investigator
University of Wisconsin, Madison
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Standard antimicrobial therapy, Granulocyte transfusions and G-CSF/dexamethasone in people with Neutropenia and Infection, run by Carelon Research at 13 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Dec 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Are Alive at 42 Days After Treatment and Have Had Microbial Response (time frame: Measured at Day 42). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00627393, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2015.