AzTrials
AzTrials

NeutropeniaPhase 3RINGNCT00627393

Safety and Effectiveness of Granulocyte Transfusions in Resolving Infection in People With Neutropenia (The RING Study)

A Phase 3 study testing Standard antimicrobial therapy, Granulocyte transfusions and G-CSF/dexamethasone in people with Neutropenia and Infection, run by Carelon Research at 13 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Neutropenia, a condition characterized by an abnormally low number of infection-fighting white blood cells called neutrophils, commonly develops in people who have undergone chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Neutropenia, Infection
What is being tested?
Standard antimicrobial therapy, Granulocyte transfusions and G-CSF/dexamethasone
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
114 participants
Where
13 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2008to May 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Severe neutropenia (Absolute Neutrophil Count < 500/mm^3) due to marrow failure caused by underlying disease or therapy
  • Must have one of the following: fungemia; bacteremia; proven or presumptive invasive tissue bacterial infection; or proven, probable, or presumptive invasive fungal infection

Who cannot join

  • Unlikely to survive 5 days
  • Evidence that patient will not be neutropenic at least 5 days
  • Previously enrolled in this study

Trial locations and contacts

13 sites in 1 country.

13 sites in 1 country

United States13 sites
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21267

  • Children's Hospital Boston

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

    Iowa City, Iowa, 52242

  • University of Wisconsin at Madison

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

  • Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53201

  • University of Minnesota

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

  • Weill Medical College, Cornell University

    New York, New York, 10021

  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104

  • Chlidren's Hospital of Philadelphia

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • University of Pittsburgh Presbyterian and Shadyside

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • University of Washington Medical Center

    Seattle, Washington, 98195

  • Montefiore Medical Center

    The Bronx, New York, 10461

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: High Dose Granulocyte Transfusions for the Treatment of Infection in Neutropenia: The RING Study (Resolving Infection in Neutropenia With Granulocytes)

Neutropenia, a condition characterized by an abnormally low number of infection-fighting white blood cells called neutrophils, commonly develops in people who have undergone chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation. The severely reduced immunity of those with neutropenia can put them at risk of entry of life-threatening infections, making the implementation of treatments that increase white blood cell numbers important. Several studies have shown that the transfusion of donor granulocytes, a type of white blood cell that includes neutrophils, is effective in promoting the recovery of adequate numbers of granulocytes. However, granulocyte transfusions can cause side effects, and it is not known whether the success of the therapy outweighs the health risks of the side effects. This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of granulocyte transfusions in treating people with a bacterial or fungal infection during neutropenia.

Read the detailed description

Thousands of people each year are hospitalized for neutropenia, which continues to cause substantial morbidity and mortality for those affected. Neutropenia is primarily caused by chemotherapy and various other cancer treatments, such as radiation therapy, biotherapy, and HSC transplantation. Signs and symptoms of neutropenia may include high fever, chills, sore throat, and diarrhea. In neutropenia, the number of neutrophils, a type of granulocyte, is greatly reduced, weakening the body's immune system and increasing the risk of infection. Therefore, a method to provide adequate numbers of functional granulocytes to people with neutropenia could be of greatest benefit for recovery. Administration of a combination of two drugs, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and dexamethasone, has been show to stimulate the body to produce a large number of granulocytes. Granulocyte transfusions obtained from donors who have received these two drugs may help people with low white blood cell counts fight infections until their own white blood cell counts recover. However, it is not clear whether the benefits of granulocyte transfusions outweigh the risks of side effects. This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of granulocyte transfusions with standard antimicrobial therapy versus the safety and effectiveness of standard antimicrobial therapy alone in increasing granulocyte numbers and in improving survival rates in people with bacterial or fungal infection during neutropenia.

Participation in the research portion of this study will last about 3 months. All participants who were not previously receiving treatment with standard antimicrobial therapy will begin therapy immediately upon study entry. Participants will then be assigned randomly to receive either granulocyte transfusion plus continued antimicrobial therapy or continued antimicrobial therapy alone. All participants will be monitored for a maximum of 42 days, during which they will provide information on medical history and ongoing status of antimicrobial therapy. Daily blood samples to measure white blood cell count will be obtained from participants until samples show that participants are making their own granulocytes. Samples will then be collected weekly until Day 42. There may be additional blood draws depending on the type of infection present in participants.

Granulocyte transfusions will be given daily during the 42-day treatment period, depending on granulocyte donor availability. Blood counts will be checked immediately before and after each transfusion to measure granulocyte levels. Transfusions will be stopped if participants start making their own granulocytes, experience serious side effects, or show a reduction in infection. At Month 3 after study entry, follow-up information will be collected about all participants' health status through reviewing their medical records and contacting their physicians.

Participation for granulocyte donors will last 1 week from the time of donation. Community donors may provide more than one granulocyte donation, but no more than one donation every 3 days. Frequency of donation from a family member will be according to local blood bank criteria with approval from a blood bank physician. Both community donors and family donors are limited to eight donations each year. Twelve hours before each donation, participants will be injected with Neupogen, which contains G-CSF, and they will take one dose of dexamethasone by mouth. Participants will then undergo a blood draw, followed by a procedure using an apheresis machine for granulocyte collection. The procedure will last 3 to 4 hours and will involve the drawing of blood from each arm, the separation of granulocytes from the red blood cells and plasma in the machine, and the return of the red blood cells and plasma to the participants.

Being tested
Standard antimicrobial therapy, Granulocyte transfusions, G-CSF/dexamethasone, Apheresis machine
Keywords
Granulocyte Transfusions
Medical subject headings
Neutropenia, Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Standard antimicrobial therapyDrug

    Antimicrobial therapy is broadly defined as therapy within the standard of care for a particular infection and should be consistent within a given institution. Participants will undergo the recommended therapy for specific infections for 42 days.

  • Granulocyte transfusionsBiological

    Participants will receive one granulocyte transfusion per day until one of the following occurs: recovery from neutropenia, life-threatening toxicity, resolution or improvement of infection, or Day 42 after treatment. Granulocyte content of each transfusion is targeted to be at least 4 x 10^10 per collection (or proportionately less for participants less than 30 kg in weight).

  • G-CSF/dexamethasoneDrug

    Also called Neupogen

    Twelve hours before each donation, participants will be injected with G-CSF and will take one dose of dexamethasone by mouth.

  • Apheresis machineDevice

    Participants will undergo a procedure using an apheresis machine for granulocyte collection. The procedure will last 3 to 4 hours and will involve the drawing of blood from each arm, the separation of granulocytes from the red cells and plasma in the machine, and the return of the red cells and plasma to the participants.

Study groups in NCT00627393
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalParticipants will receive granulocyte transfusions in addition to standard antimicrobial therapy
Receives: Drug: Standard antimicrobial therapy; Biological: Granulocyte transfusions
2Active comparatorParticipants will receive standard antimicrobial therapy alone
Receives: Drug: Standard antimicrobial therapy
3OtherParticipants will donate granulocytes after receiving a combination of two drugs, G-CSF and dexamethasone
Receives: Drug: G-CSF/dexamethasone; Device: Apheresis machine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Are Alive at 42 Days After Treatment and Have Had Microbial Response

    Microbial response was defined as follows:

    • A negative blood culture test at 42 days after randomization for subjects with fungemia (candidemia or fusariosis) or bacteremia.
    • Improvement of signs and symptoms of infectious disease (complete or partial response) at 42 days after randomization.

    Measured: Measured at Day 42

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Alloimmunization, Defined as the Appearance of Anti-human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) or Antineutrophil Antibodies

    Measured: Measured at Days 14 and 42

  2. Serious Granulocyte Transfusion Reactions, Including Febrile, Allergic, and Pulmonary Reactions (Transfusion Arm Only)

    Measured: Measured within 6 hours after end of transfusion

  3. Graft Versus Host Disease Among Recipients of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

    Time to GVHD incidence between the two treatment groups was compared using Gray's model that takes into account death as a competing risk.

    Measured: Measured at Day 42

  4. Overall Incidence of Adverse Effects

    Measured: Measured through Day 42

  5. Fever Resolution

    Fever resolution between the two treatment groups was compared using Gray's model that takes into account death as a competing risk.

    Measured: Measured through Day 42

  6. Time to Negative Test for Fungal Antigenemia (e.g., Galactomannan Antigenemia Among Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis)

    Measured: Measured at Days 7, 14, and 42

  7. Time to Negative Blood Culture for Participants With Positive Blood Culture at Baseline

    Measured: Measured through Day 42

  8. Long-term Survival

    Measured: Measured at Month 3

  9. Serious Adverse Events in Granulocyte Donors

    Measured: Measured at Week 1 after G-CSF administration

  10. Donor Availability (Proportion of Scheduled Granulocyte Transfusion Days on Which Granulocytes Were Available)

    Measured: Measured through study completion

  11. Evaluation of Granulocyte Yield

    Measured: Measured immediately after each granulocyte donation

  12. Discontinuation of Granulocyte Transfusions Due to Toxicity or Intolerance

    Measured: Measured through Day 42

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Mar 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2008
  3. Primary completionApr 2013
  4. Study completionMay 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
114 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00627393
Sponsor's protocol ID
557
Other IDs
U01HL072268, HL072268, HL072291, HL072196, HL072248, HL072191, HL072305, HL072028
Acronym
RING
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
28 Feb 2008
Last updated
17 Apr 2015
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Price TH, Boeckh M, Harrison RW, McCullough J, Ness PM, Strauss RG, Nichols WG, Hamza TH, Cushing MM, King KE, Young JA, Williams E, McFarland J, Holter Chakrabarty J, Sloan SR, Friedman D, Parekh S, Sachais BS, Kiss JE, Assmann SF. Efficacy of transfusion with granulocytes from G-CSF/dexamethasone-treated donors in neutropenic patients with infection. Blood. 2015 Oct 29;126(18):2153-61. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-05-645986. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

    PubMed 26333778

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Standard antimicrobial therapy, Granulocyte transfusions and G-CSF/dexamethasone in people with Neutropenia and Infection, run by Carelon Research at 13 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 13 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Dec 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Are Alive at 42 Days After Treatment and Have Had Microbial Response (time frame: Measured at Day 42). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00627393, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in