Age-Related Macular DegenerationNCT00627718
Assessment of Macular Edema Using HRT Technique
A study testing HRT screening for macula edema in people with Age-Related Macular Degeneration, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Age Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD) is the most common cause of irreversible blindness in people of age 50 or older in the western populations. ARMD has two forms, the wet and the dry forms. The wet form is more serious and can lead to irreversible loss of vision. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- What is being tested?
- HRT screening for macula edema
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Apr 2008to Jul 2009
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- New patients referred by general ophthalmologists to the retina specialist for possible diagnosis of ARMD, exudative formed, will be included in the study.
Who cannot join
- Significant media opacity
- Other causes of macular edema (ME) (diabetes, vascular occlusions)
- Diabetic patients with retinopathy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
MUHC
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1
Mila Oh, MDCM, FRCSC, (514) 843-1646, milaoh@videotron.ca
Mila Oh, MDCM, FRCSC
About this study
Age Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD) is the most common cause of irreversible blindness in people of age 50 or older in the western populations. ARMD has two forms, the wet and the dry forms. The wet form is more serious and can lead to irreversible loss of vision. In the wet form of ARMD, new blood vessels grow under the retina. These blood vessels leak blood and fluid and cause the retina and the macula to swell. So the thickness of the macula increases.
One of the key factors in the treatment of wet ARMD is early diagnosis and treatment to prevent complete visual loss. In this research, we are going to use a technique, called the Heidelberg retinal tomograph (HRT) to measure and compare the thickness of the macula in healthy controls and in patients suspected of having ARMD. HRT is a non-invasive imaging system that uses laser to measure the thickness of the macula. This allows us to come up with a quite simple and easy-to-use technique that helps us to diagnose wet ARMD early and treat it before visual acuity is completely lost.
Read the detailed description
Introduction: Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is a spectrum of related diseases that affects the macula and it has been traditionally classified into early and late stages with its dry (non-exudative) and wet (exudative) forms. Although the advanced form of AMD is less common, the potential visual loss is more significant. The Beaver Dam Eye Study reported that 30% of individuals aged 75 and older have some form of AMD, whereas 7% of those aged 75 and older have an advanced form. Recent studies estimate that 8 million Americans are considered to be at risk for developing advanced ARMD in the next 5 years, whereas 1.75 million are currently affected with the advanced form of the disease.
Wet AMD is characterized by proliferation of abnormal vessels in the choroid. These choroidal neovascular membranes may proliferate into the subretinal space and retina and leak fluid and blood. This fluid may accumulate in the macula area causing macular edema (ME), the final common pathway for visual loss in many diseases. There are currently no treatments that can reverse or repair the destruction and restore visual acuity. The critical time for any intervention is early in the disease, when visual acuity has been minimally affected. Due to the irreversible nature of the disease and a realistic risk of permanent vision loss, there is an increased need to improve the accuracy of identifying the presence and extent of MEvwith a prompt referral to a retina specialist following diagnosis.
ME has traditionally been assessed clinically using a combination of slit lamp biomicroscopy and fluorescein angiography. New imaging techniques such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), the retinal thickness analyser (RTA), and the Heidelberg retinal tomograph (HRT) confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope facilitate qualitative assessments of the degree of ME. Although OCT has a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ME within 500 microns of the fovea, this resolution decreases outside this area. RTA has shown lower sensitivity (57%) for the detection of ME. 4 The Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II (HRT II, Heidelberg Engineering) is a non-invasive, confocal scanning laser imaging system that uses a red (670 nm) diode laser to perform a series of optical sections of the macula area covering a 15°x15° field of view, corresponding to approximately 4.5 x 4.5 mm on the retina. The reflected laser light intensity is processed assisting with a quantitative diagnosis of ME. If ME is present, the amount of scatter inside the swollen retina increases, reducing retinal reflectance.
A few studies have evaluated the HRT for detecting ME. Tong and co-workers have proposed a scoring system for macular image assessment using HRT in patients with diabetic maculopathy. Guan and co-workers found the HRT to have a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 68% for detecting ME in the diabetic population when using clinical assessment as the gold standard. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have yet validate the used HRT for the detection of ME as an early sign of exudative disease in ARMD patients.
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to assessed the sensitivity, specificity, and repeatability, of HRT for the presence of ME in exudative ARMD Design: Prospective, observational study. Objectives: 1) Assessment of healthy volunteers to obtain baseline normal measurements of macular thickening. 2) Measurements in ARMD patient's referred to a retinal specialist clinic with the diagnosis of exudative form of ARMD Patients, Material, and Methods: 1) normal controls (N=20): baseline measurements centered at the fovea will be taken. Three consecutive measurements will be performed (within-session repeatability). 2) Patients: New patients referred by general ophthalmologists to the retina specialist for possible diagnosis of ARMD, exudative formed, will be included in the study. All patients will undergo a full ophthalmologic exam by the same retinal specialist who will determine the clinical presence of ME (gold standard) using fundus contact lens examination. In some cases, fluorescein angiograms will be use as an ancillary test. All patients will then be evaluated using HRT for the presence of ME using the macula edema module. The technician performing the test will be mask to the patients' clinical diagnosis. Three consecutive measurements will be performed in 4 quadrants (500-1000-1500 microns/ 4 quadrants) (color map and reflectivity) 3) Comparison will be made between the clinical diagnosis of ME (gold standard) and results obtained by the HRT. Features compared: 1) presence/absence of ME 2) spacial agreement between areas of elevated retina encountered by HRT Vs clinical examination.
- Conditions
- Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- Being tested
- HRT screening for macula edema
- Keywords
- Age-related macular degeneration, HRT, Macular edema, Screening for disease
- Medical subject headings
- Macular Degeneration, Macular Edema
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HRT screening for macula edemaDevice
HRT screening for macula edema at time of initial diagnosis of macular degeneration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Other | All patients with possible neovascular ARMD are assessed with HRT to determined the positive predictive value of the test Receives: Device: HRT screening for macula edema |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Positive predictive value of screening test
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2008
- Primary completionApr 2009 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2009 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Age-Related Macular DegenerationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Mila Oh, MD, Principal investigator, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00627718
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BMB 06-029
- Status last verified
- Feb 2008
- First submitted
- 22 Feb 2008
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2008
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Mar 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of Macular Edema Using HRT Technique
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00627718
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BMB 06-029
- Conditions
- Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- Keywords
- Age-related macular degeneration, HRT, Macular edema, Screening for disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2008
- Primary completion
- Apr 2009 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2009 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Age Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD) is the most common cause of irreversible blindness in people of age 50 or older in the western populations. ARMD has two forms, the wet and the dry forms. The wet form is more serious and can lead to irreversible loss of vision. In the wet form of ARMD, new blood vessels grow under the retina. These blood vessels leak blood and fluid and cause the retina and the macula to swell. So the thickness of the macula increases.
One of the key factors in the treatment of wet ARMD is early diagnosis and treatment to prevent complete visual loss. In this research, we are going to use a technique, called the Heidelberg retinal tomograph (HRT) to measure and compare the thickness of the macula in healthy controls and in patients suspected of having ARMD. HRT is a non-invasive imaging system that uses laser to measure the thickness of the macula. This allows us to come up with a quite simple and easy-to-use technique that helps us to diagnose wet ARMD early and treat it before visual acuity is completely lost.
Detailed description
Introduction: Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is a spectrum of related diseases that affects the macula and it has been traditionally classified into early and late stages with its dry (non-exudative) and wet (exudative) forms. Although the advanced form of AMD is less common, the potential visual loss is more significant. The Beaver Dam Eye Study reported that 30% of individuals aged 75 and older have some form of AMD, whereas 7% of those aged 75 and older have an advanced form. Recent studies estimate that 8 million Americans are considered to be at risk for developing advanced ARMD in the next 5 years, whereas 1.75 million are currently affected with the advanced form of the disease.
Wet AMD is characterized by proliferation of abnormal vessels in the choroid. These choroidal neovascular membranes may proliferate into the subretinal space and retina and leak fluid and blood. This fluid may accumulate in the macula area causing macular edema (ME), the final common pathway for visual loss in many diseases. There are currently no treatments that can reverse or repair the destruction and restore visual acuity. The critical time for any intervention is early in the disease, when visual acuity has been minimally affected. Due to the irreversible nature of the disease and a realistic risk of permanent vision loss, there is an increased need to improve the accuracy of identifying the presence and extent of MEvwith a prompt referral to a retina specialist following diagnosis.
ME has traditionally been assessed clinically using a combination of slit lamp biomicroscopy and fluorescein angiography. New imaging techniques such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), the retinal thickness analyser (RTA), and the Heidelberg retinal tomograph (HRT) confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope facilitate qualitative assessments of the degree of ME. Although OCT has a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ME within 500 microns of the fovea, this resolution decreases outside this area. RTA has shown lower sensitivity (57%) for the detection of ME. 4 The Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II (HRT II, Heidelberg Engineering) is a non-invasive, confocal scanning laser imaging system that uses a red (670 nm) diode laser to perform a series of optical sections of the macula area covering a 15°x15° field of view, corresponding to approximately 4.5 x 4.5 mm on the retina. The reflected laser light intensity is processed assisting with a quantitative diagnosis of ME. If ME is present, the amount of scatter inside the swollen retina increases, reducing retinal reflectance.
A few studies have evaluated the HRT for detecting ME. Tong and co-workers have proposed a scoring system for macular image assessment using HRT in patients with diabetic maculopathy. Guan and co-workers found the HRT to have a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 68% for detecting ME in the diabetic population when using clinical assessment as the gold standard. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have yet validate the used HRT for the detection of ME as an early sign of exudative disease in ARMD patients.
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to assessed the sensitivity, specificity, and repeatability, of HRT for the presence of ME in exudative ARMD Design: Prospective, observational study. Objectives: 1) Assessment of healthy volunteers to obtain baseline normal measurements of macular thickening. 2) Measurements in ARMD patient's referred to a retinal specialist clinic with the diagnosis of exudative form of ARMD Patients, Material, and Methods: 1) normal controls (N=20): baseline measurements centered at the fovea will be taken. Three consecutive measurements will be performed (within-session repeatability). 2) Patients: New patients referred by general ophthalmologists to the retina specialist for possible diagnosis of ARMD, exudative formed, will be included in the study. All patients will undergo a full ophthalmologic exam by the same retinal specialist who will determine the clinical presence of ME (gold standard) using fundus contact lens examination. In some cases, fluorescein angiograms will be use as an ancillary test. All patients will then be evaluated using HRT for the presence of ME using the macula edema module. The technician performing the test will be mask to the patients' clinical diagnosis. Three consecutive measurements will be performed in 4 quadrants (500-1000-1500 microns/ 4 quadrants) (color map and reflectivity) 3) Comparison will be made between the clinical diagnosis of ME (gold standard) and results obtained by the HRT. Features compared: 1) presence/absence of ME 2) spacial agreement between areas of elevated retina encountered by HRT Vs clinical examination.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Other | Device: HRT screening for macula edemaAll patients with possible neovascular ARMD are assessed with HRT to determined the positive predictive value of the test |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- New patients referred by general ophthalmologists to the retina specialist for possible diagnosis of ARMD, exudative formed, will be included in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Significant media opacity
- Other causes of macular edema (ME) (diabetes, vascular occlusions)
- Diabetic patients with retinopathy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HRT screening for macula edemaHRT screening for macula edema at time of initial diagnosis of macular degeneration | Device | A |
Primary outcome
Positive predictive value of screening test
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Mar 2008.
Related trials for Age-Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of 36-Week Refill Exchanges of Port Delivery System (PDS) With Ranibizumab in nAMD
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingObservational study
Pivotal Trial of an Automated AI-based System for Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Late Age-related Macular Degeneration
Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Retinal Pigment Epithelium Safety Study For Patients In B4711001
Age Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingObservational study
National Ophthalmic Genotyping and Phenotyping Network (eyeGENE (Registered Trademark)), Stage 3 - Expansion of DNA and Data Repositories for Rare Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases
Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases, Hypopigmentation Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mila Oh, MD principal investigator
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HRT screening for macula edema in people with Age-Related Macular Degeneration, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Positive predictive value of screening test (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2008.