Breast CancerNCT00630292
Feasibility Study of Vessel Analysis for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Malignancy in Breast Tumors
A study testing Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) of the Breast in people with Breast Cancer, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a pilot study designed to explore the feasibility of non-invasively diagnosing the presence of cancer in the breast using non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods and an analysis of vessel shape defined from these magnetic resonance images. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) of the Breast
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 6 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2008to Dec 2009
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult women (age >= 18),
- with Histologically documented newly diagnosed stage II-IV invasive breast cancer appropriate for neoadjuvant (preoperative) systemic therapy.
- ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2 at the initiation of the study.
Who cannot join
- pregnant women
- women with contralateral mastectomies
- known bilateral tumors
- subjects prone to claustrophobia
- contraindicated to have MRI
- mentally impaired
- not fluent in english
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This is a pilot study designed to explore the feasibility of non-invasively diagnosing the presence of cancer in the breast using non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods and an analysis of vessel shape defined from these magnetic resonance images.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) of the Breast
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) of the BreastOther
Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) of the breast will be performed before or after pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and then once again before or after the post-treatment MRI.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) of the Breast |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Amount of Blood Vessel Tortuosity in Breast With Known Cancer
Amount of vessel tortuosity before the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and at the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Measured: up to two weeks prior to start of chemotheraphy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2008
- Primary completionDec 2008
- Study completionDec 2009
Why it stopped: Existing vessel analysis software could not be applied to breast MRI data.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of North Carolina, Chapel HillThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- William Irvin, MD, Principal investigator, UNC-CH
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00630292
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LCCC0718
- Status last verified
- May 2010
- First submitted
- 28 Feb 2008
- Last updated
- 18 May 2010
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett L, D'Orsi C, Jong R, Rebner M; Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1773-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052911. Epub 2005 Sep 16.
PubMed 16169887Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Besnard PE, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM, Manoliu RA, Kok T, Peterse H, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Muller SH, Meijer S, Oosterwijk JC, Beex LV, Tollenaar RA, de Koning HJ, Rutgers EJ, Klijn JG; Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Study Group. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 29;351(5):427-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031759.
PubMed 15282350Thukral A, Thomasson DM, Chow CK, Eulate R, Wedam SB, Gupta SN, Wise BJ, Steinberg SM, Liewehr DJ, Choyke PL, Swain SM. Inflammatory breast cancer: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR in patients receiving bevacizumab--initial experience. Radiology. 2007 Sep;244(3):727-35. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2443060926.
PubMed 17709827McDonald DM, Baluk P. Significance of blood vessel leakiness in cancer. Cancer Res. 2002 Sep 15;62(18):5381-5.
PubMed 12235011Bullitt E, Reardon DA, Smith JK. A review of micro- and macrovascular analyses in the assessment of tumor-associated vasculature as visualized by MR. Neuroimage. 2007;37 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S116-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.067. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
PubMed 17512217Bullitt E, Zeng D, Gerig G, Aylward S, Joshi S, Smith JK, Lin W, Ewend MG. Vessel tortuosity and brain tumor malignancy: a blinded study. Acad Radiol. 2005 Oct;12(10):1232-40. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.05.027.
PubMed 16179200Bullitt E, Wolthusen PA, Brubaker L, Lin W, Zeng D, Van Dyke T. Malignancy-associated vessel tortuosity: a computer-assisted, MR angiographic study of choroid plexus carcinoma in genetically engineered mice. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Mar;27(3):612-9.
PubMed 16552004
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 May 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility Study of Vessel Analysis for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Malignancy in Breast Tumors
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00630292
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LCCC0718
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Existing vessel analysis software could not be applied to breast MRI data.
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel HillUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2008
- Primary completion
- Dec 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 May 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a pilot study designed to explore the feasibility of non-invasively diagnosing the presence of cancer in the breast using non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods and an analysis of vessel shape defined from these magnetic resonance images.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Other: Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) of the Breast |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- adult women (age >= 18),
- with Histologically documented newly diagnosed stage II-IV invasive breast cancer appropriate for neoadjuvant (preoperative) systemic therapy.
- ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2 at the initiation of the study.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- pregnant women
- women with contralateral mastectomies
- known bilateral tumors
- subjects prone to claustrophobia
- contraindicated to have MRI
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) of the BreastMagnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) of the breast will be performed before or after pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and then once again before or after the post-treatment MRI. | Other | 1 |
Primary outcome
Amount of Blood Vessel Tortuosity in Breast With Known Cancer
Time frame: up to two weeks prior to start of chemotheraphy
Amount of vessel tortuosity before the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and at the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 May 2010.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 16169887Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett L, D'Orsi C, Jong R, Rebner M; Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1773-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052911. Epub 2005 Sep 16.
- Background: PubMed 15282350Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Besnard PE, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM, Manoliu RA, Kok T, Peterse H, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Muller SH, Meijer S, Oosterwijk JC, Beex LV, Tollenaar RA, de Koning HJ, Rutgers EJ, Klijn JG; Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Study Group. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 29;351(5):427-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031759.
- Background: PubMed 17709827Thukral A, Thomasson DM, Chow CK, Eulate R, Wedam SB, Gupta SN, Wise BJ, Steinberg SM, Liewehr DJ, Choyke PL, Swain SM. Inflammatory breast cancer: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR in patients receiving bevacizumab--initial experience. Radiology. 2007 Sep;244(3):727-35. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2443060926.
- Background: PubMed 12235011McDonald DM, Baluk P. Significance of blood vessel leakiness in cancer. Cancer Res. 2002 Sep 15;62(18):5381-5.
- Background: PubMed 17512217Bullitt E, Reardon DA, Smith JK. A review of micro- and macrovascular analyses in the assessment of tumor-associated vasculature as visualized by MR. Neuroimage. 2007;37 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S116-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.067. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
- Background: PubMed 16179200Bullitt E, Zeng D, Gerig G, Aylward S, Joshi S, Smith JK, Lin W, Ewend MG. Vessel tortuosity and brain tumor malignancy: a blinded study. Acad Radiol. 2005 Oct;12(10):1232-40. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.05.027.
- Background: PubMed 16552004Bullitt E, Wolthusen PA, Brubaker L, Lin W, Zeng D, Van Dyke T. Malignancy-associated vessel tortuosity: a computer-assisted, MR angiographic study of choroid plexus carcinoma in genetically engineered mice. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Mar;27(3):612-9.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
William Irvin, MD principal investigator
UNC-CH
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) of the Breast in people with Breast Cancer, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 May 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 May 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Amount of Blood Vessel Tortuosity in Breast With Known Cancer (time frame: up to two weeks prior to start of chemotheraphy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00630292, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 May 2010.