Subacromial Impingement SyndromeNCT00637013
Operative Versus Non-operative Management of Subacromial Impingement
A study testing Acromioplasty and Physiotherapy in people with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome, run by Central Finland Hospital District at 3 sites in Finland.
Trial summary
The study aims at determining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical management of subacromial impingement (including partial tears) compared to conservative treatment. The research setting is prospective, randomised, and controlled. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Acromioplasty and Physiotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesFinland
- Study dates
- Jun 2008to Jan 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age over 35 years old
- duration of symptoms at least three months despite non-operative treatment
- accepts both treatment options (operative and physical therapy)
- must have pain in abduction of the shoulder
- must have painful arc
- must have pain in two of the three isometric tests (0 and 30 degrees of abduction, or external rotation)
- a positive result in the impingement test (a subacromial injection of lidocaine reduces pain)
Who cannot join
- previous shoulder operations
- too high risk for operation
- any disease or social problem reducing the ability to co-operate
- rheumatoid arthritis
- severe arthrosis of the glenohumeral or acromioclavicular joint
- a full-thickness rotator cuff tear in MRI arthrography
Show all 11Show fewer
- a progressive malign disease
- adhesive capsulitis
- high-energy trauma before symptoms
- cervical syndrome
- shoulder instability
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Finland3 sites
University of Helsinki
Helsinki
Central Finland Health District
Jyväskylä, FIN-40620
Oulu University Hospital
Oulu
About this study
Official title: The Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Operative Versus Non-operative Management of Subacromial Impingement
The study aims at determining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical management of subacromial impingement (including partial tears) compared to conservative treatment. The research setting is prospective, randomised, and controlled.
The aim of the study is to search out evidence based data of indications for subacromial decompression. The investigators also aim at offering patients the most efficient and effective treatment and reduce the number of operations that do not have sufficient effectiveness. The data obtained will facilitate developing guidelines for referrals to a specialist when subacromial impingement is suspected.
The investigators hypothesise that there are subgroups of patients suffering from subacromial impingement that benefit from surgery whereas other subgroups are best treated conservatively.
Read the detailed description
Subgroup analysis:
- age
- sex
- duration of symptoms
- presence of trauma before symptoms
- presence of partial tear
- degenerative findings
- other findings in MRI or arthroscopy
- type of operation
- co-morbidities
- occupation
- pain (VAS)
- objective shoulder function
- activities of daily living
- Conditions
- Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
- Being tested
- Acromioplasty, Physiotherapy
- Keywords
- Subacromial impingement, Shoulder, RCT, Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness
- Medical subject headings
- Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AcromioplastyProcedure or surgery
Also called Subacromial decompression
Arthroscopic or open acromioplasty
PhysiotherapyProcedure or surgery
Also called Physical therapy, Non-operative treatment
Physiotherapy according to a standardized protocol
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Acromioplasty | Active comparator | Acromioplasty + physiotherapy according to a standardized protocol following a 3 months period of active non-operative treatment Receives: Procedure: Acromioplasty |
| Physiotherapy | Active comparator | Physiotherapy according to a standardized protocol following a 3 months period of active non-operative treatment Receives: Procedure: Physiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score)
VAS (0 to 100 mm), Constant score (0 to 100 points)
Measured: 24 months after intervention
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score)
VAS (0 to 100 mm), Constant score (0 to 100 points)
Measured: 3 months after intervention
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score)
VAS (0 to 100 mm), Constant score (0 to 100 points)
Measured: 6 months after intervention
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score)
VAS (0 to 100 mm), Constant score (0 to 100 points)
Measured: 12 months after intervention
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score)
VAS (0 to 100 mm), Constant score (0 to 100 points)
Measured: 5 years after uintervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2008
- Primary completionJan 2017
- Study completionJan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Subacromial Impingement SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Central Finland Hospital District
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Academy of Finland, Oulu University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Juha Paloneva, Central Finland Hospital District
- Investigators
- Juha Paloneva, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Central Finland Health Care District, University of Eastern Finland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00637013
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B07103
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 10 Mar 2008
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Brox JI, Gjengedal E, Uppheim G, Bohmer AS, Brevik JI, Ljunggren AE, Staff PH. Arthroscopic surgery versus supervised exercises in patients with rotator cuff disease (stage II impingement syndrome): a prospective, randomized, controlled study in 125 patients with a 2 1/2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 Mar-Apr;8(2):102-11. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(99)90001-0.
PubMed 10226960Haahr JP, Ostergaard S, Dalsgaard J, Norup K, Frost P, Lausen S, Holm EA, Andersen JH. Exercises versus arthroscopic decompression in patients with subacromial impingement: a randomised, controlled study in 90 cases with a one year follow up. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 May;64(5):760-4. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.021188.
PubMed 15834056Ketola S, Lehtinen J, Rousi T, Nissinen M, Huhtala H, Konttinen YT, Arnala I. No evidence of long-term benefits of arthroscopicacromioplasty in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome: Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res. 2013 Jul 1;2(7):132-9. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.27.2000163. Print 2013.
PubMed 23836479Ketola S, Lehtinen J, Arnala I, Nissinen M, Westenius H, Sintonen H, Aronen P, Konttinen YT, Malmivaara A, Rousi T. Does arthroscopic acromioplasty provide any additional value in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome?: a two-year randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Oct;91(10):1326-34. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B10.22094.
PubMed 19794168Haahr JP, Andersen JH. Exercises may be as efficient as subacromial decompression in patients with subacromial stage II impingement: 4-8-years' follow-up in a prospective, randomized study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2006 May-Jun;35(3):224-8. doi: 10.1080/03009740600556167.
PubMed 16766370Ketola S, Lehtinen J, Elo P, Kortelainen S, Huhtala H, Arnala I. No difference in long-term development of rotator cuff rupture and muscle volumes in impingement patients with or without decompression. Acta Orthop. 2016 Aug;87(4):351-5. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1177780. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
PubMed 27348693Ketola S, Lehtinen JT, Arnala I. Arthroscopic decompression not recommended in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy: a final review of a randomised controlled trial at a minimum follow-up of ten years. Bone Joint J. 2017 Jun;99-B(6):799-805. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-0569.R1.
PubMed 28566400Cederqvist S, Flinkkila T, Sormaala M, Ylinen J, Kautiainen H, Irmola T, Lehtokangas H, Liukkonen J, Pamilo K, Ridanpaa T, Sirnio K, Leppilahti J, Kiviranta I, Paloneva J. Non-surgical and surgical treatments for rotator cuff disease: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial with 2-year follow-up after initial rehabilitation. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jun;80(6):796-802. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219099. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
PubMed 33272959
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Operative Versus Non-operative Management of Subacromial Impingement
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00637013
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B07103
- Conditions
- Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
- Keywords
- Subacromial impingement, Shoulder, RCT, Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Central Finland Hospital DistrictUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Academy of Finland, Oulu University Hospital
- Study start
- Jun 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study aims at determining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical management of subacromial impingement (including partial tears) compared to conservative treatment. The research setting is prospective, randomised, and controlled.
The aim of the study is to search out evidence based data of indications for subacromial decompression. The investigators also aim at offering patients the most efficient and effective treatment and reduce the number of operations that do not have sufficient effectiveness. The data obtained will facilitate developing guidelines for referrals to a specialist when subacromial impingement is suspected.
The investigators hypothesise that there are subgroups of patients suffering from subacromial impingement that benefit from surgery whereas other subgroups are best treated conservatively.
Detailed description
Subgroup analysis:
- age
- sex
- duration of symptoms
- presence of trauma before symptoms
- presence of partial tear
- degenerative findings
- other findings in MRI or arthroscopy
- type of operation
- co-morbidities
- occupation
- pain (VAS)
- objective shoulder function
- activities of daily living
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Acromioplasty | Active comparator | Procedure: AcromioplastyAcromioplasty + physiotherapy according to a standardized protocol following a 3 months period of active non-operative treatment |
| Physiotherapy | Active comparator | Procedure: PhysiotherapyPhysiotherapy according to a standardized protocol following a 3 months period of active non-operative treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- age over 35 years old
- duration of symptoms at least three months despite non-operative treatment
- accepts both treatment options (operative and physical therapy)
- must have pain in abduction of the shoulder
- must have painful arc
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- previous shoulder operations
- too high risk for operation
- any disease or social problem reducing the ability to co-operate
- rheumatoid arthritis
- severe arthrosis of the glenohumeral or acromioclavicular joint
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AcromioplastyAlso: Subacromial decompressionArthroscopic or open acromioplasty | Procedure or surgery | Acromioplasty |
| PhysiotherapyAlso: Physical therapy, Non-operative treatmentPhysiotherapy according to a standardized protocol | Procedure or surgery | Physiotherapy |
Primary outcome
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score)
Time frame: 24 months after intervention
VAS (0 to 100 mm), Constant score (0 to 100 points)
4 secondary outcomes
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score)
Time frame: 3 months after intervention
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score)
Time frame: 6 months after intervention
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score)
Time frame: 12 months after intervention
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score)
Time frame: 5 years after uintervention
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Feb 2024.
- Background: PubMed 10226960Brox JI, Gjengedal E, Uppheim G, Bohmer AS, Brevik JI, Ljunggren AE, Staff PH. Arthroscopic surgery versus supervised exercises in patients with rotator cuff disease (stage II impingement syndrome): a prospective, randomized, controlled study in 125 patients with a 2 1/2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 Mar-Apr;8(2):102-11. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(99)90001-0.
- Background: PubMed 15834056Haahr JP, Ostergaard S, Dalsgaard J, Norup K, Frost P, Lausen S, Holm EA, Andersen JH. Exercises versus arthroscopic decompression in patients with subacromial impingement: a randomised, controlled study in 90 cases with a one year follow up. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 May;64(5):760-4. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.021188.
- Background: PubMed 23836479Ketola S, Lehtinen J, Rousi T, Nissinen M, Huhtala H, Konttinen YT, Arnala I. No evidence of long-term benefits of arthroscopicacromioplasty in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome: Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res. 2013 Jul 1;2(7):132-9. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.27.2000163. Print 2013.
- Background: PubMed 19794168Ketola S, Lehtinen J, Arnala I, Nissinen M, Westenius H, Sintonen H, Aronen P, Konttinen YT, Malmivaara A, Rousi T. Does arthroscopic acromioplasty provide any additional value in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome?: a two-year randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Oct;91(10):1326-34. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B10.22094.
- Background: PubMed 16766370Haahr JP, Andersen JH. Exercises may be as efficient as subacromial decompression in patients with subacromial stage II impingement: 4-8-years' follow-up in a prospective, randomized study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2006 May-Jun;35(3):224-8. doi: 10.1080/03009740600556167.
- Background: PubMed 27348693Ketola S, Lehtinen J, Elo P, Kortelainen S, Huhtala H, Arnala I. No difference in long-term development of rotator cuff rupture and muscle volumes in impingement patients with or without decompression. Acta Orthop. 2016 Aug;87(4):351-5. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1177780. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
- Background: PubMed 28566400Ketola S, Lehtinen JT, Arnala I. Arthroscopic decompression not recommended in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy: a final review of a randomised controlled trial at a minimum follow-up of ten years. Bone Joint J. 2017 Jun;99-B(6):799-805. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-0569.R1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33272959Cederqvist S, Flinkkila T, Sormaala M, Ylinen J, Kautiainen H, Irmola T, Lehtokangas H, Liukkonen J, Pamilo K, Ridanpaa T, Sirnio K, Leppilahti J, Kiviranta I, Paloneva J. Non-surgical and surgical treatments for rotator cuff disease: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial with 2-year follow-up after initial rehabilitation. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jun;80(6):796-802. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219099. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
- Clinical Musculoskeletal Diseases Research Group internet pagesLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
TECAR With Shoulder Chronic Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
Recruiting
Device-Assisted Balance Training for People With Shoulder Impingement
Shoulder
Not yet recruiting
"Effectiveness of a Telerehabilitation Program Versus a Conventional Rehabilitation Program in Patients With Subacromial Pain"
Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Natural History of Shoulder Pathology in Manual Wheelchair Users
Paraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Spencer vs Positional Release Techniques for Chronic Subacromial Impingement
Chronic Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Juha Paloneva, MD, PhD principal investigator
Central Finland Health Care District, University of Eastern Finland
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Acromioplasty and Physiotherapy in people with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome, run by Central Finland Hospital District at 3 sites in Finland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score) (time frame: 24 months after intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00637013, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2024.