CancerPhase 2NCT00637975
Oxycodone and Pregabalin for the Treatment of Oncological Neuropathic Pain
A Phase 2 study testing oxycodone and pregabalin in people with Cancer and Pain, run by Associazione Progetto Oncologia UMAN.A at 8 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to assess tolerability and activity of oxycodone and pregabalin in combination for the treatment of oncological neuropathic pain with two different strategies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- What is being tested?
- oxycodone and pregabalin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- Sep 2007to Dec 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- instrumental and clinical diagnosis of every malignant neoplasm
- presence of pain with a neuropathic component in the opinion of the physician
- presence of pain >=4(NRS)
- PS ECOG <3
- written informed consent
Who cannot join
- serum creatinine >2mg/ml or creatinine clearance <40 ml/min
- mild or severe hepatic insufficiency
- iatrogenic neuropathy caused by chemotherapeutic agents
- previous allergic reactions to oxycodone and pregabalin
- pregnancy or breastfeeding
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country.
8 sites in 1 country
Italy8 sites
Ospedale Fatebenefratelli
Benevento, Benevento, 82100
Ospedali Riuniti
Bergamo, Bergamo, 24123
Ospedale S. Orsola
Brescia, Brescia, 25122
Ospedale Serbelloni
Gorgonzola, Milano, 29964
Fatebenefratelli and Ophtalmic Hospital
Milan, Milano, 20121
Ospedale Sacro Cuore
Negrar, Verona, 37024
Ospedale Civile di Legnano
Parabiago, Milano, 20015
Ospedale Fatebenefratelli
Roma, Roma
About this study
Official title: Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluating Activity and Tolerability of Fixed Dose of Oxycodone and Increasing Dose of Pregabalin Versus Increasing Dose of Oxycodone and Fixed Dose of Pregabalin for the Treatment of Oncological Neuropathic Pain
The aim of the study is to assess tolerability and activity of oxycodone and pregabalin in combination for the treatment of oncological neuropathic pain with two different strategies.
Read the detailed description
Neuropathic pain is frequently diagnosed as a complication of cancer pain. While opioids are the mainstay of cancer pain management,their efficacy in neuropathic pain seems to be less then optimal,and adjuvant drugs, mainly anticonvulsants and antidepressants,are often combined with opioids in the analgesic regimen of patients with neuropathic cancer pain. This approach is suggested by well-established guidelines, but the analgesic benefit and the safety of pregabalin and oxycodone in combination is not yet documented.
The aim of this study is to assess the activity and tolerability of the addition of pregabalin to oxycodone in the treatment of patients with neuropathic pain due to neoplasm.
- Being tested
- oxycodone, pregabalin
- Keywords
- neuropathic pain, oxycodone, pregabalin, Patients with cancer and presenting a neuropathic pain
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Pain, Neuralgia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
oxycodoneDrug
Arm A - 20 mg/day
Arm B - increasing dose startnig at 20 mg/day
For 15 days or until unacceptable toxicity develops.
pregabalinDrug
Arm A - pregabalin at increasing dose starting from 50 mg/day
Arm B - pregabalin 50 mg/day
For 15 days or until unacceptable toxicity develops.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | oxycodone 20 mg/day plus pregabalin at increasing dose starting from 50 mg/day for 15 days or until unacceptable toxicity develops Receives: Drug: oxycodone; Drug: pregabalin |
| B | Active comparator | pregabalin 50 mg/day plus oxycodone at increasing dose starting from 20 mg/day. For 15 days or until unacceptable toxicity develops Receives: Drug: oxycodone; Drug: pregabalin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Achievement of analgesia (decrease of at least 1/3 of pain intensity) assessed by NRS scale
Measured: within 15 days
Secondary outcomes (6)
Pain control rate
Measured: within 15 days
Reduction of Break Through Pain number
Measured: within 15 days
Record of adverse events
Measured: within 15 days
Reduction of allodynia in patients presenting it at T0
Measured: within 15 days
Patient satisfaction
Measured: within 15 days
Assessing whether COMT and mu blood polymorphisms are associated to response
Measured: within 15 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2007
- Primary completionDec 2010
- Study completionDec 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (29)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Associazione Progetto Oncologia UMAN.A
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
- Investigators
- Gabriella Farina, MD, Principal investigator, Fatebenefratelli and Ophtalmic Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00637975
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NEUROPAIN01
- Other IDs
- EudraCT Number 2007-005222-69
- Status last verified
- Jan 2011
- First submitted
- 12 Mar 2008
- Last updated
- 2 Feb 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Merskey H, Bugduk N. Classification of chronic pain. Description of chronic pain. Description of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of chronic pain terms. Seattle: IASP, press 1994
Negri E, Bettaglio R, Demartini L, Allegri M, Barbieri M, Miotti D, Paulin L, Buonocore M, Bonezzi C. [Validation of the Italian version of the "Neuropathic Pain Scale" and its clinical applications]. Minerva Anestesiol. 2002 Mar;68(3):95-104. Italian.
PubMed 11981518Riley J, Ross JR, Rutter D, Wells AU, Goller K, du Bois R, Welsh K. No pain relief from morphine? Individual variation in sensitivity to morphine and the need to switch to an alternative opioid in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2006 Jan;14(1):56-64. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0843-2. Epub 2005 Jun 11.
PubMed 15952009Mucci-LoRusso P, Berman BS, Silberstein PT, Citron ML, Bressler L, Weinstein SM, Kaiko RF, Buckley BJ, Reder RF. Controlled-release oxycodone compared with controlled-release morphine in the treatment of cancer pain: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Eur J Pain. 1998;2(3):239-49. doi: 10.1016/s1090-3801(98)90020-9.
PubMed 15102384Bruera E, Belzile M, Pituskin E, Fainsinger R, Darke A, Harsanyi Z, Babul N, Ford I. Randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial comparing safety and efficacy of oral controlled-release oxycodone with controlled-release morphine in patients with cancer pain. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Oct;16(10):3222-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.10.3222.
PubMed 9779695Altier N, Dion D, Boulanger A, Choiniere M. Management of chronic neuropathic pain with methadone: a review of 13 cases. Clin J Pain. 2005 Jul-Aug;21(4):364-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000125247.95213.53.
PubMed 15951657Gralow I. Cancer pain: an update of pharmacological approaches in pain therapy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002 Oct;15(5):555-61. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200210000-00014.
PubMed 17019254Farrar JT, Portenoy RK. Neuropathic cancer pain: the role of adjuvant analgesics. Oncology (Williston Park). 2001 Nov;15(11):1435-42, 1445; discussion 1445, 1450-3.
PubMed 11758872Dirks J, Petersen KL, Rowbotham MC, Dahl JB. Gabapentin suppresses cutaneous hyperalgesia following heat-capsaicin sensitization. Anesthesiology. 2002 Jul;97(1):102-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200207000-00015.
PubMed 12131110Caraceni A, Zecca E, Bonezzi C, Arcuri E, Yaya Tur R, Maltoni M, Visentin M, Gorni G, Martini C, Tirelli W, Barbieri M, De Conno F. Gabapentin for neuropathic cancer pain: a randomized controlled trial from the Gabapentin Cancer Pain Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 15;22(14):2909-17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.141.
PubMed 15254060Mercadante S, Arcuri E, Tirelli W, Villari P, Casuccio A. Amitriptyline in neuropathic cancer pain in patients on morphine therapy: a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study. Tumori. 2002 May-Jun;88(3):239-42. doi: 10.1177/030089160208800310.
PubMed 12195763Grond S, Zech D, Diefenbach C, Radbruch L, Lehmann KA. Assessment of cancer pain: a prospective evaluation in 2266 cancer patients referred to a pain service. Pain. 1996 Jan;64(1):107-114. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00076-3.
PubMed 8867252Portenoy RK, Foley KM, Inturrisi CE. The nature of opioid responsiveness and its implications for neuropathic pain: new hypotheses derived from studies of opioid infusions. Pain. 1990 Dec;43(3):273-286. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90025-9.
PubMed 1705692Chua KS, Reddy SK, Lee MC, Patt RB. Pain and loss of function in head and neck cancer survivors. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999 Sep;18(3):193-202. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(99)00070-6.
PubMed 10517041Zech DFJ, Grond S, Lynch J, Hertel D, Lehmann KA. Validation of World Health Organization Guidelines for cancer pain relief: a 10-year prospective study. Pain. 1995 Oct;63(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00017-M.
PubMed 8577492
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Feb 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluating Activity and Tolerability of Fixed Dose of Oxycodone and Increasing Dose of Pregabalin Versus Increasing Dose of Oxycodone and Fixed Dose of Pregabalin for the Treatment of Oncological Neuropathic Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00637975
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NEUROPAIN01
- Keywords
- neuropathic pain, oxycodone, pregabalin, Patients with cancer and presenting a neuropathic pain
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Associazione Progetto Oncologia UMAN.AUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
- Study start
- Sep 2007
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to assess tolerability and activity of oxycodone and pregabalin in combination for the treatment of oncological neuropathic pain with two different strategies.
Detailed description
Neuropathic pain is frequently diagnosed as a complication of cancer pain. While opioids are the mainstay of cancer pain management,their efficacy in neuropathic pain seems to be less then optimal,and adjuvant drugs, mainly anticonvulsants and antidepressants,are often combined with opioids in the analgesic regimen of patients with neuropathic cancer pain. This approach is suggested by well-established guidelines, but the analgesic benefit and the safety of pregabalin and oxycodone in combination is not yet documented.
The aim of this study is to assess the activity and tolerability of the addition of pregabalin to oxycodone in the treatment of patients with neuropathic pain due to neoplasm.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Drug: oxycodone, Drug: pregabalinoxycodone 20 mg/day plus pregabalin at increasing dose starting from 50 mg/day for 15 days or until unacceptable toxicity develops |
| B | Active comparator | Drug: oxycodone, Drug: pregabalinpregabalin 50 mg/day plus oxycodone at increasing dose starting from 20 mg/day. For 15 days or until unacceptable toxicity develops |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- instrumental and clinical diagnosis of every malignant neoplasm
- presence of pain with a neuropathic component in the opinion of the physician
- presence of pain >=4(NRS)
- PS ECOG <3
- written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- serum creatinine >2mg/ml or creatinine clearance <40 ml/min
- mild or severe hepatic insufficiency
- iatrogenic neuropathy caused by chemotherapeutic agents
- previous allergic reactions to oxycodone and pregabalin
- pregnancy or breastfeeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| oxycodoneArm A - 20 mg/day Arm B - increasing dose startnig at 20 mg/day For 15 days or until unacceptable toxicity develops. | Drug | A, B |
| pregabalinArm A - pregabalin at increasing dose starting from 50 mg/day Arm B - pregabalin 50 mg/day For 15 days or until unacceptable toxicity develops. | Drug | A, B |
Primary outcome
Achievement of analgesia (decrease of at least 1/3 of pain intensity) assessed by NRS scale
Time frame: within 15 days
6 secondary outcomes
Pain control rate
Time frame: within 15 days
Reduction of Break Through Pain number
Time frame: within 15 days
Record of adverse events
Time frame: within 15 days
Reduction of allodynia in patients presenting it at T0
Time frame: within 15 days
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: within 15 days
Assessing whether COMT and mu blood polymorphisms are associated to response
Time frame: within 15 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Feb 2011.
- BackgroundMerskey H, Bugduk N. Classification of chronic pain. Description of chronic pain. Description of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of chronic pain terms. Seattle: IASP, press 1994
- Background: PubMed 11981518Negri E, Bettaglio R, Demartini L, Allegri M, Barbieri M, Miotti D, Paulin L, Buonocore M, Bonezzi C. [Validation of the Italian version of the "Neuropathic Pain Scale" and its clinical applications]. Minerva Anestesiol. 2002 Mar;68(3):95-104. Italian.
- Background: PubMed 15952009Riley J, Ross JR, Rutter D, Wells AU, Goller K, du Bois R, Welsh K. No pain relief from morphine? Individual variation in sensitivity to morphine and the need to switch to an alternative opioid in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2006 Jan;14(1):56-64. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0843-2. Epub 2005 Jun 11.
- Background: PubMed 15102384Mucci-LoRusso P, Berman BS, Silberstein PT, Citron ML, Bressler L, Weinstein SM, Kaiko RF, Buckley BJ, Reder RF. Controlled-release oxycodone compared with controlled-release morphine in the treatment of cancer pain: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Eur J Pain. 1998;2(3):239-49. doi: 10.1016/s1090-3801(98)90020-9.
- Background: PubMed 9779695Bruera E, Belzile M, Pituskin E, Fainsinger R, Darke A, Harsanyi Z, Babul N, Ford I. Randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial comparing safety and efficacy of oral controlled-release oxycodone with controlled-release morphine in patients with cancer pain. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Oct;16(10):3222-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.10.3222.
- Background: PubMed 15951657Altier N, Dion D, Boulanger A, Choiniere M. Management of chronic neuropathic pain with methadone: a review of 13 cases. Clin J Pain. 2005 Jul-Aug;21(4):364-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000125247.95213.53.
- Background: PubMed 17019254Gralow I. Cancer pain: an update of pharmacological approaches in pain therapy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002 Oct;15(5):555-61. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200210000-00014.
- Background: PubMed 11758872Farrar JT, Portenoy RK. Neuropathic cancer pain: the role of adjuvant analgesics. Oncology (Williston Park). 2001 Nov;15(11):1435-42, 1445; discussion 1445, 1450-3.
- Background: PubMed 12131110Dirks J, Petersen KL, Rowbotham MC, Dahl JB. Gabapentin suppresses cutaneous hyperalgesia following heat-capsaicin sensitization. Anesthesiology. 2002 Jul;97(1):102-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200207000-00015.
- Background: PubMed 15254060Caraceni A, Zecca E, Bonezzi C, Arcuri E, Yaya Tur R, Maltoni M, Visentin M, Gorni G, Martini C, Tirelli W, Barbieri M, De Conno F. Gabapentin for neuropathic cancer pain: a randomized controlled trial from the Gabapentin Cancer Pain Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 15;22(14):2909-17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.141.
- Background: PubMed 12195763Mercadante S, Arcuri E, Tirelli W, Villari P, Casuccio A. Amitriptyline in neuropathic cancer pain in patients on morphine therapy: a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study. Tumori. 2002 May-Jun;88(3):239-42. doi: 10.1177/030089160208800310.
- Background: PubMed 8867252Grond S, Zech D, Diefenbach C, Radbruch L, Lehmann KA. Assessment of cancer pain: a prospective evaluation in 2266 cancer patients referred to a pain service. Pain. 1996 Jan;64(1):107-114. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00076-3.
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gabriella Farina, MD principal investigator
Fatebenefratelli and Ophtalmic Hospital
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing oxycodone and pregabalin in people with Cancer and Pain, run by Associazione Progetto Oncologia UMAN.A at 8 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Achievement of analgesia (decrease of at least 1/3 of pain intensity) assessed by NRS scale (time frame: within 15 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00637975, which also lists 29 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2011.