Graft Versus Host DiseasePhase 2NCT00639717
Addition of Etanercept and Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ECP) to Standard Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis in Stem Cell Transplant
A Phase 2 study testing stem cell transplant, tacrolimus (standard GVHD prophylaxis) and mycophenolate (standard GVHD prophylaxis) in people with Graft Versus Host Disease, run by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This research study investigates the benefits and possible risks of adding both etanercept (Enbrel) and ECP (extracorporeal photopheresis) to the conventional preventative (or prophylactic) treatments for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Graft Versus Host Disease
- What is being tested?
- stem cell transplant, tacrolimus (standard GVHD prophylaxis) and mycophenolate (standard GVHD prophylaxis)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2009to Apr 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Candidate for unrelated donor (allogeneic) HSCT for hematologic conditions, either malignant or non-malignant.
- Donor can be unrelated marrow, blood or cord blood.
- Any disease for which unrelated donor transplant is appropriate is eligible except:
- Progressive or poorly controlled malignancies for which the likelihood of durable disease control [i.e., patients expected to have at least 6 months PFS from date of transplant] is <25%.
- This determination of likelihood of durable disease control must take into account the patient's disease status and consideration of the agents and doses used in the reduced intensity conditioning regimen.
- The determination of adequate disease control will be certified by the PI or designee on the eligibility checklist.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Patients may be consented to this trial based on disease control at the time of consent, but later removed from the trial prior to initiation of transplant conditioning regimen if disease status confirmation between consenting and transplant changes. In the event this occurs these patients will be replaced.
- Must be receiving a recognized reduced intensity transplant as determined by the University of Michigan Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program.
- Patients age 50 or older are eligible based on age.
- Patients may be <50 years old if they are eligible for a reduced intensity conditioning regimen based on disease type (eg, indolent lymphoma) or if comorbidities preclude a full-intensity transplant.
- Patients must have adequate venous access by either peripheral vein or central line so that ECP can be performed.
- Patients must be expected to tolerate the fluid shifts associated with ECP. The primary reason for expected intolerance of ECP is small size (ie, <30kg weight), but other factors may also be considered in this determination.
Who cannot join
- Not a candidate for a reduced intensity transplant conditioning regimen (based on the current U-M BMT program clinical guidelines).
- Patient has a suitable related donor available for transplant.
- Karnofsky or Lansky performance status of < 50% at the time of admission for HSCT
- Patients with evidence of HIV infection or other opportunistic infection including but not limited to Tuberculosis and Histoplasmosis.
- Patients with active bacterial, fungal or viral infection not responding to treatment.
- Any medical or psychological conditions that would keep the patient from complying with the protocol and/or would markedly increase the morbidity and mortality from the procedure.
- Pregnancy.
- T-cell depleted allograft
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Michigan Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
About this study
Official title: Addition of Etanercept and Extracorporeal Photopheresis to Standard GVHD Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Reduced Intensity Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
This research study investigates the benefits and possible risks of adding both etanercept (Enbrel) and ECP (extracorporeal photopheresis) to the conventional preventative (or prophylactic) treatments for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). GVHD is a common, serious, and too often fatal, complication after matched unrelated donor stem cell transplantation, regardless of the pre-transplant conditioning regimen used (full or reduced intensity).
Reduced intensity transplants which employ lower doses of chemotherapy during the conditioning phase of the transplant, are less toxic than full intensity transplants. Reduced intensity transplants may extend the unrelated donor transplant option to older patients or to patients with existing medical conditions or illness, where a full intensity transplant is not possible. To be successful, reduced intensity transplants need to offset any lower effectiveness in killing cancer cells during the conditioning phase, with the establishment of a donor cell, graft-versus-leukemia effect (GVL). The GVL effect and GVHD are associated with each other and therefore, the goal of GVHD prophylaxis for this study is not so much to prevent all GVHD, but rather to prevent serious and fatal acute GVHD.
Most GVHD-related deaths are either the direct consequence of severe GVHD or from infections associated with intense immunosuppression, a consequence of the standard treatments for acute GVHD, which almost always include high-dose steroids. A more effective prophylaxis therapy that allows for the GVL effect to develop, while limiting the exposure to high-dose steroids may reduce transplant mortality and morbidity. We also will study how key chemical and cellular factors relate to clinical outcome.
- Conditions
- Graft Versus Host Disease
- Being tested
- stem cell transplant, tacrolimus (standard GVHD prophylaxis), mycophenolate (standard GVHD prophylaxis), etanercept, methoxsalen
- Keywords
- GVHD
- Medical subject headings
- Graft vs Host Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
stem cell transplantProcedure or surgery
reduced intensity, matched unrelated donor stem cell transplant
tacrolimus (standard GVHD prophylaxis)Drug
Tacrolimus(or cyclosporine when necessary)
Tacrolimus will begin on day -3, IV or oral.
Target trough level for tacrolimus is 8-12 ng/ml.
In the absence of GVHD, tacrolimus tapering will begin on day +56 post transplant
mycophenolate (standard GVHD prophylaxis)Drug
Mycophenolate will begin on day 0 at 10 mg/kg/dose (up to 1 gram per dose) every 8 hours orally or intravenously and will continue until day 28.
etanerceptDrug
Also called Enbrel
Etanercept will be given at a dose 0.4 mg/kg (actual weight) up to a maximum dose of 25 mg, subcutaneously, twice weekly from day 0 to day 56 (16 doses)
methoxsalenDrug
Also called UVADEX
Methoxsalen (UVADEX) treatments by Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) will be started day +28 post transplant and given weekly.
On day +70 post transplant ECP frequency will be given every other week.
On day +100 post transplant ECP will be given monthly until day +180 and stopped.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Etanercept and ECP | Experimental | Etanercept and ECP (Extracorporeal Photopheresis) in addition to standard GVHD prevention:
Etanercept will be given twice weekly by subcutaneous injection starting on the day of HSCT (Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) conditioning until 8 weeks post transplant. ECP treatments will begin at once weekly starting at 4 weeks post transplant and continue at less frequent intervals until 6 months post transplant.
GVHD prophylaxis will consist of a standard two drug regimen: mycophenolate for 4 weeks and tacrolimus (titrated to a therapeutic level) for 8 weeks, then weaned over 4 months with discontinuation by 6 months post-transplant. Receives: Procedure: stem cell transplant; Drug: tacrolimus (standard GVHD prophylaxis); Drug: mycophenolate (standard GVHD prophylaxis); Drug: etanercept; Drug: methoxsalen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Patients Alive at 6 Months
Overall survival at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Relapse by 6 Months
Relapse rate at 6 months. Relapse is defined as recurrence of disease.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
The Percentage of Patients That Experienced Graft Versus Host Disease
Incidence of acute GVHD grades 2-4 and chronic GVHD in this study population
Measured: 6 Months
Measured Level of Circulating Plasma Markers After Transplant
Measured: 100 days
Regulatory T Cell Numbers Post-transplant
Measured: 180 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2009
- Primary completionJan 2012
- Study completionApr 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Graft Versus Host DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mallinckrodt, Amgen
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gregory Yanik, MD, Principal investigator, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00639717
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- umcc 2008.003
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2008
- Last updated
- 1 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Addition of Etanercept and Extracorporeal Photopheresis to Standard GVHD Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Reduced Intensity Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00639717
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- umcc 2008.003
- Conditions
- Graft Versus Host Disease
- Keywords
- GVHD
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mallinckrodt, Amgen
- Study start
- Mar 2009
- Primary completion
- Jan 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Sep 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research study investigates the benefits and possible risks of adding both etanercept (Enbrel) and ECP (extracorporeal photopheresis) to the conventional preventative (or prophylactic) treatments for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). GVHD is a common, serious, and too often fatal, complication after matched unrelated donor stem cell transplantation, regardless of the pre-transplant conditioning regimen used (full or reduced intensity).
Reduced intensity transplants which employ lower doses of chemotherapy during the conditioning phase of the transplant, are less toxic than full intensity transplants. Reduced intensity transplants may extend the unrelated donor transplant option to older patients or to patients with existing medical conditions or illness, where a full intensity transplant is not possible. To be successful, reduced intensity transplants need to offset any lower effectiveness in killing cancer cells during the conditioning phase, with the establishment of a donor cell, graft-versus-leukemia effect (GVL). The GVL effect and GVHD are associated with each other and therefore, the goal of GVHD prophylaxis for this study is not so much to prevent all GVHD, but rather to prevent serious and fatal acute GVHD.
Most GVHD-related deaths are either the direct consequence of severe GVHD or from infections associated with intense immunosuppression, a consequence of the standard treatments for acute GVHD, which almost always include high-dose steroids. A more effective prophylaxis therapy that allows for the GVL effect to develop, while limiting the exposure to high-dose steroids may reduce transplant mortality and morbidity. We also will study how key chemical and cellular factors relate to clinical outcome.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Etanercept and ECP | Experimental | Procedure: stem cell transplant, Drug: tacrolimus (standard GVHD prophylaxis), Drug: mycophenolate (standard GVHD prophylaxis), Drug: etanercept, Drug: methoxsalenEtanercept and ECP (Extracorporeal Photopheresis) in addition to standard GVHD prevention: Etanercept will be given twice weekly by subcutaneous injection starting on the day of HSCT (Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) conditioning until 8 weeks post transplant. ECP treatments will begin at once weekly starting at 4 weeks post transplant and continue at less frequent intervals until 6 months post transplant. GVHD prophylaxis will consist of a standard two drug regimen: mycophenolate for 4 weeks and tacrolimus (titrated to a therapeutic level) for 8 weeks, then weaned over 4 months with discontinuation by 6 months post-transplant. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Candidate for unrelated donor (allogeneic) HSCT for hematologic conditions, either malignant or non-malignant.
- Donor can be unrelated marrow, blood or cord blood.
- Any disease for which unrelated donor transplant is appropriate is eligible except:
- Must be receiving a recognized reduced intensity transplant as determined by the University of Michigan Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program.
- Patients age 50 or older are eligible based on age.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Not a candidate for a reduced intensity transplant conditioning regimen (based on the current U-M BMT program clinical guidelines).
- Patient has a suitable related donor available for transplant.
- Karnofsky or Lansky performance status of < 50% at the time of admission for HSCT
- Patients with evidence of HIV infection or other opportunistic infection including but not limited to Tuberculosis and Histoplasmosis.
- Patients with active bacterial, fungal or viral infection not responding to treatment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| stem cell transplantreduced intensity, matched unrelated donor stem cell transplant | Procedure or surgery | Etanercept and ECP |
| tacrolimus (standard GVHD prophylaxis)Tacrolimus(or cyclosporine when necessary) Tacrolimus will begin on day -3, IV or oral. Target trough level for tacrolimus is 8-12 ng/ml. In the absence of GVHD, tacrolimus tapering will begin on day +56 post transplant | Drug | Etanercept and ECP |
| mycophenolate (standard GVHD prophylaxis)Mycophenolate will begin on day 0 at 10 mg/kg/dose (up to 1 gram per dose) every 8 hours orally or intravenously and will continue until day 28. | Drug | Etanercept and ECP |
| etanerceptAlso: EnbrelEtanercept will be given at a dose 0.4 mg/kg (actual weight) up to a maximum dose of 25 mg, subcutaneously, twice weekly from day 0 to day 56 (16 doses) | Drug | Etanercept and ECP |
| methoxsalenAlso: UVADEXMethoxsalen (UVADEX) treatments by Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) will be started day +28 post transplant and given weekly. On day +70 post transplant ECP frequency will be given every other week. On day +100 post transplant ECP will be given monthly until day +180 and stopped. | Drug | Etanercept and ECP |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Patients Alive at 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
Overall survival at 6 months
Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Relapse by 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
Relapse rate at 6 months. Relapse is defined as recurrence of disease.
3 secondary outcomes
The Percentage of Patients That Experienced Graft Versus Host Disease
Time frame: 6 Months
Measured Level of Circulating Plasma Markers After Transplant
Time frame: 100 days
Regulatory T Cell Numbers Post-transplant
Time frame: 180 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Aug 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Graft Versus Host Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
De-escalated Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and Ruxolitinib for Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis
Graft-versus-host Disease
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
HMCT/CT2401: Abatacept GVHD Prophylaxis Following Omidubicel HCT
Hematologic Malignancy
RecruitingObservational study
Improved Methods of Cell Selection for Bone Marrow Transplant Alternatives
Graft-Versus-Host Disease, Graft-versus-leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
The Lowest Effective Dose of Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Combination With Sirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil as Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis After Reduced Intensity Conditioning and Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of Pacritinib, A JAK2/IRAK1/CSF1R Inhibitor, in Refractory Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
Graft vs Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gregory Yanik, MD principal investigator
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing stem cell transplant, tacrolimus (standard GVHD prophylaxis) and mycophenolate (standard GVHD prophylaxis) in people with Graft Versus Host Disease, run by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Sep 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Patients Alive at 6 Months (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2017.