AnemiaPhase 3NCT00642850
STABIL Study: National Study With Mircera for Maintenance of Hemoglobin Level in Dialysis Patients
A Phase 3 study testing methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera] in people with Anemia, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 24 sites in Czechia.
Trial summary
This single arm study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of once-monthly administration of intravenous Mircera for the maintenance of hemoglobin levels in dialysis participants with chronic renal anemia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Anemia
- What is being tested?
- methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 188 participants
- Where
- 24 sitesCzechia
- Study dates
- Nov 2007to Jul 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Chronic renal anemia;
- Continuous stable intravenous maintenance epoetin therapy during previous month;
- Regular long-term hemodialysis therapy with the same mode of dialysis for previous 3 months.
Who cannot join
- Transfusion of red blood cells during previous 2 months;
- Poorly controlled hypertension, that is, sitting blood pressure exceeding 170/100 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) despite medication;
- Significant acute or chronic bleeding.
Trial locations and contacts
24 sites in 1 country.
24 sites in 1 country
Czechia24 sites
Study site
Brno, 656 91
Study site
Český Krumlov, 38127
Study site
Děčín, 405 99
Study site
Havířov, 736 24
Study site
Hradec Králové, 500 05
Study site
Jihlava, 586 33
Study site
Karlovy Vary, 360 73
Study site
Kolin III, 280 20
Study site
Liberec, 460 63
Study site
Nový Jičín, 741 11
Study site
Olomouc, 775 20
Study site
Ostrava, 708 52
Study site
Písek, 397 23
Study site
Prague, 128 08
Study site
Prague, 14000
Study site
Prague, 150 30
Study site
Prague, 169 00
Study site
Strakonice, 38629
Study site
Šumperk, 787 01
Study site
Tábor, 390 03
Study site
Teplice, 415 01
Study site
Třebíč, 674 01
Study site
Ústí nad Labem, 401 13
Study site
Znojmo, 76275
About this study
Official title: A Single Arm, Open Label Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Once-monthly Administration of Intravenous C.E.R.A. for the Maintenance of Haemoglobin Levels in Dialysis Patients With Chronic Renal Anaemia
This single arm study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of once-monthly administration of intravenous Mircera for the maintenance of hemoglobin levels in dialysis participants with chronic renal anemia. Participants will receive monthly intravenous injections of Mircera, at a starting dose of 120, 200 or 360 micrograms, according to the dose of epoetin administered in the week preceding first study drug administration. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
- Conditions
- Anemia
- Being tested
- methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]Drug
120, 200 or 360 micrograms iv monthly (starting dose)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera] |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Average Hemoglobin Concentration Within +/-1 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dL) of Reference and Within the Target Range
Percentage of participants maintaining their mean hemoglobin concentration in g/dL within plus or minus (+/-) 1 g/dL of their reference hemoglobin value, and between the target range of 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL during the efficacy evaluation period (EEP). The reference hemoglobin value was defined on the basis of the 5 assessments recorded during the Stability Verification Period (SVP) at Weeks -4, -3, -2, -1 and 0. The mean hemoglobin concentration for each individual participant during the EEP (Week 17 up to Week 24) was estimated as a time adjusted average.
Measured: Week 17 up to Week 24
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change in Hemoglobin Concentration Between Reference (SVP) and EEP
The mean change of the time adjusted average of hemoglobin from reference value obtained during the SVP (Week -4 up to Week -1) and the value during EEP (Week 17 up to Week 24) was assessed.
Measured: Week -4 up to Week -1 and Week 17 up to Week 24
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Hemoglobin Concentration Within the Target Range During EEP
Percentage of participants maintaining hemoglobin concentration within the target range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was assessed.
Measured: Week 17 up to Week 24
Mean Time Spent by Participants With Hemoglobin Concentration in the Target Range During the EEP
Mean time spent by participants with hemoglobin concentration in the target range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during the EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was assessed.
Measured: Week 17 up to Week 24
Percentage of Participants Requiring Any Dose Adjustment
Percentage of participants requiring adjustment in the dose of study drug during the dose titration period (DTP: Week 1 to Week 16) and EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was reported.
Measured: Week 1 to Week 16 and Week 17 to Week 24
Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion During the Study
Number of participant who underwent red blood cell transfusion during the study was reported.
Measured: Week -4 up to Week 28
Number of Participants With Anti-epoetin Antibody
Measured: Week -4 and at early withdrawal or Week 28
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2007
- Primary completionJul 2009
- Study completionJul 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 188 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00642850
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML21040
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2008
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Locatelli F, Choukroun G, Truman M, Wiggenhauser A, Fliser D. Once-Monthly Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator (C.E.R.A.) in Patients with Hemodialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease: Pooled Data from Phase III Trials. Adv Ther. 2016 Apr;33(4):610-25. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0309-6. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
PubMed 26965694
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Single Arm, Open Label Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Once-monthly Administration of Intravenous C.E.R.A. for the Maintenance of Haemoglobin Levels in Dialysis Patients With Chronic Renal Anaemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00642850
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML21040
- Conditions
- Anemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 188 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2007
- Primary completion
- Jul 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Jun 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This single arm study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of once-monthly administration of intravenous Mircera for the maintenance of hemoglobin levels in dialysis participants with chronic renal anemia. Participants will receive monthly intravenous injections of Mircera, at a starting dose of 120, 200 or 360 micrograms, according to the dose of epoetin administered in the week preceding first study drug administration. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera] |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Chronic renal anemia;
- Continuous stable intravenous maintenance epoetin therapy during previous month;
- Regular long-term hemodialysis therapy with the same mode of dialysis for previous 3 months.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Transfusion of red blood cells during previous 2 months;
- Poorly controlled hypertension, that is, sitting blood pressure exceeding 170/100 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) despite medication;
- Significant acute or chronic bleeding.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]120, 200 or 360 micrograms iv monthly (starting dose) | Drug | 1 |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Average Hemoglobin Concentration Within +/-1 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dL) of Reference and Within the Target Range
Time frame: Week 17 up to Week 24
Percentage of participants maintaining their mean hemoglobin concentration in g/dL within plus or minus (+/-) 1 g/dL of their reference hemoglobin value, and between the target range of 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL during the efficacy evaluation period (EEP). The reference hemoglobin value was defined on the basis of the 5 assessments recorded during the Stability Verification Period (SVP) at Weeks -4, -3, -2, -1 and 0. The mean hemoglobin concentration for each individual participant during the EEP (Week 17 up to Week 24) was estimated as a time adjusted average.
6 secondary outcomes
Change in Hemoglobin Concentration Between Reference (SVP) and EEP
Time frame: Week -4 up to Week -1 and Week 17 up to Week 24
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Hemoglobin Concentration Within the Target Range During EEP
Time frame: Week 17 up to Week 24
Mean Time Spent by Participants With Hemoglobin Concentration in the Target Range During the EEP
Time frame: Week 17 up to Week 24
Percentage of Participants Requiring Any Dose Adjustment
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 16 and Week 17 to Week 24
Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion During the Study
Time frame: Week -4 up to Week 28
Number of Participants With Anti-epoetin Antibody
Time frame: Week -4 and at early withdrawal or Week 28
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26965694Locatelli F, Choukroun G, Truman M, Wiggenhauser A, Fliser D. Once-Monthly Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator (C.E.R.A.) in Patients with Hemodialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease: Pooled Data from Phase III Trials. Adv Ther. 2016 Apr;33(4):610-25. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0309-6. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
Related trials for Anemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
The Safety and Efficacy of Daratumumab in Patients With Refractory Aplastic Anemia
Aplastic Anemia, Refractory
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study of YTS109 Cell Injection in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, Anti-CD19 STAR T-cell Therapy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Natural History of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Fanconi Anemia
Fanconi Anemia, Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
24 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera] in people with Anemia, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 24 sites in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 24 sites in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jun 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Average Hemoglobin Concentration Within +/-1 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dL) of Reference and Within the Target Range (time frame: Week 17 up to Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00642850, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2016.