Degenerative Cervical Disc DiseaseNCT00642876
PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc Study
A study testing Allograft Fusion and ATLANTIS™ Cervical Plate System and PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc in people with Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease, run by Medtronic Spinal and Biologics at 31 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the ACD in the single level surgical treatment of patients with symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease
- What is being tested?
- Allograft Fusion and ATLANTIS™ Cervical Plate System and PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 541 participants
- Where
- 31 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2002to May 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients participating in this study must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
- Cervical degenerative disc disease defined as:
- intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with at least one of the following items producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression which is documented by patient history (e.g., neck and/or arm pain], functional deficit, and/or neurological deficit, and radiographic studies (e.g., CT, MRI, x-rays, etc).
- herniated disc;
- osteophyte formation;
- One cervical level requiring surgical treatment;
Show all 14Show fewer
- C3-C4 disc to C6-C7 disc level of involvement;
- Unresponsive to non-operative treatment for approximately six weeks or has the presence of progressive symptoms or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression in the face of continued non-operative management;
- No previous surgical intervention at the involved level or any subsequent, planned/staged surgical procedure at the involved or adjacent level(s);
- Is at least 18 years of age, inclusive, at the time of surgery;
- Preoperative Neck Disability Index score > or = 30;
- Has a preoperative neck pain score of > 20 based on the Preoperative Neck and Arm Pain Questionnaire.
- If of child-bearing potential, patient is not pregnant at the time of surgery;
- Is willing to comply with the study plan and sign the Patient Informed Consent Form.
Who cannot join
- A patient meeting any of the following criteria is to be excluded from the study:
- Has a cervical spinal condition other than symptomatic cervical disc disease requiring surgical treatment at the involved level;
- Documented or diagnosed cervical instability defined by dynamic (flexion/extension) radiographs showing:
- Sagittal plane translation > 3.5 mm or;
- Sagittal plane angulation > 20.
- More than one cervical level requiring surgical treatment;
Show all 30Show fewer
- Has a fused level adjacent to the level to be treated;
- Has severe pathology of the facet joints of the involved vertebral bodies;
- Previous surgical intervention at the involved level;
- Has been previously diagnosed with osteopenia or osteomalacia;
- Has any of the following that may be associated with a diagnosis of osteoporosis (if Yes to any of the below risk factors, a DEXA Scan will be required to determine eligibility):
- Postmenopausal Non-Black female over 60 years of age and weighs less than 140 pounds.
- Postmenopausal female that has sustained a non-traumatic hip, spine, or wrist fracture.
- Male over the age of 70.
- Male over the age of 60 that has sustained a non-traumatic hip or spine fracture.
- If the level of BMD is a T score of -3.5 or a T score of -2.5 with vertebral crush fracture, then the patient is excluded from the study.
- Has presence of spinal metastases;
- Has overt or active bacterial infection, either local or systemic;
- Has severe insulin dependent diabetes;
- Has chronic or acute renal failure or prior history of renal disease;
- Has fever (temperature > 101 F oral) at the time of surgery;
- Has a documented allergy or intolerance to stainless steel, titanium, or a titanium alloy;
- Is mentally incompetent. (If questionable, obtain psychiatric consult);
- Is a prisoner;
- Is pregnant;
- Is an alcohol and/or drug abuser as defined by currently undergoing treatment for alcohol and/or drug abuse;
- Has received drugs which may interfere with bone metabolism within two weeks prior to the planned date of spinal surgery (e.g., steroids or methotrexate), excluding routine perioperative anti-inflammatory drugs;
- Has a history of an endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis (e.g., Paget's Disease, renal osteodystrophy, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, or osteogenesis imperfecta);
- Has a condition that requires postoperative medications that interfere with the stability of the implant or fusion, such as steroids. (This does not include low dose aspirin for prophylactic anticoagulation and routine perioperative anti-inflammatory drugs);
- Has received treatment with an investigational therapy within 28 days prior to implantation surgery or such treatment is planned during the16 weeks following Artificial Cervical Disc implantation.
Trial locations and contacts
31 sites in 1 country.
31 sites in 1 country
United States31 sites
Atlanta Brain and Spine Care
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
Emory Orthop and Spine Center
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329
Neurosurgery Ass, P.A.
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237
Baton Rouge Orth Clinic
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70810
Surgical Neurology New Hampshire Neurospine Institute
Bedford, New Hampshire, 03110
Central Illinois Neuroscience
Bloomington, Illinois, 61701
Central Wyoming Neurosurgery
Casper, Wyoming, 82601
Wyoming Brain and Spine Institute
Casper, Wyoming, 82601
Spine Surgery Associates
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37421
The Ortho Center of St. Louis
Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017
Hughston Clinic
Columbus, Georgia, 31908
Center of Neurosciences Orthopedics & Spine, P.C.
Dakota Dunes, South Dakota, 57049
North Alabama Neurological
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Orthoindy
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46278
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Westphal Group
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17601
University of Wisconsin Medical School
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Semmes Murphey
Memphis, Tennessee, 38104
Montgomery Neurosurgical
Montgomery, Alabama, 36106
Howell Allen Clinic
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Loyola University Medical Center
Oak Park, Illinois, 60302
Brain and Spine Center of Texas
Plano, Texas, 75093
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97201
Neurosugical Associates, PC
Richmond, Virginia, 23229
University of California, Davis
Sacramento, California, 95816
The Spine Institute
Santa Monica, California, 90403
Inland Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, P.S.
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Springfield Neurological Institute
Springfield, Missouri, 65807
Buffalo Neurosurgery Group
West Seneca, New York, 14224
Orlando Neurosurgery
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
Michigan Brain & Spine Institute
Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197
About this study
Official title: Investigation of the PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc Device at a Single Level for Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the ACD in the single level surgical treatment of patients with symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease. The primary follow-up information obtained from this clinical investigation are used to support a PMA application for the ACD.
- Conditions
- Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease
- Being tested
- Allograft Fusion and ATLANTIS™ Cervical Plate System, PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Allograft Fusion and ATLANTIS™ Cervical Plate SystemDevice
Also called ATLANTIS™
The patients that received the control treatment underwent a single level anterior cervical fusion procedure involving allograft bone and the ATLANTIS™ Cervical Plate System.
PRESTIGE® Cervical DiscDevice
Also called PRESTIGE®
The PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc is a stainless steel device that was inserted into the intervertebral disc space. The device is composed of two metal plates that interface via a ball and socket mechanism permitting segmental spinal motion.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Active comparator | The Control cohort are patients that receive the fusion treatment. Receives: Device: Allograft Fusion and ATLANTIS™ Cervical Plate System |
| Investigational | Experimental | The Investigational cohort are the study patients that received the PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc. Receives: Device: PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary endpoint is overall success, which consists of NDI score, neuro status success, with/without FSU disc ht success, no serious AE classified as "implant/surgical procedure associated", and no secondary surgical procedure classified as failure
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
The secondary outcomes are radiographic success, medical outcomes SF-36 patient survey (MCS & PCS) success, neck pain status, arm pain status, patient satisfaction, patient global perceived effect, gait assessment, foraminal compression test
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2002
- Primary completionJul 2006
- Study completionMay 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Degenerative Cervical Disc DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 541 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Spinal and Biologics
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00642876
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PRESTIGE®
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2008
- Last updated
- 10 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Mummaneni PV. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Sep;13(3):308-18. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09513.
PubMed 20809722Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Mar;6(3):198-209. doi: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.198.
PubMed 17355018Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Hodges SD, McConnell JR, Dryer RF, Schranck FW, Copay AG. One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years. Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Dec 31;13(6):551-560. doi: 10.14444/6076. eCollection 2019 Dec.
PubMed 31970051Arnold PM, Anderson KK, Selim A, Dryer RF, Kenneth Burkus J. Heterotopic ossification following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results from the prospective, multicenter, historically controlled trial comparing allograft to an optimized dose of rhBMP-2. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Sep;25(3):292-302. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.SPINE15798. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
PubMed 27129045Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid RW Jr, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):516-28. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13996. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
PubMed 25036218
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigation of the PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc Device at a Single Level for Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00642876
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRESTIGE®
- Conditions
- Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 541 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Spinal and BiologicsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2002
- Primary completion
- Jul 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Mar 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the ACD in the single level surgical treatment of patients with symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease. The primary follow-up information obtained from this clinical investigation are used to support a PMA application for the ACD.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Active comparator | Device: Allograft Fusion and ATLANTIS™ Cervical Plate SystemThe Control cohort are patients that receive the fusion treatment. |
| Investigational | Experimental | Device: PRESTIGE® Cervical DiscThe Investigational cohort are the study patients that received the PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- All patients participating in this study must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
- Cervical degenerative disc disease defined as:
- intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with at least one of the following items producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression which is documented by patient history (e.g., neck and/or arm pain], functional deficit, and/or neurological deficit, and radiographic studies (e.g., CT, MRI, x-rays, etc).
- One cervical level requiring surgical treatment;
- C3-C4 disc to C6-C7 disc level of involvement;
Key exclusion criteria (30 listed)
- Has a cervical spinal condition other than symptomatic cervical disc disease requiring surgical treatment at the involved level;
- Documented or diagnosed cervical instability defined by dynamic (flexion/extension) radiographs showing:
- More than one cervical level requiring surgical treatment;
- Has a fused level adjacent to the level to be treated;
- Has severe pathology of the facet joints of the involved vertebral bodies;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Allograft Fusion and ATLANTIS™ Cervical Plate SystemAlso: ATLANTIS™The patients that received the control treatment underwent a single level anterior cervical fusion procedure involving allograft bone and the ATLANTIS™ Cervical Plate System. | Device | Control |
| PRESTIGE® Cervical DiscAlso: PRESTIGE®The PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc is a stainless steel device that was inserted into the intervertebral disc space. The device is composed of two metal plates that interface via a ball and socket mechanism permitting segmental spinal motion. | Device | Investigational |
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint is overall success, which consists of NDI score, neuro status success, with/without FSU disc ht success, no serious AE classified as "implant/surgical procedure associated", and no secondary surgical procedure classified as failure
Time frame: 24 months
1 secondary outcome
The secondary outcomes are radiographic success, medical outcomes SF-36 patient survey (MCS & PCS) success, neck pain status, arm pain status, patient satisfaction, patient global perceived effect, gait assessment, foraminal compression test
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 May 2023.
- Background: PubMed 20809722Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Mummaneni PV. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Sep;13(3):308-18. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09513.
- Background: PubMed 17355018Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Mar;6(3):198-209. doi: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.198.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31970051Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Hodges SD, McConnell JR, Dryer RF, Schranck FW, Copay AG. One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years. Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Dec 31;13(6):551-560. doi: 10.14444/6076. eCollection 2019 Dec.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27129045Arnold PM, Anderson KK, Selim A, Dryer RF, Kenneth Burkus J. Heterotopic ossification following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results from the prospective, multicenter, historically controlled trial comparing allograft to an optimized dose of rhBMP-2. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Sep;25(3):292-302. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.SPINE15798. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25036218Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid RW Jr, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):516-28. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13996. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
Related trials for Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Assessing Microbiome in Primary Anterior Cervical Fusion Patients
Cervical Stenosis, Myelopathy
Active, not recruiting
Anterior Cervical Disectomy And Fusion Using The Tritanium® C Anterior Cervical Cage For One Or Two-Levels
Cervical Disc Herniation, Cervical Disc Degeneration
RecruitingObservational study
PMCF Study Fortilink-SC
Degenerative Disc Disease in Cervical Spine, Stenosis Cervical Spine
Enrolling by invitation
Physiotherapy and Osteopathic Treatment for Pain in the Cervical and Lumbar Spine and Temporomandibular Joints
Disc Degenerative Disease, Spine Degeneration
Recruiting
ACDF Using Structural Allograft vs. Tritanium C
Degenerative Disc Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
31 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Allograft Fusion and ATLANTIS™ Cervical Plate System and PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc in people with Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease, run by Medtronic Spinal and Biologics at 31 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 30 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 31 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary endpoint is overall success, which consists of NDI score, neuro status success, with/without FSU disc ht success, no serious AE classified as "implant/surgical procedure associated", and no secondary surgical procedure classified as failure (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00642876, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2023.