AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4NCT00654368

CAMEO: Canadian Methotrexate and Etanercept Outcome Study

A Phase 4 study testing Etanercept and Methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Amgen at 28 sites in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the use of etanercept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with or without methotrexate treatment over a 24 month period Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
Etanercept and Methotrexate
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
258 participants
Where
28 sitesCanada
Study dates
Jun 2008to Feb 2013
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years of age or older at the baseline visit
  • An American College of Rheumatology(ACR) diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis with onset of symptoms of at least 6 months
  • Active disease of at least 3 swollen joints from the Disease Activity Severity 28 at the baseline visit
  • A Disease Activity Severity 28 score of ≥ 3.2 at the baseline visit
  • Have not previously received etanercept therapy
  • Able to start etanercept therapy per the approved product monograph
  • Able to continue methotrexate therapy per the approved product monograph and have received a dose of at least 15 mg/wk (or 10 mg/wk in the case of documented intolerance to higher doses) for at least 12 weeks and this dose has been stable at least 4 weeks before the baseline visit
  • The patient or legally acceptable representative must provide written informed consent for participation in the study before any study specific procedures are performed

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have a positive purified protein derivative (PPD) skin test and who do not have a documented course of anti-tuberculosis therapy. Patients with a positive PPD skin test (equal to or greater than 5 mm), a negative chest x-ray at screening which should be repeated if indicated during of the study, at low risk based on exposure and travel and have initiated a course of anti-tuberculosis therapy of which at least 8 weeks have been completed would be eligible for the study. The full course of anti-tuberculosis therapy must be completed
  • Patients who have previously received infliximab or adalimumab
  • Active infections within 2 weeks of the baseline visit or during the study period
  • Any history of human immunodeficiency (HIV) infection, untreated tuberculosis, multiple sclerosis, congestive heart failure, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, cytopenia, prior or current use of cyclophosphamide or malignancy (other than basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or in situ carcinoma of the cervix) in the past 5 years
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating or of childbearing potential who are not using adequate contraception
  • Receipt of any investigational therapy within 4 weeks of the initiation of study medication or during the study period
  • Presence of any significant and uncontrolled medical condition, which in the investigator's opinion precludes the use of etanercept, as outlined in the product monograph
  • Participants not available for follow-up assessment or unable to comply with study procedures

Trial locations and contacts

28 sites in 1 country.

28 sites in 1 country

Canada28 sites
  • Research Site

    Bowmanville, Ontario, L1C 1P6

  • Research Site

    Brampton, Ontario, L6T 3J1

  • Research Site

    Burlington, Ontario, L7R 4B7

  • Research Site

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1Y2

  • Research Site

    Laval, Quebec, H7T 2P5

  • Research Site

    London, Ontario, N6A 4V2

  • Research Site

    Mississauga, Ontario, L5M 2V8

  • Research Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H2L 1S6

  • Research Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2

  • Research Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H3Z 2Z3

  • Research Site

    Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 3R7

  • Research Site

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 1C2

  • Research Site

    Québec, Quebec, G1V 3M7

  • Research Site

    Quispamsis, New Brunswick, E2E 4J8

  • Research Site

    Rimouski, Quebec, G5L 8W1

  • Research Site

    Saint-Eustache, Quebec, J7P 4J2

  • Research Site

    Saint-Léonard, Quebec, H1R 1X8

  • Research Site

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 0H6

  • Research Site

    St. Catharines, Ontario, L2N 7E4

  • Research Site

    St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1A 5E8

  • Research Site

    St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1C 5B8

  • Research Site

    Sydney, Nova Scotia, B1S 3N1

  • Research Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5

  • Research Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M9B 6H8

  • Research Site

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 3Y1

  • Research Site

    Victoria, British Columbia, V8P 5P6

  • Research Site

    Victoria, British Columbia, V8V 3P9

  • Research Site

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1M3

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Canadian Methotrexate and Etanercept Outcome Study: An Open Label Randomized Trial of Etanercept and Methotrexate Versus Etanercept Alone in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAMEO)

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the use of etanercept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with or without methotrexate treatment over a 24 month period

Read the detailed description

This noninferiority study was a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients who did not have an adequate response to methotrexate (MTX) had etanercept (50 mg/week subcutaneously [SC]) added to existing MTX therapy of at least 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses of MTX) at baseline and were followed for 6 months. After 6 months of therapy, participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the 2 treatment arms: either discontinue MTX (tapered over 6 weeks) and continue etanercept alone or continue both etanercept plus MTX for an additional 18 months.

Keywords
Amgen
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EtanerceptBiological

    Also called Enbrel®

    Commercially available etanercept administered subcutaneously at 50 mg/week.

  • MethotrexateDrug

    Commercially available methotrexate administed orally, subcutaneously or intramuscularly 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses)

Study groups in NCT00654368
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Etanercept + MethotrexateActive comparatorAfter six months of treatment with 50 mg/week subcutaneous etanercept added to existing methotrexate therapy of at least 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses) participants were randomized to continue both etanercept plus methotrexate for an additional 18 months.
Receives: Biological: Etanercept; Drug: Methotrexate
Etanercept OnlyExperimentalAfter six months of treatment with 50 mg/week subcutaneous etanercept added to existing methotrexate therapy of at least 15 mg/week (or 10 mg/week in case of documented intolerance to higher doses) participants were randomized to discontinue methotrexate (tapered over 6 weeks) and continue etanercept alone for an additional 18 months.
Receives: Biological: Etanercept; Drug: Methotrexate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Month 6 to Month 12 in Disease Activity Sscore 28 (DAS28)

    The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. In this study, the mean change in DAS28 scores from Month 6 to Month 12 was multiplied by a factor of -1, such that a negative change in DAS28 indicates worsening in disease activity.

    Measured: Month 6 (randomization) and Month 12

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Response

    The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. Remission is defined by a DAS28 score less than 2.6. Low disease activity is defined by a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2. Moderate is defined as a DAS28 higher than 3.2 but lower than or equal to 5.1. DAS28 above 5.1 indicates high disease activity. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Measured: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  2. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)

    The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. In this study, the mean changes in DAS28 scores from Baseline were multiplied by a factor of -1, such that a negative change in DAS28 indicates worsening in disease activity. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Measured: Baseline and Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  3. Drug Persistence

    Drug persistence is defined as the percentage of participants receiving etanercept at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.

    Measured: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  4. Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)

    The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands and feet were scored in a blinded manner by an independent reader. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 4 (bony ankylosis or complete luxation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the total mTSS score, ranging from 0 (normal) to 448 (maximal disease). An increase in mTSS from Baseline (represented by a positive change from Baseline score) indicates disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease (negative change from Baseline score) represents improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24

  5. Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Score

    X-rays of hands and feet were read centrally and in a blinded manner. Sixteen joints on each hand/wrist and 6 joints on each foot were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 to 5 (or for the feet from 0 to 10, with each side of the joint independently scored from 0 to 5) according to the following: One point is scored if erosions are discrete, rising to 2, 3, 4, or 5 depending on the amount of surface area affected (complete collapse of the bone is scored as 5). Scores were summed to calculate the total erosion score, which ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 280 (worst). A large increase in erosion score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of joint erosion. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24

  6. Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing

    X-rays of hands and feet were read centrally and in a blinded manner. Joint space narrowing (JSN) scores were recorded for each hand/wrist (15 joints) and each foot (6 joints) on a 5-point scale scored as follows:

    0 = normal; 1 = focal or doubtful; 2 = generalised, less than 50% of the original joint space; 3 = generalised, more than 50% of the original joint space or subluxation; 4 = bony ankylosis or complete luxation. The scores were summed to calculate the total JSN score ranging from 0 to 168 (worst). A large increase in joint narrowing score is indicative of worsening, whereas a small change or no change is indicative of inhibition of JSN.

    End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24

  7. Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI)

    The HAQ disability index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that addresses health-related quality of life. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants choose from four response categories, ranging from 'without any difficulty' (score=0) to 'unable to do' (score=3). The overall score is the average of each of the 8 category scores and ranges from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change score indicates an improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Measured: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  8. Change From Month 6 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The HAQ pain visual analog scale (VAS) is a measure of pain on a continuous 100 point scale. Participants were asked to indicate how much pain they had in the past week as a result of their illness on a horizontal line from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Measured: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  9. Change From Month 6 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)

    The SF-36 assesses the general quality of life (QOL) of participants by evaluating the domains of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The questionnaire consists of 36 questions that are completed by the participant.

    The SF-36 is split into two major components: physical health and mental health. Under physical health are the following four domains: physical health, bodily pain, physical functioning and physical role limitations. Under the mental health domain there are four domains; mental health, vitality, social functioning, and emotional role limitation. The individual domain scores are aggregated to derive a physical-component summary score and a mental-component summary score which range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.

    End of study is month 24 or early termination.

    Measured: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  10. Change From Month 6 in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)

    This 6-item assessment measures productivity losses during the past 7 days and includes measures on work time missed due to health, impairment while working due to health (the participant's assessment of the degree to which health affected their productivity while working), overall work impairment due to health (takes into account both hours missed due to health and the participant's assessment of the degree to which health affected their productivity while working) and activity impairment due to health (the degree in which health problems affected their ability to do regular daily activities). Scores for each measure are expressed from 0 to 100 with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. For each measure change from Month 6 is reported; a negative change score indicates improvement. End of study is month 24 or early termination.

    Measured: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  11. Change From Month 6 in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)

    The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication is a 14-item self-administered questionnaire which measures patients' experiences with their medication on four dimensions: effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction. Optional responses are: Extremely Dissatisfied (1), Very Dissatisfied (2), Dissatisfied (3), Somewhat Satisfied (4), Satisfied (5), Very Satisfied (6), and Extremely Satisfied (7). For each dimension, responses are added and transformed to a scale from 0 - 100, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. Change from Month 6 is reported for each dimension; a positive change score indicates improvement. End of study is Month 24 or early termination.

    Measured: Month 6, 12, 18 and 24

  12. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined by regulatory authorities as one that: • is fatal • is life threatening • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • other significant medical hazard.

    Measured: 25 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Apr 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2008
  3. Primary completionDec 2012
  4. Study completionFeb 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
258 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00654368
Sponsor's protocol ID
20070301
Status last verified
Jul 2014
First submitted
3 Apr 2008
Last updated
23 Jul 2014
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Pope JE, Haraoui B, Thorne JC, Vieira A, Poulin-Costello M, Keystone EC. The Canadian methotrexate and etanercept outcome study: a randomised trial of discontinuing versus continuing methotrexate after 6 months of etanercept and methotrexate therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Dec;73(12):2144-51. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203684. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

    PubMed 23979914
  • Keystone EC, Pope JE, Thorne JC, Poulin-Costello M, Phan-Chronis K, Vieira A, Haraoui B; CAMEO Investigators. Two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes from the Canadian Methotrexate and Etanercept Outcome study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Feb;55(2):327-34. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev338. Epub 2015 Sep 11.

    PubMed 26361879

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Etanercept and Methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Amgen at 28 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 28 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jun 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Month 6 to Month 12 in Disease Activity Sscore 28 (DAS28) (time frame: Month 6 (randomization) and Month 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00654368, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in