Extrahepatic Bile Duct CancerPhase 3NCT00658593
Gemcitabine With/Out Capecitabine in Locally Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic Biliary Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing capecitabine, gemcitabine hydrochloride and quality-of-life assessment in people with Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer and Gallbladder Cancer, run by NCIC Clinical Trials Group at 8 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer, Gallbladder Cancer, Liver Cancer
- What is being tested?
- capecitabine, gemcitabine hydrochloride and quality-of-life assessment
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 19 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 10 Oct 2008to 18 Jan 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically or cytologically proven adenocarcinoma of the biliary tree (intra- and extra-hepatic biliary ducts or gallbladder)
- Locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic disease
- Patients with pathologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma consistent with biliary primary with clinical documentation of gallbladder or biliary tree involvement and no evidence of another primary adenocarcinoma are eligible
- Must have evidence of disease but measurable disease is not required
- Chest x-ray and/or CT scan of the chest, CT scan or MRI of the abdomen, and other radiological examination to document all disease sites have been done within 28 days prior to randomization
- No repeat scan needed if a negative scan was performed within 35 days prior to randomization
- Patients who have only one site of disease located inside a previous radiotherapy field are eligible
- Lesions within a previous radiotherapy field may be considered measurable if documented ≥ 20% increase in size
- If the lesion size increase has not been documented since the completion of radiotherapy, and the lesion is still present (i.e. not CR), the lesion is considered evaluable for this trial
- Patients with biliary duct obstruction are eligible provided all of the following criteria are met:
- Treatable, clinically relevant obstruction
- Obstruction has been relieved by internal endoscopic drainage/stenting, palliative bypass surgery or percutaneous drainage prior to trial entry
- No ampullary carcinomas (i.e., arising from the ampulla of Vater)
- No central nervous system (CNS) metastases, including active, progressive brain or leptomeningeal metastases
- Patients with focal neurological symptoms must have had a CT scan to rule out CNS metastases
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- Minimum life expectancy of 12 weeks
- Able (i.e. sufficiently fluent) and willing to complete the quality of life questionnaires in one of the validated languages
- Must be able to swallow and retain oral medication
- Hemoglobin > 90 g/L
- Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm³
- Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³
- Total bilirubin < 3 times upper limit of normal(ULN)
- AST and/or ALT ≤ 5 times ULN
- Liver function tests stable and < 3 times ULN
- Serum creatinine < 160 µmol/L OR creatinine clearance > 60 mL/min
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients and their partners must agree to use adequate contraception prior to study entry, throughout the study, and for a period of 4 weeks after cessation of protocol therapy
- Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up
- No known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency
- No known hypersensitivity to gemcitabine or capecitabine
- No other active medical condition which would render the protocol treatment dangerous or impair the ability of the patient to receive protocol therapy, including, but not limited to, any of the following:
- Unstable angina
- Uncontrolled arrhythmia
- Heart failure
- No other condition (e.g. psychological, geographical, etc.) that does not permit compliance with the protocol
- No other malignancies except adequately treated nonmelanoma skin cancer, curatively treated in-situ cancer of the cervix, or other solid tumors curatively treated with no evidence of disease for > 5 years
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- No prior chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic disease unless used in the following circumstances:
- Fluorouracil or gemcitabine given concurrently with radiotherapy as a radiosensitizer, completed more than 3 months prior to randomization
- Fluorouracil given as adjuvant treatment following surgery, completed at least 1 year prior to randomization
- No major surgery within 4 weeks of randomization
- No prior treatment with another investigational agent within 2 weeks of randomization
- At least 4 weeks from randomization since completion of prior radiotherapy and recovered
- Patients may be randomized within the required 4 weeks if short course (< 5 fractions) of non-myelosuppressive radiotherapy was given
- Concurrent palliative radiation to a known site of bone metastasis allowed provided that the criteria for disease progression are otherwise not met
- No other concurrent anti-cancer therapy (cytotoxic, biological/immunotherapy or radiotherapy other than for known bone metastases as specified above)
- No other concurrent investigational drug therapy
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country.
8 sites in 1 country
Canada8 sites
Tom Baker Cancer Centre - Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
Cross Cancer Institute at University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Hopital Charles Lemoyne
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1
Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre - General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
St. Catharines General Hospital at Niagara Health System
St. Catharines, Ontario, L2R 7C6
BCCA - Fraser Valley Cancer Centre
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
British Columbia Cancer Agency - Vancouver Cancer Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Study of Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine (GEMCAP) Versus Gemcitabine Alone in Advanced Biliary Cancer
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine is more effective when given together with or without capecitabine in treating patients with biliary cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying giving gemcitabine together with capecitabine to see how well it works compared with giving gemcitabine alone in treating patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic biliary cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To compare overall survival (OS) rates in patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic biliary tree cancer treated with combined gemcitabine hydrochloride and capecitabine vs. gemcitabine hydrochloride alone.
Secondary
- To compare progression-free survival (PFS) in this patient group.
- To compare response rates (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]) in this patient group.
- To compare stable disease (SD) rates in this patient group.
- To compare rate of disease control (CR, PR and SD) in this patient group.
- To estimate and compare response duration in this patient group.
- To compare the effects of these treatments on measures of quality of life in this patient group using the EORTC QLQ-C30.
- To compare the nature, severity and frequency of toxicities between the two arms.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to tumour type (cholangiocarcinoma vs. gallbladder or biliary unknown), ECOG performance status (0-1 vs. 2), extent of disease (locally advanced vs. metastatic), and treatment center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I (Gemcitabine hydrochloride and capecitabine): Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV on days 1 and 8 and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II (Gemcitabine hydrochloride alone): Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed at 12 weeks after randomization and 4 weeks after completion of study treatment.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 4 weeks and then every 12 weeks thereafter.
- Being tested
- capecitabine, gemcitabine hydrochloride, quality-of-life assessment
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct, unresectable extrahepatic bile duct cancer, recurrent extrahepatic bile duct cancer, adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder, adenocarcinoma with squamous metaplasia of the gallbladder, unresectable gallbladder cancer, recurrent gallbladder cancer, liver and intrahepatic biliary tract cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Bile Duct Neoplasms, Gallbladder Neoplasms, Liver Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
capecitabineDrug
quality-of-life assessmentProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| GEMCAP | Active comparator | Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 IV days 1 and 8 ever 21 days; Capecitabine 650mg/m2 PO BID days 1-14 every 21 days. Receives: Drug: capecitabine; Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride; Procedure: quality-of-life assessment |
| Gemcitabine Alone | Active comparator | Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 IV days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days Receives: Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride; Procedure: quality-of-life assessment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival
Secondary outcomes (7)
Progression-free survival
Response rates (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR])
Rate of stable disease (SD)
Rate of disease control (CR, PR, and SD)
Response duration
Quality of Life
Toxicity
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Apr 2008 (estimated)
- Study start10 Oct 2008
- Primary completion11 May 2010
- Study completion18 Jan 2011
Why it stopped: due to poor accrual
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Extrahepatic Bile Duct CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NCIC Clinical Trials Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jennifer Knox, MD, Study chair, Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00658593
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BI1
- Other IDs
- CAN-NCIC-BI1, CDR0000592854
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 12 Apr 2008
- Last updated
- 4 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Study of Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine (GEMCAP) Versus Gemcitabine Alone in Advanced Biliary Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00658593
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BI1
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct, unresectable extrahepatic bile duct cancer, recurrent extrahepatic bile duct cancer, adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder, adenocarcinoma with squamous metaplasia of the gallbladder, unresectable gallbladder cancer, recurrent gallbladder cancer, liver and intrahepatic biliary tract cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: due to poor accrual
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NCIC Clinical Trials GroupResearch network
- Study start
- 10 Oct 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 May 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Jan 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Apr 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine is more effective when given together with or without capecitabine in treating patients with biliary cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying giving gemcitabine together with capecitabine to see how well it works compared with giving gemcitabine alone in treating patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic biliary cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To compare overall survival (OS) rates in patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic biliary tree cancer treated with combined gemcitabine hydrochloride and capecitabine vs. gemcitabine hydrochloride alone.
Secondary
- To compare progression-free survival (PFS) in this patient group.
- To compare response rates (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]) in this patient group.
- To compare stable disease (SD) rates in this patient group.
- To compare rate of disease control (CR, PR and SD) in this patient group.
- To estimate and compare response duration in this patient group.
- To compare the effects of these treatments on measures of quality of life in this patient group using the EORTC QLQ-C30.
- To compare the nature, severity and frequency of toxicities between the two arms.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to tumour type (cholangiocarcinoma vs. gallbladder or biliary unknown), ECOG performance status (0-1 vs. 2), extent of disease (locally advanced vs. metastatic), and treatment center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I (Gemcitabine hydrochloride and capecitabine): Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV on days 1 and 8 and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II (Gemcitabine hydrochloride alone): Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed at 12 weeks after randomization and 4 weeks after completion of study treatment.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 4 weeks and then every 12 weeks thereafter.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| GEMCAP | Active comparator | Drug: capecitabine, Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride, Procedure: quality-of-life assessmentGemcitabine 1000mg/m2 IV days 1 and 8 ever 21 days; Capecitabine 650mg/m2 PO BID days 1-14 every 21 days. |
| Gemcitabine Alone | Active comparator | Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride, Procedure: quality-of-life assessmentGemcitabine 1000mg/m2 IV days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 120 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| capecitabine | Drug | GEMCAP |
| gemcitabine hydrochloride | Drug | GEMCAP, Gemcitabine Alone |
| quality-of-life assessment | Procedure or surgery | GEMCAP, Gemcitabine Alone |
Primary outcome
Overall survival
7 secondary outcomes
Progression-free survival
Response rates (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR])
Rate of stable disease (SD)
Rate of disease control (CR, PR, and SD)
Response duration
Quality of Life
Toxicity
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: due to poor accrual). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Aug 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer
Recruiting
Photodynamic Therapy Combined With a Self-expandable Radioactive Particle-loaded Biliary Stent for Unresectable Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of CDX-1140, a CD40 Agonist, in Combination With Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and Keytruda in Subjects With Biliary Tract Carcinoma (BTC)
Biliary Cancer, Bile Duct Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Obtaining Solid Tumor Tissue From People Having Biopsy or Surgery for Certain Types of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms, Gastric Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Zanidatamab With Standard-of-care Therapy Against Standard-of-care Therapy for Advanced HER2-positive Biliary Tract Cancer
Biliary Tract Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing the Combination of Pevonedistat With Chemotherapy for Bile Duct Cancer of the Liver
Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma, Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jennifer Knox, MD study chair
Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing capecitabine, gemcitabine hydrochloride and quality-of-life assessment in people with Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer and Gallbladder Cancer, run by NCIC Clinical Trials Group at 8 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: due to poor accrual). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2023.