AzTrials
AzTrials

Macular DegenerationPhase 2NCT00658619

Safety and Efficacy of Brimonidine Intravitreal Implant in Patients With Geographic Atrophy Due to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

A Phase 2 study testing 400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant and 200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant in people with Macular Degeneration, run by Allergan at 7 sites in 7 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Stage 1 is a patient-masked, dose-escalation, safety evaluation of brimonidine intravitreal implant. Patients will receive implant in one eye and "sham" treatment (meaning no treatment) in the fellow eye. Stage 2 will begin after 1 month of safety has been evaluated for Stage 1. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Macular Degeneration
What is being tested?
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant and 200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
119 participants
Where
7 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
1 May 2008to 8 Apr 2011
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Geographic atrophy in both eyes due to age-related macular degeneration
  • Visual acuity between 20/40 to 20/320

Who cannot join

  • Known allergy to brimonidine
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease or infection of the eye
  • Recent eye surgery or injections in the eye
  • Female patients who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

7 sites in 7 countries.

7 sites in 7 countries

United States1 site
  • Study site

    Abilene, Texas

Other trials in United States

Australia1 site
  • Study site

    Sydney, New South Wales

Other trials in Australia

Germany1 site
  • Study site

    Karlsruhe

Other trials in Germany

Italy1 site
  • Study site

    Udine

Other trials in Italy

Philippines1 site
  • Study site

    Makati City

Other trials in Philippines

Portugal1 site
  • Study site

    Coimbra

Other trials in Portugal

South Korea1 site
  • Study site

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Safety and Efficacy of Brimonidine Intravitreal Implant in Patients With Geographic Atrophy Due to AMD

Stage 1 is a patient-masked, dose-escalation, safety evaluation of brimonidine intravitreal implant. Patients will receive implant in one eye and "sham" treatment (meaning no treatment) in the fellow eye. Stage 2 will begin after 1 month of safety has been evaluated for Stage 1. Stage 2 is a randomized, double-masked, dose-response, sham-controlled evaluation of the safety and efficacy of brimonidine intravitreal implant in patients with geographic atrophy from age-related macular degeneration. Patients will be followed for up to 2 years.

Being tested
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant, 200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant, Sham (no implant)
Medical subject headings
Macular Degeneration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate ImplantDrug

    Also called Brimonidine Tartrate PS DDS®

    400 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye on Day 1 and Month 6.

  • 200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate ImplantDrug

    Also called Brimonidine Tartrate PS DDS®

    200 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye on Day 1 and Month 6.

  • Sham (no implant)Other

    Sham in one or both eyes on Day 1 and Month 6.

Study groups in NCT00658619
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 1OtherStage 1: 400 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6.
Receives: Drug: 400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant; Other: Sham (no implant)
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 1OtherStage 1: 200 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6.
Receives: Drug: 200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant; Other: Sham (no implant)
400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2OtherStage 2: 400 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6.
Receives: Drug: 400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant; Other: Sham (no implant)
200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant Stage 2OtherStage 2: 200 µg brimonidine tartrate implant in the study eye and sham in the fellow eye on Day 1 and Month 6.
Receives: Drug: 200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant; Other: Sham (no implant)
Sham (no implant) Stage 2Sham comparatorStage 2: sham in both eyes on Day 1 and Month 6.
Receives: Other: Sham (no implant)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study Eye

    Change from baseline in size of geographic atrophy lesion area in the study eye is based on fundus photography as read by an independent Reading Center. Photographs are taken with a specialized microscope with an attached camera to photograph the interior of the eye, including the retina and optic disc. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of geographic atrophy lesion area (worsening; disease progression). Data are reported in disc area where 1 disc area = 1.767 millimeters squared (mm^2).

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study Eye

    Change from baseline in size of geographic atrophy lesion area in the study eye is based on fundus photography as read by an independent Reading Center. Photographs are taken with a specialized microscope with an attached camera to photograph the interior of the eye, including the retina and optic disc. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of geographic atrophy lesion area (worsening; disease progression). Data are reported in disc area where 1 disc area = 1.767 millimeters squared (mm^2).

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 18, Month 24

  2. Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye

    BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening.

    Measured: Baseline, 24 Months

  3. Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity in the Study Eye

    Change from baseline in contrast sensitivity in the study eye is measured using a Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart at 1 meter. The contrast sensitivity chart contains letters that are darkest at the top and then get progressively lighter. Scores range from 0 to 48 and are based on the number of letters read correctly. A negative change from baseline indicates a worsening in contrast sensitivity and a positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 24 Months

  4. Change From Baseline in Reading Speed in the Study Eye

    Change from baseline in reading speed in the study eye is assessed using modified Bailey-Lovie word charts. Patients read the chart for 2 minutes and the numbers of words read correctly per minute are totaled. An increase in the number of words read correctly indicates an improvement and a decrease in the number of words read correctly indicates a worsening.

    Measured: Baseline, 24 Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Apr 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 May 2008
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2010
  4. Study completion8 Apr 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
119 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00658619
Sponsor's protocol ID
190342-032D
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
11 Apr 2008
Last updated
21 Aug 2018
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Kuppermann BD, Patel SS, Boyer DS, Augustin AJ, Freeman WR, Kerr KJ, Guo Q, Schneider S, Lopez FJ; Brimo DDS Gen 1 Study Group. PHASE 2 STUDY OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF BRIMONIDINE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM (BRIMO DDS) GENERATION 1 IN PATIENTS WITH GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY SECONDARY TO AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION. Retina. 2021 Jan 1;41(1):144-155. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002789.

    PubMed 32134802

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing 400 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant and 200 µg Brimonidine Tartrate Implant in people with Macular Degeneration, run by Allergan at 7 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 7 sites in United States, Australia, Germany, Italy, Philippines and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Apr 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Size of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area in the Study Eye (time frame: Baseline, Month 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00658619, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in