AzTrials
AzTrials

InfluenzaPhase 1H-100-001NCT00662272

Safety and Efficacy Study of Fluzone® Vaccine Combined With Different Doses of JVRS-100 Adjuvant

A Phase 1 study testing Fluzone vaccine with JVRS-100 adjuvant and Fluzone vaccine in people with Influenza, run by Colby Pharmaceutical Company at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is designed to assess safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of Fluzone® vaccine with four dose levels of JVRS-100 adjuvant compared to Fluzone® vaccine alone in healthy adults 18-49 years of age. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 49 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Influenza
What is being tested?
Fluzone vaccine with JVRS-100 adjuvant and Fluzone vaccine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
128 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2008to Dec 2009
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 49 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • able to understand the study and provide written informed consent
  • be age 18 to 49 years
  • be in good general health, without significant medical history, physical examination findings, or abnormal laboratory results
  • be available for the study duration, including all planned follow-up visits
  • female subjects of child bearing potential must not be pregnant and agree to be correctly using an efficacious hormonal method of contraception or intrauterine device for at least 1 month before the study and during the study

Who cannot join

  • have allergy to eggs or other components of the vaccine
  • have had an influenza vaccine within 3 years preceding the screening visit
  • have a history of severe reaction of any kind to conventional influenza vaccines
  • have or suspected immunodeficiency disorder, including leukemia, lymphoma, generalized malignancy, or treatment with immunosuppressive medications, including corticosteroids, alkylating agents, antimetabolites, or radiation therapy
  • have a history of an autoimmune disorder, including systemic lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, other collagen vascular disease, multiple sclerosis, etc. Psoriasis limited to cutaneous manifestations is not an exclusion criterion.
  • have prior history of anaphylaxis to foods, hymenoptera stings, vaccines or drugs
Show all 18Show fewer
  • have had transfusion of blood or treatment with any blood product, including intramuscular or intravenous serum globulin within 3 months of the Screening Visit or anticipated through the study period
  • have received another vaccine within 30 days preceding the screening visit or anticipated through the study period
  • have participation in another clinical trial within 60 days of the screening visit
  • have a positive serum or urine pregnancy test prior to vaccination or plan on a pregnancy during study period
  • have abnormalities on laboratory assessment
  • be seropositive to HIV or HCV or positive for HBsAg
  • be positive for anti-nuclear antibodies
  • have a physical examination indicating any clinically significant medical condition
  • have a body temperature >38.1°C (100.6°F) or acute illness within 3 days prior to vaccination
  • intention to travel out of the area prior to the study visit on Day 28 of the study
  • have a history of excessive alcohol consumption, drug abuse, significant psychiatric illness
  • have the intention to increase normal exercise routine, participate in contact sports or strenuous weight lifting or to initiate vigorous exercise from Screening until after Day 28 of the study

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Johnson County Clin-Trials

    Lenexa, Kansas, 66219

  • Miami Research Associates

    Miami, Florida, 33143

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Randomized, Double Blind, Controlled Phase I Trial of the Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of Fluzone® Inactivated Trivalent Influenza Virus Vaccine Administered With Ascending Doses of JVRS-100 Adjuvant

This study is designed to assess safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of Fluzone® vaccine with four dose levels of JVRS-100 adjuvant compared to Fluzone® vaccine alone in healthy adults 18-49 years of age.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of graded, ascending doses of JVRS-100 adjuvant when administered in combination with a vaccine antigen.

Conditions
Influenza
Being tested
Fluzone vaccine with JVRS-100 adjuvant, Fluzone vaccine
Keywords
Flu, Influenza vaccine, Adjuvant, Safety of an adjuvanted vaccine, Immune response to an adjuvanted vaccine
Medical subject headings
Influenza, Human

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fluzone vaccine with JVRS-100 adjuvantBiological

    Also called Fluzone vaccine, adjuvant

    One vaccination on Day 0 with Fluzone vaccine at 22.5µg mixed with JVRS-100 adjuvant at one of four dose levels (7.5µg, 25µg, 75µg, 225µg) given by IM injection in the upper deltoid.

  • Fluzone vaccineBiological

    Also called Flu vaccine

    One vaccination on Day 0 with Fluzone vaccine at 22.5µg given by IM injection in the upper deltoid.

  • Fluzone vaccineBiological

    Also called Flu vaccination

    One vaccination on Day 0 with Fluzone vaccine at 45µg given by IM injection in the upper deltoid.

Study groups in NCT00662272
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalArm includes treatment with Fluzone® vaccine mixed with study product JVRS-100 adjuvant
Receives: Biological: Fluzone vaccine with JVRS-100 adjuvant
2Active comparatorArm includes treatment with half adult dose of Fluzone® vaccine
Receives: Biological: Fluzone vaccine
3Active comparatorArm includes treatment with full adult dose Fluzone® vaccine
Receives: Biological: Fluzone vaccine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparison of adverse events between treatment groups

    Measured: Active Study Duration

  2. Dose-response analysis of HAI geometric mean titers (GMT)

    Measured: 5 time points

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Safety endpoints include between treatment group analyses of all safety parameters as described for the primary endpoint for each ascending dose cohort.

    Measured: 2 periods

  2. Seroprotection and seroconversion rates to various antigens, distribution of antibody titers, duration of HAI antibody titers, and assessment of cross-reactive HAI responses against "drifted" strains.

    Measured: 5 time points

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Apr 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2008
  3. Primary completionOct 2008
  4. Study completionDec 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
128 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00662272
Sponsor's protocol ID
H-100-001
Acronym
H-100-001
Status last verified
Mar 2010
First submitted
15 Apr 2008
Last updated
17 Mar 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Betts RF, Treanor JJ. Approaches to improved influenza vaccination. Vaccine. 2000 Feb 25;18(16):1690-5. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(99)00508-3.

    PubMed 10689150
  • Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, Brammer L, Cox N, Anderson LJ, Fukuda K. Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States. JAMA. 2003 Jan 8;289(2):179-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.2.179.

    PubMed 12517228
  • Monto AS, Kioumehr F. The Tecumseh Study of Respiratory Illness. IX. Occurence of influenza in the community, 1966--1971. Am J Epidemiol. 1975 Dec;102(6):553-63. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112193.

    PubMed 1202957
  • Barker WH. Excess pneumonia and influenza associated hospitalization during influenza epidemics in the United States, 1970-78. Am J Public Health. 1986 Jul;76(7):761-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.7.761.

    PubMed 3717461
  • Glezen WP. Serious morbidity and mortality associated with influenza epidemics. Epidemiol Rev. 1982;4:25-44. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036250. No abstract available.

    PubMed 6754408
  • Pfleiderer M, Lower J, Kurth R. Cold-attenuated live influenza vaccines, a risk-benefit assessment. Vaccine. 2001 Dec 12;20(5-6):886-94. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(01)00386-3.

    PubMed 11738754
  • Hilleman MR. Realities and enigmas of human viral influenza: pathogenesis, epidemiology and control. Vaccine. 2002 Aug 19;20(25-26):3068-87. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00254-2.

    PubMed 12163258
  • CBER. Guidance for Industry. Clinical Data Needed to Support the Licensure of Seasonal Inactivated Influenza Vaccines. May 2007. Available at hhtp://www.fda.gov/cber/guidelines.htm

  • Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices; Smith NM, Bresee JS, Shay DK, Uyeki TM, Cox NJ, Strikas RA. Prevention and Control of Influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006 Jul 28;55(RR-10):1-42.

    PubMed 16874296
  • de Jong JC, Palache AM, Beyer WE, Rimmelzwaan GF, Boon AC, Osterhaus AD. Haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody to influenza virus. Dev Biol (Basel). 2003;115:63-73.

    PubMed 15088777
  • Beyer WE, Palache AM, Luchters G, Nauta J, Osterhaus AD. Seroprotection rate, mean fold increase, seroconversion rate: which parameter adequately expresses seroresponse to influenza vaccination? Virus Res. 2004 Jul;103(1-2):125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2004.02.024.

    PubMed 15163500
  • Banzhoff A, Nacci P, Podda A. A new MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine enhances the immune response in the elderly with chronic diseases: results from an immunogenicity meta-analysis. Gerontology. 2003 May-Jun;49(3):177-84. doi: 10.1159/000069172.

    PubMed 12679609
  • CBER. Guidance for Industry. Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials. Guidance. September 2007. Available at hhtp://www.fda.gov/cber/guidelines.htm

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Fluzone vaccine with JVRS-100 adjuvant and Fluzone vaccine in people with Influenza, run by Colby Pharmaceutical Company at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparison of adverse events between treatment groups (time frame: Active Study Duration). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00662272, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in