Urinary Bladder, OveractivePhase 3ARIESNCT00662909
A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder
A Phase 3 study testing Mirabegron in people with Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 125 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The study is intended to test the efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of mirabegron against placebo to treat patients with symptoms of overactive bladder Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- What is being tested?
- Mirabegron
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 2,149 participants
- Where
- 125 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Mar 2008to 22 Apr 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly
- Patient has symptoms of overactive bladder for ≥ 3 months
- Patient must experience frequency of micturition on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period
- Patient must experience at least 3 episodes of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence during the 3-day micturition diary period
Who cannot join
- Patient is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential, sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control
- Patient has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor
- Patient has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization
- Patient has diabetic neuropathy
- Patient has evidence of a symptomatic urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
- Patient receives non-drug treatment including electro-stimulation therapy
Show all 12Show fewer
- Patient has severe hypertension
- Patient has a known or suspected hypersensitivity to YM178, other beta-adrenoreceptor (ß-AR) agonists, or any of the other inactive ingredients
- Patient has been treated with any investigational drug or device within 30 days
- Patient had an average total daily urine volume > 3000 mL as recorded in the 3-day micturition diary period
- Patient has serum creatinine of >150 μmol/L, or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2x upper limit of normal range (ULN), or Gamma glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) > 3x ULN
- Patient has a clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG)
Trial locations and contacts
125 sites in 2 countries.
125 sites in 2 countries
United States109 sites
Study site
Albany, New York, 12208
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87109
Study site
Alpharetta, Georgia, 30005
Study site
Anchorage, Alaska, 99508
Study site
Arlington, Texas, 76017
Study site
Atherton, California, 94027
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30328
Study site
Aurora, Colorado, 80012
Study site
Austin, Texas, 78759
Study site
Aventura, Florida, 33180
Study site
Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, 19004
Study site
Bethany, Oklahoma, 73008
Study site
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Study site
Billings, Montana, 59102
Study site
Bristol, Tennessee, 37620
Study site
Buena Park, California, 90620
Study site
Burbank, California, 91506
Study site
Carmichael, California, 95608
Study site
Cary, North Carolina, 27518
Study site
Celebration, Florida, 34747
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45212
Study site
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Study site
Clearwater, Florida, 33761
Study site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122
Study site
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, 83814
Study site
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Study site
Concord, North Carolina, 28025
Study site
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78414
Study site
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Study site
Decatur, Georgia, 30034
Study site
Denver, Colorado, 80211
Study site
Denver, Colorado, 80218
Study site
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309
Study site
Edmond, Oklahoma, 73034
Study site
Endwell, New York, 13760
Study site
Englewood, Colorado, 80112
Study site
Fargo, North Dakota, 58104
Study site
Fort Myers, Florida, 33916
Study site
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825
Study site
Fresno, California, 93720
Study site
Garden City, New York, 11530
Study site
Greenbelt, Maryland, 20770
Study site
Greer, South Carolina, 29650
Study site
Homewood, Alabama, 35209
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77024
Study site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Study site
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404
Study site
Jeffersonville, Indiana, 47130
Study site
Kingston, New York, 12401
Study site
La Mesa, California, 91942
Study site
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17604
Study site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148
Study site
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90017
Study site
Lyndhurst, Ohio, 44124
Study site
Melrose Park, Illinois, 60160
Study site
Mission Hills, California, 91345
Study site
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Study site
Montgomery, Alabama, 36117
Study site
Mountlake Terrace, Washington, 98043
Study site
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464
Study site
New Britain, Connecticut, 06052
Study site
Newburgh, Indiana, 47630
Study site
Newport Beach, California, 92660
Study site
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Study site
North Kansas City, Missouri, 64116
Study site
Ocala, Florida, 34471
Study site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Study site
Orange, California, 92869
Study site
Orlando, Florida, 32803
Study site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33024
Study site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33027
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19114
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85051
Study site
Poughkeepsie, New York, 12601
Study site
Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611
Study site
Roswell, Georgia, 30076
Study site
Sacramento, California, 95816
Study site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Study site
San Bernardino, California, 92404
Study site
San Diego, California, 92108
Study site
San Diego, California, 92120
Study site
San Francisco, California, 94102
Study site
Sarasota, Florida, 34237
Study site
Seattle, Washington, 98166
Study site
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71106
Study site
Simpsonville, South Carolina, 29681
Study site
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Study site
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01103
Study site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Study site
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308
Study site
Tampa, Florida, 33606
Study site
Tarzana, California, 91356
Study site
Torrance, California, 90505
Study site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Study site
Tucson, Arizona, 85741
Study site
Wadsworth, Ohio, 44281
Study site
Warwick, Rhode Island, 02886
Study site
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708
Study site
Watertown, Massachusetts, 02472
Study site
Wellington, Florida, 33414
Study site
West Orange, New Jersey, 07052
Study site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33407
Study site
Wichita, Kansas, 57207
Study site
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Canada16 sites
Study site
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 7G1
Study site
Brampton, Ontario, L6T 4S5
Study site
Granby, Quebec, J2G 8Z9
Study site
Kitchener, Ontario, N2N 2B9
Study site
Newmarket, Ontario, L3X 1W1
Study site
North Bay, Ontario, P1B 7K8
Study site
Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 1B9
Study site
Owen Sound, Ontario, M4K 2J1
Study site
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, H9R 4S3
Study site
Saint Johns, New Brunswick, E2L 3J8
Study site
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1N1
Study site
Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7E 6E7
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M6S 4W4
Study site
Victoria, British Columbia, V8T 5G1
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder
The study is intended to test the efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of mirabegron against placebo to treat patients with symptoms of overactive bladder
- Conditions
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- Being tested
- Mirabegron, Placebo
- Keywords
- Frequency, YM178, Overactive bladder (OAB), Micturition, Urgency, Urinary urge incontinence, Urinary incontinence
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Urinary Incontinence, Urge, Urinary Incontinence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MirabegronDrug
Also called YM178, Myrebtriq
Oral
PlaceboDrug
Oral
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Experimental | Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: Mirabegron |
| Mirabegron 100 mg | Experimental | Participants received mirabegron 100 m tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: Mirabegron |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12 (Final Visit)
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was derived from the number of times a patient urinates (excluding incontinence only episodes) per day recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Secondary outcomes (29)
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 4, 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of Urgency
Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Nocturia is defined as waking at night one or more times to void. The average number of times a patient urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) during sleeping time per day was derived from the 3-day patient micturition diary.
LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
The average number of times a patient records a new pad used per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.
LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes for the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the micturition diary recorded by the patient.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
The percentage of participants with at least 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the patient micturition diary.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score
Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the symptom bother scale of the overactive bladder questionnaire. The symptom bother scale consists of 8 questions answered by the participant on a scale from 1-6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating worst severity. A negative change from Baseline in symptom bother score indicates improvements.
LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
Health-related quality of life was assessed by the HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social interaction) of the overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq). The HRQL total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQL subscale scores, and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline in HRQL score indicates improvements.
LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent of work time missed is derived from the number of hours of work missed due to OAB symptoms as a percentage of total hours that should have been worked. A higher percentage indicates more hours missed. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent impairment while working was derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent overall work impairment takes into account both hours missed due to OAB symptoms and the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with daily activities over the last 7 days. Percent activity impairment is derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their regular daily activities. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, generic instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Health status is assessed by patients evaluating their health on a vertical, visual analog scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labeled 'Worst imaginable health state' (=0) and 'Best imaginable health state' (=100). On the EQ-5D VAS, a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)
The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale (VAS) that asks patients to rate their satisfaction with treatment by placing a vertical mark on a 10 cm line where the endpoints are labeled 'No, not at all' on the left (=0) to 'Yes, completely satisfied' on the right (=10). LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician
The number of times the patient visited a physician's office during the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (excluding study visits) because of the patient's bladder condition.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit
The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. Improvement was defined as at least a 1 point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline and a major improvement was defined as at least a 2 point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline in PPBC score.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:
I have no problems in walking about; I have some problems in walking about; I am confined to bed.
In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:
I have no problems with self-care; I have some problems washing or dressing myself; I am unable to wash or dress myself. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
The EQ-5D is a standardized, nondisease-specific instrument for describing health status. Participants were asked which statement best describes their health state with regard to usual activities (work, study or leisure): I have no problems performing my usual activities; I have some problems performing my usual activities; I am unable to perform my usual activities. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available at that Visit.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:
I have no pain or discomfort; I have moderate pain or discomfort; I have extreme pain or discomfort. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:
I am not anxious or depressed; I am moderately anxious or depressed; I am extremely anxious or depressed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Apr 2008 (estimated)
- Study start28 Mar 2008
- Primary completion22 Apr 2009
- Study completion22 Apr 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urinary Bladder, OveractiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 2,149 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Astellas Pharma Inc
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Use Central Contact, Study director, Astellas Pharma Global Development
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00662909
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 178-CL-047
- Acronym
- ARIES
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 17 Apr 2008
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
Publications
Nitti VW, Auerbach S, Martin N, Calhoun A, Lee M, Herschorn S. Results of a randomized phase III trial of mirabegron in patients with overactive bladder. J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
PubMed 23079373Desroziers K, Aballea S, Maman K, Nazir J, Odeyemi I, Hakimi Z. Estimating EQ-5D and OAB-5D health state utilities for patients with overactive bladder. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Nov 19;11:200. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-200.
PubMed 24246044
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00662909
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ARIES / 178-CL-047
- Conditions
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- Keywords
- Frequency, YM178, Overactive bladder (OAB), Micturition, Urgency, Urinary urge incontinence, Urinary incontinence
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,149 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Astellas Pharma IncIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Mar 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Apr 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Apr 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Apr 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Oct 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is intended to test the efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of mirabegron against placebo to treat patients with symptoms of overactive bladder
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Experimental | Drug: MirabegronParticipants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks |
| Mirabegron 100 mg | Experimental | Drug: MirabegronParticipants received mirabegron 100 m tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly
- Patient has symptoms of overactive bladder for ≥ 3 months
- Patient must experience frequency of micturition on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period
- Patient must experience at least 3 episodes of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence during the 3-day micturition diary period
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patient is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential, sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control
- Patient has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor
- Patient has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization
- Patient has diabetic neuropathy
- Patient has evidence of a symptomatic urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MirabegronAlso: YM178, MyrebtriqOral | Drug | Mirabegron 100 mg, Mirabegron 50 mg |
| PlaceboOral | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12 (Final Visit)
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was derived from the number of times a patient urinates (excluding incontinence only episodes) per day recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
29 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of Urgency
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed
Time frame: Baseline and Week12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Nov 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 23079373Nitti VW, Auerbach S, Martin N, Calhoun A, Lee M, Herschorn S. Results of a randomized phase III trial of mirabegron in patients with overactive bladder. J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24246044Desroziers K, Aballea S, Maman K, Nazir J, Odeyemi I, Hakimi Z. Estimating EQ-5D and OAB-5D health state utilities for patients with overactive bladder. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Nov 19;11:200. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-200.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
Related trials for Urinary Bladder, Overactive
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Examining the Effects of Intra-detrusor Botox at Time of HoLEP in Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms
Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder Syndrome
Recruiting
UCon Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Males
Urinary Incontinence, Urge Incontinence
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Overactive Bladder Symptoms and Urinary Incontinence In Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
RecruitingObservational study
Predictive Value of Inflammatory Biomarkers for Mirabegron Response in Women With Overactive Bladder
Overactive Bladder (OAB)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Use Central Contact study director
Astellas Pharma Global Development
125 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Mirabegron in people with Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 125 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 125 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours (time frame: Baseline and Week 12 (Final Visit)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00662909, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2024.